In my kingdom, the people who run Berkeley wouldn't be in charge of anything. They would be decorating the trees, and left their until their bodies rotted away.

Part of the solution or part of the problem. These leftists assholes are a huge part of the problem and this world would be much, much better off without their stupid asses infecting society.

"How much black dick do I have to suck before you stop calling me a Neo-Nazi?:

Lol, that made me crack up. He went there

That was a pretty good line.

UC Bezerkley did one hell of a job censoring Milo. Amplification was not allowed while he spoke and no one could hear him because some asshole in the crowd would not stop yelling. The dean seemed thrilled as he watched with a smug smile in a blue suit and bow tie.

If you have seen the film The Neverending Story and you are a fan of Milo you will LOVE this.




Link to original video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=...oA&time_continue=265

Looks like he tied the knot

His other cake...

Sooo gaaaaaaay.

If he did, good for them.

I hope they enjoy a lifetime together.

He was being intetviewed by BBC (I think) and they asked him if he felt it was hypocritical that he is enjoying something that liberals fought for. He absolutely destroyed that argument and said something like "I am MUCH more concerned about radical Islam attacking gays". I love how fast he is on his feet and how he can defend against an attack and immediately counter attack during an interview.

quote:

Originally posted by stickman428:
He was being intetviewed by BBC (I think) and they asked him if he felt it was hypocritical that he is enjoying something that liberals fought for. He absolutely destroyed that argument and said something like "I am MUCH more concerned about radical Islam attacking gays".

In this instance, I think BBC stands for "big black cock"

Yeah....thanks to Milo and the interwebs I have a tough time taking their logo seriously.

One of my best friends spent a year in VietNam in 1968. When he got back we went to see a movie together, and as we were driving back, out of the blue he said: "I'm gay." I thought he was joking, so I went with it and said something like, "Well, that would make this a date? But I should tell you, I don't put out on the first date." He looked over at me and I realized he was serious. Then he said, "When I was in VietNam I decided that if I lived through it, I'd never be afraid of anything again. So I'm not afraid of this. I'm gay."

A few years ago he married his partner of almost 40 years when same-sex marriage became legal.

We heteros are as a group waaaaaay too fucked up to cast a jaundiced eye on guys who love other guys. If Milo did get married, Mazeltov!

quote:

...he said: "I'm gay...

That's the word he used in 1968? He was a little ahead of his time.

Right. I made that all up. :roll eyes:

quote:

Originally posted by justjoe:
One of my best friends spent a year in VietNam in 1968. When he got back we went to see a movie together, and as we were driving back, out of the blue he said: "I'm gay." I thought he was joking, so I went with it and said something like, "Well, that would make this a date? But I should tell you, I don't put out on the first date." He looked over at me and I realized he was serious. Then he said, "When I was in VietNam I decided that if I lived through it, I'd never be afraid of anything again. So I'm not afraid of this. I'm gay."

A few years ago he married his partner of almost 40 years when same-sex marriage became legal.

We heteros are as a group waaaaaay too fucked up to cast a jaundiced eye on guys who love other guys. If Milo did get married, Mazeltov!

One of the best ways I've heard it put.

I've, for a long time, been in the camp of: if whatever you are doing is done among consenting adults, and does not affect me in any way, then I support it.

I don't really understand any dislike or hatred of homosexuals. I also have a lot of friends that are. I work with some damn fine people that a gay, and I trust them 110% in every aspect.

What two (or more) people do in their own privacy, that doesn't affect me, is their own damn business. I wish them all the best.

If Milo got married the other day, then I wish him the best. I'm actually impressed that he is keeping his partner's name out of the media, certainly to protect him from the bullshit that could come his way being tied to a vilified "celebrity."

Good for them, and I hope they are happy.

From USA TODAY.

Round one to Milo Yiannopoulos.


The New York State Supreme Court on Thursday rejected Simon & Schuster’s motion to dismiss the right-wing provocateur’s $10 million lawsuit against the publisher for canceling his book, Dangerous.

The case now moves on to the discovery phase.

After the ruling, Simon & Schuster released a statement: “Today’s ruling was purely in connection with a preliminary procedural motion, and was not an adjudication on the merits of Yiannopoulos’ claims. As we proceed to discovery, we remain confident that we will ultimately prevail in this matter.”

S&S canceled Yiannopoulos' book contract in February, after podcasts surfaced in which the author, who is openly gay, seemed to condone sex between men and boys. He resigned from Breitbart News over the podcast controversy and said he does not condone pedophilia.

Dangerous was a lightning rod from the time S&S made the book deal, with many on the left lambasting the company for signing up a “hate speech” screed.


Yiannopoulos self-published his quip-filled "manifesto" on July 4. Three days later, he filed his lawsuit. In the book, he hashes old feuds (with the likes of Leslie Jones), criticizes “ugly” women and “fat” people, and extolls President Trump and his policies. (Read our 2-star review.)

Dangerous landed at No. 3 on USA TODAY’s Best-Selling Books list, but remained on the list for only five weeks. Yiannopoulos claims S&S’s cancellation of his contract hurt him financially.

"Rather than live up to the terms of its contract with Yiannopoulos to publish Dangerous, and despite pre-orders projected to propel the book onto leading best-selling book lists, Simon & Schuster wrongfully, and in bad faith, terminated the contract with Yiannopoulos in violation of its terms and canceled Dangerous under pressure from authors, bookselling accounts, business and special interest groups, celebrities, and various other self-appointed censors," the civil suit charges.

On Thursday, Yiannopoulos released a statement in response to the court’s initial ruling:

“I’m happy that the court recognized my case deserves to be heard. As we expose Simon & Schuster’s despicable and cowardly decisions to the world, it will be a lesson to all publishers that you can’t breach contracts with conservatives just because Leftists get angry and send you mean emails, and because liberal bloggers are disappointed in you.”

Have any of y'all followed Milo's lawsuit against S&S? Do you think he has a chance of winning?

The establishment continues its war on Milo. That old dude who helped fund Breitbart said publicly that he is severing all ties with Milo and now the Daily Caller has fired him before he even had a chance to write a column for the publication. Citing anger over hiring Milo The Daily Caller has apparently fired the guy who hired Milo too.

I want to see the establishment Republicans destroyed and driven from power and influence. Hell af this point even witnessing an implosion and full collapse of the GOP would be worth it if it robs the establishment of their power.


November 6 2017

The Right's War on Milo Yiannopoulos
By Pamela Geller
I have seen the enemy, and they is us: the Daily Caller, an establishment conservative publication, just hired Milo Yiannopoulos to write a weekly column. When they started getting heat for doing so, they fired him immediately -- and then claimed that they had never hired him in the first place. You can read all about it here.

Milo was not the only casualty: the Daily Caller also fired their opinion editor, Rob Mariani, who had agreed to give Milo the weekly column. CNN noted: “The Daily Caller came under immediate fire on social media for giving platform to Yiannopoulos, a controversial figure associated with white nationalism who resigned from the right-wing Breitbart website earlier this year over comments he made about pederasty. Robert Mercer, the billionaire conservative donor, said earlier this week that he was ‘mistaken’ to have supported Yiannopoulos and that he was severing ties.”


This follows a horrible, self-destructive pattern on the right. While the left always circles the wagons and protects their own, whenever the left starts to pick off people on the right, conservatives form a circular firing squad. It’s the right that has targeted Milo. This is all their doing. The recent BuzzFeed hit piece targeting Milo’s donor Robert Mercer was clearly by a right-wing insider. We expect the left to target our most effective, charismatic leaders -- it’s what they do. But the right doing their bidding is unforgivable. The right, not the left, is making Milo more toxic than… even me, and I’ve been smeared, defamed and vilified for years. But it won’t work.

Milo is a phenomenon, hugely popular with millennials -- something the right sorely lacks. Milo was the only one who would publish my book, FATWA: Hunted in America, and it’s a bestseller. He is, for all the wonderful drama and theater, an important voice for us. But the right is too cowed and intimidated by the vicious left-wing primitives than stand with intellectual leaders who are true to our political philosophy of individual rights and equality for all before the law.

The most vicious attacks on him come from the right. The left doesn't have to do anything. We are doing a fine job destroying ourselves. Part jealousy (at his success), part fear (of attacks from the cultural elites), the right was wicked quick to throw Milo under the bus. And it’s not just Milo. The best (or should I say worst) example of the right’s war on the right is that they destroy Trump right-wing elites.

Conservative leaders and flagship publications readily acquiesce to the left’s demonization of the right’s most effective politicians, spokesmen, and activists. Most people today still assume that America has a thriving two-party system, representing two mainstream and opposing visions for America and together embodying the views of the overwhelming majority of Americans. In reality, the Republican Party and the American conservative movement are deeply damaged, vastly diminished in size and scope, and increasingly unrepresentative of any genuine or effective opposition to the Left and the Democrats.

Even now, when the Republicans have majorities in Congress, they allow the left to dictate the political agenda. For decades, the “loyal opposition” that the establishment right has offered has not been a defense of American freedom and exceptionalism, but merely been a slower, weaker march toward the left’s socialist goal and their politics of personal destruction of those who refuse to submit.

The establishment right is an embarrassment to patriotic Americans who value freedom and individual rights. It is second only to the left in the harm it has done to Constitutional rule and the freedoms that citizens of the “Land of the Free” actually enjoy. The establishment right is as complicit as the left in having destroyed the standing, respect, and reverence that the United States of America held at the end of World War II.

We see many come out in a burst of light, political supernovas like Allen West, Sarah Palin, and Ted Cruz who have been systematically destroyed by the left and their lapdogs on the right. The right abandons the same people when the left goes after them like the jackals and the vultures they are. The leaders of the conservative establishment are clearly more comfortable with the weakest and most liberal figures on the right than they are with genuine conservatives. And then they abandon their flavor of the month as soon as the leftist sharks start circling.

This is how the establishment right makes its bones: on the bones of the principled right. This is how the establishment right gets legitimacy: by pandering to the left and selling out the clear, uncompromised voices on the right. Instead of destroying our philosophical enemies in the war of individualism vs. statism, the establishment right trims its message, then trims it some more, desperately hoping to appease leftists and their media lapdogs.

Is it any wonder that establishment right candidates lose elections? McCain? Romney? Jeb Bush? It’s why Trump won. Anytime someone takes a bold or brave stance against statism or collectivism, or against jihad and Sharia, they suffer withering attacks from both outside the movement and inside the movement.

The leadership on the right does not understand its own philosophy. They do not understand free markets, capitalism, and individual rights. If they did, they would be more ferocious, fiercer and more courageous in the fight for freedom and equality of rights before the law against the second-handers, moochers, and looters on the left. Like Milo.

The establishment right is on life support at a time when it should be standing with our most effective leaders chosen by the people. This most certainly should be our issue, our moment. There have been these moments in American history when right and wrong, good and evil were very clearly defined. The Republican Party was born at such a moment. We elected Lincoln at such a moment, and we took the country back from the slave party, the Democrats, at such a moment. Lincoln would be appalled at today’s Republican Party.