quote:

Originally posted by Crom:
Already the liberal spin machine has created the straw-man narrative of how it is so "beyond the pale" that Trump "won't accept the results of the election".

But do I need to point out that HE DID NOT SAY THAT !?!?!?

He said he would "look at it at the time". A perfectly reasonable position. Nobody knows what is going to happen, and we all really will "look at it at the time."

Every major news agency has that as their website headline right now

quote:

Originally posted by Crom:
Already the liberal spin machine has created the straw-man narrative of how it is so "beyond the pale" that Trump "won't accept the results of the election".

But do I need to point out that HE DID NOT SAY THAT !?!?!?

He said he would "look at it at the time". A perfectly reasonable position. Nobody knows what is going to happen, and we all really will "look at it at the time."

Good. Maybe it is time for the lefties to learn that we won't go into the night peaceably. Even if that's not what he said.

Megyn Kelly is one of Killary's best agents. Is she bucking for press secratary?

quote:

Originally posted by entropy:
Wallace did do an outstanding job. I know a few here that had their doubts on it, but he indeed do a fine job.

He will be savaged by the MSM tomorrow for being abusive to the Hag.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
I do think Trump made a mistake in his answer about accepting the results of the election.

The matter is to be determined based on facts at the time. I am not sure if it was a mistake as much as it was unclear. There are recounts, legal questions and possible future facts that will be fleshed out later that may affect whether the election is to be accepted.

What if the NeverTrumpers pull off some shenanigans that take the matter to the House of Representatives for decision? There is so much that can happen.

Time and time again, Trump is pummeled for telling us what he really thinks.

By the way, I agree with you that Wallace did a good job. He seemed to take the approach of wanting to have the candidates clarify their positions that may have been muddied or not addressed in a previous debate.

I think he did a fine job of calling out the media, Podesta, the Justice department, the FBI, Clinton foundation, and all those other pawns.

Of course, she didn't respond to any of it. She just pulled the robotic political spitspeak lines that she's been so programmed to use.
She called him a puppet.

That's just ...well.

The accept the election question was a setup, and inexcusable.

If he says yes and rightfully contests or requests a recount in a contested district, he will be accused of going back on his word.

If he says what he did - wait and see - now he is lambasted for no reason. All elections that are close may be contested and ordered to recount - that is how it works. He did not say he would resort and anything other than lawful means in the event of a contested state or district.

And we know there is Democrat fraud because the Al Franken Senate recount kept "discovering" piles of ballots that were all for Al.

And we know the Democrats claim voter suppression anytime simple ID is required to vote. Refusing to require ID to vote is nothing more than making a reservation to be able to commit fraud. There is no other reason.

Honestly, Hillary was the better debater tonight.
However, the debate was nothing spectacular.

I would call it a draw.
No minds were changed this evening.

quote:

Originally posted by kimber1911:
Honestly, Hillary was the better debater tonight.
However, the debate was nothing spectacular.

I would call it a draw.
No minds were changed this evening.

What points in the debate persuaded you to come to this conclusion?

quote:

Originally posted by kimber1911:
Honestly, Hillary was the better debater tonight.

We must have been observing 2 different beasts tonight, then.

quote:

However, the debate was nothing spectacular.

This, I agree.

Megan is actually hammering Donna brazille. She's not letting up.

quote:

Originally posted by kimber1911:
Honestly, Hillary was the better debater tonight.
However, the debate was nothing spectacular.

I would call it a draw.
No minds were changed this evening.

What?

She was not better. I don't see how anyone hasn't made up their minds already.

I think the Donald beat her. She was uncomfortable multiple times. She got under his skin a few times, but not as much as he got under hers.

Just my opinion, and opinion vary.

Meagan Kelley just cleaned Donna Brazile's clock. Had her stammering like an idiot.

The usual media suspects are completely bent out of shape with Trump not unconditionally accepting the election results.

If he doesn't, it would almost surely be relating to vote improprieties. I say go ahead, old media pukes, focus on this for the next twenty days. Bring it on. Let's look into how that could happen. Starting NOW....

Every time the 2nd amendment comes up in a debate the potential to educate people is tragically wasted. Trump did do better than Romney though. Romney's pathetic response nearly caused me to throw a shoe into the TV.

Donna Brazil said the Russians made that shit up basically. That is the new answer! No wonder they are calling people back. The DNC is going to trigger WWIII!

quote:

Originally posted by PR64:

quote:

Originally posted by kimber1911:
Honestly, Hillary was the better debater tonight.
However, the debate was nothing spectacular.

I would call it a draw.
No minds were changed this evening.

What?

She was not better. I don't see how anyone hasn't made up their minds already.

She debated better if this was a scored debate.


This debate won't change any minds.

I just watched Jamie Stiehm on BBC world news, lol, she looked hammered.

Something about closet voters voting for trump.

from my viewport, DT was markedly improved over this series of 'debates'; he was far calmer in his responses in general and didn't get so far astray from the actual point the moderator requested they both should respond to.....

HC was as skilled a liar now as decades ago and still has no answers that make sense given the failures such has racked up historically;

Chris Wallace actually did a decent job in difficult circumstances under massive public scrutiny with strong personalities not use to following anyone's rules.

quote:

Originally posted by sigspecops:
Every time the 2nd amendment comes up in a debate the potential to educate people is tragically wasted. Trump did do better than Romney though. Romney's pathetic response nearly caused me to throw a shoe into the TV.

I was looking for something to throw at the TV, I was frustrated by this as well.