I thought walls didn't work?

quote:

The Washington DC lockdown has now expanded to include federal prisons.

Aren't prisons always on lockdown? I mean, that's kinda the point.

quote:

Originally posted by feersum dreadnaught:
The Washington DC lockdown has now expanded to include federal prisons.

https://apnews.com/article/bid...b848987f44083c7b3443

WTF? I’ve lost track of exactly what the threat is purported to be at this point.

This show is designed to demonize and marginalize Trump supporters in the court of public opinion.



.

We are on heightened, extra security patrols and police rounds (assuming we are paying for them). I'm 25+ mi outside the city.

from CTH

Where was all this when Antifa was burning cities?

I just don’t see that this is all being setup for Joe’s mostly all virtual inauguration.
All I see is BLM/Antifa showing up and would not expect them to turn out in large numbers.

Alternate of course is that this Voter Fraud scheme is going to come to an end.
In that instance I would expect a large number of BLM/Antifa to show up.
In the latter case these security measures seem appropriate.

quote:

Originally posted by benny6:
Where was all this when Antifa was burning cities?

Their burning cities was justified according to the Democrats.

Imagine a tourist from a foreign country now visiting DC. Sends a message. In third world countries it often signals that the incoming administration is not welcome by the populace. I do not see any Abrams tanks, they have a way of tearing up the streets.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
from CTH

I guess weapons of war Are ok on America’s streets.

The optics of this are absolutely terrible. How do you think this looks to the rest of the world? What fucking kind of example is this? Neither the right nor the left benefit from this bullshit. It’s 100% fucking pathetic and disgusting. This is not who we are and we know it. We are better than this. Being sworn in before a sea of troops not American.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:

(Image)

from CTH

Absurd.

This is what you get under Democrat control. You may not like it, but it is because of their actions.

This is 100 percent on them.

quote:

Originally posted by jljones:
This is what you get under Democrat control. You may not like it, but it is because of their actions.

This is 100 percent on them.

I agree, but I don't think the rest of the World will see it that way.

flashguy

...Time to be positive, this story isn’t over yet.

quote:

Originally posted by stickman428:
Being sworn in before a sea of troops not American.

From the Political Memes thread: this pic

https://www.breitbart.com/law-...-biden-inauguration/

“The Defense Department has agreed to provide up to 25,000 service members to support the Presidential Inauguration National Special Security Event federal law enforcement mission and security preparations, as led by the U.S. Secret Service,” the National Guard said in a statement.

The statement said the Army and the National Guard are “working on a sourcing solution” to support the request, and that every state, territory, and the District of Columbia will have National Guardsmen supporting the inauguration.

At least 7,000 National Guardsmen are already in D.C. now from at least 13 states: D.C., Arizona, Colorado, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington.

The Secret Service, Capitol Police, and U.S. Park Police requested support from the National Guard, according to the latter entity. The Secret Service is the lead federal agency coordinating security for the inauguration on January 20. Since D.C. is not a state, the civilian leadership of the Army and the Pentagon, versus a state governor, must approve such requests.

quote:

Originally posted by Czechvar:
...Time to be positive, this story isn’t over yet.

My wife just said those troops will come in really handy for President Trump's inauguration. . .


And yes, I believe we can still pull this off.

quote:

Originally posted by goose5:
I asked the question on page 663. Who are you listening to? Where do you get your information? Well I've been monitoring this thread since that page. The following is the the list of links provided.

1. Youtube.
2. Citizen Free Press.
3. Michigan Local News.
4. Forbes.
5. The Epoch Times.
6. Defenceone.com.
7. Kunstler.com.
8. Twitter.
9. Natural News.
10 100percentfedup.com.
11. Antrimmichigan Forensics.
12. New American.
13. AP.
14. We the People Daily.

It really seems to me many here are wildly searching for anything that supports what they already believe. Only two are news sources are on this list that have any history. So, I've concluded the problem is not the sites on the internet. Or where people get their information. People are predisposed to believe what they believe, and they tend to search the information available to support that belief. This is why both sides tend to call balls and strikes against the other side only. The real solution is a majority of people calling balls and strikes on both sides. And, I don't see that happening anytime soon from what I've observed here. So, have fun running amok. You're not doing this board any favors by doing so. I'm sure you'll feel better when you're done.

Thanks for sharing your Rorschach test with us. You flunked.

I look at over a thousand different sites, blogs and streams and pick my sources based on clarity, coverage, original source links and other criteria.

Since you are so sure what sites have “any history,” do tell. Which sites or sources meet your approval? MSNBC? New York Times? Washington Post? Salon? Seriously, what meets your superior approval?

Oh, and while you are making that list, please link to one of your sites that shows the clarity, the comprehensiveness, and the direct links to court documents found at 100percentfedup.

In reality, there is a virtual news blackout about the proven cheating and crooked machines being used in the election and a court proceeding showing it.

The truth is, we must find information from where we can. It is not as though we can now rely on traditional media or even talking heads to tell us what is truly going on.

Our founders had the same problem in the founding era. Samuel Adams came up with the solution to such misinformation - what he called the “trained mob” or the Seditious Committees of Correspondence. These non-traditional Committees/sources, with no “history,” ultimately became standing committees in Virginia’s House of Burgesses and in every colony.

Finding non-traditional sources is to be expected where media sources stop reporting the news to substitute opinion spin and black-out in its place. Our normal news sources have been stuck on the spin cycle for quite some time. Don’t you agree?

We have a history of citing a source to help other members here gauge the veracity of a claim or to help them find more information. You are your only source for your anorexic claim. Enough said. You embarrassed yourself.

You also, in your highness, said the solution was using a detached calling of balls and strikes - something you entirely failed to do. So, pony up. As one member pointed out, you did not make a single evaluation of the substance of any of the claims you tried to batch erase.

You seem to have only told us of your prejudices, otherwise void of any other content. So here’s your chance, oh bright one. Display your superiority for all to see. Answer the questions posed and tell us your approved sources, showing their careful, in-depth reporting on the Michigan litigation, for instance. Yea. I didn’t think so.

When information cannot be conveyed through normal means, the truth will find a way. If that’s through non-traditional sources/means, so be it.

I see pictures of places with curfews etc and have a real desire to fly there and start walking around...