Link to original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...Ts&feature=emb_title

This message has been edited. Last edited by: EZ_B,

8. Talk about having to physically remove Trump from office 6 months before the election.

I love our President, go get 'em!

Now if only his staff can hook up a monitor so he can show graphics digitally versus holding up a poster. Are the WH personnel really that inept at supporting a presentation?

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
...
...

- "setting the stage" so the sequence "seemed reasonable" to much of the public

"reasonable" because of covered tracks, anonymity, plausible deniability, news media ignoring the obvious and, most importantly, a political opponent so horrible that anything goes in defeating him, not just fair game, righteous.

quote:

Originally posted by EZ_B:
Link to original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...Kk&feature=emb_title

Wow! The Prez is pulling no punches! Love it!


...

The last minute of Mr. Trump's speech that EZ_B posted for us says it all.

quote:

Originally posted by rat2306:
The last minute of Mr. Trump's speech that EZ_B posted for us says it all.

Agree. Wish there was a shorter version that could go viral. He did fantastic. Most people won't watch the full thing though.

I was sent this by someone in my office - and hadn't seen it before...

https://www.glennbeck.com/radi...ikes-in-pennsylvania

I'm having trouble getting the speech using the link provided. I wonder if it has been taken down?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...Kk&feature=emb_title

I'm watching the live coverage with Giuliani in Mich. I can't understand the witness's statement because she is wearing a mask. What a shame. I bet I'm not alone.

The YT video posted by EZ_B is still on. I don't know what you guys are looking at.

I'm still getting the video posted just above. The link to Youtube worked about 45 minutes ago but it doesn't work now.

I put my nanner hooks on the President's video.
I will get it posted and have a link in my profile and reply to this thread.

I figured it would get nooked.

The link is next to the "Homepage URL:" in my user profile.

EZ-B's imbed is working fine, and that link, but clicking onto Gene's will not connect. I think it was up to 500K views.

quote:

Originally posted by Gene Hillman:
I'm still getting the video posted just above. The link to Youtube worked about 45 minutes ago but it doesn't work now.

EZ_B's original link actually forwards to this URL: "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFzTuaVS8Kk&feature=emb_title" (Click on link or remove quotes to copy-and-paste.)

quote:

Originally posted by lastmanstanding:
Here is the link to the declaration mentioned in the above article by Andrea Widburg.
Link

American Thinker is not one of the sites that get out over their skis very often if at all. I only hope it's true that we had white hat patriots in the right place at the right time that are now willing to do the right thing.

I'm not familiar with the author but right off the bat there seem to be problems. I read the declaration, though there were a few of the linked screenshots that were not high enough resolution to enlarge enough to actually read. Though that was only a couple of them and I doubt would make much difference overall.

In the first paragraph she (Andrea Widburg) refers to "a November 25 declaration from an active-duty military analyst was made public today,". The 2nd bullet point in the actual declaration mentioned he "was" an analyst with the military. That doesn't rule out the person that wrote the declaration being active duty, but nothing in it mentions being active duty. Seems like an important distinction. And if Andrea gets something so basic as that wrong, what are we to make of the rest? It's too bad the declaration writers name is blocked out, as the high level white hat stuff is a fairly small world with not many degrees of separation. If they are truly used by some of the top specialists in a niche field as claimed they're probably known. It would help establish some credentials. Which leads to what they go on to describe isn't even "hacking". With one possible exception.

With 20+ years of involvement in network security issues his declaration really isn't much. For the non technically or network security inclined it basically boils down to 2 things.

1. "I drove by the UPS office and saw something I believe looks suspicious. Also, I discovered UPS has offices and financial relationships in other countries I believe are suspicious".

I just used UPS as a placeholder name, be could FedEx, Macy's, Bass Pro, or anything. But there is no evidence of any wrong doing in that declaration. It's just the writer saying here is some stuff I find to be suspicious.

2. The passwords he mentions in "7." is something different. Those can be discovered through common OSINT techniques by just looking at the common trackers of data breaches. I suspect that's what was done, and then just following up in the usual ways like searching pastebin dumps. I only mention this separately as the other primary way to obtain this sort of thing does involve actual hacking. But as the writer never mentions anything (hacking) of the sort I suspect it's just outdated info from pw dumps that's easily available publicly.

In the end, nothing in that declaration is evidence of any wrong doing. And for any international business isn't even very suspicious. That doesn't mean there hasn't been wrongdoing of some sort, but nothing in that declaration shows that there was. Also, the claim by Andrea Widberg that "The declaration has specific evidence showing that, on November 8, 2020, Dominionvotingsystems.com, which is Dominion Voting Systems' proprietary URL, was connected over the internet to Belgrade, Iran, China — and to "the Indivisible (formerly ACORN) political group for Obama."" is completely untrue. There is nothing in the linked declaration that shows that. Though I do believe Andrea when she says "In the spirit of complete honesty, the declaration is almost completely unintelligible to me."

Right now, 12/2 1730 PST, I’m watching the Right Side Broadcasting channel on YouTube.
Giuliani and a number of eyewitnesses are testifying before a panel of the Michigan legislature what they saw in Detroit on election night. It’s very compelling when you hear how the GOP poll watchers were treated, how the Dems ganged up on them, and what they saw. Who knows what the numbers were, but the process was clearly biased, i.e. it stank.
One witness is a woman with IT expertise, naturalized citizen from India, who stepped up to testify because she was shocked at what she heard. Another is a young man, perhaps Hispanic, who also talked about the corrupt process.
The testimony gets into the weeds, but it’s important for me and my wife to hear them.

While I’m writing, I’ll note that Breitbart has a big post up about Lin Wood, saying he’s a democrat and he’s fooling Republicans in Georgia into not voting in order to get a double Dem win.
Link

There is a lot posted here, so maybe I missed it.

Has anyone from the Media (Biden campaign) addressed the fractional voting totals ?

Seems like the elephant in the room, surely it has been addressed.

quote:

Originally posted by Arty:
https://www.foxnews.com/politi...ng-out-of-state-dead

"Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger has launched investigations into several groups, including one founded by former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, for seeking to “aggressively” register “ineligible, out-of-state, or deceased voters” before the state’s Jan. 5 Senate runoff elections.
Raffensperger’s office on Wednesday said the investigations are into groups including America Votes, Vote Forward and The New Georgia Project — which was founded by Abrams and previously chaired by Democratic Senate candidate Raphael Warnock."

Not hard to fix. Investigations need to proceed full speed ahead, and legislature needs to enact a law that only those on record as having voted in 2020 can vote in the runoff.

Link to original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...mw&feature=emb_title