On another Vote, I voted today in Pompano Beach,FL. South Florida, that is supposed to be a Democratic strong hold. Well there were Trump signs ALL OVER in front of where I voted and 2 dozen people from the RNC and Trump supporters handing out pamplets on who to vote for. Not a single one or sign from the DNC or HRC crew.....

quote:

Originally posted by sigfreund:
The events of this election campaign would have been literally unimaginable to me a year ago. What’s next? Some beribboned general appearing on all the channels at once and declaring, “I’m in charge now”?

It would probably be that clip of the Libyan dictator Khadafi saying Death to America!

Remember that one?

It will either be Khadafi or Baghdad Bob asking why his ass is so warm.

Oh to listen in on the phone calls zinging around among the Washington elites. The tachycardia. The flop sweat. The frantic squints to find the exits. Barack Hussein Obama. Harry Reid. Nancy Pelosi. And the Republican traitors fearful of how they may be exposed. Paul Ryan. Mitch McConnell. All of them like rats at the first sniff of smoke in the abandoned building.

I hope the goods are the real deal.
The Washington Elites need to be taken down a few pegs.

Speculation around the Net tonight is that Hitlery has until tomorrow morning, maybe, to throw Huma under the bus in a last-ditch effort to save her campaign.

Does she do it? Will Huma play ball? Is it too late to matter anyway?

quote:

Originally posted by erj_pilot:

quote:

Originally posted by Lord Vaalic:
She should lose all 50 states.

You mean lose all 57 states? As attested to by the Compstituional Lawyer Barry Obama??

57, and one more left to visit.

quote:

Originally posted by Mainframe Coder:
Speculation around the Net tonight is that Hitlery has until tomorrow morning, maybe, to throw Huma under the bus in a last-ditch effort to save her campaign.

Does she do it? Will Huma play ball? Is it too late to matter anyway?

If Clinton does that, she looks guilty.
Come on Hillary, do it.

The Dems are kind of politically correct in public.
Would it be anti Muslim to fire her?

Could it be?

quote:

Originally posted by Mainframe Coder:
Speculation around the Net tonight is that Hitlery has until tomorrow morning, maybe, to throw Huma under the bus in a last-ditch effort to save her campaign.

Does she do it? Will Huma play ball? Is it too late to matter anyway?

What does that mean? How does that save her?

quote:

Originally posted by lbj:

quote:

Originally posted by Mainframe Coder:
Speculation around the Net tonight is that Hitlery has until tomorrow morning, maybe, to throw Huma under the bus in a last-ditch effort to save her campaign.

Does she do it? Will Huma play ball? Is it too late to matter anyway?

If Clinton does that, she looks guilty.
Come on Hillary, do it.

The Dems are kind of politically correct in public.
Would it be anti Muslim to fire her?

Hillary has very few options this evening. I don't see a way out for her as things sit tonight. I'm not sure Huma would accept being the sacrificial lamb anyway.

We haven't yet won but things sure look a helluva lot better now than they did this morning. We were likely going to win anyway but we will take all the help we can get.

quote:

Originally posted by lbj:

quote:

Originally posted by sigfreund:
The events of this election campaign would have been literally unimaginable to me a year ago. What’s next? Some beribboned general appearing on all the channels at once and declaring, “I’m in charge now”?

It would probably be that clip of the Libyan dictator Khadafi saying Death to America!

Remember that one?

It will either be Khadafi or Baghdad Bob asking why his ass is so warm.

That light you see rising in the east is not the sun! It is the exploding heads of liberals from Maine to Florida as they express their outrage over Comey's decision to reopen the investigation into HRC's criminality.

Anthony Weiner as Carlos Danger. The musical.



.

Here my plausible theory:

I mentioned Mr Kimdotcom (Assange friend) in the other thread earlier. He said he had, or had access to the missing emails and would have a surprise on H's birthday 10/26. I've followed the boards and twitter. I won't go into his story, but he absolutely has the technical knowledge and connections to be credible. Hillary raided his house and seized millions in assets on his birthday a few years ago. He played some signals on twitter 10/26

The missing emails undoubtedly are detrimental to the US and perhaps prove treason and it's been said they could catalize war. I mean if there was SAP material on there it would be risky leaking them.

Assange disappears and is likely being rendered with a dead mans switch undoubtedly in play. Couple days later DDoS attack. So where I'm going is...

It's a negotiated deal for Assange to be freed. It's a negotiated deal to have the missing emails do their damage without risking WW3 or criminal action on the leakers.

GO BACK AND DO YOUR JOB ON THE HILLARY CASE LIKE YOU SHOULD HAVE. HERES THE EMAIL YOU NEED TO DO IT. THE REST WONT BE RELEASED.

quote:

Originally posted by justjoe:
Comey's reputation is already in the toilet. He's not going to re-open the investigation only to re-close it. That would just be like pressing the flush lever. So I think he has something so explosive that he could not just walk away from it.

I agree. Has anyone noticed the the WikiLeaks email dumps have been getting worse and worse? The Klinton Foundation is starting be drug into this mess. There have also been no emails of Hillary released so far. Julian says Hil's start next week and will (should) get her arrested. Is Comey trying to get in front of that?

quote:

Originally posted by lbj:
I hope the goods are the real deal.
The Washington Elites need to be taken down a few pegs.

Amen. Lord, please deliver! Amen again.

Hitlery will pull a Bill, as a last ditch effort to save her campaign.
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS.../11/reax.whitehouse/

Bernstein: FBI Would Not Reopen Case Unless New Evidence Was "A Real Bombshell"

http://www.realclearpolitics.c..._real_bombshell.html

Watergate journalist Carl Bernstein comments on the FBI's shocking Friday afternoon announcement that they are reopening the investigation into Hilary Clinton's email server because new evidence has come to light.

Related Video: Flashback August 2015: Donald Trump Jokes About Anthony Weiner Accessing Classified Info Through Huma Abedin

CARL BERNSTEIN: Well, there's no question that the e-mails have always been the greatest threat to her candidacy for president, that her conduct in regard to the e-mails is really indefensible and if there was going to be more information that came out, it was the one thing, as I said on the air last night, actually that could really perhaps affect this election.

We don't know what this means yet except that it's a real bombshell. And it is unthinkable that the Director of the FBI would take this action lightly, that he would put this letter forth to the Congress of the United States saying there is more information out there about classified e-mails and call it to the attention of congress unless it was something requiring serious investigation. So that's where we are...

Is it a certainty that we won't learn before the election? I'm not sure it's a certainty we won't learn before the election.

One thing is, it's possible that Hillary Clinton might want to on her own initiative talk to the FBI and find out what she can, and if she chooses to let the American people know what she thinks or knows is going on. People need to hear from her...

I think if she has information available to her from the FBI or any other source as to her knowledge of what these e-mails might be, hopefully she will let us know what they are and what is under discussion here.

Right now we're all talking in a vacuum but I want to add here that in the last, oh, 36, 48 hours, there has been an undercurrent of kind of speculative discussion among some national security people that something might surface in the next few days about e-mails, and I think the expectation in this chatter -- and I took it as just chatter but informed chatter, to some extent -- was that it would relate to another round of WikiLeaks e-mails, which our Justice Department people seem to be saying is not the case, but there has been some noise in the national security community the last day or two of this kind of possibility of some kind of revelation.

But this is her achilles heel and we have to remember that it also comes on the -- back to the word heel -- of the revelations about the Clinton Foundation. So the confluence of all of this is bad for her as it stands now but with some knowledge she might be able to stop, turn things around, and give us some idea of what's going on in a way we might not otherwise know, and also it's very possible that some members of congress very quickly are going to get an idea of what these e-mails are, and what this is all about, and for whatever purpose put some information out there.

Looking forward to the same viewing experience without the fork.