quote:

Originally posted by PrinceAliFabulousHe:
I'm going to be honest.

Oh?

quote:

I had semi forgotten about this and then I decided to log on here tonight where I found this post.

Horse shit

Mexican President Stands With Trump – Calls For War


https://wethepeopledaily.com/2...FK_VVmuDQs7DabmsxUkA



For years, countless Americans, including lawmakers and the president, have raised the alarm about social media censorship. Many conservatives, especially popular thought leaders, found their accounts secret throttled, blocked from search results, or outright shut down. Yet despite these calls, Congress refused to take action, such as revoking these companies’ Section 230 immunity.

Finally, last week, Twitter and other social sites shut down Donald Trump’s accounts on vague and unprovable charges. We heard little from our own lawmakers (who, ironically, are just as vulnerable to censorship). But around the world, leaders from foreign nations were expressing outrage.

Now, the president of Mexico is taking unprecedented steps to confront big tech.

Left-wing Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador reportedly vowed to take on tech companies on Thursday in response to the bans that President Donald Trump has faced on social media.

“I can tell you that at the first G20 meeting we have, I am going to make a proposal on this issue,” López Obrador said. “Yes, social media should not be used to incite violence and all that, but this cannot be used as a pretext to suspend freedom of expression.”

“How can a company act as if it was all powerful, omnipotent, as a sort of Spanish Inquisition on what is expressed?” López Obrador asked…

López Obrador’s Foreign Relations Secretary Marcelo Ebrard said that Mexico has already started the work of getting other nations involved in the effort, including “officials in France, Germany, the European Union, Africa, Latin America and Southeast Asia,” The Associated Press reported. [Source: Daily Wire]

Isn’t that interesting? Congress has refused to do anything to confront or rein in social media. But the President of Mexico is forming an alliance of numerous countries to address this growing issue.

Obrador condemned the actions of sites like Twitter and Facebook, calling it “a sort of Spanish Inquisition.” He said what many already believe, that social networks can’t us accusations of inciting violence as a “pretext to suspend freedom of expression.”

Funny, this should be something American leaders are saying. Instead, our lawmakers waste time on a bogus impeachment, harping on a false narrative to shame and disgrace an outgoing president. Everything our leaders are doing prove they are on the side of big tech, who abuses its power to silence and crush anyone they do not like.

It might take the actions of leaders from Mexico, France, Germany and beyond to finally end the scourge of online censorship. These nations, some from Europe, Africa, South America, and Asia, appear to value free speech more than Congress.

Hopefully they will be able to do what our government refused, to the great shame of our crooked lawmakers.



.

Again sorry if this has been posted before if not here is some of what looks like a document dump of some of the government files. Enjoy and God Bless !!!

https://linktr.ee/kagbabe?fbcl...LKj1-jSF_8KtFNZg7Zi4

I asked the question on page 663. Who are you listening to? Where do you get your information? Well I've been monitoring this thread since that page. The following is the the list of links provided.

1. Youtube.
2. Citizen Free Press.
3. Michigan Local News.
4. Forbes.
5. The Epoch Times.
6. Defenceone.com.
7. Kunstler.com.
8. Twitter.
9. Natural News.
10 100percentfedup.com.
11. Antrimmichigan Forensics.
12. New American.
13. AP.
14. We the People Daily.

It really seems to me many here are wildly searching for anything that supports what they already believe. Only two are news sources are on this list that have any history. So, I've concluded the problem is not the sites on the internet. Or where people get their information. People are predisposed to believe what they believe, and they tend to search the information available to support that belief. This is why both sides tend to call balls and strikes against the other side only. The real solution is a majority of people calling balls and strikes on both sides. And, I don't see that happening anytime soon from what I've observed here. So, have fun running amok. You're not doing this board any favors by doing so. I'm sure you'll feel better when you're done.

Is there anything you'd like to add?

Just a little recap of what happens to left wing rioters.

https://www.theguardian.com/us...ests-charges-dropped


Trump inauguration protests: charges dropped against last 39 activists
This article is more than 2 years old
US government’s motion to dismiss final charges comes 18 months after more than 200 people were arrested

The US government is dropping charges against the last 39 people accused of participating in a violent protest on the day of Donald Trump’s inauguration.

Friday’s motion to dismiss charges seemingly ends an 18-month saga that started with the justice department attempting to convict more than 190 people.

That effort saw the government facing off against an intensely coordinated grassroots political opposition network that made Washington the focus of a nationwide support campaign offering free lodging for defendants, legal coordination and other support.

Two group trials ended in defeats for the US attorney’s office, which was hindered by the fact that most protesters wore similar black clothing and covered their faces.

The first trial ended with acquittals for all six defendants. A second trial for four people in May ended in acquittals on most charges and a hung jury on the rest. After that defeat, the government dropped charges against 129 defendants, saying prosecutors would focus on the defendants against whom they had the strongest evidence.

More than 200 people were arrested after the protest, during which several store windows were broken and a parked limousine set ablaze.

“This is huge news,” said Dylan Petrohilos, a Washington-based activist who was one of the original defendants but had his charges dropped earlier this year. “The solidarity we showed as defendants won out.”

Activists credited a unified defense strategy with prevailing. This strategy included persuading defendants, sometimes over the objections of their lawyers, not to accept plea bargains.

“Solidarity was what won the case,” said Sam Menefee-Libey, a member of the DC Legal Posse activist collective. “I hope that organizers and people on the left study it.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.c...dropped-charges-aga/

Mike Lindell brings note to WH… It ain’t over til it’s over.
This looks very positive for us.

quote:

Originally posted by kimber1911:
Mike Lindell brings note to WH… It ain’t over til it’s over.
This looks very positive for us.

I'll welcome any good news at this point but what does Mike Lindell have to do with this other than I know he is a friend to the President but why would he be involved in things dealing with national security? The note he is showing is rather disjointed and I don't see what can really be taken from it.

Pure speculation on my part.
Mike Lindell sells pillows, but more than that he is a marketing guy.
It may be possible that there is material which needs to be put together to show the public a story of what happened.
I think Mr. Lindell is there for his marketing skills.

quote:

Originally posted by lastmanstanding:

quote:

Originally posted by kimber1911:
Mike Lindell brings note to WH… It ain’t over til it’s over.
This looks very positive for us.

I'll welcome any good news at this point but what does Mike Lindell have to do with this other than I know he is a friend to the President but why would he be involved in things dealing with national security? The note he is showing is rather disjointed and I don't see what can really be taken from it.

You don’t get it. Clearly the way to save the republic is for us all to get a better night sleep. But unfortunately that pic of Lindell is photoshopped. He doesn’t even have a blue silk shirt. Duh.

quote:

Originally posted by frayedends:
He doesn’t even have a blue silk shirt. Duh.

OK, I am missing your point.
Please explained the blue silk shirt.

quote:

Originally posted by kimber1911:

quote:

Originally posted by frayedends:
He doesn’t even have a blue silk shirt. Duh.

OK, I am missing your point.
Please explained the blue silk shirt.

He has the same shirt in every my pillow ad. So that’s not him.

The establishment is the real enemy of Trumpism and , at the end of the day, the Republican party is a cuckold to the establishment...has been for decades. Trump voters are probably on their own. The Republican party will cling to the establishment even as the establishment steers us to globalism and socialism. Make no mistake, the cucks in the Republican party feel we have no choice but to embrace their tepid opposition.

quote:

Originally posted by frayedends:

quote:

Originally posted by lastmanstanding:

quote:

Originally posted by kimber1911:
Mike Lindell brings note to WH… It ain’t over til it’s over.
This looks very positive for us.

I'll welcome any good news at this point but what does Mike Lindell have to do with this other than I know he is a friend to the President but why would he be involved in things dealing with national security? The note he is showing is rather disjointed and I don't see what can really be taken from it.

You don’t get it. Clearly the way to save the republic is for us all to get a better night sleep. But unfortunately that pic of Lindell is photoshopped. He doesn’t even have a blue silk shirt. Duh.

Maybe he's a CIA spook. As long as he isn't behind my medicine cabinet when I open the door in the morning I'm carrying under my bath robe. Things could get ugly!

quote:

Originally posted by goose5:
I asked the question on page 663. Who are you listening to?...

14. We The People -

Are you saying this article is false? Did the President of Mexico not make this statement?

You are impugning sources instead of criticizing the substance. That is a Leftist tactic, without substance and void of honest dissent.





.
.

Not sure why they need 25,000 troops in D.C. for Biden’s inauguration.
Seems a bit excessive when all 12 Biden supporters will be sitting within their designated circles.

quote:

Originally posted by kimber1911:
Not sure why they need 25,000 troops in D.C. for Biden’s inauguration.
Seems a bit excessive when all 12 Biden supporters will be sitting within their designated circles.

It’s not for Biden.

It’s a message to us Trump supporters to NEVER gather again.

Fuck them

Yeah, they are terrified the actual voters of this country are going to decide to take the government back.

quote:

Originally posted by goose5:
I asked the question on page 663. Who are you listening to? Where do you get your information? Well I've been monitoring this thread since that page. The following is the the list of links provided.

Umm, your sample size to justify this consists of posts over a timespan of less than 24 hours? Hmm...