^^^^That’s some rich stuff.

Lefty heads explode

quote:

Originally posted by MikeinNC:
^^^^That’s some rich stuff.

Lefty heads explode

Ya think DeSantis maybe had that idea in mind?

State militias are not a new idea.

I love how the Left is freaking out and screeching about DeSantis’s “private army”. Anything to taint and damage the guy ahead of 2024, FFS

Rare combat camera of The Grand Army of The Everglades firing cannon as they push north to liberate Georgia. The audio recording was a little scratchy but in this transcript are the words from an Everglades Army artillery officer on that day:

"We fired our cannon 'till the barrel melted down so we grabbed an alligator and we fought another round. We filled his head with cannonballs and powdered his behind, and when we touched the powder off the gator lost his mind"

quote:

Originally posted by mbinky:
So…. I sit down this evening and I check the news. Now I had been driving all day, and I had heard about Biden’s cough and how gas prices were actually down (wink wink). But it wasn’t until I sat down and checked the internet that I learned that Governor DeSantis had formed up a Florida Guard.

Governor DeSantis continues to make me happy I voted for him. $3.5M or so for a "State Guard" is not a very serious number. He is trolling all too well regarding what he saw the pentagon signaling to Oklahoma's national guard. The loss of national recognition, some reference to being "downgraded" to a Militia. Just begging to get called out. The added benefit, its appealing to most Floridians, and drives the mental giants we call "journalists"...mad.
"Red Army" so on.

Biden’s top aide Ron Klain complains press coverage is too negative

https://nypost.com/2021/12/04/...verage-too-negative/

He’s the Whine House Chief of Staff.

President Biden’s top aide, Ron Klain, took to Twitter Saturday to decry press coverage of his boss.

The chief of staff — known to insiders as the “Prime Minister” for his outside influence inside the West Wing — shared an opinion essay from the Washington Post arguing that Biden was receiving worse coverage than former President Trump.

The piece from Post opinion columnist Dana Milbank warned that “My colleagues in the media are serving as accessories to the murder of democracy.”

Milbank said he came to the conclusion after an analysis of more than 200,000 articles from 65 news organizations by the information company FiscalNote.

“We need a skeptical, independent press. But how about being partisans for democracy? The country is in an existential struggle between self-governance and an authoritarian alternative,” Milbank carped.

Klain agreed. “Submitted for your consideration,” he said linking to the piece.

During his four years in office, Trump was subjected to withering and relentless press coverage which included a years-long inquiry into unsubstantiated allegations of collusion with Russia. During the 2020 presidential campaign, unflattering news about Biden — specifically relating to his business dealings with son Hunter — was actively suppressed by journalists and social media platforms and falsely labeled by Biden aides and supporters as Russian disinformation.

“Only an idiot or a journalist would find this persuasive,” GOP strategist Luke Thompson told The Post.

Frank, thank you for that.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/...arris-story-n2600135

Days after news came out that Vice President Kamala Harris would be losing not only her top adviser, Symone Sanders, but two other staffers, The Washington Post ran a piece noting the departures “[reignite] questions about her leadership style—and her future ambitions.”

The article comes less than a month after CNN ran a brutal story on the “entrenched dysfunction and lack of focus” by the VP and her staff.

In the report published Saturday, WaPo details how former staffers who worked with her prior to her becoming VP, said a “consistent problem” with the Democrat is that she would “refuse to wade into briefing materials prepared by staff members, then berate employees when she appeared unprepared.”

“It’s clear that you’re not working with somebody who is willing to do the prep and the work,” one former staffer told the Post. “With Kamala you have to put up with a constant amount of soul-destroying criticism and also her own lack of confidence. So you’re constantly sort of propping up a bully and it’s not really clear why.”

They are prepping her for culling. She was never more than a seat occupier anyway. All be design.

If you are referring to Harris, "culling" how?
She was elected to the office and will occupy it for another three plus years.

Do we believe that somehow the Vice President can just be fired by someone in the Democrat hierarchy?

^^IRT getting rid of an elected official, all you have to do is drag out the skeletons…slowly and alert the media, and she will be gone if they want to get rid of her.

I don’t know what hers are but I’m sure she has something she worries about

quote:

Originally posted by sigfreund:
If you are referring to Harris, "culling" how?
She was elected to the office and will occupy it for another three plus years.

Do we believe that somehow the Vice President can just be fired by someone in the Democrat hierarchy?

She can't be 'fired,' per se. Not even a (real) President can force a VP to leave. The VP CAN, however, decide to resign whenever they feel like it.

I agree with MikeinNC - they (whoever the people who are REALLY in charge of the presidency right now, and it's NOT president potato) will simply and quietly ask her to resign. She will come up with some face-saving bs about white supremacy, health issues, spending time with family, racism, more white supremacy, etc, and be allowed to leave without anybody knowing all the shady crap they certainly have on her. She will be replaced with a DNC-approved alternate, who will be the DNC's REAL choice for the presidency. Then, when president potato has his final 'health crisis,' he will resign, and the new VP will take over.

There is a reason the DNC entered the TWO most spineless, gutless, and dull candidates for their 2020 run - so they could exert 100% control over both of them. For now, they both get to play pretend, act like they are in control of the Executive Branch, and get a butt-load of free travel and benefits. They will both benefit financially - book deals, plus a lot of under-the-table stuff we'll never hear about (in the media, at least).

It won't last, and this shouldn't surprise anybody who's paying attention.

She's unqualified, she's a dilettante and she's lazy.

Theres a reason that she was one of the least popular dem prez candidates and dropped out Dec 3 2019 when there were still 6 in the race (despite conspiracy theories the Obiden machine got her to do it for future tit for tat).

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/...arris-story-n2600135

Days after news came out that Vice President Kamala Harris would be losing not only her top adviser, Symone Sanders, but two other staffers, The Washington Post ran a piece noting the departures “[reignite] questions about her leadership style—and her future ambitions.”

The article comes less than a month after CNN ran a brutal story on the “entrenched dysfunction and lack of focus” by the VP and her staff.

In the report published Saturday, WaPo details how former staffers who worked with her prior to her becoming VP, said a “consistent problem” with the Democrat is that she would “refuse to wade into briefing materials prepared by staff members, then berate employees when she appeared unprepared.”

“It’s clear that you’re not working with somebody who is willing to do the prep and the work,” one former staffer told the Post. “With Kamala you have to put up with a constant amount of soul-destroying criticism and also her own lack of confidence. So you’re constantly sort of propping up a bully and it’s not really clear why.”

As I understand it if ,la resigns, the newly appointed VP has to be approved by both houses of congress.

Without the VP vote to break the tie, Senate vote is a wash and VP seat goes unfilled untl the next election.

quote:

Originally posted by Hound Dog:

quote:

Originally posted by sigfreund:
If you are referring to Harris, "culling" how?
She was elected to the office and will occupy it for another three plus years.

Do we believe that somehow the Vice President can just be fired by someone in the Democrat hierarchy?

She can't be 'fired,' per se. Not even a (real) President can force a VP to leave. The VP CAN, however, decide to resign whenever they feel like it.

I agree with MikeinNC - they (whoever the people who are REALLY in charge of the presidency right now, and it's NOT president potato) will simply and quietly ask her to resign. She will come up with some face-saving bs about white supremacy, health issues, spending time with family, racism, more white supremacy, etc, and be allowed to leave without anybody knowing all the shady crap they certainly have on her. She will be replaced with a DNC-approved alternate, who will be the DNC's REAL choice for the presidency. Then, when president potato has his final 'health crisis,' he will resign, and the new VP will take over.

There is a reason the DNC entered the TWO most spineless, gutless, and dull candidates for their 2020 run - so they could exert 100% control over both of them. For now, they both get to play pretend, act like they are in control of the Executive Branch, and get a butt-load of free travel and benefits. They will both benefit financially - book deals, plus a lot of under-the-table stuff we'll never hear about (in the media, at least).

It won't last, and this shouldn't surprise anybody who's paying attention.

Dems would feel horrible doing dirt to a woman of color in public. Dems are perfectly comfortable with ignoring women of color in private - which is why their leadership tends to be lily white and why you only see Dem politicians of color on TV when white Dems want to emphasize a point.

The Dems have no need for Kamala to resign; they're perfectly accustomed to ignoring her and working around her, and doing so allows others to take the initiative.

quote:

,la

quote:

Originally posted by Il Cattivo:
Dems would feel horrible doing dirt to a woman of color in public.

No, Dems would feel horrible being seen to doing dirt to a WoC in public.

quote:

Originally posted by Il Cattivo:
Dems would feel horrible doing dirt to a woman of color in public. Dems are perfectly comfortable with ignoring women of color in private - which is why their leadership tends to be lily white and why you only see Dem politicians of color on TV when white Dems want to emphasize a point.

The Dems have no need for Kamala to resign; they're perfectly accustomed to ignoring her and working around her, and doing so allows others to take the initiative...

I agree, but what about 2024? Are they going to have a senile fossil (heck, that's him now) pretend to campaign along with a VP disliked by everyone?

The Dems are in a bind that is totally self-inflicted.

quote:

Originally posted by MikeinNC:
^^IRT getting rid of an elected official, all you have to do is drag out the skeletons…slowly and alert the media, and she will be gone if they want to get rid of her.

I don’t know what hers are but I’m sure she has something she worries about

I respectfully disagree. She HAS no skeletons. She has been bared for the world to see. That woman has no soul, no remorse, and no ethical breach that keeps her awake at night. I'm sure she sleeps like a baby, being the whore that she is.

Attempting to remove her will cause a backlash, only and if only the Krimson Kenyan comes out from the control center and does all the media to remove and admonishes her, then maybe just maybe she’s gone. Otherwise she’s entrenched.