I think it has more to do with progressives' goal of making pedophilia a recognized "sexual preference"


https://www.opindia.com/2018/0...ves-are-at-it-again/

https://link.springer.com/arti...7/s10508-021-02057-x


(paywall) https://www.nytimes.com/2014/1...der-not-a-crime.html

quote:

Originally posted by LS1 GTO:

quote:

Originally posted by SIGnified:
So who in her family is the pervert?

Her dad or uncle?

quote:

Originally posted by Jimbo Jones:
I think it has more to do with progressives' goal of making pedophilia a recognized "sexual preference"


https://www.opindia.com/2018/0...ves-are-at-it-again/

https://link.springer.com/arti...7/s10508-021-02057-x


(paywall) https://www.nytimes.com/2014/1...der-not-a-crime.html

quote:

Originally posted by LS1 GTO:

quote:

Originally posted by SIGnified:
So who in her family is the pervert?

Her dad or uncle?

Makes perfect sense now that we know that the entire world leader ship was hanging with Jeffrey Epstein

So she's gonna defer to a biologist to define what a woman is. I'll take it. Painted herself into a corner.

Except here in bizarro world.

quote:

Originally posted by vinnybass:
So she's gonna defer to a biologist to define what a woman is. I'll take it. Painted herself into a corner.

Except here in bizarro world.

Loved the woman Tucker Carlson had on his show tonight that was caught on video at a swim meet commenting on Lia Thomas when some smarmy little prick in the crowd asked her if she was a biologist. Her response...."No I'm not. I'm also not a veterinarian, but I know what a dog is." Boom. Mic drop.

I can define what a "woman" is: a woman is an adult human whose DNA has 2 X chromosomes; and a man is an adult human with an X and a Y chromosome. That is as simple and unequivocal as it can get.

flashguy

The Emperor has no clothes.

Tucker does a good job going after Sharticus and his ridiculousness


Can't get it to embed

https://video.foxnews.com/v/63...036001#sp=show-clips

quote:

Can't get it to embed

Use rumble.

^^^^^ I watched that and almost retched watching Booker and his emotional fawning over Jackson. It was utterly disgusting, and wholly inappropriate during confirmation questioning.

flashguy

Justice Thomas is releasing released from hospitalization !!!

'Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was released from the hospital Friday morning following a nearly week-long stay for an infection.

Thomas, 73, had been sick with an infection and was admitted to Sibley Memorial Hospital in Washington, D.C., on Friday evening after experiencing "flu-like" symptoms. Thomas did not participate in oral arguments in the courtroom this week."

https://www.foxnews.com/politi...as-released-hospital

Thank God.

GOP Support For Jackson Evaporates After Confirmation Hearings Go Sideways

Democrats hoping to snag at least one Republican Senator to support Supreme Court Nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson may need to dig deep to secure all 50 members of their party - as GOP support for the controversial judge has all but evaporated following a week of contentious confirmation hearings.

A simple majority of all 50 Democrats can confirm Jackson without GOP support, with Vice President Kamala Harris breaking any tie - and with Friday's announcement from Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) that he'll support Jackson, it only leaves Sen. Kyrsten Sinema as the other potential roadblock on the radar.

On Thursday, Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell (KY) formally announced his opposition to Brown's nomination, saying in a statement: "After studying the nominee's record and watching her performance this week, I cannot and will not support Judge Jackson for a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court."

One Democrat 'has a feeling' however...

"We’re going to get some GOP support. …I feel like we’re going to get some folks," said Sen. Doug Jones (D-AL), who has been helping advance Jackson's nomination through the Senate.

Sen. Dick Durban thinks there's a chance, telling The Hill "I still think there’s a chance. …I’ve talked to a few of them," while declining to "name names."

If no Republicans vote for Jackson, she'll be the second justice in US history to be confirmed entirely by one party - the first being Justice Amy Coney Barrett in 2020, who GOP Sen. Susan Collins (ME) crossed the aisle to vote against.



https://www.zerohedge.com/poli...hearings-go-sideways

quote:

Originally posted by flashguy:
I can define what a "woman" is: a woman is an adult human whose DNA has 2 X chromosomes; and a man is an adult human with an X and a Y chromosome. That is as simple and unequivocal as it can get.

flashguy

You can also add to that that a woman can reproduce life. Contrary to the utter BS being vomited out by progressives, men don't.

quote:

Originally posted by bigdeal:

quote:

Originally posted by flashguy:
I can define what a "woman" is: a woman is an adult human whose DNA has 2 X chromosomes; and a man is an adult human with an X and a Y chromosome. That is as simple and unequivocal as it can get.

flashguy

You can also add to that that a woman can reproduce life. Contrary to the utter BS being vomited out by progressives, men don't.

Human parthenogenesis is not yet perfected, but I am sure woke scientists are working on it.

quote:

Originally posted by RichardC:

quote:

Originally posted by bigdeal:

quote:

Originally posted by flashguy:
I can define what a "woman" is: a woman is an adult human whose DNA has 2 X chromosomes; and a man is an adult human with an X and a Y chromosome. That is as simple and unequivocal as it can get.

flashguy

You can also add to that that a woman can reproduce life. Contrary to the utter BS being vomited out by progressives, men don't.

Human parthenogenesis is not yet perfected, but I am sure woke scientists are working on it.

Yep, and if the past is any indicator of the future, their results will end in three legged, three eyed, genderless zombies. I tell ya, when the human race eventually disappears from this planet, I am confident it will be specifically due to the meddling of scientific 'experts'.

Children can be either XX or XY, getting one of their mother's 2 X chromosomes and either the X or Y from their fathers. So far as I know there have been no children born YY, and by natural processes it would be impossible, since females don't have a Y chromosome to donate. I suppose that it would be possible to genetically manipulate a fertilized egg to have 2 Y chromosomes, but I don't know if such an egg would even develop into a fetus--since the X and Y chromosomes are different, there are no doubt some genes found only in the X that might be essential to the development process. I'm hoping that no one tries the experiment.

flashguy

Back to the point. Will Manchin bail us out on this one? The Democritters don't need any Republican votes if they can keep all their people on the reservation.

quote:

Originally posted by BBMW:
Back to the point. Will Manchin bail us out on this one? The Democritters don't need any Republican votes if they can keep all their people on the reservation.

No, Manchin to vote For. https://www.reuters.com/world/...-jackson-2022-03-25/

The illogic of a woman nominated to SCOTUS specifically because she is a woman, who cannot define what a woman is. If she can't define her primary qualifying characteristic she is a moron or a liar. But why should I be closed minded, when she could very well be both?

Sinema may still be a wild card. But I wouldn't bet my lunch money on her saving us.