So either they lost the memo where Trump declassified the papers OR they planted the stuff they wanted to find.

Actually reading the search warrant, this was a huge fishing expedition as one of the things listed was ALL paperwork for Trump's entire presidency from when he took office to when he left. Due to the low ratings of season #1 of the January 6th Committee, they need new material for the narrative for the season 2 production coming up.

Just remember EVERY single thing Trump has said has been eventually proven true.

A person who tweets as "Kingmaker Big IF! (True)" made an observation about the warrant that I completely missed

Talk about a fishing expedition

from the warrant "property to be seized":

"Any physical documents with classification markings, ( remember this could include "Unclassified")

along with any containers/boxes ( including any other contents ) in which such documents are located,

as well as any other containers/boxes that are collectively stored or found together with the aforementioned documents and containers/boxes"


With something this broad the FBI might have taken everything there

^^^This one from the warrant jumped right off the page and is particularly rich:

c. Any government and/or Presidential Records created between January 20, 2017 and January 20, 2021...

quote:

^^^This one from the warrant jumped right off the page and is particularly rich:

c. Any government and/or Presidential Records created between January 20, 2017 and January 20, 2021...

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Standard boilerplate language. Most subpoenas and warrants have a clause covering anything and everything. They just inserted the word Presidential.

Anyone think that the “whistleblower“ works for the executive office? Like another agency?

Furthermore I disagree with the guy above that says Trump will be a lame duck from day one because he can’t run again. Lame duck means they’re neutered. Don’t see that happening with Trump.

quote:

Originally posted by ZSMICHAEL:

quote:

^^^This one from the warrant jumped right off the page and is particularly rich:

c. Any government and/or Presidential Records created between January 20, 2017 and January 20, 2021...

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Standard boilerplate language. Most subpoenas and warrants have a clause covering anything and everything. They just inserted the word Presidential.

Bullshit! EVERYTHING from his entire Presidency...They trying to erase him!

ETA - Not sure how you arrive at this conclusion. Warrants are definitely NOT supposed to have a clause covering anything and everything, unless of course they're issued by a corrupt and tyrannical .gov, as in a third world 'bananna republic' or communist dictatorship!

I just watched a clip from Laura Ingram and she said that the "whistleblower" may have been one of Trump's Secret Service agents.

Link to that clip.

Color me unshocked ^^^

He sure does hire some attractive lawyers.

quote:

Originally posted by nhracecraft:

quote:

Originally posted by ZSMICHAEL:

quote:

^^^This one from the warrant jumped right off the page and is particularly rich:

c. Any government and/or Presidential Records created between January 20, 2017 and January 20, 2021...

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Standard boilerplate language. Most subpoenas and warrants have a clause covering anything and everything. They just inserted the word Presidential.

Bullshit! EVERYTHING from his entire Presidency...They trying to erase him!

ETA - Not sure how you arrive at this conclusion. Warrants are definitely NOT supposed to have a clause covering anything and everything, unless of course they're issued by a corrupt and tyrannical .gov, as in a third world 'bananna republic' or communist dictatorship!

Speaking only about the search warrant ... I agree with ZSMICHAEL that the search warrant is boiler plate with fill in the blanks and usually will have some clause covering anything and everything. Not arguing, just the fact based on what the courts (not LEOs) created.

The search warrant really does not shed light on anything we are all wanting to know, and the search warrant "return" is very basic to the point that any of those boxes could also contain the complete collection of my grandmother's recipes.

What we want to see it the search warrant "affidavit" (currently sealed). It is the affidavit that will have all the details. Cleaver the language being used that the affidavit is sealed because of "on-going investigations".

Even Bill Maher is saying the FBI just made Trump into a martyr and greatly improved his chances of running again:


Bill Maher slams FBI's Trump raid and claims it has 'saved him politically' from losing to Gov. DeSantis because it will make him President Martyr

Good legal analysis of Trump raid at Coffee & Covid today...

The Biden Raid Roundup.

Yesterday, the Court unsealed the Biden Raid search warrant and the FBI’s inventory. As I predicted would happen, the new documents provided very little new information, and now everyone wants the affidavit.
Twitter avatar for @TheLeoTerrellTheLeoTerrell @TheLeoTerrell
I will say it over and over and over again. The warrant is meaningless. I want to see the affidavit , affidavit affidavit , affidavit. Merrick Garland release the affidavit.

August 12th 2022
2,474 Retweets10,592 Likes

Remember, nobody except the FBI and the Magistrate have seen the search warrant affidavit at this point. It was NOT provided to Trump or anyone on his team; they’d be the last people to get a copy, and it was not unsealed in the case.

Judicial Watch and several corporate media outlets, including The New York Times, have asked the Court to unseal ALL warrant materials, including the affidavit, “as expeditiously as possible.” The Court ordered the DOJ to respond to those requests by this Monday, August 15th. Obviously the DOJ will oppose unsealing the affidavit, or they’d have already agreed to its unsealing.

My guess is DOJ will cite “sources and methods” as its justification for keeping the affidavit under seal, because that’s what law enforcement always says, and it’s so murky and ambiguous that it’s almost impossible to argue against. Law enforcement always says, “judge, if we reveal our sources it will hurt the investigation, we obviously can’t tell you who the sources are or even confirm whether they exist or not, and it’s not good enough to just redact their name from the affidavit because someone can still guess their identity from the context.”

How do you argue with that?

A betting man would place his bitcoins on Magistrate Reinhart’s keeping the search warrant affidavit sealed, which will further inflame everybody and fuel all the wild conspiracy theories currently circulating social media.

If you want to take a look for yourself, here is a quick link to the now-unsealed search warrant and the inventory, six pages total.

quote:

Originally posted by erj_pilot:
https://twitter.com/razrelics/...kyr9N1uOJTSWWL2gvm_Q

That picture has proven to be a Photoshop, FNC got busted using it.

quote:

Originally posted by erj_pilot:
https://twitter.com/razrelics/...kyr9N1uOJTSWWL2gvm_Q

And because Washington is so immeasurably retarded at this point, Politifact had to come out and tell everyone the above Meme was not true and that Judge Reihart was not actually on a plane with Ghislaine Maxwell. In related news, water is wet and fire is hot.

quote:

Originally posted by PASig:
That picture has proven to be a Photoshop, FNC got busted using it.

No they didn't. I was always a GD joke. Unfortunately a big part of the country has its panties in such a wad that common sense and humor have completely left the building.

Of course it’s Photoshop… It’s a very famous photo of her with Epstein, changed to put in the scandalous magistrate.

Sorry y’all…deleting. Didn’t fact-check on that at all…my bad.

Need to bring back Effrem Zimbalist junior!