The jury should follow the evidence and the law. If that does not suffice for a guilty verdict, then they should not care how miscreants react.

An age-old issue: Fiat justitia ruat caelum "Let justice be done though the heavens fall"

Reasonable doubt exists from my perspective. If the jury does the right thing he will be acquitted, the media arsonists will fan the flames, and cities will burn.

quote:

Originally posted by HayesGreener:
Reasonable doubt exists from my perspective. If the jury does the right thing he will be acquitted, the media arsonists will fan the flames, and cities will burn.

I truly believe that this is be design. Law abiding citizens are fed up with this behavior and I would not at all be surprised to see looters and arsonists being shot down in the streets this go around- the perfect opportunity for the leftist democRAT trash to point and say “see? Guns bad! Ban time!”. I hope to be proven wrong.

quote:

Originally posted by gearhounds:

quote:

Originally posted by HayesGreener:
Reasonable doubt exists from my perspective. If the jury does the right thing he will be acquitted, the media arsonists will fan the flames, and cities will burn.

I truly believe that this is be design. Law abiding citizens are fed up with this behavior and I would not at all be surprised to see looters and arsonists being shot down in the streets this go around- the perfect opportunity for the leftist democRAT trash to point and say “see? Guns bad! Ban time!”. I hope to be proven wrong.

Well, I’m not looking to go shooting down rioters, but I have to admit to thinking that a Tiananmen Square type response to to the protestors might have its attractions. Nope, don’t want that kind of government, but darn, it sure seems like these yutes have not benefitted from a lack of training in natural consequences...

quote:

Originally posted by slosig:
...but I have to admit to thinking that a Tiananmen Square type response to to the protestors might have its attractions.

Night sticks, dogs, and fire hoses worked in the 60s and they'll work today. It just has to be done with conviction and consistency.

And, if that doesn't work? Send in the Ohio National Guard.

quote:

Originally posted by HayesGreener:
Reasonable doubt exists from my perspective. If the jury does the right thing he will be acquitted, the media arsonists will fan the flames, and cities will burn.

Absolutely! The defense has only started presenting it's case, but reasonable doubt should've been apparent to everybody after the defense raked the states witnesses over the coals last week during cross examination.

I don't know if that's going to help Chauvin though. Things that I thought "NO WAY!" just a couple years ago are now everyday occurrences. It's getting really weird!

Silly, dumb bitch. Legitimately one of the stupidest things I've ever read.



https://mobile.twitter.com/che.../1381975967917240322

After that asshole Obama basically told people they had a right to resist law enforcement, I’m not at all shocked by the white saviors making statements like this. The real irony is that the lack of compliance with lawful arrest is what contributes most to these incidents.

Dr. Fowler's testimony is particularly informative. I had no idea he would be going into so many topics.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
Silly, dumb bitch. Legitimately one of the stupidest things I've ever read.



https://mobile.twitter.com/che.../1381975967917240322

Non compliance gives you a 100% chance of being tazed or shot. Apparently, she's not good at math.

I am a white male and I sure as hell am not going to resist or give lip to the armed gentleman with the radio to call more armed gentleman.

I’ll take it up with the courts.

The problem with the VAST majority of these folks are that they HAVE warrants or ARE In the process of breaking the law so they will, of course, have little recourse in the courts, but the point still stands if you don’t want the angry men with metal sticks and guns to not killify you, you might want to do your best to make nice with them. I mean even if said cop is being the biggest belligerent asshole in the world, hell be nicer cuz he’s probably looking for a reason.

“Why hello nice officer ima leave my hands on the wheel or out the window until you decide how you want to proceed. My license is in my back pocket, you want me or you to get it. Etc. Etc.”

EVERY DAMN TIME THIS HAPPENS ITS BECAUSE SOME JACKWAGON HAS PREVIOUSLY DONE ILLEGAL SHIT AND DOES STUPID SHIT DURING A STOP!!

quote:

Originally posted by cslinger:
I am a white male and I sure as hell am not going to resist or give lip to the armed gentleman with the radio to call more armed gentleman.

I’ll take it up with the courts.

The problem with the VAST majority of these folks are that they HAVE warrants or ARE In the process of breaking the law so they will, of course, have little recourse in the courts, but the point still stands if you don’t want the angry men with metal sticks and guns to not killify you, you might want to do your best to make nice with them. I mean even if said cop is being the biggest belligerent asshole in the world, hell be nicer cuz he’s probably looking for a reason.

“Why hello nice officer ima leave my hands on the wheel or out the window until you decide how you want to proceed. My license is in my back pocket, you want me or you to get it. Etc. Etc.”

EVERY DAMN TIME THIS HAPPENS ITS BECAUSE SOME JACKWAGON HAS PREVIOUSLY DONE ILLEGAL SHIT AND DOES STUPID SHIT DURING A STOP!!

Funny how that works.
Behave like a civilized human get treated like a civilized human. No matter what race, creed or whatever you are.
Behave like a thug get treated like a thug. How hard is that to understand?

quote:

Originally posted by PeteF:
Funny how that works.
Behave like a civilized human get treated like a civilized human. No matter what race, creed or whatever you are.
Behave like a thug get treated like a thug. How hard is that to understand?

Way too hard, apparently. Common sense is becoming less and less common.

quote:

Originally posted by SIG4EVA:

Non compliance gives you a 100% chance of being tazed or shot. Apparently, she's not good at math.

Well, if while resisting arrest you get accidentally shot 50% of the time, does that not mean that you would be shot on purpose the other 50% of the time which adds up to 100%?

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
Silly, dumb bitch. Legitimately one of the stupidest things I've ever read.

[IMAGE]

She's just a D list has been and desperate for some attention. She also shared earlier that she didn't think there should be a trial for Chauvin since it was "all on video". Yep, no innocent until proven guilty with her (or many other retards on the left).

quote:

Originally posted by PeteF:
How hard is that to understand?

Apparently, like rocket science hard because these savants in da hood can't seem to figure it out.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
Silly, dumb bitch. Legitimately one of the stupidest things I've ever read.


https://mobile.twitter.com/che.../1381975967917240322

If you think what that bimbo said is stupid, read the comments on Twitter. She is not alone and often pales in comparison.

Where’s the comet

quote:

Originally posted by rburg: Please explain the "root cause" thing if you will or can.

Cause of death determinations can be tricky to decipher because different jurisdictions use different terminology but generally a death certificate will contain a list of things starting with the immediate cause that lead to the death and working backward through the chain of events to the initial event that set things in motion.

Say a person is hit by a truck and dies - the death certificate could say "cerebral hemorrhage as a consequence of blunt force trauma to the cranium as a consequence of a person versus vehicle collision." The ultimate cause of death is the cerebral hemorrhage but the root cause (as that term is being used by the witness at issue) would be the vehicle collision.

quote:

Originally posted by gearhounds:
After that asshole Obama basically told people they had a right to resist law enforcement, I’m not at all shocked by the white saviors making statements like this. The real irony is that the lack of compliance with lawful arrest is what contributes most to these incidents.

Not most, ALL.

quote:

Originally posted by Gustofer:

quote:

Originally posted by slosig:
...but I have to admit to thinking that a Tiananmen Square type response to to the protestors might have its attractions.

Night sticks, dogs, and fire hoses worked in the 60s and they'll work today. It just has to be done with conviction and consistency.

And, if that doesn't work? Send in the Ohio National Guard.

Asian and European countries have TONS of experience with this stuff. They know how to defend against, and stop, decisively, mobs and rioters without going unhinged, and without firearms. Sadly, I feel a "Tiananmen Square type response" in many, too many U.S. cities/counties, would be met overly harshly.

Me: Love the police; a police fan; respect, honor, listen to & obey, move on. Have also been dismayed by the militarization of the police for years -- which is not good in the U.S.A.

I lived in an overly (established) white suburban family kid area in north (Dallas) Texas for over 15 years. I saw the the local police dept. driving armored vehicles around, some of which had stickers that said, "paid for by seized property assets." Two strikes there against the govt. IMO.

POLICE, are to protect and serve. Nothing beyond that. IMO.

Militarized police* (equipment) in the U.S.A. is out of bound.


*Applies to any/all political parties; anyone who likes it in one, has to accept it in another.