quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:



Everything about Nancy Pelosi is false. Her words disguise a viscous, purely partisan and self-serving nature. She received communion not as atonement for the nature of man and for her sins and for a union with Christ, but simply as a big "screw you, I'll show you".

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
Nancy Pelosi Defies Her Catholic Bishop, Receives Communion

https://www.lifenews.com/2022/...ral-catholic-church/

In defiance of her own Archbishop’s decision to deny her communion because of her aggressive promotion of abortion, new reports indicate Nancy Pelosi received communion yesterday at a liberal Catholic church in Washington.

quote:

Originally posted by Rey HRH:

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
Nancy Pelosi Defies Her Catholic Bishop, Receives Communion

https://www.lifenews.com/2022/...ral-catholic-church/

In defiance of her own Archbishop’s decision to deny her communion because of her aggressive promotion of abortion, new reports indicate Nancy Pelosi received communion yesterday at a liberal Catholic church in Washington.

I'm willing to bet this is the first time in a long time she's received communion. She did it just to prove to the Archbishop of San Francisco that she can go around him.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
https://www.breitbart.com/poli...-records-affidavits/

The Supreme Court’s probe into the leaked draft abortion opinion has reportedly intensified into requiring law clerks to hand over phone records and sign affidavits.

“Some clerks are apparently so alarmed over the moves, particularly the sudden requests for private cell data, that they have begun exploring whether to hire outside counsel,” CNN reported. It is not clear what scope, content, or time period the affidavits and cell phone search may cover.

The reported escalation into cell phone data and affidavits indicate the court has not found the leaker. Cell phone data may be a key to discovering the leaker’s identity.

Both hard copies and electronic copies of draft opinions were likely circulated within the court from Justice Samuel Alito’s February 11 draft opinion. The leaked draft was probably distributed among the court’s clerks and staffers of the nine justices. The number of individuals who likely had access to the leaked opinion may be over 60 people.

Chief Justice John Roberts reportedly held a group meeting with the court’s law clerks, but it is unknown if any individual interviews have occurred to discover who leaked the draft opinion on May 2. Roberts initiated the probe on May 3 by designating the marshal of the court, Gail Curley, as the lead.

“This was a singular and egregious breach of that trust that is an affront to the Court and the community of public servants who work here,” Roberts said in a press release.

“To the extent this betrayal of the confidences of the Court was intended to undermine the integrity of our operations, it will not succeed,” Roberts wrote. “The work of the Court will not be affected in any way.”

quote:

Originally posted by spunk639:
A Spanish Priest, (Probably White Hispanic aka racist) disagrees with Whoopi.

quote:

Originally posted by Lefty Sig:

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
https://www.breitbart.com/poli...-records-affidavits/

As far as I understand, this is not a criminal investigation because leaking the draft my not technically be illegal. Rather, it is an employee misconduct investigation. Last I checked, no staffer or clerk is entitled to a job at the Supreme Court, and violating their terms of employment is punishable up to and including dismissal. Failure to follow ethics about confidentiality may lead to disbarment but that is administrative and not criminal. Failure to comply with an investigation is grounds for dismissal, and I don't think you are entitled to legal representation during misconduct investigations. I may be wrong about that - people represented by unions get representation, and some staffers might be unionized, but I doubt the clerks are.

In any case, government issued phones are certainly within limits. Failure to turn one over or erasing the phone before turning it in should result in dismissal. I'm not sure about personal phones. I would not turn my personal phone over to HR without a court order nor do I think anyone else should.

quote:

Originally posted by DaveL:
And good luck becoming a member of the bar - I’m only familiar with Florida but the character and fitness investigation is very thorough and unforgiving.

quote:

Originally posted by Hound Dog:

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
Nancy Pelosi Defies Her Catholic Bishop, Receives Communion

In defiance of her own Archbishop’s decision to deny her communion because of her aggressive promotion of abortion, new reports indicate Nancy Pelosi received communion yesterday at a liberal Catholic church in Washington.

She's not fooling anybody (that matters).

Galations 6:7: Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.


She will have to stand before God and give an account for what she's done with her life, as well as what she's done with her great power and authority. I truly pity that woman for what she will experience that day.