SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    The Sig P320 and discharges.
Page 1 ... 54 55 56 57
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
The Sig P320 and discharges. Login/Join 
:^)
Picture of BillyBonesNY
posted Hide Post
I would not be surprised if the MIM parts are sourced from India


quote:
Originally posted by uvahawk:
Can anyone enlighten me why the airman had the pistol pointed in his direction after detaching his holster from his duty belt? BTW, if it is true that Sig sourced some of the key components from different vendors, was there a rigorous inspection process to ensure these components were in fact manufactured to specs?


----------------------------------------
http://lonesurvivorfoundation.org
 
Posts: 7204 | Registered: March 19, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by trapper189:
There’s only hearsay at this point about the circumstances contributing to the airman’s death.


Of the recently reported cases, I'm most skeptical of this one (as rumored).
 
Posts: 9235 | Location: The Red part of Minnesota | Registered: October 06, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I swear I had
something for this
posted Hide Post
A nice YouTube video that brings everything up to date with the P320 and also includes diagrams and visual aids as well:



While it sucks because I loved shooting my P320 when I had it, there's too many WTFs in the design going from the P250 to the P320 that makes me shake my head. I never went looking, but I had assumed they had used a plunger style firing pin block like everyone else did, not a spring and hook Rube Goldberg system to hold the striker in place.

I also had assumed that all of the events where the P320 would go off in someone's holster was just catching a burr or something in the holster as this gun is the equivalent of taking a 1911 or P226, cocking the hammer, and holstering it. But seeing just a tiny amount of trigger movement seems to deactivate the striker safety (and the manual safety doing nothing to stop the striker itself) is absurd.

I haven't been a huge fan of Ron Cohen, but something he has made clear is that he'll kill product lines and revamp them if something better comes along (like the history of the MCX), yet he never did anything about the P320 except make the P365 which "seems" to fix the problems with the P320? Seems weird.
 
Posts: 5003 | Location: Kansas City, MO | Registered: May 28, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Raptorman
Picture of Mars_Attacks
posted Hide Post


____________________________

Eeewwww, don't touch it!
Here, poke at it with this stick.
 
Posts: 35019 | Location: North, GA | Registered: October 09, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
Good video, worth watching
 
Posts: 112249 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Raptorman
Picture of Mars_Attacks
posted Hide Post
It's as if when designing the 365, they worked out all the problems and now know they will be replacing every FCG on the 320 series with a redesigned unit. That will most certainly bankrupt them and we are left with dangerous firearms.

I still can't get mine to malfunction, but I haven't let it get filthy beyond tolerances. I agree that a clogged up sear and stuck firing pin block will most certainly cause the issue.

I just have a habit of keeping my weapons clean and inspected for a reason.

I find the Glock's simple sear system superior as it has a generous engagement and also loads the striker with the trigger pull.


____________________________

Eeewwww, don't touch it!
Here, poke at it with this stick.
 
Posts: 35019 | Location: North, GA | Registered: October 09, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
When you fall, I will be there to catch you -With love, the floor
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mars_Attacks:
It's as if when designing the 365, they worked out all the problems and now know they will be replacing every FCG on the 320 series with a redesigned unit. That will most certainly bankrupt them and we are left with dangerous firearms.

I still can't get mine to malfunction, but I haven't let it get filthy beyond tolerances. I agree that a clogged up sear and stuck firing pin block will most certainly cause the issue.

I just have a habit of keeping my weapons clean and inspected for a reason.

I find the Glock's simple sear system superior as it has a generous engagement and also loads the striker with the trigger pull.


the fact you think they will be replacing the fcu is comical. I guess you subscribe to every backyard YouTube expert. As gar as bankrupting them, you really have no clue about the financial inner working of the company.


Richard Scalzo
Epping, NH

http://www.bigeastakitarescue.net
 
Posts: 5870 | Location: Epping, NH | Registered: October 16, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
When you fall, I will be there to catch you -With love, the floor
posted Hide Post
[QUOTE]Originally posted by BillyBonesNY:
I would not be surprised if the MIM parts are sourced from India
[QUOTE]

Love when people don't have the facts so they simply make them up. One of the larger vendors of some MIM parts are located in the southeaster portion of the US. Not at all hard to root out that info....but facts only get in the way.


Richard Scalzo
Epping, NH

http://www.bigeastakitarescue.net
 
Posts: 5870 | Location: Epping, NH | Registered: October 16, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
I want you to be courteous to your fellow members. You can say what you want to say without behaving this way.
 
Posts: 112249 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Pale Horse:
Ah! We’ve come full circle into the “weaponslights are dangerous” comments!


If I'm a BG, I know that there's meat near that light.
Somethin' to think about.
 
Posts: 472 | Registered: November 03, 2019Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rscalzo:

the fact you think they will be replacing the fcu is comical. I guess you subscribe to every backyard YouTube expert. As gar as bankrupting them, you really have no clue about the financial inner working of the company.



I've got measurements from 18 P320 FCU's so far of all different versions and across the entire length of production.

14 of them are measurably outside of the tolerances from Sig's own drawings.

Only 4 of them were within spec.
 
Posts: 8 | Registered: July 28, 2025Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of iron chef
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rscalzo:
quote:
Originally posted by BillyBonesNY:
I would not be surprised if the MIM parts are sourced from India

Love when people don't have the facts so they simply make them up. One of the larger vendors of some MIM parts are located in the southeaster portion of the US. Not at all hard to root out that info....but facts only get in the way.

How is that making things up? When I've ordered Sig small parts, such as Short Reset Trigger kits, some of them came in bags that had "Made in United States" on them. Some had "Made in India."
 
Posts: 3550 | Location: Texas | Registered: June 17, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Raptorman
Picture of Mars_Attacks
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rscalzo:

the fact you think they will be replacing the fcu is comical. I guess you subscribe to every backyard YouTube expert. As gar as bankrupting them, you really have no clue about the financial inner working of the company.


What are you talking about? Please explain. You sound impaired.


____________________________

Eeewwww, don't touch it!
Here, poke at it with this stick.
 
Posts: 35019 | Location: North, GA | Registered: October 09, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Actually, straight from the Sig rep’s mouth, most of their MIM parts are sourced from Indo-MIM, which manufacturers both in India and USA. Hence the bags stating both “Made in India” and “Made in USA”
 
Posts: 633 | Registered: September 29, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best
Picture of 92fstech
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rscalzo:
As gar as bankrupting them, you really have no clue about the financial inner working of the company.


You've said this several times now, but if you've provided specifics or clarification I've missed it. What revenue streams does Sig have that would enable them to survive a complete recall of the P320/M17/M18, which so far as I can tell is currently their flagship product? Are they really making enough on machine guns and markup on cheap Chinese optics to eat the whole platform?

I'm genuinely curious, and I hope you're right, because like it or not at this point I'm personally very heavily invested in their products and I'd rather not see them get orphaned like Remington did to my 870. I want to see a fix, not a lynching.
 
Posts: 10707 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of vthoky
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 92fstech:
I'd rather not see them get orphaned like Remington did to my 870. I want to see a fix, not a lynching.


I like these two statements, a lot.




God bless America.
 
Posts: 14793 | Location: Virginia | Registered: July 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 ... 54 55 56 57 
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    The Sig P320 and discharges.

© SIGforum 2025