quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
The full Goldman Sachs speeches from 2013 have been posted.

Very interesting reading

WORD format (the docs will download like a pdf does)

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-...s//fileid/11011/2873

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-...s//fileid/11011/2874

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-...s//fileid/11011/2875

I am still reading the first one, but thought others would be interested.

These speeches are from 2013 before she announced she would run.

Must say I am learning a lot I never knew.

I just read an interesting line from Clinton:

"Our political press has just been
captured by trivia. I mean, to me. And so you
don't want to give them any more time to trivialize the importance of the issues than you have to give them."

I've perused the first two. I really don't see anything in there that is a big deal. I am really curious why she was so adamant in not releasing them. Perhaps I'm missing something that a closer read would reveal?

quote:

Originally posted by 46and2:
Lucky you. ^

I would tear up croque-madame right now.

I'm sure that's on that menu tomorrow. Tonight is our traditional party with my wife's French friends. Great people, but they party harder than even my degenerate friends. Seriously, it's absurd. Over 18 hours straight.

A croque-madame after that much boozing will be just the ticket. I'm three hours in right now. Only 15 or so more to go. Every minute I'll be drinking to the preservation of our Republic.

Vive le Trump!

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
Every minute I'll be drinking to the preservation of our Republic.

I'll drink to that!

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:

quote:

Originally posted by 46and2:
Lucky you. ^

I would tear up croque-madame right now.

I'm sure that's on that menu tomorrow. Tonight is our traditional party with my wife's French friends. Great people, but they party harder than even my degenerate friends. Seriously, it's absurd. Over 18 hours straight.

A croque-madame after that much boozing will be just the ticket. I'm three hours in right now. Only 15 or so more to go. Every minute I'll be drinking to the preservation of our Republic.

Vive le Trump!

Fun.

Yeah, the last wedding and reception I attended over there (in Metz) ended at 5:30a.

Have fun.

I just received an email from an old AF buddy that contained an article just recently published in the NEW YORKER MAGAZINE. Now folks, this is an ULTRA, ULTRA left wing liberal magazine, and always has been. The article was written by a writer from the Huffington Report. I wasn't going to read it, but my friend is a true right wing conservative, so I read it. I couldn't believe it!!! It was 100% pro-Trump and basically stated if HRC wins, this County is going down the drain!! We know this to be true, but I NEVER thought I would read that in an article in the New Yorker magazine. Obviously some folks are seeing the light, even if late......better late than never. It made my day.

Trump in Bangor, ME

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5Mil0Bys7s

quote:

Originally posted by GT-40DOC:
I just received an email from an old AF buddy that contained an article just recently published in the NEW YORKER MAGAZINE. Now folks, this is an ULTRA, ULTRA left wing liberal magazine, and always has been. The article was written by a writer for the Huffington Report. I wasn't going to read it, but my friend is a true right wing conservative, so I read it. I couldn't believe it!!! It was 100% pro-Trump and basically stated if HRC wins, this County is going down the drain!! We know this to be true, but I NEVER thought I would read that in an article in the New Yorker magazine. Obviously some folks are seeing the light, even if late......better late than never. It made my day.

Not to rain on anyone's parade, but I just went on the New Yorker site to see this for my own eyes, and came up empty. I would like to believe this is true, unlikely though that would be.

Would you have an article title and author we could search for? There was nothing referring Hillary I could see on the www.newyorker.com site in the current issue articles other than the usual gushing leftist nonsense.

quote:

Originally posted by joel9507:

quote:

Originally posted by GT-40DOC:
I just received an email from an old AF buddy that contained an article just recently published in the NEW YORKER MAGAZINE. Now folks, this is an ULTRA, ULTRA left wing liberal magazine, and always has been. The article was written by a writer for the Huffington Report. I wasn't going to read it, but my friend is a true right wing conservative, so I read it. I couldn't believe it!!! It was 100% pro-Trump and basically stated if HRC wins, this County is going down the drain!! We know this to be true, but I NEVER thought I would read that in an article in the New Yorker magazine. Obviously some folks are seeing the light, even if late......better late than never. It made my day.

Not to rain on anyone's parade, but I just went on the New Yorker site to see this for my own eyes, and came up empty. I would like to believe this is true, unlikely though that would be.

Would you have an article title and author we could search for? There was nothing referring Hillary I could see on the www.newyorker.com site in the current issue articles other than the usual gushing leftist nonsense.

I am so sorry, but I have deleted that email.....I just checked. My memory sucks these days, so I can't remember the author's name, but he writes for the Huffington Report on a daily basis. If I could just remember the name of the article....but I can't. I believe that the article was genuine, and I will see if my friend will send it to me again.

Wikileaks just keeps giving.

Addressing a Goldman Sachs event in 2013, Hillary answered a question from an audience member.

quote:

Attendee: My question is, as entrepreneurs, we risk a lot. And Mike Bloomberg had 30 billion other reasons than to take office. Do we need a wholesale change in Washington that has more to do with people that don’t need the job than have the job?

Clinton: That’s a really interesting question. You know, I would like to see more successful business people run for office. I really would like to see that because I do think, you know, you don’t have to have $30 billion, but you have a certain level of freedom. And there’s that memorable phrase from a former member of the Senate: ‘You can be maybe rented but never bought.’ And I think it’s important to have people with those experiences.

You know Hil, I actually agree with you

link

above quote from:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-...s//fileid/11011/2875

Hope that gets into an ad. Or maybe Trump will raise it in the next debate.

'I would like to see more successful business people run for office"

She also said:

"And especially now, because many of you in this room are on the cutting edge of technology or health care or some other segment of the economy, so you are people who look over the horizon. And coming into public life and bringing that perspective as well as the success and the insulation that success gives you could really help in a lot of our political situations right now."

Shockingly, Clintons News Network (hey, it was on at the gym earlier), was reporting on these releases...

Of course, DT's campaigning was "imploding" and they were content to remain silent while that happens, but the correspondent/analyst did actually warm [again, shockingly], it would be dangerous for hil to remain too silent on this topic.

Err, ya think? She has a habit of just not answering questions she doesn't like, meaning she has no answer she can't give that's either a lie (ya know, like taking sniper fire), or will be very unpalatable to the voting public.

I think this is well time, and a lot more relevant to American's than someone saying 'Garsh, 30 years ago, a guy groped me on a plane...'

Anybody with even a dim light on the attic gets this...

The next couple weeks will definitely be interesting, and I hope DT takes it up another notch at the next debate.

BOSS

John Kasich: GOP Must Evolve Or Die

Incredible.

1.) John Kasich lost 49 out of 50 states in the Republican primaries. In his mind, this puts him in the catbird position to dictate terms to the party’s base.

2.) John Kasich refused to endorse the winner of the Republican primary.

3.) John Kasich refused to attend his party’s own convention in Ohio even though he is the governor.

4.) John Kasich publicly trashed his own party’s nominee and said he could never vote for him on the eve of the election. He did this in order to throw the election to Hillary Clinton

5.) John Kasich is working with Obama to help pass the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

But wait.

Now, the Republican Party must become what John Kasich, the #NeverTrump turncoats, and the GOP establishment want it to be, which is to say, an open borders, pro-globalization, warmongering party for cucked suburbanites. They want it to be their own little private country club. It can either evolve into that … or die.

The party is evolving and what Kaysuck doesn't realize is that the party is leaving worthless fucks like him behind.

Kasich is delusional as hell. What a stupid man.

It is quite obvious that for the time being, it is the Party of Trump. A good number of Republicans have seen that the Emperor has no clothes on. Not a stitch.

I would love to see the lights come on for the kool-aid drinkers at the New Yorker, but count me as skeptical too. GT-40DOC, I hope you prove me wrong.

quote:

Originally posted by joel9507:

quote:

Originally posted by GT-40DOC:
I just received an email from an old AF buddy that contained an article just recently published in the NEW YORKER MAGAZINE. Now folks, this is an ULTRA, ULTRA left wing liberal magazine, and always has been. The article was written by a writer for the Huffington Report. I wasn't going to read it, but my friend is a true right wing conservative, so I read it. I couldn't believe it!!! It was 100% pro-Trump and basically stated if HRC wins, this County is going down the drain!! We know this to be true, but I NEVER thought I would read that in an article in the New Yorker magazine. Obviously some folks are seeing the light, even if late......better late than never. It made my day.

Not to rain on anyone's parade, but I just went on the New Yorker site to see this for my own eyes, and came up empty. I would like to believe this is true, unlikely though that would be.

Would you have an article title and author we could search for? There was nothing referring Hillary I could see on the www.newyorker.com site in the current issue articles other than the usual gushing leftist nonsense.

John Kasich is a cancer within the Republican Party, one of several such cells that have brought the body to the brink of death.

The GOP doesn't need to "evolve." Drifting from its core beliefs is what has doomed the party to its eventual demise. The only small hope the GOP has for survival is to return to a staunch support of limited government, strong defense, and rugged individualism. What's good for America, and not globalism, must drive the agenda again.....and soon.

There hasn't been a real Republican in the White House for 28 years. Kasich is not a Republican. He is a cancer.

I posted this many pages back during the convention, but it deserves another post.

On John Kasich:

Trump and others debunk his accusers. Way to long to copy and paste. "LINK TO STORY"

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
Oh, yes, polls. Tell us more about the polls.

Yep. Dont believe 'em!

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/...nformation-poll-data