FNC reporting the Hilary's Email contained a "Top Secret" labeled message

John Steed

Member

posted

^^^^^^^^^^^ Or the hacker's claim may be a hoax.

... stirred anti-clockwise.

Posts: 2160 | Location: Michigan | Registered: May 24, 2009

Ignored post by John Steed posted

Peace through
superior firepower

posted

quote:
Originally posted by John Steed:
^^^^^^^^^^^ Or the hacker's claim may be a hoax.

Or, it may be legitimate:

quote:
Promising to give the trove of the former Secretary of State’s emails to the highest bidder, the specialist is showing subject lines as proof of what appear to be legitimate messages.

Posts: 109056 | Registered: January 20, 2000

Ignored post by parabellum posted

dgwiggans

Member

posted

Best be careful if there is any classified material in that batch. The hacker isn't cleared and likely neither will be the payor who gets them for money. Unauthorized possession of classified material is a crime.[/QUOTE]

If the hacker is legitimate, he'd best seek an immunity, along with the cash & hope like hell his name doesn't come out. I'd like to think some "group" would come together with the needed $ & along with a willing prosecutors' promise of immunity, obtain the emails. First step is establish if they're really legitimate copies. There are plenty of differing sides that don't won't the emails out there for their own various reasons. I think the emails could be just as equally damaging to the Zipper & VJ as they are to Hildabeast & all her cronies.

.

Posts: 1884 | Registered: July 06, 2008

Ignored post by dgwiggans posted

mbinky

Glorious SPAM!
Picture of mbinky

posted

Shoot, when I heard five Chinese Navy ships showed up off the coast of Alaska while the pres was there I thought they were dropping off a good copy of Hillary's server

Posts: 10640 | Registered: June 13, 2003

Ignored post by mbinky posted

Peace through
superior firepower

posted

If Hil isn't crapping her Underoos this morning, she should be.

Posts: 109056 | Registered: January 20, 2000

Ignored post by parabellum posted

domcintosh

Member

posted

quote:
Originally posted by parabellum:
quote:
Originally posted by John Steed:
^^^^^^^^^^^ Or the hacker's claim may be a hoax.
Or, it may be legitimate:
quote:
Promising to give the trove of the former Secretary of State’s emails to the highest bidder, the specialist is showing subject lines as proof of what appear to be legitimate messages.

I'm still skeptical; The released 'subject lines' may just be fabrications to stoke the flames.

I'd like it to be true, but then that would demonstrate how vulnerable her server was, highlighting an opening that other countries or actors may have accessed.

The opinions expressed in no way reflect the stance or opinion of my employer.

Posts: 5446 | Location: Stationed in Kitsap Washington w/ the USN | Registered: November 04, 2007

Ignored post by domcintosh posted

Cookster

Member

posted

quote:
Originally posted by parabellum:
If Hil isn't crapping her Underoos this morning, she should be.

Maybe shrillary can do commercials for 'Depends' from her jail cell?!

__________
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal labotomy."

Posts: 3579 | Location: Lehigh Valley, PA | Registered: March 27, 2007

Ignored post by Cookster posted

SapperSteel

Essayons

posted

quote:
Originally posted by John Steed:
^^^^^^^^^^^ Or the hacker's claim may be a hoax.

Might be.

Might not be.

This public exposure of the very real, but long downplayed, risks that Mrs. Clinton put to our nation with her flauting of classified information procedures should motivate the alphabet soup agencies to get off their asses and pursue the data with a vengance!

And, for sure, it should keep the issue from dying on the vine, which is what the Clinton campaign has been trying to make it do.

She can stonewall no more as long as this hacker is out there offering the data for sale.

And, about the hacker: I think he has grossly under-priced the data. If Uncle Sam is willing to pay Qatar $1B to take a Taliban general off his hands at GITMO, then Hillary's treasure trove of state secrets ought to be worth at least that much, don't you think?

Thanks,

Sap

Posts: 3452 | Location: Arimo, Idaho | Registered: February 03, 2006

Ignored post by SapperSteel posted

Sig2340

Step by step walk the thousand mile road
Picture of Sig2340

posted

Edward Snowden, you devious son-of-a-bitch....

Nice is overrated

"It's every freedom-loving individual's duty to lie to the government."
Airsoftguy, June 29, 2018

Posts: 32012 | Location: Loudoun County, Virginia | Registered: May 17, 2006

Ignored post by Sig2340 posted

Peace through
superior firepower

posted

quote:
Originally posted by domcintosh:
I'm still skeptical; The released 'subject lines' may just be fabrications to stoke the flames.

No one around here just fell off the hay truck. I'm skeptical about everything, all the time.

Posts: 109056 | Registered: January 20, 2000

Ignored post by parabellum posted

dgwiggans

Member

posted

I'd like it to be true, but then that would demonstrate how vulnerable her server was, highlighting an opening that other countries or actors may have accessed.[/QUOTE]

Rats seldom live alone. If there is legitimate copies out "there", it just takes one to come out & the rest of the copies become worthless. This could be bait to possibly shake things loose.

Posts: 1884 | Registered: July 06, 2008

Ignored post by dgwiggans posted

Peace through
superior firepower

posted

"Hello, Hil? Huma here. How's your taint this morning?"

Posts: 109056 | Registered: January 20, 2000

Ignored post by parabellum posted

sdy

wishing we
were congress

posted

This example is from the State Dept site (open source) that shows the released emails so far.

2 interesting things

1. The subject line is "confidential"

That is true in ten other of the released emails.

Even if you want to indicate that something is sensitive, but not formally conf, it is very poor to send on govt unclass email systems any messages saying they are confidential.

2. Note that there is yet another commercial firm scanning her email

MailController.altohiway.com

adding: The redacted parts of the email are for "B6". That is just to protect personal info.

I am not saying anything here was actually ever classified. Just sloppy choice of language.

Posts: 19759 | Registered: July 21, 2002

Ignored post by sdy posted

INV136

Member

posted

quote:
Originally posted by rburg:
quote:
Originally posted by Himiko:
quote:
It could get very interesting if DoJ put the pressure on either of them.

I think that is a rather unlikely scenario.

Maybe with this DOJ, but in a year or so we may have a different AG, one without love for the Klintons, maybe even an honest one.

Unless, of course, Obama pardons Clinton and all personnel involved to save face for the Democrat party as well as allowing Hillary to continue her run for president. The last part no so much, because I don't think he likes Hillary much because she's not quite as radical an extremist as he is and because she is white. He may just offer a pardon if she just backs out of the race. That opens the door for his man Biden.

Posts: 2476 | Registered: January 21, 2007

Ignored post by INV136 posted

oddball

Get Off My Lawn
Picture of oddball

posted

Great article on Hillary has a simple explanation for all of this.

quote:

Leftism, of course, elevates dummies and whispers into the ears of these sock puppets that they are actually brilliant. Mouthing hoary leftist nostrums is always deemed terribly wise, and parroting the party line is invariably thought subtle and profound. Why would we suspect that Hillary would be the exception to the process of leftism dumping hapless mediocrities on America after pronouncing these people smart? More than most leftists, Hillary has made stupid mistake after stupid mistake. More than most, Hillary has fallen back on her spouse and her "experience" as first lady as proof that she is up to the job as president. One explanation is that Hillary is super-clever. A better explanation is she is not too bright.

_{"I’m not going to read Time Magazine, I’m not going to read Newsweek, I’m not going to read any of these magazines; I mean, because they have too much to lose by printing the truth"- Bob Dylan, 1965}

Posts: 17157 | Location: Texas | Registered: May 13, 2003

Ignored post by oddball posted

INV136

Member

posted

quote:
Originally posted by sdy:
http://www.washingtonexaminer....0000/article/2571207

New Hillary Clinton emails released from the State Department suggest that top aide Huma Abedin complained about her pay despite making more in total salary that President Obama.

In fact, an email from a State worker suggested that her complaints became a joke, according to the Clinton watchdog group and critic America Rising. One email cited by the Weekly Standard included this line: "To quote Huma, I don't get paid enough."

Huma Abedin was simultaneously receiving compensation from four separate pots of money:

1. State Department

2. Teneo Holdings

3. Clinton Foundation

4. Hillary Clinton's personal funds

Of these four, we know that from Teneo and the State Department, Abedin was earning AT LEAST $490,000.

But Abedin's outside clients included Teneo, an international strategic consulting firm co-founded by former Bill Clinton right-hand man Doug Band. She reportedly raked in $355,000 as a consultant to Teneo, while simultaneously pocketing $135,000 in government pay.

oh, do you remember that in 4 years she never took a day of leave at State Dept ? then she cashed in that saved up leave when she left.

The leave part is the least objectionable because, as a government employee, she would have lost anything over 240 hrs at the end of every year. It doesn't accumulate for the full 4 years.

Posts: 2476 | Registered: January 21, 2007

Ignored post by INV136 posted