quote:

Originally posted by erj_pilot:

quote:

Originally posted by PASig:
Oh man

[QUOTE]
White House is terrified Biden, 79, will get COVID because it will show vaccines aren't fully effective and will be used against him after he promised to 'shut down the virus

By ASSOCIATED PRESS

Yeah. I don't need President Potato to contract COVID-19 for me to know that the vaccine is already a truck load of equine fecal matter. That was proven MONTHS ago. So...whatever.

They cannot possibly be so stupid as to assume that anyone that hasn’t gotten the snake oil already is suddenly going to change their minds. They’re probably worried that their trained seals won’t line up for their 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, etc boosters.

^^^ There is a point to that. There was an article posted many pages back about vaccine discussion with friends and family....those who'd already had it and how since they did, have to defend their decision to some degree. A natural instinct I suppose. But I do know some who wish they hadn't got it.

quote:

Originally posted by PASig:


White House is terrified Biden, 79, will get COVID because it will show vaccines aren't fully effective and will be used against him ...

Trick question, no one who "matters" holds anything against Creepy Joe. Nor do they give any voice to those who do. It would seem they'd welcome the criticism so as to identify those who need to be criminalized and hated.

quote:

Originally posted by gearhounds:
“ They told her to stop taking her cancer medication to take this Plaxovid and I would imagine it would be the same for taking Ivermectin”
Why? Are they intimating that ivermectin interferes with her current treatment? I call bullshit on that. They want to punish her for choosing to try something outside their “recommended regimen”.

It may be just a conflict with Plaxovid, but a lot of cancer treatments are poisons and are used with the hope that they’ll do more harm to the cancer cells than they do to the rest of the patient. The doctor may be telling her to pause her cancer meds to give her body a break while she deals with the covid. I seriously doubt her doctors are punishing her for taking a drug they went to some trouble to find for her.

quote:

Originally posted by slosig:

quote:

Originally posted by gearhounds:
“ They told her to stop taking her cancer medication to take this Plaxovid and I would imagine it would be the same for taking Ivermectin”
Why? Are they intimating that ivermectin interferes with her current treatment? I call bullshit on that. They want to punish her for choosing to try something outside their “recommended regimen”.

It may be just a conflict with Plaxovid, but a lot of cancer treatments are poisons and are used with the hope that they’ll do more harm to the cancer cells than they do to the rest of the patient. The doctor may be telling her to pause her cancer meds to give her body a break while she deals with the covid. I seriously doubt her doctors are punishing her for taking a drug they went to some trouble to find for her.

Well for one Plaxovid has complications with a large variety of drugs based on how it works. My mom has had to stop taking her cancer medication, Imbruvica, any time she has had any type of treatment such as recent eye surgery. My mom refused to ever get the vaccine and after she read the package insert for Plaxovid she refused to take it. The next day she started to develop a cough with congestion along with her already sore throat and runny nose.

I had obtained Ivermectin, horse paste, and she chose to take it along with all the other vitamins and supplements we were already doing. The very next day after taking Ivermectin all of her symptoms were completely gone. I am having her do a 5 day dosage and then stop the Ivermectin and today was day 3. I had her stop her cancer medication like it has been suggested for all other things and she will re-start her cancer medication 48 hours after her final dose of Ivermectin.

Ivermectin freaking works! It is so sad our government will not acknowledge it. I always thought my mom getting COVID would be a death sentence, but the FLCCC protocol works and saved my mom’s life.

quote:

Originally posted by StorminNormin:
I had obtained Ivermectin, horse paste, and she chose to take it along with all the other vitamins and supplements we were already doing. The very next day after taking Ivermectin all of her symptoms were completely gone. I am having her do a 5 day dosage and then stop the Ivermectin and today was day 3. I had her stop her cancer medication like it has been suggested for all other things and she will re-start her cancer medication 48 hours after her final dose of Ivermectin.

Ivermectin freaking works! It is so sad our government will not acknowledge it. I always thought my mom getting COVID would be a death sentence, but the FLCCC protocol works and saved my mom’s life.

Fantastic! Glad that you were able to help your Mom and she recovered so quickly!

Fantastic news StorminNormin.

^^ Great news!

Great news for sure!

StorminNormin, that is fantastic! Really good news. I was hoping she would make that choice.
What dosage did she take? Standard or stepped up due to symptoms present?

That's great news, StorminNormin.

quote:

Originally posted by StorminNormin:
I always thought my mom getting COVID would be a death sentence, but the FLCCC protocol works and saved my mom’s life.

That is great news! I was really hoping she'd bounce right through this and she apparently has.

quote:

Originally posted by amals:
StorminNormin, that is fantastic! Really good news. I was hoping she would make that choice.
What dosage did she take? Standard or stepped up due to symptoms present?

She took the standard based on weight.

Thank you so much everyone. It means a lot and I am grateful for both the thoughts and advice I got.

Nice to read that StorminNormin. You did good sir.

England Halts Vaccine Mandates For Health And Care Home Workers

https://www.zerohedge.com/poli...nd-care-home-workers

England’s CCP virus vaccine mandates for health care and care home workers are set to be scrapped, subject to consultation and parliamentary approval, the UK’s Health Secretary Sajid Javid said on Monday.

The latest government U-turn came just three days before the deadline by which National Health Service (NHS) and other health care workers would have to get their first doses to avoid redeployment or termination.

The deadline will no longer apply while the government carries out a two-week consultation on the proposed policy reversal before putting a motion to Parliament for approval.

However, the vote in Parliament could be a formality as the main opposition Labour Party - which supported the mandates - said it will also support the government on their reversal.

In the previous consultation on mandating the vaccines for older adult care homes, 57 percent of the respondents opposed the proposal, while 65 percent of those responding to the consultation on extending the mandate to the NHS and wider social care sector were against the mandate (pdf). In both proposals, the responses from the sectors were mixed, while the service users—who the mandates aimed to protect—mostly opposed them.

The policy reversal means patient-facing NHS and other health and social care staff who choose not to take the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus vaccines will not have to be redeployed or sacked from April 1.

However, Javid insisted that health care workers have a “professional duty” to take the vaccines, saying those “who would not do the responsible thing and choose to remain unvaccinated” were “choosing to walk away from their jobs in health and care.”

Javid told MPs that he had asked the NHS to “review its policies on the hiring of new staff and the deployment of existing staff, taking into account their vaccination status,” and ordered a consultation on updating the Code of Practice for England’s health care and social care providers registered with the Care Quality Commission.

He also asked health regulators to “urgently review current guidance” on vaccinations to “emphasise their professional responsibilities in this area.”

According to NHS weekly data, by Jan. 23, around 5 percent (77,591) of England’s NHS staff members and 18 percent (193,354) of social care workers had not received any CCP virus vaccines.

Javid said the government estimates 19,300 workers have already lost their jobs due to the care home vaccine mandate, which came into effect in November 2021. These workers are now free to reapply to their old jobs, but the health secretary declined to offer them continuity of service and pension contributions, saying it was “their choice” to leave their jobs rather than “do the professional thing” and get vaccinated.

He said the policy reversal is due to two new factors: England’s population is “now better protected against hospitalisation from COVID-19,” because of both the widespread natural immunity from the highly infectious Omicron variant and the vaccination programme, and that the Omicron variant, which currently dominates in England, “is intrinsically less severe.”

But he refused to rule out mandating vaccination in the future, saying the government “will always listen to the evidence, be guided by the evidence as it has been today.”

Jeremy Hunt, former health secretary and current chair of the Health and Social Care Select Committee, said he’s concerned the U-turn will bring uncertainty to potential future vaccine mandates such as with flu vaccines, while other MPs spoke to support the withdrawal of the mandates.

Several MPs criticised the language Javid used to describe health workers who choose not to be vaccinated, saying it was a “disgrace” and doesn’t show respect to people’s bodily autonomy.

Compared to Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, England has the fewest legal CCP virus restrictions on the general public, but is the only UK nation that has mandated the CCP virus vaccines in the health sector.

https://www.breitbart.com/poli...ic-and-social-costs/

A Johns Hopkins University literature review and meta-analysis of the effects of lockdowns on mortality stemming from the Chinese coronavirus found that “lockdowns have had little to no public health effects,” and have “imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted.”

“In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument,” they added.

The study, the authors said, was “designed to determine whether there is empirical evidence to support the belief that ‘lockdowns’ reduce COVID-19 mortality.”

“our meta-analysis fails to confirm that lockdowns have had a large, significant effect on mortality rates,” the authors wrote.

The review also noted that studies looking at specific NPIs, such as “lockdown vs. no lockdown, facemasks, closing non-essential businesses, border closures, school closures, and limiting gatherings,” also found “no broad-based evidence of noticeable effects on COVID-19 mortality.”

quote:

Originally posted by StorminNormin:

quote:

Originally posted by amals:
StorminNormin, that is fantastic! Really good news. I was hoping she would make that choice.
What dosage did she take? Standard or stepped up due to symptoms present?

She took the standard based on weight.

That is even more amazing. FLCCC protocols would have had her take at least double with her symptoms and covid-positive test. I am so sold on ivermectin; I know it helped me as well. When are more people going to listen? Rhetorical question; probably never, since they have to dig for the information in the first place.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
https://www.breitbart.com/poli...ic-and-social-costs/

A Johns Hopkins University literature review and meta-analysis of the effects of lockdowns on mortality stemming from the Chinese coronavirus found that “lockdowns have had little to no public health effects,” and have “imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted.”

“In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument,” they added.

The study, the authors said, was “designed to determine whether there is empirical evidence to support the belief that ‘lockdowns’ reduce COVID-19 mortality.”

“our meta-analysis fails to confirm that lockdowns have had a large, significant effect on mortality rates,” the authors wrote.

The review also noted that studies looking at specific NPIs, such as “lockdown vs. no lockdown, facemasks, closing non-essential businesses, border closures, school closures, and limiting gatherings,” also found “no broad-based evidence of noticeable effects on COVID-19 mortality.”

If this country wasn't partially insane, this would be the gamechanger that would have the public wanting scalps of every 'expert' involved in this BS. Unfortunately, the people who should be screaming are double masked, standing in Covid test line, and screaming for more regulations.

Just another healthy 49-year-old having a stroke
Alex Berenson
This one happens to be a Democratic senator from New Mexico.



https://alexberenson.substack....49-year-old/comments