CONFIRMED: Early Voting Data Shows Trump Lead – Ignore Trolls Who Say Otherwise


DO NOT BE DISCOURAGED WITH EARLY VOTING DATA — IGNORE ALL TROLLS WHO SAY OTHERWISE

DO NOT LISTEN TO THE CORRUPT MEDIA– We Know Hillary’s Plan. It was revealed by Wikileaks…

LEAKED CLINTON INTERNAL DOCUMENT: Discourage Trump Supporters with Bogus Polls and Declaring Election Over

So do not listen to the lying media–
Trump is leading in early voting data—

DO NOT BE DISCOURAGED WITH EARLY VOTING DATA — IGNORE ALL TROLLS WHO SAY OTHERWISE https://t.co/cTLCHpUHVP via @reddit pic.twitter.com/ik6aXfVGst

— MicroSpookyLeaks™ (@WDFx2EU7) October 24, 2016

Here is the post from Reddit The Donald:

I keep seeing post after post in this subreddit (and in other parts of Reddit) that claim that the early voting data is showing bad signs for Trump and good signs for Clinton. This is absolutely false.

First, Republicans are turning in their mail-in ballots in higher numbers than the Democrats in Florida. Yes, that site claims that more Democrats received their mail-in ballots, but it shows that more republicans actually give enough of a shit to vote i.e. Trump is inspiring more people to vote than Hillary (this means that more Pro-Trump independents will vote than Pro-Hillary independents).

Of course, people would say that McCain and Romney held a higher lead with mail-in ballots in Florida than Trump (assuming that most republicans will vote for the republican candidate — which they most likely will). That is true, but it is highly misleading. If holding a lead in mail-in ballots actually mattered, then both McCain and Romney should have won Florida, yet they did not. Trump’s campaign is generating much more excitement than Hillary’s campaign, so Trump’s supporters are more likely to turnout in-person to vote, as opposed to just mailing in a ballot. That is how Obama won Florida in 2008 despite losing the mail-in ballot count — and it will be how Trump will win Florida in 2016. In fact, the very fact that the Democrats aren’t ahead in mail-in ballots should be highly concerning for the Hillary campaign, since it is unlikely that many of her supporters would actually turn out in-person to vote for her.

Same logic applies in North Carolina. I don’t have the exact number, but I believe that the republicans are requesting main-in ballots slightly more than Democrats. The fact that the republican lead with mail-in ballot requests in 2016 is less than their lead in 2008 and 2012 is irrelevant. If the Democrats wish to stand any chance in NC, then they should be the ones ahead with ballot requests.

tl;dr Hillary’s supporters are more likely to vote via mail-in ballot than Trump’s supporters. The fact that the republicans are leading in mail-in ballot requests (no matter how small that lead may be) is a very good sign for Trump.

NOTE: THIS IS NOT AN EXCUSE TO STAY HOME AND NOT VOTE. GO OUT AND VOTE!

Huh, no polls at the polling place today.

Whos going to watch the Hannity Lesbo to Hilliary connection tonight.

I've pretty much tuned the stuff out but this might be worth a cigar....

http://www.nationalenquirer.co...-mr-fix-it-articles/

Man I am stuck in the doc office taking family in for appointment. No headphones and CNN is blaring!!

Man I've ignored mainstream media forever and now I'm can't get away from it. I agree completely to stay away from the mush.

Stay happy and stay positive

Speaking of the media, have gallons of eye bleech and a bottle of your favorite hootch if you go to the Drudge Report. He's got a collage image that will both sicken and haunt. Yikes!

If you're brave and want it straight without going to Drudge, here's the image URL: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CvfD8eVXYAEGfOs.jpg

Can't say you didn't warn me, Bald1, but yeeesh, that's unsettling. So that's what she hides under that creepy-ass grin she has plastered on her face.

Trump Campaign: McAuliffe’s Donation to FBI Official’s Wife ‘Deeply Disturbing’

The Trump campaign is pouncing on news that Clinton friend Terry McAuliffe donated money to an FBI investigator’s wife when she ran for office.
The Wall Street Journal broke the story Sunday. The FBI has been under fire for not recommending indictment against Hillary Clinton.

“Last night’s revelation that close Clinton ally Terry McAuliffe authorized $675,000 to the wife of a top official at the FBI, who conveniently was promoted to deputy director, and helped oversee the investigation into Clinton’s secret server is deeply disturbing and calls into question the entire investigation,” Trump senior communications adviser Jason Miller said in a statement.

“The fact that this was allowed to occur shows either outright negligent behavior by the FBI or a level of corruption that is beyond belief. The FBI needs to fully address these issues as soon as possible,” Miller added.

The Republican National Committee likewise expressed alarm.

“Given all we know about how the corrupt Clinton machine operates, it’s hard not to see this as anything other than a down payment to influence the FBI’s criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server,” RNC chairman Reince Priebus said.

“These troubling revelations are the epitome of the rigged system millions of Americans are fed up with. We simply cannot allow the kind of rank corruption Hillary Clinton and her cronies traffic in to take root in our nation’s highest office,” Priebus said.

The Wall Street Journal reported:

The political organization of Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, an influential Democrat with longstanding ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton, gave nearly $500,000 to the election campaign of the wife of an official at the Federal Bureau of Investigation who later helped oversee the investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s email use. Campaign finance records show Mr. McAuliffe’s political-action committee donated $467,500 to the 2015 state Senate campaign of Dr. Jill McCabe, who is married to Andrew McCabe, now the deputy director of the FBI. The Virginia Democratic Party, over which Mr. McAuliffe exerts considerable control, donated an additional $207,788 worth of support to Dr. McCabe’s campaign in the form of mailers, according to the records. That adds up to slightly more than $675,000 to her candidacy from entities either directly under Mr. McAuliffe’s control or strongly influenced by him. The figure represents more than a third of all the campaign funds Dr. McCabe raised in the effort. Mr. McAuliffe and other state party leaders recruited Dr. McCabe to run, according to party officials. She lost the election to incumbent Republican Dick Black.


LINK

Okay folks, now is the time to start giving 'til it hurts.

At https://donate.donaldjtrump.com/founding-member I just made my second donation.

quote:

Originally posted by lbj:
Those that are retired have to work that day.

WHOA! Hold on lbj...I don't remember reading that in the SigForum waiver.

Trump is our man in the arena.

You either are going to help him...or be the cold and timid souls who neither know victory or defeat.

Trump does not care about polls, yard signs or if you are a D or an R...the only label he cares about is if you are an American.

quote:

Originally posted by KMitch200:

quote:

Originally posted by lbj:
Those that are retired have to work that day.

WHOA! Hold on lbj...I don't remember reading that in the SigForum waiver.

It's invisible ink. Place the waiver in the oven at 300 degrees for 10 minutes and then you will see it.

quote:

If you're brave and want it straight without going to Drudge, here's the image

At least she has all her teeth.

41

This message has been edited. Last edited by: 41,

Anybody get a load of Townhall.com today. My regular daily email from them was totally covered with stories telling all who will read that Trump is history. They even featured a 'Must Read' story from Reuters that predicts Landslide: Reuters Projects 326 Electoral Votes For Clinton. Then all the way at the bottom of the page, you'll find this little story, almost offered as no more than a space filler...

Professor With "Remarkable" Record of Predicting Elections Says Trump Will Win

Forget what the polls and pundits are saying, Donald Trump will be the next president of the United States, predicts Stony Brook University professor Helmut Norpoth.

Norpoth, who has accurately predicted the last five presidential elections, uses two models. The first, he told Fox News’ Tucker Carlson, is the primary model, which tracks how the candidates are performing, and “it usually turns out the candidate who does better in his party's primaries or her party’s primaries beats the other guy who does less well.”

He used the primary races in South Carolina and New Hampshire for the 2016 election, where Trump won and did better than Clinton did in the Democratic race.

The second model, he explains, is called the Swing of the Pendulum, which is the tendency for a change after two terms of a party being in the White House. This, of course, gives the prediction that a Republican will win in 2016.

Norpoth is so convinced by his models that he’s putting his money where his mouth is. He bought shares in the Republican candidate in the Iowa Electronic Markets a long time ago and he’s sticking with it, he said.
----------------------------------------------

Looks like a total media blitz is on from here to election day to try and weaken Trump support. Not gonna happen in my house, and from the looks of things, not my neighborhood either.

Para has already posted the SUNY Professor, bigdeal. Coming from liberal New York State, its good news.

Tonight's rally is in Tampa.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rg7tZ_4WGgA

27K+ in Tampa this evening.

Charles Monroe Oberly, III was appointed US Attorney for the District of Delaware by obama.

Oberly's info on the November elections:

https://www.justice.gov/usao-d...ember-2016-elections

This part sounds good:

"Federal law protects against such crimes as intimidating or bribing voters, buying and selling votes, impersonating voters, altering vote tallies, stuffing ballot boxes, and marking ballots for voters against their wishes or without their input."


But this part sounds like a classic Democrat:

"It also contains special protections for the rights of voters and provides that they can vote free from acts that intimidate or harass them.

For example, actions of persons designed to interrupt or intimidate voters at polling places by questioning or challenging them, or by photographing or videotaping them, under the pretext that these are actions to uncover illegal voting may violate federal voting rights law."

Wow. You guys weren't kidding about the media the past two weeks. I just came back into the country today, and when I went to pick up the Jeep in the airport economy parking lot, I started her up and Fox News was tuned in on the satellite. The Five was on, and it was all about how Trump has lost and Clinton can start making preparations for entering the White House. I spent a good full minute cursing at the radio and then immediately pulled out my phone and went to the Trump website and made another decent size donation before returning to the terminal to pick up the wife and daughter standing with the bags.

Just got home. My mail in ballot was here waiting for me. I can't wait to fill it in and drop it off tomorrow.

Here’s Cryptographic Proof That Donna Brazile Is Wrong, WikiLeaks Emails Are Real

Cryptographic signatures demonstrate that Democratic National Committee Chairman Donna Brazile is wrong when she suggests the WikiLeaks emails were altered and that she did not send an email tipping off Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton to debate questions.

Many email systems use a verification system called DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) that shows whether an email has been changed. It uses a key stored on the email server that sent the email, so it can’t be forged.

HillaryClinton.com uses Gmail to handle its mail and uses DKIM. Staffer Jennifer Palmieri, using her HillaryClinton.com email, replied to a Brazile email warning that Brazile was “worried” about Clinton’s ability to answer a question about the death penalty, that she said would be asked at an upcoming debate. She copied Podesta — who also uses Gmail — presumably so that he could encourage Clinton to prepare for the question.

The emails were hacked from Podesta’s account by WikiLeaks, but Clinton’s campaign — and Brazile — have all but claimed their contents have been falsified.

But a check of the DKIM signature by the Daily Caller News Foundation against HillaryClinton.com’s key shows that Palmieri did, in fact, send the exact email to Podesta that WikiLeaks says she did.

The email from Brazile had a subject line of “From time to time I get the questions in advance” and said “Here’s one that worries me about HRC,” followed by the full text of a question about the death penalty.

Clinton was indeed asked the question at a debate by moderator Roland Martin.

Brazile claimed the emails were “doctored” by “Russian sources” and that she wouldn’t share debate questions with candidates ahead of time. Brazile became Democratic National Committee Chairman after her predecessor, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, resigned amid accusations that she was helping Clinton over rival Sen. Bernie Sanders in the primaries.
When Fox News’ Megyn Kelly asked Brazile about the impropriety of sharing debate questions in advance with candidates, Brazile claimed she was being “persecuted” by the question.

Brazile then called Daily Caller reporter Chuck Ross “so unprofessional” for asking for evidence that the email wasn’t real. Unfortunately for Brazile, she does not understand DKIM.

TheDCNF ran code to confirm that the email was valid as provided by WikiLeaks — the only way it could be false is if Palmieri herself changed the body of Brazile’s email before replying to it and copying Podesta.

TheDCNF downloaded the raw source of the email here: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5205

Then ran the following code in Python:...

Did the early voting today. Went at 10 am and it was too crowded so I left. Passed by at 2 pm on the way to Walmart and it looked less crowded so I parked and went in. Took 40 minutes in all, and about 10 minutes of that was coloring in all the appropriate dots on the paper ballot, both sides.

It's amazing how for the last few weeks the media has been camped and broadcasting live at HRC rallies and just show edited video clips of Trump rallies.