Apparently the Gen 5 G17/19 are available for preorder.

RHINOWSO

Go ahead punk, make my day

posted

Posts: 45798 | Registered: July 12, 2008

Ignored post by RHINOWSO posted

saigonsmuggler

Member

posted

^^ Marksman barrel

No front night sight??

looks to me like same old crappy plastic sights.

Posts: 1804 | Location: Austin TX | Registered: October 30, 2003

Ignored post by saigonsmuggler posted

Nick B

Member

posted

What's a DLC coating ?

Posts: 705 | Location: S.W.Florida | Registered: August 18, 2012

Ignored post by Nick B posted

Big Stack

posted

Diamond Like Carbon.

Here's one company's riff on it. Have no idea who/what Glock is using.

https://www.ibccoatings.com/dl...-coating-ceratough-d

My guess is that this will replace the gaseous nitriding that replaced Tennifer.

quote:
Originally posted by Nick B:
What's a DLC coating ?

Posts: 21240 | Registered: November 05, 2003

Ignored post by BBMW posted

Sunset_Va

Waiting for Hachiko
Picture of Sunset_Va

posted

quote:
Originally posted by Nick B:
What's a DLC coating ?

In my limited useage,

Ion Bond, DLC

Its a surface hardening treatment.

美しい犬

Posts: 6673 | Location: Near the Metropolis of Tightsqueeze, Va | Registered: February 18, 2007

Ignored post by Sunset_Va posted

RHINOWSO

Go ahead punk, make my day

posted

quote:
Originally posted by saigonsmuggler:
^^ Marksman barrel

No front night sight??

looks to me like same old crappy plastic sights.

Personally I like it that they come with those sights, because with the myriad of options available today, the stock night sights would get tossed anyway.

Posts: 45798 | Registered: July 12, 2008

Ignored post by RHINOWSO posted

Gundawg

Member

posted

so in my thinking to two most important aspects will be how the DLC holds up, and if any differences in accuracy are seen with the new barrel.

Posts: 6727 | Location: Charlotte, NC | Registered: November 09, 2010

Ignored post by Gundawg posted

Big Stack

posted

I bet the majority of buyers (who are not posting on web forums) keep the stock sights on. I bet more would if they were better.

Before the drop safety fiasco, one of the things I liked better about the P320 was the fact that I didn't really have to change anything on it to get it the way I would want it. Can't say that about the Glock. Of course some people buy the Glock specifically for a project, but none of the parts should be bad enough that they need to be replaced. The sights are.

quote:
Originally posted by RHINOWSO:
quote:
Originally posted by saigonsmuggler:
^^ Marksman barrel

No front night sight??

looks to me like same old crappy plastic sights.
Personally I like it that they come with those sights, because with the myriad of options available today, the stock night sights would get tossed anyway.

Posts: 21240 | Registered: November 05, 2003

Ignored post by BBMW posted

saigonsmuggler

Member

posted

quote:
Originally posted by BBMW:
I bet the majority of buyers (who are not posting on web forums) keep the stock sights on. I bet more would if they were better.

Before the drop safety fiasco, one of the things I liked better about the P320 was the fact that I didn't really have to change anything on it to get it the way I would want it. Can't say that about the Glock. Of course some people buy the Glock specifically for a project, but none of the parts should be bad enough that they need to be replaced. The sights are.

Yeah that's me right there. If the Glock sights were just metal, I would've just use them like that. The main reason my Glocks have night sights was because of the stock plastic sights.. ugh

I was hoping I'd get the 19M with the FBI sights.. guess not, a bit of a bummer. However I'm getting this 19 anyway.

Posts: 1804 | Location: Austin TX | Registered: October 30, 2003

Ignored post by saigonsmuggler posted

terra

Member

posted

That looks mighty promising. I love the flared mag well and glad they are ditching the finger grooves on the 19.

Posts: 1662 | Location: NH | Registered: January 27, 2011

Ignored post by terra posted

Big Stack

posted

I had read, and this info is old, that Glock will install a good set of metal night sights (rebranded Meprolites?) pretty cheap, if you send your slide into Smyna. I don't know if this is still the case.

But if it is, they should just offer the guns that way.

quote:
Originally posted by saigonsmuggler:
quote:
Originally posted by BBMW:
I bet the majority of buyers (who are not posting on web forums) keep the stock sights on. I bet more would if they were better.

Before the drop safety fiasco, one of the things I liked better about the P320 was the fact that I didn't really have to change anything on it to get it the way I would want it. Can't say that about the Glock. Of course some people buy the Glock specifically for a project, but none of the parts should be bad enough that they need to be replaced. The sights are.

Yeah that's me right there. If the Glock sights were just metal, I would've just use them like that. The main reason my Glocks have night sights was because of the stock plastic sights.. ugh

I was hoping I'd get the 19M with the FBI sights.. guess not, a bit of a bummer. However I'm getting this 19 anyway.

Posts: 21240 | Registered: November 05, 2003

Ignored post by BBMW posted

saigonsmuggler

Member

posted

quote:
Originally posted by BBMW:
I had read, and this info is old, that Glock will install a good set of metal night sights (rebranded Meprolites?) pretty cheap, if you send your slide into Smyna. I don't know if this is still the case.

But if it is, they should just offer the guns that way.

Yes they still do. Sent my last 26's slide in about 2 months ago via FedEx ground and Glock charged $64 or so for return postage and night sights installed. Very reasonable.

Posts: 1804 | Location: Austin TX | Registered: October 30, 2003

Ignored post by saigonsmuggler posted

TheFrontRange

Each post crafted from
rich Corinthian leather
Picture of TheFrontRange

posted

Looks like a gun store / range in my area is sponsoring a "Midnight Madness" event this weekend to unveil the Gen 5s. A bit past my bedtime but may try to make it anyway.

"The sea was angry that day, my friends - like an old man trying to send back soup in a deli." - George Costanza

Posts: 6694 | Registered: September 04, 2003

Ignored post by TheFrontRange posted

sns3guppy

Member

posted

quote:
Originally posted by parabellum:
Slightly higher velocities than traditional land-and-groove barrels, all else being equal, and these barrels are ridiculously easy to clean, even after extensive shooting.

After running several thousand coated bullets through a G19 barrel, a few passes with a pass and brush, and a bore snake...no visible evidence that the barrel had ever been used.

Poly barrels are much easier to clean and maintain that lands and grooves, for sure.

Posts: 6650 | Registered: September 13, 2006

Ignored post by sns3guppy posted

Big Stack

posted

I would consider a non-polygonal barrel a step backward.

quote:
Originally posted by sns3guppy:
quote:
Originally posted by parabellum:
Slightly higher velocities than traditional land-and-groove barrels, all else being equal, and these barrels are ridiculously easy to clean, even after extensive shooting.

After running several thousand coated bullets through a G19 barrel, a few passes with a pass and brush, and a bore snake...no visible evidence that the barrel had ever been used.

Poly barrels are much easier to clean and maintain that lands and grooves, for sure.

Posts: 21240 | Registered: November 05, 2003

Ignored post by BBMW posted

12131

Oriental Redneck
Picture of 12131

posted

Looks like RTF3 grip. I like.

Posts: 26390 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: September 04, 2008

Ignored post by 12131 posted

.38supersig

My other Sig
is a Steyr.
Picture of .38supersig

posted

quote:
Originally posted by BBMW:
I would consider a non-polygonal barrel a step backward.

^^^ +1 ^^^

Posts: 9155 | Location: Somewhere looking for ammo that nobody has at a place I haven't been to for a pistol I couldn't live without... | Registered: December 02, 2014

Ignored post by .38supersig posted

Big Stack

posted

The only advantage I would see to conventional rifling would be to shooter who shot cast lead bullets. How many 9mm auto shooters are out there who shoot cast lead? I don't think its going to be a big number, especially percentage-wise.

Posts: 21240 | Registered: November 05, 2003

Ignored post by BBMW posted