SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    The Trump Presidency : Year VI
Page 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 ... 62
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
The Trump Presidency : Year VI Login/Join 
Member
Picture of Rawny
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by yanici:
I thought it was out of line and rather stupid of him. I love the guy but sometimes his brashness is misplaced.
If Trump said that to the Japanese PM, I'd be inclined to agree. This is just some pissant reporter acting petulant. He deserved to get his pee pee wacked.
 
Posts: 2965 | Location: San Hozay, KA | Registered: August 09, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Semper Fi - 1775
Picture of Ronin1069
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by nhracecraft:
Stupid?? Sorry dude, you're just wrong! The VAST Majority of us (somehow it's apparently not everyone though) voted for this...ALL of it! Big Grin Razz


I voted for “no more wars” and full disclosure of Epstein.

Truthfully I’m feeling pretty let down.


___________________________
All it takes...is all you got.
____________________________
For those who have fought for it, Freedom has a flavor the protected will never know

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
 
Posts: 12653 | Location: Belly of the Beast | Registered: January 02, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Main Thing Is
Not To Get Excited
Picture of wishfull thinker
posted Hide Post
I'm opposed to needless war. I see the dismemberment of states supporting terrorism as needed.


_______________________

 
Posts: 6787 | Location: Washington | Registered: November 06, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oriental Redneck
Picture of 12131
posted Hide Post
^^^^ 100% agree.


Q






 
Posts: 30961 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: September 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I think this is 100% the right move with respect to Iran.

When their negotiator sits across from you and not only says "No" to giving up the enriched uranium, but states that "We have enough to make 11 bombs"... Well, then you have to do something about that if your position is that Iran will never have a nuke on your watch.

This is not a new stance by The President, this has always been his stance going back decades. If you are an informed voter, then you should have been 100% knowledgeable about where he stood on this issue. There is plenty of video out there where he has been asked questions about Iran and he has been consistent, going back to the Iran Hostage debacle.


The "Boz"
 
Posts: 1643 | Location: Central Ohio, USA | Registered: May 29, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
Keep in mind that the US did not start the war with Iran. They started it in 1979 and have continued it since. It is long overdue that the US treated it as such because failure to act against aggression only encourages more aggression.

Will the current military action end the war for good? Probably not, but it's possible, and very few wars settle things forever. It's enough if they settle them for a time.




6.0/94.0

“I can’t give you brains, but I can give you a diploma.”
— The Wizard of Oz
 
Posts: 49513 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Commirado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Get Off My Lawn
Picture of oddball
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ronin1069:
I voted for “no more wars” and full disclosure of Epstein.

Truthfully I’m feeling pretty let down.





"I’m not going to read Time Magazine, I’m not going to read Newsweek, I’m not going to read any of these magazines; I mean, because they have too much to lose by printing the truth"- Bob Dylan, 1965
 
Posts: 19262 | Location: Texas | Registered: May 13, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of TigerDore
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sigfreund:
Keep in mind that the US did not start the war with Iran....

Amen and well said. Ignoring the largest sponsor of terror on the planet will not make them go away, it will only give them time to get stronger. They should have been dealt with long ago.


.
 
Posts: 10062 | Registered: September 26, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Thank you
Very little
Picture of HRK
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 27602 | Location: Gunshine State | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Common sense is genius dressed in its working clothes
Picture of sandman76
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TigerDore:
quote:
Originally posted by sigfreund:
Keep in mind that the US did not start the war with Iran....

Amen and well said. Ignoring the largest sponsor of terror on the planet will not make them go away, it will only give them time to get stronger. They should have been dealt with long ago.


.


Every president since Carter has probably wanted to do something about Iran. No one had the actual balls until now.


_______________________
“There is more stupidity than hydrogen in the universe, and it has a longer shelf life.”
― Frank Zappa
 
Posts: 2029 | Location: Douglas County, Colorado | Registered: July 13, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
semi-reformed sailor
Picture of MikeinNC
posted Hide Post
^^ concur




“You may beat me, but you will never win.” sigmonkey-2020

“ in my opinion, anything that we can do to trigger a potential aneurysm in a leftist is a good thing and worth doing” nhtagmember 2025
 
Posts: 12307 | Location: Temple, Texas! | Registered: October 07, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of TigerDore
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rawny:
If Trump said that to the Japanese PM, I'd be inclined to agree. This is just some pissant reporter acting petulant. He deserved to get his pee pee wacked.

Yep. It was a rude, stupid question.


.
 
Posts: 10062 | Registered: September 26, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
His Royal Hiney
Picture of Rey HRH
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by yanici:
quote:
Originally posted by Rey HRH:
I had to pop into this thread just to say this:

Trump was hosting the Japanese minister in the White House today. During the press conference, a Japanese reporter asked why Trump didn't notify allies before the attack on Iran. He said the Japanese people are very confused about this.

Trump said, "We wanted to come in hard. We wanted to surprise Iran. And who knows better than Japan about surprise attacks? Why didn't you tell us about Pearl Harbor in advance?"


I thought it was out of line and rather stupid of him. I love the guy but sometimes his brashness is misplaced.


You're going to have to explain what's so stupid about it. By you saying that, you must have thoughtfully considered what he said and the context in which he said it. Please intelligently articulate what you think was stupid about it.

Also, what would you have preferred he said?



"It did not really matter what we expected from life, but rather what life expected from us. We needed to stop asking about the meaning of life, and instead to think of ourselves as those who were being questioned by life – daily and hourly. Our answer must consist not in talk and meditation, but in right action and in right conduct. Life ultimately means taking the responsibility to find the right answer to its problems and to fulfill the tasks which it constantly sets for each individual." Viktor Frankl, Man's Search for Meaning, 1946.
 
Posts: 21698 | Location: The Free State of Arizona - Ditat Deus | Registered: March 24, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of TigerDore
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sandman76:
Every president since Carter has probably wanted to do something about Iran. No one had the actual balls until now.

I agree. With one exception, I believe that Reagan had the balls. I can only guess that, between a complete rebuilding of the military and the Democrats' seething rage over him getting the hostages freed, delivering one of the biggest (Carter) and the biggest (Dukakis) electoral smackdowns in US history, along with his great economic turnaround, Ronaldus Magnus decided that he needed to keep his powder dry.


.
 
Posts: 10062 | Registered: September 26, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I think President Reagan had the will and the balls to do this. I think President Trump had the will, the balls, and the military ability to carry the mission out. Back in the Reagan days he absolutely would have had to put troops in Iran to accomplish anything of meaning.

What we are witnessing here is a confluence of the will to act and military technology advances and coordination allowing it to actually be done without massive involvement of ground troops.
 
Posts: 8479 | Location: Florida | Registered: June 18, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
No More
Mr. Nice Guy
posted Hide Post
I believe Trump has a new philosophy, too. In the past we actively installed or attempted to install new regimes which we expected to be friendly to us. That required extensive boots on the ground, and was counterproductive in the end. We tried to win the hearts and minds of populations by waging war in their country.

Trump's approach looks to be removing hostile regimes and then leave it to the locals. If the new regime becomes hostile, Trump will remove it.

I don't think previous Presidents had Trump's mindset.
 
Posts: 11150 | Location: On the mountain off the grid | Registered: February 25, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Respectfully you missed my point. In the Reagan era the military technology to wage air warfare on this level did not exist. Back then you sent in Wild Weasels to get SAM sites to target and shoot and then they tried to shoot the shooter. An amazingly brave and deadly form of warfare. Nothing even close to what occurred in the last month. The tech has matured to allow thousands and thousands of combat missions with ZERO loss due to the enemy.

It doesn’t matter what Reagan wanted to do. What we have seen in the nuclear bunker bombing, Maduro, and now this has never happened in the history of warfare. Never. Pick any age or era and never have the tools on one side been this overwhelming effective.

This reads like a sci fi book where modern soldiers time travel back to kill knights. And they have air support.

Reagan’s philosophy was driven by what was actually doable with the tools at hand, which inevitably led to “boots on the ground”.
 
Posts: 8479 | Location: Florida | Registered: June 18, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Shall Not Be Infringed
Picture of nhracecraft
posted Hide Post


____________________________________________________________

If Some is Good, and More is Better.....then Too Much, is Just Enough !!
Trump 47....Making America Great Again!
"May Almighty God bless the United States of America" - parabellum 7/26/20
Live Free or Die!
 
Posts: 10855 | Location: New Hampshire | Registered: October 29, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
No, not like
Bill Clinton
Picture of BigSwede
posted Hide Post
I'm good with it



 
Posts: 6782 | Location: GA | Registered: September 23, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Get Off My Lawn
Picture of oddball
posted Hide Post
They had a small dinner last night at the White House and all was excellent between the two. She is becoming a great ally to Trump.

And here she is in the middle of this clip, reacting to the Auto Pen portrait of Biden. Smile




"I’m not going to read Time Magazine, I’m not going to read Newsweek, I’m not going to read any of these magazines; I mean, because they have too much to lose by printing the truth"- Bob Dylan, 1965
 
Posts: 19262 | Location: Texas | Registered: May 13, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 ... 62 
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    The Trump Presidency : Year VI

© SIGforum 2026