quote:

Originally posted by Flashlightboy:
In the first case why would they protect one of the 500 people who reportedly had access to the area? If they have video evidence of who accessed Locker 50 and matched prints, it's a federal crime to have illegal drugs in the WH. The SS can't be so naive to think it's OK to let it slide.

[SNIP]

I'm just not seeing the coverup, based on the fact that they can't force the 500 people to give up DNA or fingerprints to make a match and there's little reason to think it's the inner family. The conventional wisdom is that the Dems want someone else to run in 2024 and dirtying up Joe and his family would be a great way to do that but that's not happening.

The 'Legacy State Media' is strong with this one...

quote:

Originally posted by nhracecraft:

quote:

Originally posted by Flashlightboy:
In the first case why would they protect one of the 500 people who reportedly had access to the area? If they have video evidence of who accessed Locker 50 and matched prints, it's a federal crime to have illegal drugs in the WH. The SS can't be so naive to think it's OK to let it slide.

[SNIP]

I'm just not seeing the coverup, based on the fact that they can't force the 500 people to give up DNA or fingerprints to make a match and there's little reason to think it's the inner family. The conventional wisdom is that the Dems want someone else to run in 2024 and dirtying up Joe and his family would be a great way to do that but that's not happening.

The 'Legacy State Media' is strong with this one...

I don't trust the MSM to do the job of being unbiased and digging out stories. Not at all.

There are unsolved murders in the US and it's a pretty significant number. Not all crimes are solved and it's not a conspiracy that they aren't. There's no evidence of a conspiracy.

No one has come forward, off the record, to say we know who it is and this supervisor or head of the SS told us to keep it quiet.

Believe whatever you want

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
^^^^^

You simply can't be this naive.

The evidence would suggest he can

quote:

Originally posted by ensigmatic:

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
^^^^^

You simply can't be this naive.

The evidence would suggest he can

I do appreciate the kind words and thoughts.

Paranoia and conspiracy are very related with paranoia generally arising from a personal set of beliefs that are not a rational reaction to a stimuli or set of events. Conspiracy can be the same thing but on a group basis. You can be one but not always not necessarily the other.

And once you're locked into the conspiracy mindset, it's hard to back away from it because that can devolve into the retained individual belief - paranoia. Believing in a conspiracy is comforting to most because you're with like minded people.

But there's no conspiracy here that's been brought to light and zero evidence of a plot to hide the truth. It's all a fun mental dalliance.

Enough with this shit, Spock.

The story from the White House has changed multiple times on this...It's clear they're covering up here and anything the 'Legacy state Media' is parroting on their behalf should NOT be trusted! Simply put, they are lying!

quote:

Originally posted by Flashlightboy:
But there's no conspiracy here that's been brought to light and zero evidence of a plot to hide the truth.

One of the (previously?) preeminent law enforcement and protective service agencies in the world couldn't identify the suspected culprit of a felony committed in one of the most secure buildings in the world--a building that's certainly lousy with video surveillance.

Right

We have hundreds of pictures and video of the president’s son smoking crack with hookers and a bag of cocaine found in a building that should have the tightest security on the planet with changing official statements about where the bag was found with WH spokespeople and the President stonewalling everyone, but anyone who doesn’t buy the story that they don’t know whose bag of dope it is is buying into conspiracy theories.

All I know is, in the past few years, the difference between a conspiracy theory and fact is about six months. And that's being generous. Lately it's only been a few weeks.

Hunter practically stumbled around the White House that weekend with a coke mustache, but it's true we can't prove that was his bag of cocaine. In fact, without a functioning media and our institutions compromised, we can't really be sure of much.

quote:

Originally posted by Flashlightboy:

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
^^^^^

You simply can't be this naive.

I'm going to guess, as much as a WAG as I can muster, that any conspiracy that harms Trump is bad and any that hurts Biden is good and there's no middle ground for you.

At least you're fuckin' consistent.

quote:

Originally posted by bdylan:
In fact, without a functioning media and our institutions compromised, we can't really be sure of much anything.

FIFY

quote:

Originally posted by P220 Smudge:
We have hundreds of pictures and video of the president’s son smoking crack with hookers and a bag of cocaine found in a building that should have the tightest security on the planet with changing official statements about where the bag was found with WH spokespeople and the President stonewalling everyone, but anyone who doesn’t buy the story that they don’t know whose bag of dope it is is buying into conspiracy theories.

Someone online called it “Occam’s razor blade”.

FBI technicians show how they prepared the White House Cocaine Baggie for fingerprint collection

^^^ Right?

Because between the person who purchased the baggies, the person who filled them, the person that sold them, and the person who bought it there's not a single trace of fingerprints or DNA on it.

It has been stated that fingerprints were found on the bag and identified. Doesn't that count as "evidence"?

flashguy

I'm keeping this event in reserve for the next time an anti-gun advocate tries to claim the government can and should control who has guns.

We've heard the response that the government can't keep drugs and weapons out of prisons, but now we have the even better argument that they can't keep cocaine out of the White House, and when they find it they can't figure out who it belongs to.

Jon Stewart’s famous rant on CoVid comes to mind.

“There’s been a dangerous outbreak of chocolatey goodness near Hershey Pennsylvania! Maybe a bat flew into a pangolin…or maybe…just maybe…it’s the giant chocolate factory just down the street!”

Yeah, it’s the President’s drug addled son.

I know, I know…Nobody saw shit, nobody knows shit.

But the same vast government apparatus that was able to identify and jail every man, woman, and child anywhere near DC on J6 can’t figure out who brought coke into the WH. Yeah, it’s a real head-scratcher.

Clown shoes.