Those that are retired have to work that day.

Don't forget the Senate races. We will want a friendly majority in any scenario, and there are a bunch of close races that together will decide the balance. NC, NH, IN, MO, NV, and PA, according to today's WSJ

Since R possession of the Senate will determine whether a President Trump gets friendly treatment of his Supremes (or, heaven forfend, whether the Dame of Benghazi's activist nominees would get ushered through) please consider helping any of those close races.

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
BTW, if you work for a living, I suggest taking off the day after election day. If we win, we'll be exhausted from celebration, and if we lose, we won't want to face the world that day.

Wednesday, November 9th- make it a vacation day.

If Trump wins, my guess is there will be Ferguson/Baltimore style riots in the major cities. Taking time off would be a good idea to allow you to guard your property...

If Clinton wins, I expect no violence at all.

This is NOT an endorsement of Clinton, I just think there's tremendous hate and fear on the other side for Trump...

I heard Pope John Paul II dropped off a Trump sign at Jesus' place. So, not all the Poles are bad.

I'm willing to bet Trump has no problem taking PA. The Philly burbs are heavily Trump, signs are EVERYWHERE.

Even in Philly, many are pro Trump, even grudgingly so. The Union leadership is for Hilary, but the average Union member is voting Trump.

Early Voting started today, so did the required trip, lots of voters, a constant flow, but not crowded and out the door.

Checked the appropriate boxes got my sticker and back to work...

I'm taking the weekend through voting day off for a motorcycle trip to Kiawah Island with a few hundred others for the EOY event from Drag Specialties. Cigars, bikes and surf...

quote:

Originally posted by btanchors:
... I just think there's tremendous hate and fear on the other side for Trump...

And a voting base made up largely of emotionally immature, weak-minded voters easily led/bribed to violent behavior.



.

quote:

Originally posted by WildSig:
Even in IL the Trump/Pence signs outweighed the Hitlery signs but I didn't drive through any major metropolitan areas.

That is the situation nationwide. Rural and suburban areas are generally Republican, but most of the very densely populated urban centers are heavily Democrat.

Some of you guys are severely tone deaf and may be dyslexic.

Or, maybe you're just not bothering to read this thread at all.

third OKeefe video due out in the next half hour


adding:
OKeefe:

This is bizarre. @YouTube is not processing / uploading our Part III! What is going on??

I carry my cell phone with me everywhere. I'm sure that in the next couple of days the media will dial my number because they really want to know how i'm going to vote. Any minute now...

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
BTW, if you work for a living, I suggest taking off the day after election day. If we win, we'll be exhausted from celebration, and if we lose, we won't want to face the world that day.

Wednesday, November 9th- make it a vacation day.

I actually took the entire week off!

Well, to be honest, I took it off for my yearly elk hunting trip. I am going to be miles and miles from the nearest cell phone tower in the Colorado wilderness from 11/3 - 11/10. I won't know the results until 11/10 at the earliest. I am actually looking forward to being away from civilization when the results come in.

The CNN headline: "Clinton Looks to Transition" and "Her campaign is taking pains to not look presumptuous". I will never, ever, trust our news organizations again.

video III

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...-jY&feature=youtu.be

loading slowly for me

quote:

Originally posted by jljones:

quote:

Originally posted by Deqlyn:
You think thats a good sign? My toast came out toasted with "VOTE TRUMP"

Mine said the same AND it groped me.

Very good sign, indeed.

Grabbed you by your pussy, huh?

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
video III

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...-jY&feature=youtu.be

loading slowly for me

Just watched it. time for people in duck suits to show up at all Hilary events (I'd suggest body armor inside the suit though) Afraid this is a bit nuanced for the great unwashed masses. cliff notes from the veritas web site:

Project Veritas Action has released the third video in a multi-part series that is sending shockwaves through the DNC and the Clinton campaign. The first video explained the dark secrets and the hidden connections and organizations the Clinton campaign uses to incite violence at Trump rallies. The second video exposed a diabolical step-by-step voter fraud strategy discussed by top Democratic operatives and showed one key operative admitting that the Democrats have been rigging elections for fifty years. This latest video takes this investigation even further.

Part III of the undercover investigation dives further into the back room dealings of Democratic politics. It exposes prohibited communications between Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the DNC and the non-profit organization Americans United for Change. And, it’s all disguised as a duck.

Several Project Veritas Action undercover journalists catch Democracy Partners founder directly implicating Hillary Clinton in FEC violations.

“In the end, it was the candidate, Hillary Clinton, the future president of the United States, who wanted ducks on the ground,” says Creamer in one of several exchanges. “So, by God, we would get ducks on the ground.”

It is made clear that high-level DNC operative Creamer realized that this direct coordination between Democracy Partners and the campaign would be damning when he said: “Don’t repeat that to anybody.”

It was earlier this year when people wearing Donald Duck costumes started showing up at Donald Trump events all over the country. Brad Woodhouse is the president of Americans United for Change (AUFC) and he worked with Robert Creamer, Scott Foval, and DNC Rapid Response Coordinator Aaron Black to launch their “Donald Ducks” campaign.

After the first video in this series, Woodhouse fired Scott Foval, his national field director.

In the video, the operatives go on to explain their plot.

“Let me tell you something. I think she [Hillary Clinton] has the right instinct on this. This thing is resonating, but that story is not exactly what you want to hear about how presidential decision-making happened,” said Woodhouse.

However, the originator of the Donald Ducks scheme was supposed to remain secret.

Robert Creamer goes on to add, “I was actually on a plane to go to London last week -- Christina Reynolds [Deputy Communications Director for Hillary for America] calls saying, ‘I have good news and bad news. The good news is the candidate would like to have a mascot following around the duck -- I mean, Trump.’”

Creamer then says, “If the future president wants ducks, we will put ducks on the ground.”

Hillary Clinton and the DNC wanted the Donald Ducks agitators at Trump and Pence campaign events. The direct involvement of the campaign and the Democratic National Committee with Americans United for Change and activists wearing Donald Duck costumes smacks strongly of illegal coordinated campaign expenditures.

Federal campaign law experts have told us “the ducks on the ground are likely public communications for purposes of the law. It’s political activity opposing Trump, paid for by Americans United for Change funds but controlled by Clinton and her campaign.”

Representatives of Clinton’s campaign were on daily conference calls which PVA journalists witnessed with Creamer, AUFC managers and their operatives. They were talking about where to send the duck and the “ducks message.” Not only was the campaign in on it, but apparently Donna Brazille’s Democratic National Committee was in on it as well.

After last week’s stories released by Project Veritas Action, Americans United for Change fired Scott Foval and Robert Creamer announced to the DNC that he was stepping down from campaign responsibilities. James O’Keefe and Project Veritas Action have filed a complaint with the Federal Elections Commission.

Project Veritas Action Fund (AKA Project Veritas Action) was founded by James O’Keefe to investigate and expose corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud and other misconduct.

http://projectveritasaction.co...-clinton-involvement

quote:

Originally posted by RAMIUS:
I'm willing to bet Trump has no problem taking PA. The Philly burbs are heavily Trump, signs are EVERYWHERE.

Even in Philly, many are pro Trump, even grudgingly so. The Union leadership is for Hilary, but the average Union member is voting Trump.

Notice how, every couple of days now, that the Dems keep sending in the big guns: Slick Willie, Michelle Obama, Joe Biden, even Hillary herself.

They are scared SHITLESS that they will lose PA and PA puts Trump over the top to victory. There's no other way to explain why they keep sending big name Democrats to Philly and the Philly burbs which are both normally reliably Democrat-voting, to BEG for them to vote for Hillary!

quote:

Originally posted by c1steve:
The CNN headline: "Clinton Looks to Transition" and "Her campaign is taking pains to not look presumptuous". I will never, ever, trust our news organizations again.

You're surprised that the Clinton News Network has already declared her the victor and November 8th is just a mere formality? LOL, I'm not.

With regard to the 60 Minutes story last night. Of course it showed a clear slant in the story, but think about the whole segment. It showed five union members at the union hall(with a Hillary sign on the door). When they asked who they were voting for three said Trump, and two were undecided.

Both women who were voting for her had no good reasons, other than they did not trust Trump. Like they should trust her! The woman who claimed to be an R said she would vote for Portman so he can try to stop Hillary. There's alot of air between those ears. She sounds like their governor.(if I ever run for office I'm sure that will surface)

Jim

quote:

Originally posted by PASig:

quote:

Originally posted by c1steve:
The CNN headline: "Clinton Looks to Transition" and "Her campaign is taking pains to not look presumptuous". I will never, ever, trust our news organizations again.

You're surprised that the Clinton News Network has already declared her the victor and November 8th is just a mere formality? LOL, I'm not.

When Trump wins, just watch the MSM actively incite riots with all the "Trump Stole The Election" talk. The blm-type idiots will lose their minds.

I'm gonna lock and load and hunker down on election day.

I watched video III from OKeefe. It is about a silly campaign trick to use the Donald Duck figure to ridicule Trump for "ducking" taxes.

But the importance of the video is that it includes quotes and video that link the Clinton Campaign, the DNC, Bob Creamer, and "Americans United for Change". AUFC is headed by Brad Woodhouse; Scott Foval worked for Woodhouse until he was recently fired.

There are several quotes that it was Hillary herself that wanted the Donald Duck figure to be used. There are also quotes that Donna Brazille was involved.

There is video of Jenna Price (Asst Sec of the DNC) saying "we just have to be careful about these things, and the way we talk about them, and who knows about certain things; but you guys are. I trust that it will all be fine."

and "we aren't taking credit for the duck anymore. .. But it's still something that we're involved in."

Some of you may wonder how OKeefe got the recordings. When a Project Veritas person first approached Bob Creamer, the person asked if their niece could work for Creamer. Creamer agreed.

So now there is audio/video of links from Clinton/Brazille/DNC to Bob Creamer and AUFC (Woodhouse/Foval)

Combine that with the fact that Creamer visited the WH 342 times.

No doubt the FBI will be all over this. or maybe not