That GA news is huge!!!

Only three Democrats have ever won the presidency without winning Ohio: Grover Cleveland in 1884/1892, Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1944, and John F. Kennedy in 1960 (though that election was also stolen).

Now add in also losing Florida. Florida has only backed the losing candidate three times since 1928, one of those being the stolen election in 1960.

I’m not worried. They started this. It’s too big to hide. We’re not in tin foil hat territory anymore. It’s going to be a great week.

quote:

Originally posted by icom706:
YES... Go kick Snuffogoplasses ASS on TV.

Gov. Noem!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




Link to original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvfZI4umWqQ

^^That was probably one of the very best responses I've seen, particularly in the last couple days. Despite George Shill-o'nopolis's best efforts, Gov. Noem was steady, levelheaded, and with resolve.

Jeez getting tired of people saying 'there's no evidence.'

Now it's 'there's no widespread evidence'

Probably in the next week they'll attempt 'well, the fraud wasn't enough to change the outcome...'

But are any of us suprised...a little trip down memory lane...




Link to original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x12JrcyqT0c

$.02 Worth.

Boss

Researchers Question Reliability of Dominion Voting Systems, Election Systems & Software

https://www.breitbart.com/poli...on-systems-software/

Researchers have questioned the reliability of new voting machines that state and local officials have rushed to implement at their polling locations ahead of the 2020 presidential election.

“Some of the most popular ballot-marking machines, made by Election Systems & Software and Dominion Voting Systems, register votes in bar codes that the human eye cannot decipher,” according to a February report by Associated Press.

But according to researchers, that’s a problem, as “voters could end up with printouts that accurately spell out the names of the candidates they picked, but, because of a hack, the bar codes do not reflect those choices.”

“Because the bar codes are what’s tabulated, voters would never know that their ballots benefited another candidate,” the report adds.

State and local officials had reportedly rushed to replace old voting systems with the new software ahead of the 2020 presidential election out of fear of “unreliable electronic voting machines” in the wake of so-called “Russia’s interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential race.”

But instead of using hand-marked paper ballots — which are most resistant to tampering due to the fact that paper cannot be hacked — many have opted out for technology that computer security experts believe to be nearly as risky as the older electronic systems.

Election Systems & Software disagrees, insisting that the security and accuracy of the company’s ballot-marking machines “have been proven through thousands of hours of testing and tens of thousands of successful elections,” according to a company spokesperson, Katina Granger.

Nonetheless, critics see the machines as vulnerable to hacking and noted that tinkerers at last year’s DefCon hacker convention in Las Vegas were able to “hack two older ballot-marking devices” in less than eight hours.

“There are a huge number of reasons to reject today’s ballot-marking devices — except for limited use as assistive devices for those unable to mark a paper ballot themselves,” said Doug Jones, a University of Iowa computer scientist.

The report added that Jones is one of many experts who believe that today’s ballot-marking machines undermine the concept of keeping a paper record that can be used in audits and recounts.

Several counties in both Michigan and Georgia have reported encountering what election officials described as a “glitch” involving their voting machines during the 2020 presidential election.

Dominion Voting Systems election software was implemented in all of Georgia’s counties for the first time this year.

“Georgia’s new electronic voting system is vulnerable to cyberattacks that could undermine public confidence, create chaos at the polls or even manipulate the results on Election Day,” reported the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC) in October.

The report added that computer scientists, voting-rights activists, U.S. intelligence agencies and a federal judge have continuously warned of security deficiencies in Georgia’s system, but state officials have dismissed their concerns.

An investigation by AJC also determined that Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s office weakened the system’s defenses by disabling password protections on a key component that controls who is allowed to vote.

The report continued:

Officials tell voters to verify their selections on a paper ballot before feeding it into an optical scanner. But the scanner doesn’t record the text that voters see; rather, it reads an unencrypted quick response, or QR, barcode that is indecipherable to the human eye. Either by tampering with individual voting machines or by infiltrating the state’s central elections server, hackers could systematically alter the barcodes to change votes.

Such a manipulation could not be detected without an audit after the election.

The new voting system “presents serious security vulnerability and operational issues” caused by “fundamental deficits and exposure,” U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg wrote in a recent order, in which she criticized state officials for not taking the problems more seriously.

“These risks,” Totenberg wrote, “are neither hypothetical nor remote under the current circumstances.”

The report added that Texas rejected Dominion Voting Systems, saying its inspectors encountered “multiple hardware issues” and could not certify that it was “safe from fraudulent or unauthorized manipulation.”

Dominion disagrees with these findings, stating that multiple large local governments across the country — such Cook County, Illinois, which includes Chicago, and San Francisco and San Diego counties in California — have purchased their system.

U.S. intelligence agencies, however, have warned that such systems can be targets of foreign governments trying to disrupt elections.

Dead voters. Biden van full of ballots. Trump legal team details shock Nevada claims

https://www.washingtonexaminer...-shock-nevada-claims



NORTH LAS VEGAS, Nevada — President Trump's Nevada legal team beefed up its legal challenge to mail-in ballot signature verification in the state with startling claims of voter and ballot fraud.

Among the allegations: dead voters, votes from thousands who no longer live in Nevada, and a van marked "Biden-Harris" full of opened mail-in ballots.

Former Nevada Attorney General Adam Laxalt, who is helping Trump's legal effort in the state, detailed grievances that the campaign has with mail-in ballot signature verification in Clark County, Nevada, which accounts for the vast majority of voters in the state.

"We were told that signature verification will save all chances of fraud," Laxalt said in front of a crowd of around 50 pro-Trump protesters on Sunday.

Laxalt identified several complaints about the more than 600,000 mail-in votes cast in Nevada. Laxalt said about 200,000 of those were verified through a machine, and never by a human. He also charged that Clark County registrar of voters Joe Gloria set the factory setting on the machine to accept signatures with an only 40% match.

A federal judge on Friday blocked a Trump campaign attempt to stop the use of the machine that validated voter signatures on mail-in ballots.

Another 400,000 of those mail ballot signatures were verified by hand, but Laxalt said that the campaign is not able to view those.

"I am positive, if you all got to see those," Laxalt said, "you're going to see countless mismatches."

At the Sunday news conference, American Conservative Union Chairman Matt Schlapp joked that a small pug dog that someone had brought to the protest may have voted before he detailed the kind of eye-popping allegations that quickly spread on social media.

He noted two reports the Republican Party received of deceased people who "miraculously" cast ballots in the general election: Rosemarie Hartle and Fred Sokes Jr., both of whom died in 2017.

A woman who said she was a family friend of Hartle, Marianne Rombola, spoke out about the fraudulent vote.

"It is heartbreaking what is happening in America, and for this family to be exploited, or anybody who has faced a tragedy in losing somebody and their vote has been counted as a person — this is just not America," Rombola said. "These things need to be heard and taken care of."

Schlapp mentioned one whistleblower who worked in a ballot counting center and signed an affidavit alleging that a supervisor instructed the person to process mail-in ballots despite concerns about whether the signature matched the name on the envelope.

Schlapp said that another whistleblower from a ballot counting center, while taking a walk around the counting center on his lunch hour, “noticed a van pulled up at the center marked Biden-Harris.”

“The doors of the van were open, ballots were clearly visible, ballots were open with letter openers, and ballots were filled in and resealed in envelopes,” Schlapp said. “These people who were involved in this activity then decided to create a human shield around what they were doing in the van.”

Schlapp said that at least 9,000 people who moved out of state voted in Nevada’s election. Trump’s campaign previously sent to the Justice Department a list of more than 3,000 Nevada voters who, according to a national change of address database, no longer live in the state. Only an estimated third of people update their address in the database, so triple the number of voters on that list comes to about 9,000.

Laxalt dodged a question from the Washington Examiner about whether the Trump campaign's legal challenges, if successful, could tip Nevada to Trump's corner in the Electoral College. Apparent presidential election winner Joe Biden currently leads in the state by about 34,300 votes.

He expressed disappointment with what he said was the question he is "seeing out of the media now, which is, 'Have we produced enough illegal voters to overturn the election?'" He asserted: "That, of course, is an absurd question. Let’s first start covering the fraud and now acknowledge that there are illegal voters.”

“The way we resolve division, even when you don't get your way in an election, is to count every legal ballot," Schlapp said. "Make sure that we count every legal ballot, and make sure that illegal ballots do not reduce the civil rights and the votes of those who voted legally.”

It's going to be an interesting week.

Keep donating to DJT's fund if you are able (lawyer's ain't free) --

-----------------------------------------

Indeed...

I remember hearing on Rush that no R rand. has ever won the election w/o Ohio...and Trump killed it in Ohio!!!

One think Ive been wanting to look at in more detail is the minority voting comparisons between the four cities in the "swing states" the DemonRats are trying to steal...

Does anyone have stats to back this up (...Ruhs's report that Biden underperformed re PDJT across the nation except in Milwaukee, Detroit, Philly and Atl).

If true and significant...how can you argue that African-Americans in Columbus, OH, Cincinnati, Memphis, etc votes in a significantly different manner than the four cities in question...

Not proof but more just more overwhelming circumstantial evidence about the fraud perpetrated, and courts can hear circumstantial evidence in a trial or hearing. Once there is enough to show a pattern, no idea what legal standard applies to make it "proof".

This is far from over. Lots of good things to hang hope on this AM. I like that Sydney Powell is on Trump's legal team. I like the Doug Collins is on the job in GA. I like that report from gateway pundit about the 132k illegal ballots in GA...

I missed going to the "Stop the Steal" rally in Raleigh as I was out of town Sat but def going to try and go to any future rallies in NC.


PDJT: "The Art of the Deal"

DemonRats: "The Art of the Steal"

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
Just wondering, when was the last time a candidate lost the election when he won both Florida and Ohio? Hmmm...

Aaaaand ...... once again:
Opinion piece from The Wall Street Journal

=======================================

Libertarians Spoil the Election

By Walter E. Block

Did the Libertarian Party throw the election to Joe Biden? Maybe. At this writing nominee Jo Jorgensen’s vote total exceeds Mr. Biden’s margin over President Trump in Arizona, Georgia, Nevada and Pennsylvania, enough to change the outcome.

In 2000 the Green Party was accused of ruining things for the Democrats. Did Ralph Nader throw the election from Al Gore to George W. Bush? The cognoscenti are still divided, but the 2020 parallels are strong. Probably most Green voters would have gone Democratic if forced into a binary choice. Similarly, on the Libertarian-O-Meter, Mr. Trump scores much higher than Mr. Biden.

Yes, the Donald is a protectionist, and free trade is the preferred policy of those who favor economic and personal liberty. But when it comes to lowering taxes and easing regulations on business, the party of the elephant is far more closely aligned to the libertarian philosophy than that of the donkey. Mr. Trump has appointed conservatives to the Supreme Court, not libertarians like Randy Barnett, Clint Bolick, Jacob Huebert, Gregory Rome or Brandon Thibodeaux. But supporters of the freedom philosophy prefer judges who adhere to the U.S. Constitution over those who make things up as they go along.

In contrast, Mr. Biden is a puppet in the marionette hands of out-and-out socialists like Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Yes, there are some issues on which libertarians are closer to Democrats, such as Oregon’s decriminalization of heroin and cocaine. But these are few and far between.

The national Libertarian Party started in 1971, several state parties earlier. In 1969 I had the honor to run for the New York Assembly. My motto was “Disassemble the Assembly.” I didn’t win; I’m not sure my vote total reached triple digits. But I’ve been a staunch member of the party ever since.

In 2016 physician Donald Miller, historian Ralph Raico and I started a group called Libertarians for Trump. Our advice to libertarian voters was: If you live in Massachusetts or California, strong blue states, vote for Gary Johnson, the Libertarian nominee. The Republicans will lose big there, and your vote for the porcupine won’t help the donkey beat the elephant. Likewise in Louisiana or Alabama, where Mr. Trump was sure to win. But if you live in a purple state, don’t vote Libertarian. It is crucial that Donald beat Hillary!

I kick myself for not reinstituting this effort in 2019. My thought was that Gary Johnson, a former governor, was well-known and might manage 5% of the vote. He actually registered 3.27%, still more than three times the previous record of 1.06%, set by Ed Clark in 1980. I figured Ms. Jorgenson for 0.25%. She now looks on track to exceed Mr. Clark’s percentage slightly—and hand the presidency to Mr. Biden.

Pardon me while I beat my head against the wall. How could libertarians in purple states be so stupid?

Mr. Block is a professor of economics at Loyola University New Orleans.

LINK

quote:

Originally posted by Boss1:
Jeez getting tired of people saying 'there's no evidence.'

Now it's 'there's no widespread evidence'

Oh yeah, this has been the committee generated response by Democrat politicians, media, etc. I see it 100% by leftists on another gun forum. Show me the evidence"

This is the new "climate change" and "common sense gun control" commie phrase of the day.

The legal team of ANY case is not going publicly show all of their evidence in a case to the media and public. Number 2, they are still gathering all the evidence to be organized into a presentable manner. According to Rudy, they have thousands of examples.

How in the world did the dims hope to get way with this? Mindnumbing stupid criminals. Do we have enough jails?

No Cushy federal time, hard core state pens, General population would suit them fine.

quote:

Originally posted by sigfreund:

Did the Libertarian Party throw the election to Joe Biden? Maybe.

No, not even close. The cheating, democrat machine is what threw (stole) this election.

quote:

Originally posted by recoatlift:
How in the world did the dims hope to get way with this? Mindnumbing stupid criminals. Do we have enough jails?

Well, they still might. We'll all know what they did, but that won't matter to them. The end always justifies the means for the left. In fact, that's their entire creed.

I guess it’s part of re-education camps that all main stream media including Fox refer to Sleepy as President elect Biden. I’ll never get used to that.

quote:

Jeez getting tired of people saying 'there's no evidence.'

Now it's 'there's no widespread evidence'

Probably in the next week they'll attempt 'well, the fraud wasn't enough to change the outcome...'

That's always been how the left works: Deny it all, admit there's a little, admit there's more than a little, admit that there's a lot, then move on to the next topic in the same order.

quote:

I see it 100% by leftists on another gun forum. Show me the evidence"

I'm still waiting for them to show me the evidence of widespread Russian collusion.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:

quote:

Originally posted by sigfreund:

Did the Libertarian Party throw the election to Joe Biden? Maybe.

No, not even close. The cheating, democrat machine is what threw (stole) this election.

The WSJ "writer" is a fucking moron, no math skills or basic intelligence. Or just a lying scumbag. Take your pick.

There has ALWAYS been a libertarian candidate in presidential races. In all the races WSJ mentioned, Jorgensen won FAR less votes than Gary Johnson in 2016, not counting ex Republican Evan McMullen who also ran in 3 of the 4 states mentioned in 2016. And Trump won 3 of those states. In Georgia alone, Johnson received twice the amount of votes than Jorgensen.

This is the writer trying to deflect outright cheating as the main reason why Biden has "more votes" in these states.

Isn't it interesting how we had the listen to three years of accusations of election influence by the Russians, but now the media dosen't want to spend 3 minutes on voter fraud.

quote:

Originally posted by oddball:
The WSJ "writer" is a fucking moron, no math skills or basic intelligence. Or just a lying scumbag. Take your pick.

D. All of the above.

quote:

Originally posted by oddball:

quote:

Originally posted by Boss1:
Jeez getting tired of people saying 'there's no evidence.'

Now it's 'there's no widespread evidence'

Oh yeah, this has been the committee generated response by Democrat politicians, media, etc. I see it 100% by leftists on another gun forum. Show me the evidence"

This is the new "climate change" and "common sense gun control" commie phrase of the day.

The legal team of ANY case is not going publicly show all of their evidence in a case to the media and public. Number 2, they are still gathering all the evidence to be organized into a presentable manner. According to Rudy, they have thousands of examples.

This is one more reason we have to follow through on all of these. Even if they do not turn back the tide the amount of fraud has got to be documented so that some day we can actually get some movement on voter ID and such.

https://www.breitbart.com/news...us-election-decided/

TOKYO (AP) — Stock markets rocketed higher Monday after Pfizer said early data show its coronavirus vaccine is effective and investors breathed a sigh of relief after days of U.S. presidential limbo ended with Democrat Joe Biden declared the president-elect.

Markets were already sharply higher on the U.S. election result when Pfizer said that data shows vaccine shots may be 90% effective at preventing COVID-19, indicating the company is on track this month to file an emergency use application with U.S. regulators.

Any economic recovery depends on checking the pandemic, and investors pounced upon the news. Pfizer’s data is only preliminary and does not mean a vaccine is imminent. Getting the vaccine to billions of people will be a massive undertaking, even if it is approved.

Dow futures jumped 4.2% higher while those for the S&P 500 rose 3.1%.

In Europe, France’s CAC 40 jumped 5.6% to 5,239, while Germany’s DAX surged 5.1% to 13,112. Britain’s FTSE 100 gained 4% to 6,145.

Markets were already buoyant about the result of the U.S. elections, which saw Biden win the presidency.


xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

other countries are happy if the U.S. has a weak ineffective president

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
https://www.breitbart.com/news...us-election-decided/

TOKYO (AP) — Stock markets rocketed higher Monday after Pfizer said early data show its coronavirus vaccine is effective and investors breathed a sigh of relief after days of U.S. presidential limbo ended with Democrat Joe Biden declared the president-elect.

Markets were already sharply higher on the U.S. election result when Pfizer said that data shows vaccine shots may be 90% effective at preventing COVID-19, indicating the company is on track this month to file an emergency use application with U.S. regulators.

Any economic recovery depends on checking the pandemic, and investors pounced upon the news. Pfizer’s data is only preliminary and does not mean a vaccine is imminent. Getting the vaccine to billions of people will be a massive undertaking, even if it is approved.

Dow futures jumped 4.2% higher while those for the S&P 500 rose 3.1%.

In Europe, France’s CAC 40 jumped 5.6% to 5,239, while Germany’s DAX surged 5.1% to 13,112. Britain’s FTSE 100 gained 4% to 6,145.

Markets were already buoyant about the result of the U.S. elections, which saw Biden win the presidency.


xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

other countries are happy if the U.S. has a weak ineffective president

Impressive Pfizer did this on their own, without any government involvement or aid. Free market at work!