quote:

Originally posted by Tubetone:

quote:

Originally posted by JALLEN:
You can read the US response filed with the 9th Circuit earlier today, here.

Thanks for posting that, JALLEN.

The brief was much more focused and better tied to the President's responsibilities and powers.

Neither the states nor the courts are authorized to impose immigration policy in place of the executive.

The 9th Circuit will still screw it up. They cannot/will-not alter their fascist DNA.



.

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
Nancy "Braniac" Pelosi says she can't work with President Bush.

Obviously this sick sad woman should not be able to keep the doctors she likes, and the Federal Government should rotate Congresswoman Pelosi to new "providers", yearly at least.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDIMl4rfKY4

President Trump makes a visit to MacDill Air Force Base Central Command yesterday.

Finally someone that gives credit to others. Sometimes I can not believe what is happening and get choked up at times.

41

quote:

Originally posted by TigerDore:

quote:

Originally posted by Tubetone:

quote:

Originally posted by JALLEN:
You can read the US response filed with the 9th Circuit earlier today, here.

Thanks for posting that, JALLEN.

The brief was much more focused and better tied to the President's responsibilities and powers.

Neither the states nor the courts are authorized to impose immigration policy in place of the executive.

The 9th Circuit will still screw it up. They cannot/will-not alter their fascist DNA.



.

I wouldn't say that so certainly. Judges are supposed to follow the law. If it just isn't close, it's harder to stretch the gap from personal philosophy to judicial decision.

Separation of powers and the role of the President in protecting the country is not something an ideologue may be willing to eliminate. The law in question has created the same alleged harms complained of for over 60 years and has not been deemed unconstitutional. The history of the case law supports the necessary Presidential power.

We will see.

BTW, some of the media have picked up better analysis of what is at stake now. This short time interval has brought more gravity to what all this means for our self-preservation. Thoughts are also marinating in the judiciary.

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
Nancy "Braniac" Pelosi says she can't work with President Bush.

Having worked on various conservatorship proceedings over the years, the question of who one believes to be the President is often a threshold query.

If she starts showing up for work with no skirt and skid marks on her grannies, we'll finally know. Sadly, it may not be a "brainiac" issue.

In fairness, I try to put the entire disastrous Obama era out of my mind too but as hard as I try, I can't forget.

quote:

Originally posted by Tubetone:

quote:

Originally posted by TigerDore:

quote:

Originally posted by Tubetone:

quote:

Originally posted by JALLEN:
You can read the US response filed with the 9th Circuit earlier today, here.

Thanks for posting that, JALLEN.

The brief was much more focused and better tied to the President's responsibilities and powers.

Neither the states nor the courts are authorized to impose immigration policy in place of the executive.

The 9th Circuit will still screw it up. They cannot/will-not alter their fascist DNA.



.

I wouldn't say that so certainly. Judges are supposed to follow the law. If it just isn't close, it's harder to stretch the gap from personal philosophy to judicial decision.

Separation of powers and the role of the President in protecting the country is not something an ideologue may be willing to eliminate. The law in question has created the same alleged harms complained of for over 60 years and has not been deemed unconstitutional. The history of the case law supports the necessary Presidential power.

We will see.

BTW, some of the media have picked up better analysis of what is at stake now. This short time interval has brought more gravity to what all this means for our self-preservation. Thoughts are also marinating in the judiciary.

Yeah that is the theory, but the Ninth Circus Of Appeals is so bad at following the law, they make up their own (batshit crazy is one way to describe their decisions). Most of their decisions are overturned at the Supreme Court.

Most of the judges on the Ninth Circus are to the left of BLM, ACLU, and other liberals.

I don't think they will overturn the original order and would not be surprised if they expanded it and added some really crazy crap to it.

quote:

Originally posted by jsbcody:

quote:

Originally posted by Tubetone:

quote:

Originally posted by TigerDore:

quote:

Originally posted by Tubetone:

quote:

Originally posted by JALLEN:
You can read the US response filed with the 9th Circuit earlier today, here.

Thanks for posting that, JALLEN.

The brief was much more focused and better tied to the President's responsibilities and powers.

Neither the states nor the courts are authorized to impose immigration policy in place of the executive.

The 9th Circuit will still screw it up. They cannot/will-not alter their fascist DNA.



.

I wouldn't say that so certainly. Judges are supposed to follow the law. If it just isn't close, it's harder to stretch the gap from personal philosophy to judicial decision.

Separation of powers and the role of the President in protecting the country is not something an ideologue may be willing to eliminate. The law in question has created the same alleged harms complained of for over 60 years and has not been deemed unconstitutional. The history of the case law supports the necessary Presidential power.

We will see.

BTW, some of the media have picked up better analysis of what is at stake now. This short time interval has brought more gravity to what all this means for our self-preservation. Thoughts are also marinating in the judiciary.

Yeah that is the theory, but the Ninth Circus Of Appeals is so bad at following the law, they make up their own (batshit crazy is one way to describe their decisions). Most of their decisions are overturned at the Supreme Court.

Most of the judges on the Ninth Circus are to the left of BLM, ACLU, and other liberals.

I don't think they will overturn the original order and would not be surprised if they expanded it and added some really crazy crap to it.

We'll see in due time. Right now, we're all just betters and bookies.

Betsy DeVos has been confirmed!

Tony.

quote:

Originally posted by benny6:
Betsy DeVos has been confirmed!

Tony.

I thought that was firecrackers. Guess it's commie/teachers union members heads exploding.

quote:

Originally posted by Tubetone:
If she starts showing up for work with no skirt and skid marks on her grannies, we'll finally know.

quote:

Originally posted by Tubetone:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by TigerDore:


I wouldn't say that so certainly. Judges are supposed to follow the law. If it just isn't close, it's harder to stretch the gap from personal philosophy to judicial decision...

I would be very happy to be wrong on this, but this is the ninth circuit. I am convinced that their chambers feature padded walls and posters of Che Guevara. Again, I hope I am completely wrong.



.

quote:

Originally posted by TigerDore:

quote:

Originally posted by Tubetone:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by TigerDore:


I wouldn't say that so certainly. Judges are supposed to follow the law. If it just isn't close, it's harder to stretch the gap from personal philosophy to judicial decision...

I would be very happy to be wrong on this, but this is the ninth circuit. I am convinced that their chambers feature padded walls and posters of Che Guevara. Again, I hope I am completely wrong.



.

It will be many hours before the Ninth panel will issue a ruling.

In the meantime, you may want to read THIS excellent opinion written by a panel of Ninth Circuit judges. It is really quite good. See if this changes your anxiety about what can happen in a panel of the Ninth. LINK

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
9th circuit court has set up a website for the

State of Washington & State of Minnesota v. Trump

looks like a comprehensive set of documents on the site

https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/c...php?pk_id=0000000860

The livestream of the hearing will be 6:00 pm EST, 3:00 pm. PST.

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/me...hp?pk_vid=0000010884

I really don't know much about Devos, but I know some people hate her. Lotsa liberal hate on social media.

I just started ignoring everyone's argument, no matter how valid or invalid by just saying that they're against her because she's a woman and calling them a member of the repressive patriarchy.

Good on you! Turn the tables on 'em!

quote:

Originally posted by RAMIUS:
I just started ignoring everyone's argument, no matter how valid or invalid by just saying that they're against her because she's a woman and calling them a member of the repressive patriarchy.

http://hotair.com/archives/201...-against-daily-mail/

First Lady Melania Trump has settled a libel lawsuit against a blogger who published a post last year claiming she had once worked as an escort. Maryland-based blogger Webster Tarpley made the accusations in August but today he put out a fulsome apology to Mrs. Trump and her entire family.

In addition to the apology, Tarpley also reportedly paid a “substantial sum” according to Mrs. Trump, though her lawyers declined to specify exactly how much money was involved.

"I posted an article on August 2, 2016 about Melania Trump that was replete with false and defamatory statements about her. I had no legitimate factual basis to make these false statements and I fully retract them. I acknowledge that these false statements were very harmful and hurtful to Mrs. Trump and her family, and therefore I sincerely apologize to Mrs. Trump, her son, her husband and her parents for making these false statements."

Melania Trump also filed a libel suit against the Daily Mail which published the same accusations last year. That lawsuit was dismissed by a Maryland judge citing jurisdictional issues. However, today, Mrs. Trump refiled the $150 million lawsuit in New York

awesome

hit back at them, every time, don't ever give up

quote:

I wouldn't say that so certainly. Judges are supposed to follow the law. If it just isn't close, it's harder to stretch the gap from personal philosophy to judicial decision.

My memory is failing with my advancing years, but I have ZERO memory of the 9th doing anything other than pandering to the wild eyed left.

What was that statistic from a couple years ago concerning the % of times they were over ruled by SCOTUS? Pretty high as I recall.

quote:

Originally posted by Elk Hunter:

quote:

I wouldn't say that so certainly. Judges are supposed to follow the law. If it just isn't close, it's harder to stretch the gap from personal philosophy to judicial decision.

My memory is failing with my advancing years, but I have ZERO memory of the 9th doing anything other than pandering to the wild eyed left.

Try THIS LINK.

All the Liberals I know, are against Betsy Devos. That was all I needed to see.

Thank you President Trump.