I actually thought his video apology was pretty good, especially the first half. Second half was good, but instead of just talking about what he did compared to what Bill did (and Hillary's defense of Bill), I want him to hit her harder about EVRYTHING. Every time she attacks him, his response should be [One quick sentence addressing it] but remember the alternative is to elect someone who endangered national security with an illegal email system designed to get around transparency laws, someone who has been in the establishment and political elite for 30 years with no accomplishments to show for it, someone who made millions giving speeches to Wall Street but won't tell you what you said, someone who as Secretary of State, engage din a foreign policy that resulted in no successes but that gave us ISIS, Benghazi, Syria and more hostility to Israeli than ever before, etc.

quote:

Originally posted by Skins2881:

quote:

Originally posted by MNSIG:
I just asked my wife. She is not reeling in horror from his comments of 11 years ago. In fact, she doesn't give a crap.

GF has no problem with. Actually thinks it's funny. She's always had guy friends and they talked like she was one of the guys in front of her. This is mild compared to the potty/locker room talk she's heard.

She likes the campaign sign too. We talked about printing one for our front yard

Ok resident printers and shirt screeners can we make this happen? Great job Skins!

Americans have short term memory loss. This is just another "nail in the coffin" that will do nothing to suppress Trump or his supporters. This will be forgotten in a week, just like all the other things he's said to drive off all the voters that still showed up for him at the polls and at his rallies.

Let's see this for what it is; just a meaningless distraction, created to keep us from paying attention to the WikiLeaks e-mails that just came out yesterday, with more to come.

Show me one person who will be swayed by this besides the politicians that are "unendorsing" Trump to keep from feeling the wrath of the media.

Tony.

Incident after incident in this campaign the media has said "If only Trump would have come out and apologized, this would have been a one day story" Well, he apologized for this one...do you see it going away anytime soon?

Welp, Condoleezza Rice just threw in the towel on Trump. I'm tossing her into my basket of deplorables.

Ironic.

Trump says something about fat broads, about grabbing pussy, trying to move on a married woman etc.
He said those things one time, long time ago, often only in close company of those that heard the things said.

Yet, we have both leftists and media repeating them over, and over and over.

If the act of hearing them is the offense, then the repeated and re-enforcing hearing of them should certainly be damages the fragile psyche of untold millions of young girls, young and older women all over America and even the world.

So who is the worse offender of sensibility and decorum?

Nothing is new. The establishment is trying to knock him off. The left and the right in this Country have become one incestious group. Theyre all afriad their collective gravy trains will stop and their dirty laundry aired. Rice? A Bush crony. Good woman, but knows who butters her bread.

The attacks against Trump will probably keep on coming. Expect a rough couple weeks in front of us.

I am still very suspicious that the 2005 interviewer was a close Bush family member. "Coincidences" like that seldom turn out to be coincidental.

It has been said so many times, but if the Republicans would go after Obama and Clinton like they go after Trump, this would be a much easier contest.

It is pretty obvious that the establishment Republicans would prefer Clinton over Trump. Makes me want to puke.

I don't know for sure who's going to win this thing, but I do know this: paybacks in politics, within a party, are brutal and long lasting. They also almost always occur in private. With Trump? I'd expect they'll be very public and in plain view for all to see.

For those RINO's who are turning on Trump today, who are in elected office, and will be next year, they damn well better hope that Trump loses. Because....if he doesn't, the paybacks are going to be glorious to watch.

quote:

Originally posted by ceptor781:

quote:

Originally posted by Skins2881:

quote:

Originally posted by MNSIG:
I just asked my wife. She is not reeling in horror from his comments of 11 years ago. In fact, she doesn't give a crap.

GF has no problem with. Actually thinks it's funny. She's always had guy friends and they talked like she was one of the guys in front of her. This is mild compared to the potty/locker room talk she's heard.

She likes the campaign sign too. We talked about printing one for our front yard

Ok resident printers and shirt screeners can we make this happen? Great job Skins!

Stole it from someone else's post earlier. Can't take credit.

quote:

Originally posted by Mainframe Coder:
Pence has backed out of Paul Ryan's event in Wisconsin today. I think it is probably a good decision.

If that is true, it is great news in that the team may have seen how Ryan's snub would be used for never-Trump purposes. I've been out training a horse to pull a cart today so I have been away. It seems as though the "that's it" narrative is being pushed hard.

I wrote this morning that if Pence could stay subordinate, everything will work out. Pence is more palatable to the the establishment and makes a nice complement on the ticket.

Having Trump and Pence stay together as a team is best for us all and our country.

With all the silly talk of replacement, Pence is wise to stay in his lane. He will be rewarded for it in his own political career. Undercutting his own ticket by allowing rump groups to fluff his ego or use him as a prop to attack Trump would be a disaster.

It is the same RHINO hacks that barely got behind Trump or refused to endorse him that are yelling about him (again). I believe there are three political parties in this country now:

1. Republicans
2. Democrats
3. UNI Party; made up of multiple term Washington Insiders from both parties who owe allegiance to other members and backers of the UNI Party.....aka Honor Among Thieves.

If anyone thinks that conversation was bad, they should listen to high school locker room (especially now that the trans are using the girls locker rooms) barracks talk in any branch of the military, even the Air Force and Coast Guard .

If you really want to be startled and truly upset, listen to the sexual conversations between a group of women.

If you read the Drudge headlines this PM, there's a glorious step-UP to hand the flack back to the DNCsters now in progress.

What are alleged to be direct quotes from an entire phalanx of the errupting-had-enough-of-Clintonistas previously mistreated by them.

Take a look:
"KATHLEEN WILLEY CALLS FOR HILLARY TO RESIGN FROM CAMPAIGN...
JUANITA BROADDRICK: She lives with and protects a rapist....
PAULA JONES: Bill 'was getting wee wee sucked under Oval Office desk and won second term'...

and so forth.

There's even video of some 'young obama' reading some stuff.....

As of today, we have one month to go.

The MSM and her would have been better to sit on this 2 more weeks...though I'm sure this was stragetically planned to occur just before the debate. The effects will wear off, if it doesn't get any worse and he addresses it properly in very near future. But the grade of DT's hill has just increased a good bit.

The MSM advantage she has is a monster. Add to that the unethical lengths they're willing to go to...

Maybe this will unhinge DT to take the gloves off tomorrow night and revert back to the direct, aggressive candidate that has gotten this far.

As I've said before, he needs to go after her directly and aggressively for the emails and Benghazi ...and not left her off the hook with hollow apologies. He needs to box her in a corner, and hammer it. Something like:

The comments a decade ago? That was a mistake, in retrospect I probably shouldn't have made those comments in a recorded setting. I've learned from them, and I will use that lesson to be a better man...or whatever. Now, let's talk about your breaking the law, jeopardizing national security, covering it up, and obstructing justice? This is ongoing, RIGHT NOW. Esteemed members of congress are seeking to re-open the investigation against you. They're telling the head of the premier federal law enforcement agency in the country that he 'Blew it' with your investigation. Former prosecutors are grilling the FBI on how they didn't properly investigate your case and handed out improper immunity deals. You claim transparency, but make side deals that limit FBI searches and then destroy evidence. Please, enlighten us on how you're fit for this office???

And when she offers us some BS answer, he needs to not accept it, and keep going after it.

And of course there's the 'OK, you want to bring up these kinds of things from years past?? Let's start with Lewinski...'

BOSS

Why do some of you guys waste your time paying attention to what the GDC media says, and parroting it here? We all know they're full of shit and in the tank for hillary. Well, most of us do.

Pretty good view of the situation I think:

http://www.naturalnews.com/055...streating_women.html

Post-p***y analysis: Trump talked about women almost as crudely as Bill Clinton treated them

(NaturalNews) I apologize in advance for the vulgarity of this article. The U.S. Presidential race has just plummeted into the gutter with new revelations about Trump's lewd behavior eleven years ago. In order to analyze this, I have to use the appropriate words, but I will be condemning the actions described by those words, not celebrating them.

For those who may not yet know, the Washington Post dredged up an 11-year-old "hot mic" recording between Donald Trump and the nephew of George H.W. Bush, a younger man named "Billy Bush." The two were caught engaging in the kind of crude, lewd locker room banter about women that's far more common than you might suspect. To no one's surprise, both men and women turn into filthy potty mouths when they're chumming around with "cool" friends and they think no one is listening.

Among Trump's most glaring lewd remarks is one where he describes himself coming onto women, wanting to "grab them by the p***y." On the audio, found at this Washington Post link, this claim sounds more like bro-bravado than an actual tactic for hitting on women, but it's extremely lewd and offensive nonetheless.

How much did the Washington Post pay for that audio?
What these hot mic revelations by the Washington Post proves more than anything else is that it's amazing how much dirt you can come up with when you offer cash for audio and video recordings about your political enemies. No one is yet asking the obvious question: How much did the Washington Post pay for that audio? And why was no similar offer of cash made for audio or video recordings that might be damaging to Hillary Clinton?

This is how the leftist media works: It's all about smearing Trump while protecting Hillary at all costs. While Trump's words and behavior eleven years ago are, of course, highly offensive and wildly inappropriate, I don't think any living person could survive the systematic, highly coordinated and well funded smear campaign that has been directed at Trump. This doesn't excuse his words from 2005, but then again could ANY of us survive that sort of scrutiny if cash prizes were offered to all our friends and associated for going public with embarrassing audio, video or photos of us?

I just thank God there was no internet when I was in high school. The things we did on the football team, the track team and even at the math team events would blow your mind (or perhaps not, as you were 18 at one time too, remember?). Trump's words were nothing compared to what I heard from teammates and competitors from other schools. One night at a regional track meet, and entire busload of male athletes from a competing school was busted for singing, at the top of their voices, a coordinated rendition of a rap song that was very famous at the time called, "HEY, WE WANT SOME P***Y!"

Then again, Donald Trump in 2005 wasn't 18 years old. Lewd, crude, juvenile behavior is almost expected from teens and twenty-somethings, but a decent human being is supposed to outgrow all that by age 30, we hope. When it comes to women, Donald Trump apparently NEVER grew up and continued to speak about them with juvenile lewdness almost into his 60s. Then again, if he wins the election and keeps on grabbing p***y in the Oval Office, it won't be any different than what Bill Clinton did in the 90s, will it? Or JFK in the 60s, for that matter...

But there's a bigger question in all this: How do Trump's lewd words measure up to Bill and Hillary Clinton's ACTIONS against women?

Trump grabbed it, Hillary ate it and Bill assaulted it
So now the U.S. presidential circus descends into the gutter with an almost insane, sad hilarity to it all. We've got a lewd, p***y-grabbing Trump who actually has great financial sense and is running as a legitimate outsider who can shake up the system.

Then we've got Hillary Clinton and her spy / lover sidekick Huma, with Bill Clinton assault victim Gennifer Flowers explaining that Bill Clinton told her "Hillary had eaten more p***y than he had." (Seriously, I warned you this article was going to get crude...)

And finally we have Bill himself, who is a serial rapist and sexual assault predator who gets a free pass by the same leftist media trying to destroy Trump. Every time Bill rapes another women, Hillary's job is to cover it up and destroy the victim, and if you ask me, destroying some woman's reputation for real is far worse than anything Trump might be saying in mere words.

Has any woman accused Donald Trump of raping them? Assaulting them? Biting their lip until they bled? Not a single one. But Bill Clinton has been accused of all those and more. Whatever Donald Trump does with women in their bedrooms, it is apparently carried out with consent. Contrast that to the legacy of Bill Clinton, who is the white, legally immune version of Bill Cosby, engaged in actual sexual ASSAULTS of women who are then double victimized when Hillary comes along and destroys their reputations for threatening to speak out.

Trump's words were horrific and stupid, but Bill and Hillary Clinton's actions were CRIMINAL.

And while every effort in the world is being made to dredge up every personality flaw and verbal gaffe Donald Trump ever made, the same measure of effort is being used to cover up, gloss over or bury the real crimes of Bill and Hillary Clinton. So the scrutiny, you see, is all directed solely at one candidate.

We are all being told to ignore the traitorous actions of Hillary Clinton and her massive Clinton cartel of corruption while solely focusing our full attention on Donald Trump's "p***y grabbing" comment from 2005. This is nothing more than journalistic sleight of hand to keep you focused on one thing while they're stealing the election.

We aren't electing Donald Trump to take our daughters out on dates
None of this means Donald Trump is the kind of person you'd want to take your daughter out on a date. He was obviously a lewd, insensitive womanizer -- a "player" trolling for hot babes to bed -- but I seem to recall the entire leftist media and democrat party telling us all, back in the 1990s, "It doesn't matter what Bill Clinton does in his private life."

That was the explanation we heard after the Monica Lewinski scandal, which had Bill doing a whole lot more than just "grabbing p***y" ... and in the Oval Office, no less!

When that scandal broke, we were all given a stern talking-to by the democrats and the media, who reminded us that Bill's private life exists separately from his public life, and no matter what sort of extra-marital cheating and sexual conduct he engaged in while President, he was still an awesome human being to be celebrated by all (and he's still celebrated today).

So why the double standard when it comes to Trump? Suddenly, because Trump TALKED about doing things to women that Bill Clinton has actually done, he's said to be unfit to fill the same role that Bill Clinton held while he was "dicking bimbos" inside the White House!

See, this is the insanity that I'm talking about. Yeah, both Bill Clinton and Donald Trump treat women horribly... but only the words of Trump are said to matter, never the actions of Bill or Hillary.

And that's my issue with all this. If Trump is going to be held to the mat on all this, then I fully support that stance if the same standard is equally applied to democrats, too. But it never is. Democrats get a free pass on all their rape, sexual assault, corruption, bribery, money laundering, marital infidelity and everything else. They are never held to account for their own crimes, actions or horrendous assaults against women.

As with everything else in this campaign, these "hot mic" attacks against Trump are one-sided, highly orchestrated and conducted purely out of a goal to destroy a political enemy, not to achieve universal respect for women across both major political parties.

Until the leftist media and democrats start reporting the truth about Bill and Hillary's assaults on women, their cherry-picked attacks on Trump can't be viewed as anything other than politics as usual.

What's really sad in all this, however, is the fact that rarely do decent, honest people ever seek high political office in any nation. The kind of people who want to be President are usually power hungry, egocentric s***heads who feed off self-worship and a desire to rule over others. That's a description of Hillary, by the way, and yet for your amusement, I offer you a new, revised Trump campaign slogan:

MAKE AMERICA GRAB P***Y AGAIN
...because we're all juvenile lazy f***tards who sat on our overweight asses and watched Monday Night Football while America descended into Idiocracy.

And yeah, that's how I really feel about what we're witnessing right now.