SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Donald Trump is a first-rate ass clown, but...
Page 1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... 1312

Closed Topic Closed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Donald Trump is a first-rate ass clown, but... Login/Join 
Quit staring at my wife's Butt
Picture of XLT
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rusbro:
(Monday Night)

Megyn Kelly: Mr. Trump, I hold in my hand a list of some 40 women - various ex-wives of yours, Trump employees, high-priced escorts, strippers, party girls, etc. Many of them claim you pressured or even paid them for sex. Some say you snorted cocaine off their asses and lapped champagne puddled between their boobies. How do you respond to that?
The Donald: You better believe I did! Look Megyn; it's called being a rich motherfucker and getting, some, ass! OK? I took advantage of the system, and that's what I'll do for America. We'll all be getting high-priced ass when I'm president. Besides, all of those women were sluts and pathetic losers, just like you.

(Tuesday Night)
Megyn Kelly: BREAKING TONIGHT: DONALD TRUMP AGAIN SURGES IN THE POLLS!


Big Grin Big Grin
 
Posts: 5720 | Registered: February 09, 2003Report This Post
Banned
posted Hide Post
Reagan won in 1980 with an ex-wife. 36 years ago.

Now all of a sudden it's a big deal?

Let's not forget former Presidents that had mistresses that I assume were well known. Eisenhower, JFK, Clinton.

The media can spin stories all they want. Few people believe them anyway.

More people are more pissed about runaway national debt, the illegal immigrant invasion, & #onlyblackligesmatter.
 
Posts: 1801 | Location: Possum Kingdom, TX | Registered: April 11, 2005Report This Post
I believe in the
principle of
Due Process
Picture of JALLEN
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by maximus_flavius:
Reagan won in 1980 with an ex-wife. 36 years ago.

Now all of a sudden it's a big deal?

Let's not forget former Presidents that had mistresses that I assume were well known. Eisenhower, JFK, Clinton.

The media can spin stories all they want. Few people believe them anyway.

More people are more pissed about runaway national debt, the illegal immigrant invasion, & #onlyblackligesmatter.


Reagan's ex-wife caused no issues. Anyway it was Hollywood and seen as more common.

Eisenhower, Kennedy and some predecessors may have had mistresses but it wasn't public knowledge. Some knew, of course, but the media at least in Kenndey's case, kept their mouths shut about it. That all changed with Nixon after a couple of police beat reporters became multi millionaires, invited to all the best parties, lavished with praises and prizes and had Dustin Hoffman and Whatzizname play them in the movies.

Depending on the dirt dug up, it might matter or it might not.




Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson

"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown
 
Posts: 48369 | Location: Texas hill country | Registered: July 04, 2005Report This Post
I believe in the
principle of
Due Process
Picture of JALLEN
posted Hide Post
Here's one view:

Megyn Kelly's Very Smart Question to Donald Trump

Townhall.com
Star Parker | Aug 12, 2015

quote:



Unfortunately, the circus that Donald Trump has created around Fox News commentator Megyn Kelly and her allegedly "unfair" question to him in the Republican debate has drowned out the central importance of that "unfair" question.
Voter frustration on the right reflects two things. One, we want to hear tough and straight talk from candidates. But two, we want a candidate who will be elected and set change in motion.

All the tough talk in the world means nothing if the candidate doesn't get elected.

Kelly's question to Trump was about this. It wasn't about whether Trump is courteous, or a jerk, or politically correct.

She opened the debate segment with, "our first round of questions is on the subject of electability in the general election."

Ben Carson was asked about his absence of political experience. Marco Rubio about his absence of experience as an executive. Bush about dealing with the mentality that "the last thing this country needs is another Bush."

Then Kelly turned to Trump.

"You've called women you don't like 'fat pigs, dogs, and disgusting animals' ... how will you answer the charge from Hillary Clinton ... likely to be the Democratic nominee, that you are part of the war on women?"

Need I remind anyone that sitting in the White House today is the most left-wing politician to ever occupy the Oval Office?

He was elected not once, but twice. So we can't really say the first time around he fooled America voters.

Despite everything conservatives find so revolting about Barack Obama, his approval rating, now 47 percent, remains relatively strong compared to previous presidents at the same stage of their presidencies. At this time in his presidency, George W. Bush stood at 34 percent.

During this seven-year nightmare for every American that longs for a nation that is free, moral, a light unto nations, Obama has been successful in about everything he has put his hand to, taking us in the opposite direction.

We have government health care, government propped-up big banks, national debt as big as GDP, deficits as far as the eye can see, some 15 million illegals, and same-sex marriage.

Planned Parenthood continues to siphon off $500 million a year in taxpayer funds, despite the latest round of videos showing the commerce they do in the flesh of murdered fetuses.

Our only real ally in the Middle East, Israel, gets dissed and it seems likely that the U.S. will conclude a nuclear agreement with a nation -- the world's number one supporter of terrorism -- that hates Israel and us.

Around half of American households now get some form of government assistance. By some estimates, combined unfunded liabilities of Social Security and Medicare are as large as $100 trillion -- yet polls do not show that Americans want major reform of these bankrupt entitlement monstrosities.

Projections indicate that the percentage of the American electorate in 2016 that is white will be down to 70 percent, a historic low. And of the total American electorate, 53 percent are women.

How much clearer can it be that it will be impossible to elect a conservative Republican in 2016 if that candidate does not have the skill and persona to attract some voters who don't traditionally vote Republican?

The last time a Republican presidential candidate won the women's vote was 25 years ago when George H.W. Bush squeaked by Michael Dukakis with 51 percent.

The women's vote will be a particular challenge in an election in which Democrats run the first woman candidate for president.

So Megyn Kelly's question to Trump was smart, on target and very fair. The real question is how could Trump -- whose big selling point is being a smart businessman -- call this "unfair"?

It certainly won't be fair to American voters if he gets nominated and is defeated and then calls the tens of millions who didn't vote for him a bunch of losers.


Link




Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson

"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown
 
Posts: 48369 | Location: Texas hill country | Registered: July 04, 2005Report This Post
Banned
posted Hide Post
That's just Star's opinion. Everybody has 1, like everybody has an asshole.

I don't think the War on Women question was "unfair". I think it was nonsensical. There is no War on Women.

Is there any evidence that Trump hates women in particular? Of course not. Ill stand by & wait for any evidence.

My problem with Ms Kelly's line of questioning is, she could have asked legitimate questions, about actual facts, like Trumps stance on abortion, gun control, debt, ISIS, or any number of things that actually exist. Instead, she perpetrated a myth of a War on Women, mimicking the Communist fabricated talking points.

Next, I'm betting she will say only blacklivesmatter, fire can't melt steel, 9/11 was an inside job, & we didn't really land on the moon. All just as nonsensical as a War on Women......
 
Posts: 1801 | Location: Possum Kingdom, TX | Registered: April 11, 2005Report This Post
Gracie Allen is my
personal savior!
posted Hide Post
Come to think of it...I may be Monday morning quarterbacking here, but I do kinda wonder why Trump didn't fall back on one of the oldest debate tactics in the book.

"Megyn, I'm a public figure and people tell lots of stories about public figures. But let me start with the premise about your question about electability. There is no war on women. That's just something the DNC speechwriters came up with." After giving a couple of examples, he could've just gone on from there to address womens' success stories, talk about women who he's worked with who have done well, and wrap up with another general denial that there is such a thing as a war on women.

There's a mistake that politicians sometimes make that's beginning to look like a classic to me. That mistake is to treat a journalist or interviewer as a peer. Respond to the issue and the facts, NOT to some airhead who'll get a raise if he or she can get you all wound up and involved in what is essentially petty, personal bickering. Unfortunately da Don took da bait.
 
Posts: 27322 | Location: Deep in the heart of the brush country, and closing on that #&*%!?! roadrunner. Really. | Registered: February 05, 2008Report This Post
safe & sound
Picture of a1abdj
posted Hide Post
This is the most recent CNN poll for Iowa. They show all of their questions and how the candidates rank for each.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/12/...ucus-data/index.html


________________________



www.zykansafe.com
 
Posts: 15980 | Location: St. Charles, MO, USA | Registered: September 22, 2003Report This Post
I believe in the
principle of
Due Process
Picture of JALLEN
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by maximus_flavius:
That's just Star's opinion. Everybody has 1, like everybody has an asshole.

I don't think the War on Women question was "unfair". I think it was nonsensical. There is no War on Women.

Is there any evidence that Trump hates women in particular? Of course not. Ill stand by & wait for any evidence.

My problem with Ms Kelly's line of questioning is, she could have asked legitimate questions, about actual facts, like Trumps stance on abortion, gun control, debt, ISIS, or any number of things that actually exist. Instead, she perpetrated a myth of a War on Women, mimicking the Communist fabricated talking points.

Next, I'm betting she will say only blacklivesmatter, fire can't melt steel, 9/11 was an inside job, & we didn't really land on the moon. All just as nonsensical as a War on Women......


You may be getting warmer.

Go back and read the dialogue. He was being asked, having made those statements in the past, how would he respond when Hillary and her minions accuse him of being part of the war on women. You know that would be coming from them, whether you think it is accurate or not.




Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson

"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown
 
Posts: 48369 | Location: Texas hill country | Registered: July 04, 2005Report This Post
Little ray
of sunshine
Picture of jhe888
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JALLEN:

Go back and read the dialogue. He was being asked, having made those statements in the past, how would he respond when Hillary and her minions accuse him of being part of the war on women. You know that would be coming from them, whether you think it is accurate or not.


Those distinctions are lost on people. This thread is evidence, as many people clearly think (or want to act as if) Kelly did accuse Trump of bring involved in a "war on women." It is part of the reason campaigns are bone-headed - some people can't keep those distinctions straight.




The fish is mute, expressionless. The fish doesn't think because the fish knows everything.
 
Posts: 53463 | Location: Texas | Registered: February 10, 2004Report This Post
Member
Picture of DrDan
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jhe888:
quote:
Originally posted by JALLEN:

Go back and read the dialogue. He was being asked, having made those statements in the past, how would he respond when Hillary and her minions accuse him of being part of the war on women. You know that would be coming from them, whether you think it is accurate or not.


Those distinctions are lost on people. This thread is evidence, as many people clearly think (or want to act as if) Kelly did accuse Trump of bring involved in a "war on women." It is part of the reason campaigns are bone-headed - some people can't keep those distinctions straight.


One can't be a true conservative, unless one only asks the right kinds of questions, ya know.




This space intentionally left blank.
 
Posts: 5071 | Location: Florida | Registered: August 16, 2009Report This Post
Banned
posted Hide Post
Isn't that an awfully convoluted way of asking a strawman question on a false narrative?

She could have asked him a convoluted question on Elvis sightings. It's just as valid.

Like "Some people say you have you beaten your wife". "When did you quit beating your wife".

I could rattle off dozens of questions to each candidate, in a similar matter. That does not make any of them valid. I do not expect such questions in a debate that wants to be professional & informative. It's was more of a "gotcha" set up, & completely inappropriate, & the moderators did not question the other candidates in a similar fashion. Most people saw thru that bullshit, that's 1 reason Trumps numbers are up since. Claiming that Hillary & her minions may ask about made up bullshit is just trying to justify !s Kelly's insulting stupid questioning.
 
Posts: 1801 | Location: Possum Kingdom, TX | Registered: April 11, 2005Report This Post
I believe in the
principle of
Due Process
Picture of JALLEN
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by maximus_flavius:
Isn't that an awfully convoluted way of asking a strawman question on a false narrative?

She could have asked him a convoluted question on Elvis sightings. It's just as valid.

Like "Some people say you have you beaten your wife". "When did you quit beating your wife".

I could rattle off dozens of questions to each candidate, in a similar matter. That does not make any of them valid. I do not expect such questions in a debate that wants to be professional & informative. It's was more of a "gotcha" set up, & completely inappropriate, & the moderators did not question the other candidates in a similar fashion. Most people saw thru that bullshit, that's 1 reason Trumps numbers are up since. Claiming that Hillary & her minions may ask about made up bullshit is just trying to justify !s Kelly's insulting stupid questioning.


"Opinions are like assholes."




Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson

"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown
 
Posts: 48369 | Location: Texas hill country | Registered: July 04, 2005Report This Post
Coin Sniper
Picture of Rightwire
posted Hide Post
Considering the competition....




I project that the email scandal will destroy Hillary. If Trump's mouth doesn't get him in trouble, he will be a strong challenger.




Pronoun: His Royal Highness and benevolent Majesty of all he surveys

343 - Never Forget

Its better to be Pavlov's dog than Schrodinger's cat

There are three types of mistakes; Those you learn from, those you suffer from, and those you don't survive.
 
Posts: 38558 | Location: Above the snow line in Michigan | Registered: May 21, 2004Report This Post
Bad dog!
Picture of justjoe
posted Hide Post
The matter of Trump's ex-wives is silly.

Trump has a shelf life, but the expiration date will depend on whether he gets sucked into endless petty squabbles, in which case he has another few weeks, or stays focused on issues that have Americans pissed off, in which case he has 4 or 5 months, or more.

If he did nothing more than he has done so far, we would owe him a sincere thank you. But I think he has more work to do....


______________________________________________________

"You get much farther with a kind word and a gun than with a kind word alone."
 
Posts: 11324 | Location: pennsylvania | Registered: June 05, 2011Report This Post
Bad dog!
Picture of justjoe
posted Hide Post
Trump did an interview with Hannity and-- what do you know?-- Hannity's ratings went through the roof, beating both Megyn Kelly and O'Reilly on that night. And Megyn thought all those viewers on debate night tuned in to see her.


______________________________________________________

"You get much farther with a kind word and a gun than with a kind word alone."
 
Posts: 11324 | Location: pennsylvania | Registered: June 05, 2011Report This Post
More Human
Than Human
Picture of Ian111
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by justjoe:
Trump did an interview with Hannity and-- what do you know?-- Hannity's ratings went through the roof, beating both Megyn Kelly and O'Reilly on that night. And Megyn thought all those viewers on debate night tuned in to see her.


You think people are angry and fed up? Mmmmm.. Could be.


__________________________
They keep saying they just want "sensible gun laws" but they hold up countries where they are banned and confiscated as their ideal.
Antis thinks guns are only good for killing people. I think guns are good for self defense. So I'm the one with the "problem"?
The Bill of Rights affirms the Rights of the Individual Not the State. Anyone tells me different is a liar.

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”― Christopher Hitchens
 
Posts: 9811 | Location: Los Angeles, CA | Registered: September 27, 2002Report This Post
Political Cynic
Picture of nhtagmember
posted Hide Post
I am glad he slammed MK

why be nice?

she isn't his friend - she's demonstrated by her actions to be the enemy

so you do what you have to do to destroy your enemy

MK fired the first shot and it missed

Trump fired the second and we're still getting secondary explosions

Go Donald



[B] Against ALL enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC


 
Posts: 54155 | Location: Tucson Arizona | Registered: January 16, 2002Report This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ian111:
quote:
Originally posted by justjoe:
Trump did an interview with Hannity and-- what do you know?-- Hannity's ratings went through the roof, beating both Megyn Kelly and O'Reilly on that night. And Megyn thought all those viewers on debate night tuned in to see her.
You think people are angry and fed up? Mmmmm.. Could be.
Yeah, Fox and the RNC have a crack team of monkeys working on this puzzler. Roll Eyes
 
Posts: 110401 | Registered: January 20, 2000Report This Post
would not care
to elaborate
Picture of sse
posted Hide Post
I think everyone owes the Donald a thank you just for the sake of entertainment.
 
Posts: 3076 | Location: USA | Registered: June 12, 2008Report This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
For more than that, baby. Much more than that.
 
Posts: 110401 | Registered: January 20, 2000Report This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... 1312 

Closed Topic Closed

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Donald Trump is a first-rate ass clown, but...

© SIGforum 2024