^^^I know, but a guy can dream, can't he...It would be Glorious!

Joey D
5/9/22


Description

In the third hour of the morning show, Larry O'Connor and Julie Gunlock talked to legal analyst Joe diGenova and foreign policy expert Jim Carafano. They also talked about smash and grab incidents in Alexandria.

biden called Donald Trump "The Great MAGA King",

Donald Trump response:




Election Wizard:

"The world was at peace, prices were low, and the economy roaring under The Great MAGA King."

This message has been edited. Last edited by: sdy,

Joey D
5/16/22


Description

In the third hour of the morning show, Larry O'Connor and Julie Gunlock talked to legal analyst Joe diGenova and Big Tech expert Kara Frederick. They also shared the latest Critter News.

from Jesse Kelly:

"I remain convinced the Trump Era was the moment in America when everything that comes after it will be different.

And not because of him. But because every part of a very corrupt system sold out the last of their credibility to bring him down."

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
from Jesse Kelly:

"I remain convinced the Trump Era was the moment in America when everything that comes after it will be different.

And not because of him. But because every part of a very corrupt system sold out the last of their credibility to bring him down."

I would say even because of him.
When is the last time before or since any President lived up to their promises?

Jesse Kelly is a treasure, listen to him if you can.

Joey D
5/24/22


Description

Joe diGenova, legal analyst and former U.S. Attorney of the District of Columbia, joined WMAL's "O'Connor and Company" radio program on Monday about Hillary Clinton personally approving the spread of disinformation to the media.

DAILY CALLER: Hillary Clinton Personally Approved Spreading Trump-Russia Disinformation To Media, Former Campaign Manager Testifies

Could be an interesting report

https://theconservativetreehou...is-week/#more-233655

Federal cybersecurity officials have verified there are software vulnerabilities in certain ballot-marking devices made by Dominion Voting Systems, discovered during a controversial Georgia court case, which could in theory allow a malicious actor to tamper with the devices, according to a draft analysis reviewed by CNN.

The vulnerabilities have never been exploited in an election and doing so would require physical access to voting equipment or other extraordinary criteria standard election security practices prevent, according to the analysis from the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.

But because the subject is Dominion voting equipment, which has been the target of conspiracy theorists who falsely claim there was large-scale fraud in the 2020 election, federal and state and local officials are bracing for election deniers to try to weaponize news of the vulnerabilities ahead of midterm elections.

xxxxxxxxxxxxx

"would require physical access to voting equipment" , like that was an impossibility in 2020 ?

Joey D
5/30/22


Description

In the third hour of the morning show, Larry O'Connor and Julie Gunlock talked to legal analyst Joe diGenova and discussed the latest hamster critter news and how a pistol packing woman saved the day after a shooter.

https://apnews.com/article/202...4dbf794349df498c9542

Cyber agency: Voting software vulnerable in some states

Electronic voting machines from a leading vendor used in at least 16 states have software vulnerabilities that leave them susceptible to hacking if unaddressed, the nation’s leading cybersecurity agency says in an advisory sent to state election officials.

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency, or CISA, said there is no evidence the flaws in the Dominion Voting Systems’ equipment have been exploited to alter election results. The advisory is based on testing by a prominent computer scientist and expert witness in a long-running lawsuit that is unrelated to false allegations of a stolen election pushed by former President Donald Trump after his 2020 election loss.

The advisory, obtained by The Associated Press in advance of its expected Friday release, details nine vulnerabilities and suggests protective measures to prevent or detect their exploitation. Amid a swirl of misinformation and disinformation about elections, CISA seems to be trying to walk a line between not alarming the public and stressing the need for election officials to take action.

CISA Executive Director Brandon Wales said in a statement that “states’ standard election security procedures would detect exploitation of these vulnerabilities and in many cases would prevent attempts entirely.” Yet the advisory seems to suggest states aren’t doing enough. It urges prompt mitigation measures, including both continued and enhanced “defensive measures to reduce the risk of exploitation of these vulnerabilities.” Those measures need to be applied ahead of every election, the advisory says, and it’s clear that’s not happening in all of the states that use the machines.

University of Michigan computer scientist J. Alex Halderman, who wrote the report on which the advisory is based, has long argued that using digital technology to record votes is dangerous because computers are inherently vulnerable to hacking and thus require multiple safeguards that aren’t uniformly followed. He and many other election security experts have insisted that using hand-marked paper ballots is the most secure method of voting and the only option that allows for meaningful post-election audits.

“These vulnerabilities, for the most part, are not ones that could be easily exploited by someone who walks in off the street, but they are things that we should worry could be exploited by sophisticated attackers, such as hostile nation states, or by election insiders , and they would carry very serious consequences,” Halderman told the AP.

Concerns about possible meddling by election insiders were recently underscored with the indictment of Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters in Colorado, who has become a hero to election conspiracy theorists and is running to become her state’s top election official. Data from the county’s voting machines appeared on election conspiracy websites last summer shortly after Peters appeared at a symposium about the election organized by MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell. She was also recently barred from overseeing this year’s election in her county.

One of the most serious vulnerabilities could allow malicious code to be spread from the election management system to machines throughout a jurisdiction, Halderman said. The vulnerability could be exploited by someone with physical access or by someone who is able to remotely infect other systems that are connected to the internet if election workers then use USB sticks to bring data from an infected system into the election management system.

Several other particularly worrisome vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to forge cards used in the machines by technicians, giving the attacker access to a machine that would allow the software to be changed, Halderman said.

“Attackers could then mark ballots inconsistently with voters’ intent, alter recorded votes or even identify voters’ secret ballots,” Halderman said.

Halderman is an expert witness for the plaintiffs in a lawsuit originally filed in 2017 that targeted the outdated voting machines Georgia used at the time. The state bought the Dominion system in 2019, but the plaintiffs contend that the new system is also insecure. A 25,000-word report detailing Halderman’s findings was filed under seal in federal court in Atlanta last July.

U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg, who’s overseeing the case, has expressed concern about releasing the report, worrying about the potential for hacking and the misuse of sensitive election system information. She agreed in February that the report could be shared with CISA, which promised to work with Halderman and Dominion to analyze potential vulnerabilities and then help jurisdictions that use the machines to test and apply any protections.

Halderman agrees that there’s no evidence the vulnerabilities were exploited in the 2020 election. But that wasn’t his mission, he said. He was looking for ways Dominion’s Democracy Suite ImageCast X voting system could be compromised. The touchscreen voting machines can be configured as ballot-marking devices that produce a paper ballot or record votes electronically.

In a statement, Dominion defended the machines as “accurate and secure.”

Dominion’s systems have been unjustifiably maligned by people pushing the false narrative that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump. Incorrect and sometimes outrageous claims by high-profile Trump allies prompted the company to file defamation lawsuits. State and federal officials have repeatedly said there’s no evidence of widespread fraud in the 2020 election — and no evidence that Dominion equipment was manipulated to alter results.

Halderman said it’s an “ unfortunate coincidence ” that the first vulnerabilities in polling place equipment reported to CISA affect Dominion machines.

“There are systemic problems with the way election equipment is developed, tested and certified, and I think it’s more likely than not that serious problems would be found in equipment from other vendors if they were subjected to the same kind of testing,” Halderman said.

The CISA advisory specifically advises against using the machines as they are configured in Georgia, where a printed paper ballot includes both a barcode and a human-readable list reflecting the voter’s selections, and votes are tallied by a scanner that reads the barcode.

“When barcodes are used to tabulate votes, they may be subject to attacks exploiting the listed vulnerabilities such that the barcode is inconsistent with the human-readable portion of the paper ballot,” the advisory says. It recommends that the voting machines should be configured, if possible, to produce “traditional, full-face ballots” rather than summary ballots that use a barcode.

in some places, including all of Georgia, almost all in-person voting is on the affected machines.

Halderman said that as far as he knows, “no one but Dominion has had the opportunity to test their asserted fixes.”

To prevent or detect the exploitation of these vulnerabilities, the advisory’s recommendations include ensuring voting machines are secure and protected at all times; conducting rigorous pre- and post-election testing on the machines as well as post-election audits; and encouraging voters to verify the human-readable portion on printed ballots.

https://informingamerica.com/g...date-in-gop-primary/

Democrats in Georgia gave an assist to Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in his win in the GOP primary election held on May 24.

Raffensperger defeated Rep. Jody Hice (R-GA) by around 27,000 , avoiding a runoff by totaling 52.3% of the vote. Hice received 33.4%.

According to an analysis by the Associated Press, more than 37,000 people who voted in the Democratic primary in 2020 changed affiliation to vote in this year’s GOP primary instead.

President Trump endorsed Hice, saying, “Jody will stop the Fraud and get honesty into our Elections!”

^^^^^^
So do you think the Demotards voted for Raffensperger out of spite for Trump because he endorsed Hice?? I mean, it's just swell that Demotards MIGHT be seeing the light, but it doesn't do any good when they vote for Socialist-loving RINOs. And I'm not accusing Raffensperger of being a RINO (don't know who he is), but just pointing out that Demotards "coming over" to the Republican side of the aisle doesn't necessarily resolve the LIBTARD issue and the devastating FAILURE they display at running things.

More likely they remain D voters in the main election, but cross over in the primary to poison the R ticket. They vote for the R candidate least likely to win the general election. I've seen plenty of leftists gleefully discuss the strategy.

Joey D
6/6/22

Description

In the third hour of the morning show, Larry O'Connor and Julie Gunlock talked to legal analyst Joe diGenova and Alexandria Police's Marcel Bassett. They also talked about the latest Critter News including an unusually aggressive coyote and boar attack on a beach.

quote:

Originally posted by Fly-Sig:
More likely they remain D voters in the main election, but cross over in the primary to poison the R ticket. They vote for the R candidate least likely to win the general election. I've seen plenty of leftists gleefully discuss the strategy.

That is not allowed in Texas…one must vote his party even in primaries. I’m sure coniving, cheating, unprincipled sunsabitches find a way to circumvent that rule, though.

quote:

Originally posted by erj_pilot:

quote:

Originally posted by Fly-Sig:
More likely they remain D voters in the main election, but cross over in the primary to poison the R ticket. They vote for the R candidate least likely to win the general election. I've seen plenty of leftists gleefully discuss the strategy.

That is not allowed in Texas…one must vote his party even in primaries. I’m sure coniving, cheating, unprincipled sunsabitches find a way to circumvent that rule, though.

It's not difficult or mysterious. They simply switch their party affiliation for the primary. Party affiliation doesn't matter in the general. So Texas is not immune to this tactic.

It is so shameful the Media Cartel (sans Fox) is going to promote the Democratic Lies and Vendetta against President Trump tonight.
Going to watch Netflix, Prime or HBO tonight.
Pure media tyranny.

How obvious and ridiculous is it that they decided to run these hearings in primetime? These phony asshats are desperate to make the American people care more about the fake "insurrection" than what they're seeing at the gas pump and grocery stores.

I don't expect there will be any truth presented in that fake event. No statements in opposition will be made (or permitted). It's a witch hunt/kangaroo court for sure.

flashguy