quote:

Unfortunately, that asshole and his husband are going to be thorns in the side of this country for another 30 years.

BFD. This asshole is but one of many. They are our thorns, and we are their thorns. Until the end of time, not just another 30 years.

Liberal Nate Silver says Trump has a commanding lead over Harris. Drills the pollsters for leftist bias:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.c...-says-trump-favored/


Liberal Data Analyst Nate Silver Says Trump Favored to Win, Accuses Pollsters of ‘Putting Finger on the Scale’ to Make Election Seem Closer Than it is (VIDEO)


Liberal data analyst Nate Silver believes Trump will win the election. His forecast puts Trump somewhere in the mid-50s and Harris in the mid-40s.

During a recent appearance on the Risky Business podcast, he accused pollsters of cheating and putting their fingers on the scale in order to make the race appear closer than it actually is.

He says that the race has gradually drifted to Trump over a long period of time and notes that Harris has been regularly losing ground.

Polling expert Nate Silver criticized other pollsters for manipulating survey results in the lead-up to the 2024 presidential election. He accused them of recycling past results to keep the race between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris appearing close. Silver, founder of FiveThirtyEight, called out pollsters for “herding” their numbers, specifically mentioning Emerson College in his criticism.

“I kind of trust pollsters less,” Silver said during an episode of his weekly podcast, Risky Business with Nate Silver and Maria Konnikova. “They all, every time a pollster [says] ‘Oh, every state is just plus-one, every single state’s a tie,’ no! You’re f–king herding! You’re cheating! You’re cheating!”

Silver’s own model shows Trump ahead of Harris, 55% to 45%, as the election nears. He expressed frustration with pollsters showing close races consistently, arguing they were trying not to stand out. He suggested, “Your numbers aren’t all going to come out at exactly one-point leads when you’re sampling 800 people over dozens of surveys. You are lying! You’re putting your f–king finger on the scale!”

Watch the video below, strong language warning:

https://x.com/DailyCaller/stat...ays-trump-favored%2F



.

The "polling" in the next couple of days is pure 100% gaslighting, just ridiculous. This is the end game and they have nothing. Like this poll that is the lead in for the NYT, as if intelligent voters will believe that Harris leads Trump in IOWA. Other more reasonable polls and Trump's own internal polling has him at +10.

https://x.com/TheLastRefuge2/s...sistance-day-1385%2F

quote:

Originally posted by oddball:
The "polling" in the next couple of days is pure 100% gaslighting, just ridiculous. This is the end game and they have nothing. Like this poll that is the lead in for the NYT, as if intelligent voters will believe that Harris leads Trump in IOWA. Other more reasonable polls and Trump's own internal polling has him at +10.

My final prediction based on that poll.

Works for me.

I’d be shocked and delighted to see Kommiefornia get that right. Bring it baby!!!

quote:

Originally posted by oddball:
The "polling" in the next couple of days is pure 100% gaslighting, just ridiculous...

Even the leftwing polls cared more about their credibility at one time. Rush Limbaugh used point out how the polls would show Democrat advantage 30-60 days out, in order to try to drive votes for the Left, but that they would adjust their polls, slowly, in the final weeks to accurately reflect voter sentiment in order to preserve their professional reputations.

Interesting that they no longer care about their credibility.


.

They don’t care about credibility because they’ve never had any. You cannot miss something you’ve never had.

Liberals hate America and everything it stands for.

They hate the MAGA tagline. Why do they despise America and Americans wanting to be great?

quote:

Originally posted by nhtagmember:
They hate the MAGA tagline. Why do they despise America, AND Americans wanting to be great?

FIFY

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:...
My final prediction based on that poll.

...

Sherwin-Williams poll is in...



(We have American citizens around the entire world who can vote)

quote:

Originally posted by oddball:
The "polling" in the next couple of days is pure 100% gaslighting, just ridiculous. This is the end game and they have nothing. Like this poll that is the lead in for the NYT, as if intelligent voters will believe that Harris leads Trump in IOWA. Other more reasonable polls and Trump's own internal polling has him at +10.

Haha, Gold-standard poll indeed. Get a load of this genius, the woman who put together that poll. Selzer herself.

https://x.com/tomselliott/status/1853218979088662623

quote:

Originally posted by oddball:
The "polling" in the next couple of days is pure 100% gaslighting, just ridiculous.

Nah! It's been bullshitting for a long time, now. They're just playing us. One day, Trump is up, the next it's the Kackle. One day it's razor thin, the next it's a blow out. A gazillion of pollsters out there to pick and choose from. All of them are trustworthy. Yeah, not really. Don't give a damn. Only care about the final poll on election day.

Goddamn, these people are insufferable.

https://x.com/CUBANNAT0R/status/1852739472498085914

^^^^
Video, but no sound.

This time there was sound, but I couldn’t understand a single word of it.

Sound plays for me

well apparently the Pentagon forgot to send ballots to our soldiers stationed overseas

so they put their lives on the line to fight for the country, and our current socialist regime conveniently ignores them

of course the secretary of defense is all over this like stink on white rice

what an absolute disgrace

Do you have a link for this?

quote:

Originally posted by 83v45magna:
Do you have a link for this?

https://www.foxnews.com/politi...s-ahead-election-day

This may be it?

Here's one site that has the no ballots for overseas service members:

https://mast.house.gov/2024/11...ice-members-can-vote


Nov 01 2024
Mast, Huizenga, Waltz Demand Pentagon Mobilize Resources To Ensure Active Duty Service Members Can Vote

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Today, Reps. Brian Mast (FL-21), Bill Huizenga (MI-04), and Michael Waltz (FL-06) blew the whistle on the Pentagon’s negligence in facilitating the ability of every active duty armed service member across the nation and overseas to vote this election cycle. As such, the congressmen are demanding Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin mobilize the Pentagon’s resources to ensure eligible active duty service members are afforded the opportunity to vote if they so choose.

“Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have mobilized federal manpower, resources, and tax dollars to block state-level election integrity measures, including in Georgia and Virginia, through lawsuits and smears,” said Rep. Mast. “They claim to care about democracy and the right to vote, yet they’ve failed to plan accordingly to facilitate the right to vote for every single one of our nation’s brave men and women in uniform. This is absolutely unacceptable. Our nation’s elite warriors deserve to have every opportunity to vote for the next commander-in-chief, especially since that person will be making life-and-death decisions for our troops.”

“Both Joe Biden & Kamala Harris have dismissed our warfighters serving in combat zones by either falsely claiming the U.S. has suffered no casualties under this administration or by claiming thousands of these service members aren’t in active combat zones,” said Rep. Waltz. “We need assurances these service members who are putting their lives on the line for our country have the information and tools they need to cast their ballot to vote.”

“It is completely unacceptable that our men and women serving overseas are not receiving the proper information and resources necessary to cast their ballot,” said Rep. Huizenga. “Sadly, this is the latest example of the Biden-Harris Administration failing to stand up for our servicemembers.”

During recent visits with active duty service members, concerns were raised about the Pentagon’s inadequate education at the administrative level on voter registration, absentee ballot requests, and the use of a federal write-in absentee ballot when state-issued ballots do not arrive in time. Some service members have even reported that requests for federal write-in absentee ballots were sometimes met with the response that the base's stockpile of these ballots was depleted and had not been replenished.

Reps. Mast, Huizenga, and Waltz raised these concerns in a letter to Secretary Austin urging him to make every resource available to facilitate voting by American armed service members, pursuant to federal and state regulations governing elections. He also asked that Congress be made aware of what preparedness and planning initiatives the Pentagon has undertaken to facilitate voting.