I'm interested in where people are leaning these days in their preference on handgun actions for a defensive or fighting handgun. My preference remains with the DA/SA autoloader. Thanks for your participation.
___________________________ Originally posted by Psychobastard: Well, we "gave them democracy"... not unlike giving a monkey a loaded gun.
I like strikers. I like DA/SA. I like appendix carry at times. I don’t like appendix and strikers at all. Personal opinion. I shoot DA/SA well so that is my preference and vote, as I fondle a 3rd gen S&W 3913 in my lap.
Posts: 7540 | Location: Florida | Registered: June 18, 2005
Originally posted by 12131: I like the DA/SA but carry the P365. What does that make me?
I think that's the next question - as all handguns are a compromise in one regard or other, are you choosing the 365 because of size? If there was a comparable-sized DA/SA would you carry that instead of the striker-fired 365?
___________________________ Originally posted by Psychobastard: Well, we "gave them democracy"... not unlike giving a monkey a loaded gun.
I prefer the striker guns but am equally comfortable with a Beretta or a 1911.
Rom 13:4 If you do evil, be afraid. For he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is God's minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil.
Posts: 727 | Location: Wyoming | Registered: September 30, 2012
IMO, Glock is the current state of the art in the handgun world. They are immediately ready for action right out of the holster, eschewing the need for a manual safety. They have a consistent trigger from the first round to the last one in the magazine. Unlike legacy DA/SA designs, they don't need to be de-cocked or re-saftied prior to re-holstering.
Further, Glock specifically typically has far fewer moving parts in their action and none of those internal parts require specific hand fitting.
It's like Ken Hackathorn said and Bill Wilson agreed: