Eight very painful years!

Concur with Shovelhead.

As a P.S. to that after Wixom Assembly was closed THEN the state rebuilt the interchange. Now on the site is a RV dealer, a home improvement store, Duluth Trading Co. and At Home store.

The cynic in me has always wondered how Beck became a priority and who benefited.

If you take all of Granholms knowledge of the energy needs of our country and stick it up a gnat's ass, it would be like putting a BB into a box car.
She is tied with our esteemed Transportation Secretary in incompetence.

quote:

Originally posted by shovelhead:
The cynic in me has always wondered how Beck became a priority and who benefited.

The hospital.

These people are out of control.

We are 24 days out from FREAKING CHRISTMAS, you demented old fool!

They are SO determined to cancel Christmas 2021

But lets just keep letting all these illegals just pour into the fucking country unchecked!

Biden to enact strict COVID regulations on US air travel in response to Omicron variant

The title is misleading. It is only for passengers entering the country. And it's not much different than what's being done almost everywhere else. Not that it's a reason, mind you, but it's not exactly new news.

Of course, it's still bullshit but it affects a much, much smaller % of people than the title of the article leads you to believe. And doesn't impact domestic travel at all.

But to your point, the fact that they'll ignore all the illegals coming in, just shows their ass.

Article:
The Biden administration is set to announce some of the "strictest COVID regulations" on American citizens since the start of the pandemic during a press brief on Thursday, the Washington Post reports.

The COVID regulations that are to be announced take aim at US air travel.

According to the Washington Post, multiple federal health officials told the outlet that in preparation for the Biden administration's winter COVID protocols there will be strict testing requirements for all travelers entering the United States, including Americans.

All air travelers that plan to enter the US will be expected to submit a negative COVID test within one day of departure despite vaccination status. The current policies include submitting a negative COVID test within 24 hrs for those that are unvaccinated, while those that are vaccinated are allowed to 72 hrs.

In addition, President Biden is weighing controversial protocols that would require all travelers, including US citizens, to self-quarantine for seven days even if they submit negative test results, according to Washington Post.

The new restrictions come after President Biden announced the United States would be blocking air travel to and from South Africa, where reports of the alleged omicron strain originated. During Biden's presidential campaign, Biden slammed former President Donald Trump for alleged "xenophobia" after Trump announced he would restrict air travel from certain countries to reduce the spread of COVID.

Fox News reporter Peter Doocy appeared on Fox News' Sean Hannity on Tuesday and weighed in on President Biden breaking COVID campaign promises.

On the Biden administration enacting self-quarantine policies, Doocy questioned how officials would enforce it.

"Do you send somebody to the door that just came back from overseas regardless of vaccination status and testing status to make sure that they are home?" Doocy asked.

And then they take the next step:

Banning domestic travel not off the table

Even though Biden suspended his vaccine mandate for federal workers to save himself a few approval points, he’s nevertheless looking for alternative ways to “force” people to get vaccinated, and a domestic travel ban is one such possibility.

“So, the President said earlier today that there haven’t been any recommendations to put in place domestic travel requirements. But what we saw with the Delta variant is that once it was already here, it spread rapidly across the country. So why not have any testing or vaccination requirements whatsoever for domestic air travel since people are, you know, going fairly openly across the country?” a reporter asked Psaki.

“Well, I think what you heard the President say […] was that he wasn’t taking any options off the table, but he’s going to rely on that advice of his health and medical experts,” Psaki responded.

However, like his vaccine mandate, a ban on domestic travel is also unconstitutional, as it is guaranteed under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Unfortunately, the Biden administration doesn’t even consider the Constitution as a guideline, let alone a set of rules.

Dr. Fauci also revealed back in September during an interview on the “Skimm This” podcast that a vaccine mandate for travel was under consideration. “I would support that,” he said. “If you want to get on a plane and travel, then you should be vaccinated.”

The scary thing is, they think they have the power to do this.

When I signed into my AOL account a few minutes ago, its news feed (often fake, provided by Yahoo) had a big red banner proclaiming "first case of Omnicron variant found in the U.S."!
I am suitably panicked now!

Also the leading headline on Fox News website. Quick, everybody PANIC!

You mean like this??

quote:

Originally posted by YooperSigs:
If you take all of Granholms knowledge of the energy needs of our country and stick it up a gnat's ass, it would be like putting a BB into a box car.
She is tied with our esteemed Transportation Secretary in incompetence.

Why focus on any one of Biden's administration. All of them are utterly incompetent. I have never seen a more incompetent group of buffoons in the last 25 years.

quote:

Originally posted by Shaql:
Dr. Fauci also revealed back in September during an interview on the “Skimm This” podcast that a vaccine mandate for travel was under consideration. “I would support that,” he said. “If you want to get on a plane and travel, then you should be vaccinated.”

Because 'everyone' travels by plane. I'll be driving to Georgia and then onto North Carolina for Christmas and New Years. Guess I'll have to handle the super spreader duties since people won't be able to fly. This administration is truly retarded on every level.

Great idea Fauci. Given the rising number of post-vaccination blood clot cases, I think everyone should go get their 2nd booster and then fly for 5 hours at 30,000 feet.

WTF, put on a Muppets Christmas thing on YouTube on my Roku TV and I’m forced to sit through a propaganda ad about how Joe Biden is fixing the shipping and supply chain mess and all is well. How is this even friggen legal?

seen at CTH

"Earlier today Joe Biden compared the shortage of essential products, pet foods, raw materials, petroleum products and chemicals in the U.S. (due to his self-inflicted energy policy) to the shortage of Cabbage Patch dolls in the 1980’s."

In reference to Bidet video on supply chain problems:

Do you know who doesn't have a supply chain problem? Hunter Biden, he is still getting cash, drugs, and hookers.

Biden legal defeats rapidly piling up across the nation on broad array of policy fronts

https://justthenews.com/govern..._campaign=newsletter

Since President Biden took office in January, federal courts across the country have ruled against his administration time and again, finding many of his policies violate the Constitution. The Biden legal defeats have extended nationwide, impacting a wide range of issues — most recently vaccine mandates.

On Tuesday, federal judges blocked the administration from enforcing two mandates requiring millions of Americans to get the COVID-19 vaccine.

In one case, Judge Terry Doughty of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana issued a preliminary injunction halting the start of Biden's national vaccine mandate for health care workers. The injunction temporarily blocks the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) from enforcing the order.

"There is no question that mandating a vaccine to 10.3 million health care workers is something that should be done by Congress, not a government agency," Doughty wrote. "It is not clear that even an act of Congress mandating a vaccine would be constitutional."

Doughty's ruling applies nationwide except in 10 states, where CMS was already blocked from enforcing the mandate due to a separate order issued on Monday by a federal court in Missouri. The judge in St. Louis sided with the 10 states which joined a lawsuit against Biden's requirement that all health workers in hospitals and nursing homes be fully vaccinated by Jan. 4.

In another adverse ruling, U.S. District Judge Gregory Van Tatenhove of the Eastern District of Kentucky blocked the administration from implementing its vaccine mandate for federal government contractors and subcontractors.

"This is not a case about whether vaccines are effective," Van Tatenhove wrote in his opinion. "They are. Nor is this a case about whether the government, at some level, and in some circumstances, can require citizens to obtain vaccines. It can."

Instead, he continued, the question before him was whether the president had the authority to mandate employees of federal contractors and subcontractors to receive the vaccine.

"In all likelihood, the answer to that question is no," the judge wrote.

Van Tatenhove's ruling applies to Kentucky, Ohio, and Tennessee — the three states that filed the lawsuit.

These losses for Biden came after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which is based in New Orleans, last month temporarily blocked the president's broader mandate requiring private businesses with 100 or more employees to ensure all workers get vaccinated or submit to weekly COVID-19 testing. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration is charged with enforcing the order through seldom-used emergency powers.

One week later, the Fifth Circuit Court reaffirmed its stay on Biden's order, citing a retweet from White House chief of staff Ron Klain as a key piece of evidence. In September, Klain retweeted a post from MSNBC anchor Stephanie Ruhle, who praised Biden's mandate as "the ultimate work-around" to avoid potential constitutional challenges.

"The mandate is a one-size-fits-all sledgehammer that makes hardly any attempt to account for differences in workplaces (and workers)," Circuit Judge Kurt Engelhardt wrote in his opinion, calling the order "staggeringly overboard."

Beyond vaccine mandates, the courts have quashed several other efforts by Biden to respond to COVID-19, deeming them unconstitutional. In June, for example, a federal judge ruled the CDC can't dictate rules for cruise ships, ruling against the administration for exceeding its constitutional authority.

Then in August, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the Biden administration's federal moratorium on residential evictions.

Citing the economic fallout from the pandemic, the administration had imposed the moratorium, leading to a legal challenge from a coalition of landlords and real estate groups.

"The [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or CDC] has imposed a nationwide moratorium on evictions in reliance on a decades-old statute that authorizes it to implement measures like fumigation and pest extermination," the majority opinion read. "It strains credulity to believe that this statute grants the CDC the sweeping authority that it asserts."

"If a federally imposed eviction moratorium is to continue, Congress must specifically authorize it," the opinion added. "Our system does not permit agencies to act unlawfully even in pursuit of desirable ends."

The high court's decision came two days after it denied Biden's legal bid to rescind the Remain in Mexico Policy, officially called the Migrant Protection Protocols — another major loss in the courts. Under the protocols, a central feature of the Trump administration's immigration policy, asylum seekers from Central America had to stay in Mexico during their immigration proceedings.

Despite being ordered to reinstate the Remain in Mexico policy, the Biden administration is still fighting to terminate it, so far to no avail.

This wasn't the first time the courts proved to be a roadblock for Biden's immigration agenda. Less than a week after Biden assumed office, a federal court in Texas temporarily blocked the Biden administration's 100-day moratorium on deportations of some illegal immigrants.

In its opinion, the court derided the administration for omitting "a rational explanation grounded in the facts reviewed and the factors considered." This omission, the court explained, made the Department of Homeland Security's "determination to institute a 100-day pause on deportations an arbitrary and capricious choice."

Biden's losses in the courts also extend to farming. In Wisconsin, a federal judge halted Biden's controversial $4 billion race-based federal relief program for farmers. The court found "the only consideration in determining whether a farmer or rancher's loans should be completely forgiven is the person's race or national origin, " noted legal expert Jonathan Turley. Therefore, farmers were "experiencing discrimination at the hands of their government."

A federal court in Texas found similar discrimination by the Biden administration, but in a different context: restaurants. Indeed, the Restaurant Restoration Fund, approved by Congress to help struggling restaurants during the pandemic, gave preference to women, minorities and "socially and economically disadvantaged" people, leading the court to deem the program discriminatory.

Back in June, another federal judge issued a preliminary injunction blocking the Biden administration from pausing new oil and gas leases on federal land. Judge Doughty, the same one who ruled against Biden's vaccine mandate for health care workers, wrote in his opinion that the administration can't legally stop leasing federal territory for oil-and-gas production without approval from Congress.

One of Biden's most notorious legal defeats was decided by the Supreme Court in June. In Terry v. United States, Tarahrick Terry, a criminal who pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute an unspecified amount of crack in 2008, argued for a sentence reduction under the First Step Act, President Trump's criminal justice reform law.

Both the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled against Terry, who then petitioned to the Supreme Court. The Trump administration was preparing to defend its position and argue against Terry, noting that the First Step Act was meant to provide leniency to minor drug offenders sentenced to disproportionately long sentences and that Terry was in a different category.

But once in charge, the Biden administration told the Supreme Court it wouldn't defend the ruling, calling it an error and siding with Terry. The high court ruled unanimously against the administration, dismissing its arguments as "sleight of hand."

Despite the above losses and others that Biden has suffered in the courts, he and his team appear undeterred in pushing the legal envelope in pursuit of their policy agenda. It seems their success — or failure — will be determined at least as much in the courtroom as in the Capitol.

Dim bulb