You will recall that in 2020, Birx was all-in for this poison, and said so, publicly and enthusiastically, but now:

"I knew these vaccines were not going to protect against infection, and I think we overplayed the vaccines."

Every fucking one of these people are frauds.

https://twitter.com/Simply4Tru.../1788413122337812719

Overplayed?

The understatement of the millennium

Ya think?

She's disgusting and continues to talk out of both sides of her mouth!

There sure does seem to be a lot of “prominent” leftists making sure they’re on the right side of history all of a sudden. As said leftists NEVER admit being wrong, it makes me think something big is over the horizon. If I had to make a wild guess, I’d say it is in preparation for attacking Trump for the “vaccines” which he helped push through with operation Warp Speed and to this day still seems to want to take credit for. The Democrat party is fueled by lies and the media is their mouthpiece.

I discussed excess mortality and vaxx injuries with my neighbor the other day, and my surprise if it isn't exposed before the election. I said once it is out, they'll blame DT. You can bet they're hatching a plan to blame DT for it all, and it'll be as precarious as sleepy joe pandering to both the squad and Israel.

quote:

Originally posted by gearhounds:
There sure does seem to be a lot of “prominent” leftists making sure they’re on the right side of history all of a sudden.

In 50 years, democrats will be reminiscing about the party flip that happened around 2020.

quote:

Originally posted by gearhounds:
There sure does seem to be a lot of “prominent” leftists making sure they’re on the right side of history all of a sudden. As said leftists NEVER admit being wrong, it makes me think something big is over the horizon. If I had to make a wild guess, I’d say it is in preparation for attacking Trump for the “vaccines” which he helped push through with operation Warp Speed and to this day still seems to want to take credit for. The Democrat party is fueled by lies and the media is their mouthpiece.

While a political calculation is always in play, I think some of the central players who had true power are more worried about saving their own skins. Those like Birx who should have prevented the damage but instead used their power to inflict much damage are at risk of personal consequences.

If a reckoning comes along, Birx et al want to be able to say they follow the science which has evolved, as evidenced by such statements.

quote:

Originally posted by Lunasee:
I'm very relieved that the one and only vaccine I took was the J&J one. It contained no mRNA.

I posted something similar maybe a hundred pages ago. Also asked what if any evidence exists that there was not similar damage, tho I've not seen an answer.

With all the buzz on mRNA, I just hoped it had been a safer choice. I've watched and read a majority of this thread (and thank and admire the prolific posters here). I just watched EZ_B video above ^^^, and there is a comment @ 1:37 that the J&J shot was an Adenoviral vector shot with DNA payload similar to Astra Zeneca.

I've not seen anything broken down by type. Has anyone read or seen an explanation about IF there are similar complications with the mRNA versions, or not??

quote:

Originally posted by gearhounds:
If I had to make a wild guess, I’d say it is in preparation for attacking Trump for the “vaccines” which he helped push through with operation Warp Speed and to this day still seems to want to take credit for. The Democrat party is fueled by lies and the media is their mouthpiece.

Even if they did, the important thing here is Trump didn't force anyone to take it. That's all on the Tater Head Joe's watch. If you choose to do something or take something, that's on you and you better research it thoroughly. But Tater Head and his minions tried to FORCE people to take it or else their lives would be destroyed, jobs lost, bank/credit cancelled, literal banishment from participating in society. Never forget.

quote:

Originally posted by preten2b:


I've not seen anything broken down by type. Has anyone read or seen an explanation about IF there are similar complications with the mRNA versions, or not??

I've read and watched quit a bit about the various injectables. I'm not a doc or biologist etc.

My understanding is that the mRNA platform itself is a great hazard. The spike is a great hazard. Put together, the complications are widespread with those products. The other products appear to have much reduced hazards because they don't turn random cells in your body into spike factories. There seems to be fewer studies and less reporting on the non-mRNA products, which suggests their risk profile is not nearly as worrisome to researchers.

I believe people who took the non-mRNA jabs can ignore the reports on those. Seek out reputable sources (e.g. Dr John Campbell) specific to the product you took.

FLY -TY. That is similar to what I could gather as well. It does not mean that there isn't a study which looked at each vaccine type to identify individual risks. I doubt there will be anytime soon either. Most western countries are NOT interested in researching their mistakes.

quote:

I've read and watched quit a bit about the various injectables. I'm not a doc or biologist etc.

Same here.

Here's a brief summary of what we've learned:

1. Do your own research.
2. Don't trust or believe the public health agencies including but not limited to CDC and FDA.
3. No one is liable for harm.
4. Buyer beware.
5. If they try to FORCE you to take it or else: lives would be destroyed, jobs lost, bank/credit cancelled, literal banishment from participating in society... it's still better than submitting.
6. Never forget.

quote:

6. Never forget

Bears repeating.

Never EVER Forget!

Methodological Considerations Regarding the Quantification of DNA Impurities in the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Comirnaty®

https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9279...ack&utm_medium=email

2. Conclusions
The available information and data indicate that the ready-to-use mRNA vaccine Comirnaty contains DNA impurities that exceed the permitted limit value by several hundred times and, in some cases, even more than 500 times, and that this went unnoticed because the DNA quantification carried out as part of batch testing only at the active substance level appears to be methodologically inadequate when using qPCR, as explained above. Because of the conditions during the production of the mRNA active substance of Comirnaty, the applied qPCR is designed so that a massive under-detection of DNA impurities appears to be the result. Here, we have to remember that qPCR is matchless if specific DNA sequences are being quantified, but this is not the case if the aim is the quantification of the total DNA content. However, DNA contamination in Comirnaty is about total DNA, regardless of the sequences that it contains. Accordingly, it can be assumed that a fluorescence spectrometric measurement of the total DNA in the end product, analogous to the quantification of the mRNA active ingredient, a process that is, in fact, carried out in the end product, is not associated with a risk of under-detecting DNA contaminations but rather provides reliable values and thus satisfies the required level of drug safety.

Against this background, experimental testing of the total DNA contained in the ready-to-use diluted vaccine Comirnaty® via fluorescence spectrometric measurement, which is to be carried out by the authorities as part of the legal mandate for official batch testing, appears to be essential. Why this was systematically omitted by the European control laboratories according to the statements by the German Federal Government cited above should therefore be the subject of extensive expert discussions and reconsiderations.

Further, it should also be taken into account that DNA impurities in Comirnaty® are apparently integrated into the lipid nanoparticles and are thus transported directly into the cells of a vaccinated person, just like the mRNA active ingredient. What this means for the safety risks, particularly the possible integration of this DNA into the human genome, i.e., the risk of insertional mutagenesis, should be a secondary focus of the discussion required, which must go far beyond what could have been considered years before the so unexpected introduction of mRNA pharmaceuticals into the global market.

More at link

This message has been edited. Last edited by: wcb6092,

^^^ In other words...

Remember, the jabs were definitely not gene therapies; that’s misinformation. But another new study poking a hole in that exhausted refrain appeared this month in the journal Methods and Protocols, titled “Methodological Considerations Regarding the Quantification of DNA Impurities in the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Comirnaty®.”

According to the researchers, it turns out that Pfizer may have slightly under-reported the amounts of DNA contamination in its magic spike protein elixirs. Behold my shocked face:
And by slightly under-reported, I mean by orders of magnitude. Their conclusion included the alarming determination that contaminant DNA enters patients’ cells. In the study authors’ own words:

The available information and data indicate that the ready-to-use mRNA vaccine Comirnaty contains DNA impurities that exceed the permitted limit value by several hundred times and, in some cases, even more than 500 times, and that this went unnoticed because the DNA quantification carried out as part of batch testing only at the active substance level appears to be methodologically inadequate when using qPCR.
Further, DNA impurities in Comirnaty® are apparently integrated into the lipid nanoparticles and are thus transported directly into the cells of a vaccinated person, just like the mRNA active ingredient. What this means for the safety risks, particularly the possible integration of this DNA into the human genome, i.e., the risk of insertional mutagenesis, should be a secondary focus of the discussion required, which must go far beyond what could have been considered years before the so unexpected introduction of mRNA pharmaceuticals into the global market.

Haha, “unexpected introduction of mRNA” into the global market. Nice one. Unexpected is one way of putting it.

See, what you really don’t want in a vaccine is a cellular delivery system for random bacterial DNA. What could go wrong? One thing that could go wrong is cancer, or ‘oncogenesis’ in public health’s dialect.

But forget about contamination! Follow the science. Let’s keep looking at obesity and alcohol consumption instead. Except in downtown San Fransisco, that is, where the government-funded booze train must keep trundling down the addiction tracks.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com...ack&utm_medium=email