Fuckin travesty. Politically motivated, rigged, two tiered sham of a justice system.

quote:

They are now political prisoners who will be dragged in front of show trials around October 1st of 2022 so the Democrats can remind everyone just how evil we Trump supporters are. I’m sure the ball-less GOP will go right along with it too

They are receiving the same kind of treatment the N. Vietnamese gave our boys in Hanoi. You know, the same kind of treatment that gave Jane Fonda tears of joy. I think the routine was called brainwashing back in the day. Sad to have to admit that this is what our beloved U.S.A. .gov has become.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/...select-committee.php

Kevin McCarthy picked Republicans for the select subcommittee to investigate the events of January 6 of this year. McCarthy made five selections, including Jim Jordan.

Pelosi vetoed Jordan and Jim Banks

McCarthy responded that none of the five Republicans he selected will participate. Liz Cheney will be the only Republican on the committee.


adding:

Q to Liz Cheney: Did you personally urge the speaker to take this step ?

Cheney: " I agree with what the speaker has done"

video at

https://twitter.com/DailyCalle.../1417930813161754632

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
https://www.powerlineblog.com/...select-committee.php

Kevin McCarthy picked Republicans for the select subcommittee to investigate the events of January 6 of this year. McCarthy made five selections, including Jim Jordan.

Pelosi vetoed Jordan and Jim Banks

McCarthy responded that none of the five Republicans he selected will participate. Liz Cheney will be the only Republican on the committee.

McCarthy or whoever the new Rpublican Speaker is after 2022 elections should move Pelosi's office to outside the basement boiler room. God I hope the shoe is on the other foot soon.

Surely Cheney will be toast when she runs for reelection. I can't imagine any conservative voting for her.

^^^^^

I can't cite any source but in the last week I ran across someone somewhere claiming Cheney is flush with cash and will be very difficult to unseat. Of course we can imagine why she'd be flush with cash.

Less do with cash & more to do with how much cheating the Dems can assist her with.

quote:

Originally posted by Dakor:
Less do with cash & more to do with how much cheating the Dems can assist her with.

She plans to win the primary by having democrat voters vote for her. She hasn't been auditioning for conservative votes, she wants the lefty votes. So if she wins the primary the state republicans will have a choice: send her back to congress or send a democrat. If I were in that situation, I'd send the democrat.

quote:

Originally posted by mbinky:

quote:

Originally posted by Dakor:
Less do with cash & more to do with how much cheating the Dems can assist her with.

She plans to win the primary by having democrat voters vote for her. She hasn't been auditioning for conservative votes, she wants the lefty votes. So if she wins the primary the state republicans will have a choice: send her back to congress or send a democrat. If I were in that situation, I'd send the democrat.

Not much of a difference at that point. The good news, the Dimocrap would only be there for two years.

John Kerry and the back door to the Iranians? Hunter Biden / China, Ukraine?


Weaponizing FARA? Trump Ally Barrack Released On Stunning $250 Million Bail

https://www.zerohedge.com/poli...ing-250-million-bail

There are so many things wrong with the story of Thomas Barrack that it's hard to know where to begin.

Briefly, Biden's DOJ charged Barrack, the man who chaired Trump's inaugural fund, with illegal lobbying for the UAE. Then, for the 74-year-old Barrack to get out of jail, a federal magistrate imposed a $250,000,000 bail on him, along with other serious restrictions on travel. This is a travesty of justice and a clear threat to Trump allies, past, present, and future.

As always, the Daily Mail has a good summary:

Donald Trump's billionaire ally Thomas Barrack is being released on $250 million bond after being charged with illegally lobbying the Trump administration on behalf of the United Arab Emirates.

The 74-year-old reached a deal with prosecutors on Friday that will see him released from custody while he awaits trial on charges of illegal lobbying.

A federal magistrate judge in Los Angeles signed off on the conditions of the agreement, which will include surrendering his passport, complying with a curfew, and wearing an ankle bracelet with GPS monitoring.

The agreement also calls for Barrack to put up a $250 million bond, secured by $5 million cash, which would be forfeited if he does not appear for court proceedings.

Barrack, who chaired Trump's inaugural fund in 2017 and founded the private equity firm Colony Capital, waived his right to appear in federal court.

He will be arraigned in federal court in Brooklyn, New York on Monday.

There are several points to be made here, which I offer in no particular order:

One: Before the Democrats weaponized it, few people had ever been prosecuted as unregistered foreign agents under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). An article from 2010 reveals that the act was intended to sweep up foreign nationals:

The major roll-up of 11 Russian spies-cum-suburbanites involves the relatively rare use of the criminal code that requires agents of foreign powers to register with the U.S. Justice Department – a provision that allows prosecution of covert foreign operatives working without diplomatic immunity.

By 2010, when people were swept up under the act, they were working for hostile governments, as was the case with Robert Cabelly, a former State Department official under George H.W. Bush and Clinton who worked for Sudan, and Frank Duran, a Venezuelan national who worked for Hugo Chávez.

By 2019, when the leftist Foreign Policy declared that the Act "is broken," it also noted that its purpose, when enacted in 1938, was to combat fascist propaganda and that, since then, it was a "previously obscure piece of legislation." The same publication noted that it was Mueller who revitalized it to go after Trump allies.

Just to remind you of the uneven application of this law, the DOJ, which has long been a leftist swamp, ignored it entirely when Tony Podesta represented a bank that was tied to Russian spying agencies.

Two: Given that FARA was meant to protect against people sneakily representing enemies of the United States, it's telling that, in Barrack's case, the DOJ brought the charge against someone working with the United Arab Emirates. The UAE not only has a friendly relationship with America but is also completely dedicated to the Abraham Accords with Israel. It seems likely that the Biden administration is sending a "back off" message to anyone who gets too friendly with a nation the left wants to destroy. Certainly, MSNBC wants everyone to understand that any Mideast nation friendly with Trump is a Biden enemy.

Three: The trend across Democrat-run cities and states across America is to do away with bail. After all, no one would expect a repeat violent offender, released without bail, to commit another violent crime or make a run for it.

However, an elderly man with an ankle bracelet and a seized passport nevertheless must put up $250,000,000 in bail. You don't correct the age-old situation of having one law for the rich and one for the poor by relieving the poor of any obligations under the law and treating those rich people who aren't political allies as if every one of them is Jack the Ripper.

Four: What's happening to Barrack has nothing to do with law or justice. This represents the left's continued persecution of anybody who worked with Donald Trump. The clear intent is to make sure that everyone gets the message that, if Trump runs again, whether he wins or loses, those who work with him will be completely destroyed — not just shunned and barred from the "right" parties, but ground into dust.

The peaceful, constitutional transition of power in America cannot include hunting down every ally of the previous administration and destroying those people. But if it does — if that's what the Democrats have set as the new standard — game theory says we win by doing this twice as hard (and on much better evidence) when Republicans gain power from the corrupt, feckless Democrats.

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
when Republicans gain power from the corrupt, feckless Democrats.

May that time come soon.

quote:

Originally posted by vthoky:

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
when Republicans gain power from the corrupt, feckless Democrats.

May that time come soon.

”Republicans” hmmm… need to be more specific.

We have wolves in sheep’s clothing within the Republican Party.
How many Republicans are truly Democrat implants?

Georgia’s Raffensperger, Sterling and Fuchs All Connected to Firm that Helps Georgia Democrats Run as Republicans

Link

Joey D
7/26/21

No description provided

https://www.theepochtimes.com/...cursion_3920814.html

Every Member of Pelosi’s Jan. 6 Select Committee Voted to Impeach Trump, Most Said he Incited Capitol Incursion

BY MARK TAPSCOTT
July 27, 2021 Updated: July 27, 2021
biggersmaller Print

News Analysis

When Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) announced Democrats to serve on her Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol on July 1, she told a news conference that the panel’s purpose was “to seek and to find the truth. We want to do so in the most patriotic and nonpartisan way, so the American people have confidence in the results.”

After Pelosi rejected two of House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s five Republican picks to serve on the select committee, whose first hearing was on July 27, he claimed “this panel has lost all legitimacy and credibility.”

Pelosi accused Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio and Rep. Jim Banks of Indiana of “statements and actions” that would undermine “the integrity of the investigation,” presumably including their votes against creating the committee.

In response, Jordan and Banks accused Pelosi of rejecting them because she knew they would demand answers to why the U.S. Capitol Police, who are under her control, were not prepared for the Jan. 6 breach of the Capitol despite being warned days ahead of time that trouble was brewing.

McCarthy withdrew all five of his nominees, so Pelosi added Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) as the second and last member of the panel, joining Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.). Both Cheney and Kinzinger voted to impeach Trump following the riot.

All of the seven Democrats on the select committee also voted to impeach Trump a week after the Jan. 6 breach and to hold him responsible for the day’s events.

That vote was the second to impeach Trump for several of the panel members, including the chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.). Thompson also sued Trump after the Capitol incursion, claiming he incited it.

Other select committee Democrats are Rep. Elaine Luria of Virginia, Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, Rep. Stephanie Murphy of Florida, Rep. Pete Aquilar of California, Rep. Adam Schiff of California, and Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California.

Raskin was a member of the House Impeachment Team that presented the case to the Senate for Trump’s responsibility for the riot and helped draft the impeachment articles that were approved by 222 House Democrats and 10 Republicans.

Schiff as chairman of the House Select Committee on Intelligence was leader of the first impeachment campaign against Trump, based on accusations that the chief executive had abused his powers in making U.S. aid to Ukraine contingent upon that country providing negative information about then-former Vice-President Joe Biden.

Schiff also famously claimed to have viewed “direct evidence” that Trump had conspired with Russians to steal the 2016 election from Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. Schiff has never provided or described any such evidence despite repeatedly claiming to have seen it.

Shortly after casting his vote to impeach Trump, Aquilar issued a statement saying, “when the President sent a mob to the Capitol, radicalized by his lies about the results of a free and fair election, to stop the counting of electoral votes he made it clear that he poses a grave threat to our democracy.”

Lofgren, voted to impeach Trump in 2019 and told the House she would support the second Trump impeachment because “the President incited right-wing terrorists to attack the Congress to try to overturn constitutional government.”

Similarly, Murphy, who voted to impeach in 2019, defended her second impeachment vote against Trump, saying “the mob was incited by the President.”

With such a makeup of Pelosi’s select committee, two attorneys defending individuals arrested in connection with the Jan. 6 incursion told The Epoch Times July 26 in a statement that the panel will damage the ability of the more than 500 facing charges to get fair trials.

“These hearings are not an objective search for truth, but rather a deliberate attempt by Nancy Pelosi’s House of Representatives to thwart the judicial process by creating subjective evidence for the Department of Justice to use during January 6th criminal trials and to continue poisoning jury pools beyond repair,” attorneys Joseph McBride and Steven A. Metcalf said.

And Pelosi's Puppet, Kevin McCarthy, wont lift a finger to punish Cheney or Kinzinger. He's too busy yelling "Cuba Libre!!!!" with the rest of the useless republican party.

Twitter Suspends All Election Audit ‘War Room’ Accounts; Senator Wendy Rogers Predicts She Will Be Next.
Link

Arizona Audit Twitter Accounts Removed By Big Tech
Link

Hmmm… Arizona papers audit was scheduled to be completed today.

CDC issues new mask guidelines.
All vaccinated need to put mask back on.
Link

DOJ says it’s legal to mandate vaccines.
Link

Pelosi spins up Jan. 6th sham investigation, adding RINO’s that voted to impeach President Trump.
Link

President Joe Biden on Tuesday warned that a significant cyber attack on the United States could lead to "a real shooting war" with a major power, comments that highlight what Washington sees as growing threats posed by Russia and China.
Link

So much happening, almost as if they are trying to provide distractive cover from audit results, don’t ya think.

interesting events

so essentially the fascists operating our 'government' has decreed that its alright to force an experimental vaccine on people

whats next, forced sterilization? forced organ harvesting?

as for that arrogant cocksucker Biden saying that the non-vaccinated are stupid, if he wants to see stupid, he should look in the mirror

when is the revolution going to start - we need to stop this bullshit and take our country back

The audits must have some validity of fraud. If Biden had won fair and square the weight of the Federal government would not be brought forward as a threat.


Department of Justice Warns States Against Violating Federal Law With Audits

https://www.theepochtimes.com/...JUIlI4OmAd2jk2oDufqG

Department of Justice officials on Wednesday alerted states that they’re tracking closely the 2020 election audit taking place in Arizona and proposed audits in several other states.

The new guidance document summarizes the Biden administration’s position on federal law concerning audits, deeming the round of reviews either done, being done, or proposed “unusual” and “exceedingly rare” while highlighting that federal law imposes constraints under which counties and states must comply.

The laws include the Civil Rights Act of 1960, which mandates the retention of election records for 22 months after a federal election, and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which outlines that no person “shall intimidate, threaten, or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any person for voting or attempting to vote, or intimidate, threaten, or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any person for urging or aiding any person to vote or attempt to vote.”

The former, for instance, makes it the duty of election officials to maintain the security and integrity of the records and safeguard their chain of custody, “so that a complete and uncompromised record of federal elections can be reliably accessed and used in federal law enforcement matters,” the document states.

“Where election records leave the control of elections officials, the systems for maintaining the security, integrity, and chain of custody of those records can easily be broken. Moreover, where elections records are no longer under the control of elections officials, this can lead to a significant risk of the records being lost, stolen, altered, compromised, or destroyed. This risk is exacerbated if the election records are given to private actors who have neither experience nor expertise in handling such records and who are unfamiliar with the obligations imposed by federal law,” it adds, in a clear reference to the audit being done in Maricopa County, Arizona.

The GOP-controlled Arizona Senate last year ordered the audit, tapping Florida-based Cyber Ninjas, which has no election audit experience.

Violators of the Civil Rights Act face fines of up to $1,000 and a jail sentence of up to one year for each violation.

“The reason we’re issuing this as guidance is to tell jurisdictions, generally, that we are concerned that if they’re going to conduct these audits, so-called audits of the past election, they have to comply with federal law, and warning them that they can’t conduct these audits in a way that is going to intimidate voters,” a DOJ official told reporters in a call about the guidance.

“This document sets down a marker that says the Justice Department is concerned about this and we will be following this closely,” the official added.

Officials noted that Attorney General Merrick Garland last month said the DOJ would focus in part on scrutinizing audits to make sure they comply with federal laws.

Arizona Senate President Karen Fann, who ordered the audit, told The Epoch Times at the time that “Democrats have been trying every avenue they can to stop or discredit this audit.”

“I’m sure this will be one of many avenues they will pursue post audit as well,” Fann, who did not reply to questions on Wednesday, wrote in an email.

Arizona’s attorney general, Republican Mark Brnovich, warned Garland in June that his office would “not tolerate” any attempt to thwart the audit, which is widely opposed by Democrats, including Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs.

Maricopa County agreed to lease new machines from Dominion Voting Systems after Hobbs said the audit may have left them compromised and Pennsylvania’s top elections official decertified machines from Dominion in Fulton County after an elections assessment was done.

The Maricopa County effort is by far the largest post-election review in the nation. Auditors hand tallied the ballots cast last year—nearly 2.1 million, according to county officials—and examined hundreds of machines used to count votes.

Auditors are expected to complete their physical work this week. A final report on what they found is expected to be released next month.

An initial plan to canvass households from which questionable votes were cast was put on hold after Pamela Karlan, a DOJ official, reached out to Fann to express concern about possible voter intimidation. Cyber Ninjas CEO Doug Logan at a hearing this month recommended the canvass happen to clear up worries about some of the ballots auditors reviewed.

The Arizona audit has inspired lawmakers in other states. Pennsylvania Sen. Doug Mastriano, a Republican, recently initiated a review of the 2020 election three counties after visiting the audit, though two of the counties have signaled they will not cooperate. Legislators and election integrity groups in Georgia and Wisconsin are pursuing similar efforts.

quote:

Originally posted by nhtagmember:


when is the revolution going to start - we need to stop this bullshit and take our country back

What are you waiting for? Kick it off.