Quote from Ozarkwoods:

"For those of you that have not received the “vaccine”. Have you given it any thought that the blood supply is no longer clear of the spike protein?"

I had neck fusion surgery back in November. Prior to surgery I was required to sign a form allowing permission for the surgeon to give me a blood transfusion if it was needed.

At the time I didn't think too much about possible contamination from spike proteins. I was at a point where I think I needed the surgery despite the risk.

It turns out a transfusion wasn't needed.

I go back for a ct scan at the end of the month. The doctor may recommend a second surgery. At this point in time I don't think it will be necessary. If there comes a time surgery becomes necessary I will address the issue with the doctor and then make a determination based on what she tells me.

It could be a damned if I do or damned if I don't scenario.

This was mentioned a few pages (?) back. I think it was chellim who mentioned if one has an upcoming surgery and time, they can donate their own blood to be used if needed. I think that's a great idea if one has the time to prepare.

^^^I believe you can donate blood to yourself for use in a scheduled surgery as a option. You may also have other compatible persons in your family/circle that can donate 'Pure Blood' for your use as well.

This is a question I will ask the doctor.

I don't want it to be a debate issue with her about the "vaccines".

My primary care doctor has always mentioned the "vaccine". He's never attempted to push it on me, I suspect he's had some negative reactions from some of his patients when he's mentioned it to them.

I'm going to predict this won't get any better. I'm fearful of how much worse it may become. While I'm not happy about basically being forced to get the vaccine, I'm glad I got the J&J and not one of the two shot ones.

I had a follow up today from total hip replacement end of Nov., it’s the first time in almost 3 years they didn’t have signs plastered everywhere about wearing a mask and nobody in the office had one on. I never wore one in there unless I was asked before this time anyways. I said to my Doc “ I see they dropped all the bullshit finally, he just looked at me and laughed and said I never supported it anyways but you and I can have that discussion the next time I see you at the range.

Long Covid and impotence

https://fortune.com/2022/08/17...alth-carolyn-barber/

Deadline Passes for Pfizer to Submit Results of Post-Vaccination Heart Inflammation Study to US Regulators

https://www.theepochtimes.com/...er&src_cmp=ZeroHedge

The deadline has passed for Pfizer to submit the results of a study exploring the frequency of heart inflammation following receipt of the company’s COVID-19 vaccine.

Pfizer was required by the U.S. and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to conduct multiple studies on its vaccine after the FDA approved the shot in August 2021 because regulators determined that without the studies, there would not be sufficient data to assess the “known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis,” or heart inflammation and a related condition.

Regulators were also concerned about the potential risk of subclinical myocarditis, or heart inflammation without typical symptoms.

The FDA told Pfizer to carry out six studies, with various deadlines for completion and reporting final results to the agency. The first final deadline arrived on Dec. 31, 2022.

Pfizer was required to submit a report on the study, which was to assess the incidence of subclinical myocarditis following administration of a third dose of Pfizer’s vaccine, or a booster shot, in people aged 16 to 30.

It’s unclear whether Pfizer met the deadline. The company and the FDA did not respond to requests for comment, and neither have issued any information about the study or its results since the deadline passed.

According to the FDA, Pfizer had until June 30, 2022, to complete the study and then another six months to prepare and submit the final results.

In a Dec. 8, 2022, memorandum explaining why the FDA authorized Pfizer’s bivalent booster without any clinical data, FDA officials noted that Pfizer was “conducting additional safety-related post-authorization/post-marketing studies for the PfizerBioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, including post-marketing requirements to assess known serious serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis and an unexpected serious risk of subclinical myocarditis..”

‘Shouldn’t Have to Ask’
The results of the study should be shared promptly, according to Jessica Adams, a former regulatory officer at the FDA.

“We shouldn’t have to ask or demand this information. We should expect that it’d be promptly shared by default,” Adams wrote on Twitter.

Dr. Janet Woodcock, the agency’s principal deputy director, told Adams in an email that the FDA is “not allowed to comment on potential actions on regulated products.”

It’s not clear how reporting results on a study relates to potential regulatory actions.

In light of the growing amount of evidence related to post-vaccination adverse events, some others are questioning the FDA’s delay in sharing information on the study.

“Why are FDA officials dragging their feet on making Pfizer’s prospective study data on subclinical myocarditis available to the public when evidence has been published in the medical literature that Pfizer’s pre-EUA clinical trials revealed ‘a 36 percent higher risk of serious adverse events in vaccinated participants in comparison to placebo recipients,'” Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center, told The Epoch Times via email.

She was citing a reanalysis of the original trial data that found vaccinated participants had a higher risk of serious adverse events.

“With 79 percent of Americans having received at least one COVID shot and so many vaccinated young adults, especially physically fit athletes suffering heart attacks and sudden deaths, public health officials should insist that the company with the biggest market share of the COVID vaccine business in the U.S. be completely transparent about what it knows about the biological mechanisms of heart inflammation induced by the mRNA COVID vaccine Pfizer maintains is both safe and effective,” Fisher added.

Warning
The FDA added a warning about myocarditis following Pfizer and Moderna vaccination to patient and health care provider fact sheets in June 2021. Both vaccines utilize messenger RNA (mRNA) technology. Prospective vaccine recipients were told the risk of myocarditis was increased after vaccination, particularly after the second dose of the two-dose primary series.

If certain symptoms appeared after vaccination, such as chest pain or shortness of breath, people were told to immediately seek medical care.

U.S. authorities, and some officials elsewhere, have since acknowledged that the vaccines cause heart inflammation.

“The current evidence supports a causal association between mRNA COVID-19 vaccination and myocarditis and pericarditis,” Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, a top CDC official, said during a meeting in 2022.

Some cases of the post-vaccination inflammation have ended in death.

Some 5,163 reports of post-vaccination myocarditis, pericarditis, or myopericarditis have been filed with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a passive early warning system that alerts officials to possible side effects from vaccines. The reports don’t prove a connection with a vaccine but are an undercount of the true number of cases, research has found and authorities have acknowledged.


More than 800,000 other adverse events following receipt of the Pfizer vaccine have been lodged with the system.

Moderna Studies
The FDA also required Moderna to conduct post-approval studies after approving the company’s shot in early 2022.

Moderna was told to carry out six studies, the same number as Pfizer, focusing on assessing the incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis, the long-term impact of myocarditis, and the occurrence of subclinical myocarditis.

Two studies were due to be completed by Dec. 31, 2022, but the deadlines for submission of the results to the FDA aren’t until June 30, 2023.

Other deadlines for the Moderna and Pfizer studies stretch months or even years into the future, including one in 2025 and one in 2028.

Bless that Missouri attorney general. The disclosures from the Missouri v. Biden case are confirming what we all knew was going on, but couldn’t prove. The latest tidbit to be flipped out of the chum bucket is a pivotal March 21st, 2021 email from a Facebook staffer to Andy Slavitt, the White House Covid Coordinator.

And here is the damning email that proves Missouri’s entire case:
(see image @ link)

Here’s the crucial bit that I highlighted above:

[W]e have been focused on reducing the virality of content discouraging vaccines that does not contain actionable misinformation. This is often-true content, which we allow at the post level because experts have advised us that it is important for people to be able to discuss both their personal experiences and concerns about the vaccine, but it can be framed as sensation, alarmist, or shocking. We’ll remove these Groups, Pages, and Accounts when they are disproportionately promoting this sensationalized content. More on this front as we proceed to implement.

Often true! This email is a key bit of evidence proving several key facts, if not the entire case against the federal government. You could even call it a “smoking gun.” Why?

First, the email proves that Facebook’s motive was not really to stop “misinformation” from hurting people, but rather it was always intended to help promote the government’s hyper-aggressive vaccine program.

In his email, the staffer expressly admitted that Facebook was not just censoring “misinformation” to keep people safe, but was also censoring TRUE factual information that Facebook couldn’t find any way to label as mis-information. Like when somebody posted, “Seven hours after taking the second jab, my aunt died of a massive stroke.” That’s a fact.

That fact about the poster’s aunt falls into the “often true” category. It’s not misinformation. But it’s “shocking” and more importantly, it might cause some “vaccine hesitancy,” which is what the title of that paragraph called the whole project. They were “tackling vaccine hesitancy.”

Tackling vaccine hesitancy is not part of Facebook’s social media mission. That was the government’s depopulation mission. Sorry, sorry, I meant, “public health mission.”

Next, the staffer specifically proved at least one of the technical mechanisms of censorship, and helpfully admitted that people’s free speech rights were harmed — even putting a number on it. That admission proves DAMAGES. He said:

Additional limitations we placed in April 2020 on forwarding of messages that have been forwarded many times reduced these kinds of messages by over 70%.

It’s worded a little obtusely, but what he’s saying is that they put the digital brakes on any message that got forwarded a lot and was critical of the vaccines. And it worked! In coordination with the White House, Facebook frustrated most (“over 70%”) of the forwarders. I remember all this very well. During this timeframe, when Facebook was C&C’s primary platform, commenters often complained that (a) they didn’t get the daily posts in their feed, and (b) they were blocked from forwarding or re-posting the daily roundups.

Next, the email proves COORDINATION between the government and the private actor, Facebook. In the email’s second-to-last sentence, the Facebook staffer called the previous list “these commitments.” If, as corporate media apologists suggest, Facebook was just detailing some of its totally private preferences, why call them “commitments?” Commitment to whom? Why commitments?

A commitment is something you make to someone that you are working with as part of an agreement, contract, or collusion.

Next, the very last sentence, promising “More on this front as we proceed to implement,” proves the White House was coordinating censorship with Facebook. In other words, if Facebook were just letting the White House know what its own preferences were, as a completely private actor, there would be no need to keep the government posted on the how the implementation was proceeding.

Finally, look at this delicious sentence that also proves coordination, the sentence with which the whole email begins:

Thanks for taking the time to connect on Friday. Per our discussion, I wanted to follow up with next steps:

“Next STEPS!” Steps are what you take when you are walking out a PLAN. A plan to move toward a goal. A plan is an agreement between two or more parties to take some particular action. This email alone proves the White House was involved in massive civil rights violations.

Facebook’s stealth censorship ultimately escalated to 3-day and 7-day virtual jail terms, which prompted C&C’s packing up and moving to Medium.com, where we got summarily canceled, and finally restarted on Substack. And so here we are.

Andy Slavitt was probably smart enough to know not to put any of his own preferences and directives in writing. But the Facebook staff aren’t familiar with public records laws and how to evade them like politicians. So the Facebook team sometimes forgot, and wrote what they really meant, instead of using plausibly-deniable political doublespeak.

This is why politicians disdain tech people and scientific experts, who consider themselves to be smarter than politicians. Politicians see these kinds of emails and think the tech/science experts are blockheaded morons who are slow-walking to their own destruction.

It’s hard to argue with that.

There’s a word for this kind of government control of big private companies. I can’t remember the exact word, it starts with an ‘f’, and Mussolini really loved it. Fash-something.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com...ack&utm_medium=email

quote:

Originally posted by FishOn:
Long Covid and impotence

https://fortune.com/2022/08/17...alth-carolyn-barber/

I have not read the study itself, but the immediate question is how they determined who had covid and who did not. Merely a positive test or never a positive test is not proof either way. Likely almost everyone has been exposed and infected, with many never having symptoms. An antibody test is not robust, depending on timing, and the jab could influence tests.

So much science is junk these days, and this article comes across as agenda based reporting. I start out skeptical.

^^^ Yep, this article comes across as agenda based reporting.

quote:

Doctors and researchers have exhaustively categorized those symptoms, which range from the mundane (cough, fever, headache) to the slightly mysterious (brain fog, loss of taste or smell, a pins-and-needles sensation). But it’s a more recent body of evidence that has them looking for answers–and it may push many vaccine-hesitant men to reconsider their stance .

Take your jab! You don't want impotence, do you?

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:

Take your jab! You don't want impotence, do you?

Wear a tuxedo.

Oh boy, where do I sign up?

Could you be a part of the next vaccine breakthrough?

quote:

Originally posted by V-Tail:

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:

Take your jab! You don't want impotence, do you?

Wear a tuxedo.

That's right! If you've going to be impotent ...

quote:

Originally posted by sse:
Oh boy, where do I sign up?

Could you be a part of the next vaccine breakthrough?

This is very troubling to me. Flu vaccines work when they target the strains they are based on. Now they’re going to produce them with the same technology that clearly isn’t working with Covid and causes unknown injuries? I wonder how many of those people will have to take annually to keep the flu under control- 4? 6? Permanent rotation based on infection?

Flu vaccines are entrenched as safe by millions in this country so many will (hopefully not) take them without questioning what’s in them. People that decide not to get them will be called… yup. Anti-vaxxers. How dare we refuse to fill the pockets of big pharma while they continue use of a “product” people don’t trust?

This is the way we get to 'I Am Legend'...

That infuriates me! They know damn well, this technology is a problem, but they roll out more poison.

quote:

Originally posted by WaterburyBob:

quote:

Originally posted by V-Tail:

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:

Take your jab! You don't want impotence, do you?

Wear a tuxedo.

That's right! If you've going to be impotent ...

They're accidently sayin' you cannot go f' yourself

quote:

Originally posted by 6guns:
That infuriates me! They know damn well, this technology is a problem, but they roll out more poison.

Which makes me extremely hesitant to take any future injections of anything. It will become increasingly difficult to discern what precisely the product is. The person injecting me might well have no idea. I called the pharmacy and my doc's office about the ingredients in a prescribed med I reacted to (I'm Celiac), and they both said "don't know, no way to find out". Then I started digging deep myself. Lots of shady stuff going on out there.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Fly-Sig,

quote:

Originally posted by Fly-Sig:

quote:

Originally posted by 6guns:
That infuriates me! They know damn well, this technology is a problem, but they roll out more poison.

Which makes me extremely hesitant to tank any future injections of anything. It will become increasingly difficult to discern what precisely the product is. The person injecting me might well have no idea. I called the pharmacy and my doc's office about the ingredients in a prescribed med I reacted to (I'm Celiac), and they both said "don't know, no way to find out". Then I started digging deep myself. Lots of shady stuff going on out there.

or is the "Flu Vaccine" also a Covid vaccine mixed in there?


https://www.westernjournal.com...omething-isnt-right/