The juror names list will be available in 14 days - make Day-15 hell for 11 of them!

There has never been a better time to attack feminazism in this country if not the world.

Women giving this murderess a pass because HORMONES or POST PARTUM or MEN DON’T UNDERSTAND have opened themselves up to losing power to n politics, operatingbheavy machinery, serving in the military, you name it. They’ve embraced mental instability as an acceptable defense. For murdering helpless children. Hell, make it a screen out question on job applications. “I’m sorry ma’am, your answer to question #7 indicates you are not psychologically capable of safely flying a fighter jet loaded with ordinance”.

The prosecutor seemed just a regular law and order guy who couldn't fathom how the case wasn't a slam dunk. The defense attorney a clever leftist who knew exactly which buttons to push with the heavily propagandized jury. Hard to believe a case like this would get this outcome anywhere but a very blue cesspool. We really may not be able to share a country with this level of state sponsored evil forever.

The defense dragged the exhusband through the mud.
And pointed the fingers at him.
Too bad he cant sue them into poverty.

quote:

Originally posted by bdylan:
The prosecutor seemed just a regular law and order guy who couldn't fathom how the case wasn't a slam dunk. The defense attorney a clever leftist who knew exactly which buttons to push with the heavily propagandized jury. Hard to believe a case like this would get this outcome anywhere but a very blue cesspool. We really may not be able to share a country with this level of state sponsored evil forever.

Agreed. Just don’t know how.
I’d be happy if we could contain them in the leftist urban areas. But they spread… like cancer.

It seems that a big part of the debacle is that Mass requires the prosecution to prove she wasn't insane. In most states, if the defendant claims the insanity defense then they must prove it.

The difference between what regular people think insanity means vs what it means in the legal world is quite significant. Plus, without substantial experience with actual insane people, regular people just aren't capable of evaluating insanity.

I count myself as one of the people that would have difficulty discerning the difference, but I have no difficulty understanding that people like this woman need to be permanently removed from society.

For quite some time I've been of the opinion that some folks, like Lindsay Clancy supporters, should do well to experience some quality time in the company of a bipolar Italian Mafioso.

Ten (10) minutes tops, and their whole perspective on life, happiness, and all creatures great and small will get some much-needed restructuring.

But they wouldn't last three (3) minutes before crying for their mommy...

And that alone would get the Mafioso "unsettled"...

IMO these Clancy apologists are making the case why women presidents are a bad idea. If one can snap and kill the innocent and helpless with inappropriate accountability and we can’t identify her in advance, then none can be trusted with the nuclear football.

quote:

Originally posted by gearhounds:
There has never been a better time to attack feminazism in this country if not the world.

Women giving this murderess a pass because HORMONES or POST PARTUM or MEN DON’T UNDERSTAND have opened themselves up to losing power to n politics, operatingbheavy machinery, serving in the military, you name it. They’ve embraced mental instability as an acceptable defense. For murdering helpless children. Hell, make it a screen out question on job applications. “I’m sorry ma’am, your answer to question #7 indicates you are not psychologically capable of safely flying a fighter jet loaded with ordinance”.

That, or they’re as mentally and emotionally capable as men, and accountable for their actions. They’ve chosen to have it both ways, and take whichever approach best suits them for a given scenario. I agree that this absolutely needs to be part of the national discussion. You’re either as capable as men, and we accept you in places and roles we didn’t in the past, and you are accountable for your actions, or you say you aren’t fit for these kinds of roles for the same reasons so many say Clancy isn’t accountable for murdering her children.

quote:

Originally posted by jehzsa:
For quite some time I've been of the opinion that some folks, like Lindsay Clancy supporters, should do well to experience some quality time in the company of a bipolar Italian Mafioso.

Ten (10) minutes tops, and their whole perspective on life, happiness, and all creatures great and small will get some much-needed restructuring.

A college buddy became psychotic and tried to murder a fellow roommate. He was batshit crazy for a month before the attack, but though we tried there was nothing any authority could do until he tried to harm himself or others. So we saw insane in action for that month and then for the time period he was hospitalized, escaped, and finally put on trial.

So I know crazy when I see it, but have no confidence in being able to read someone's mind to know if they met the legal definition to be found not-guilty. The danger to society, though, is obvious.

After some years in prison he was let out, then killed a woman. Because he was insane.

quote:

So I know crazy when I see it, but have no confidence in being able to read someone's mind to know if they met the legal definition to be found not-guilty.

I'm certain you can. Because you don't have to be psychic.

A legal system relies on definitions. If some factors are involved, it's murder 1. If not, then it could be murder 2 or manslaughter.

The state of mind required in the definition of murder 1 (mens rea) does not require the ability to read someone's mind to be able to judge it. It can be inferred, proven, shown by the perpetrator's actions. Did he/she had a plan and carried it out. What did he/she do before and after the commission of the crime. Etc., etc., etc.

That's why definitions are so important. As to your college buddy, I have no idea if he murdered that woman. Did his actions show that he knew right from wrong when he did it?

Granted it's a tricky slope. Ever considered a murder so horrifying that you are unable to grasp/comprehend/understand how someone could commit such an act? Any LEO can explain your lack of comprehension --- you are normal. Normal people don't/can't even think about the whole gamut of possibilities that humans can inflict upon others.Then you hear words like, "how could he/she/somebody do that?".

No one ever said that it is a simple process. Or even trying to explain it. Is my explanation making sense?

"Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them."

It appears that the entire family is morally bankrupt.

https://x.com/MandyKennerly/st.../2096546621270200551

Woe to those who call evil good and good evil,
who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.

Nope, this bitch deserves to be at the end of a rope but since most states don't have the balls to kill worthless criminals anymore she should rot in jail for the rest of her life.

What I would recommend for the defense attorney with his tirade against the lone juror, has been declared unprotected speech by the Supreme Court of the United States.

quote:

Originally posted by jehzsa:

I'm certain you can. Because you don't have to be psychic.

A legal system relies on definitions. If some factors are involved, it's murder 1. If not, then it could be murder 2 or manslaughter.
.
.
.
No one ever said that it is a simple process. Or even trying to explain it. Is my explanation making sense?

My buddy planned his attack for at least an hour while he was waiting in ambush, but probably planned it for several days at least because of the weapon he used. He fled immediately. By those measures it was premeditated murder. But he pled self defense in court, claiming that people including his roommate were harming him with their brainwaves.

He also very likely killed a family member in what was a premeditated attack. And the woman he later killed, by our sane logic he had threatened during his peak insanity we witnessed, but he described it as wanting to protect her.

Nobody can know for sure what was in a person's mind in the moment they commit the crime when that person is crazy. I couldn't tell you that he knew what he was doing was morally wrong, but he knew it was illegal. He definitely needed lifelong psychiatric medication, and should have been kept locked up forever.