SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Donald Trump is a first-rate ass clown, but...
Page 1 ... 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 ... 1312

Closed Topic Closed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Donald Trump is a first-rate ass clown, but... Login/Join 
Imagination and focus
become reality
posted Hide Post
Crickets on Jeb's, I mean Trump's new immigration plan?
 
Posts: 6813 | Location: Northwest Indiana | Registered: August 15, 2004Report This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ogie:
Crickets on Jeb's, I mean Trump's new immigration plan?
Get out of this thread and stay out. Don't let me see you in here again.

Take your smarmy bullshit elsewhere. The rest of us are concerned about the country. We've no time for your pissing about Trump.

If you show up in this thread again, you're going to regret it.
 
Posts: 110398 | Registered: January 20, 2000Report This Post
wishing we
were congress
posted Hide Post
A bit OT, but this is an article about the Senate races in 2016. The Republicans have done very well in State Govt elections over the last few years. That results in fewer Dem up and coming candidates for the higher offices.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08...ack-senate.html?_r=0

Democrats’ Weak Bench Undermines Hope of Taking Back Senate
 
Posts: 19759 | Registered: July 21, 2002Report This Post
Bad dog!
Picture of justjoe
posted Hide Post
It's Trump. Or Hillary.

That is a pretty basic and obvious fact, but some people seem unable to grasp the simple choice. All the "Never Trump" fools. And those who want to moan and whine about something about Donald Trump.

The alternative is Hillary Clinton.

Trump. Or. Hillary.


______________________________________________________

"You get much farther with a kind word and a gun than with a kind word alone."
 
Posts: 11324 | Location: pennsylvania | Registered: June 05, 2011Report This Post
Banned
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sdy:
A bit OT, but this is an article about the Senate races in 2016. The Republicans have done very well in State Govt elections over the last few years. That results in fewer Dem up and coming candidates for the higher offices.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08...ack-senate.html?_r=0

Democrats’ Weak Bench Undermines Hope of Taking Back Senate


I read that article earlier today. They just can't get over the "Trump effect" that they say is hurting downstream GOP candidates at the state and local level.

Nonsense. Trump is the best chance many of them have to get a coattails bounce. Toomey in PA, Young in IN, and a host of others, have a better chance with Trump at the top of the ticket than they ever would of had with Cruz, etc. Toomey has hurt himself in PA and probably will not survive but it will have nothing to do with Trump. Young has a realistic chance of defeating a legend in Indiana and it wouldn't of happened without Trump.

Downstream candidates have a better chance with Trump at the top than anyone else we could have nominated.
 
Posts: 1562 | Location: Chester County, PA | Registered: February 12, 2016Report This Post
Stop Talking, Start Doing
posted Hide Post
It was just announced that trump with be holding a rally at an arena near my house on Tuesday. It's like 15 mins away. Might have to attend!


_______________
Mind. Over. Matter.
 
Posts: 5092 | Location: The (R)ight side of Washington State | Registered: August 31, 2011Report This Post
Rule #1: Use enough gun
Picture of Bigboreshooter
posted Hide Post
KKK Grand Dragon endorses Hillary....

http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...ses-hillary-clinton/



When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own house, his possessions are undisturbed. Luke 11:21


"Every nation in every region now has a decision to make.
Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." -- George W. Bush

 
Posts: 14826 | Location: Birmingham, Alabama | Registered: February 25, 2009Report This Post
Member
Picture of WyoRobert
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by justjoe:
It's Trump. Or Hillary.

That is a pretty basic and obvious fact, but some people seem unable to grasp the simple choice. All the "Never Trump" fools. And those who want to moan and whine about something about Donald Trump.

The alternative is Hillary Clinton.

Trump. Or. Hillary.


I've been wondering about that. I have not asked enough, perhaps, but I have not seen a good answer to the question: "Assuming one agrees with #neverTrump, what is the proposed course of action?" What do they propose doing? Assuming Trump is a First-rate Assclown, what is the alternative, at this point?

I have seen a few suggest supporting Hillary, a few defecting to the Libertarians, and now the McMullen thing. All of which seem to me to be cures far worse than the disease.


Robert
------------------------------------------------

Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. -- Marianne Williamson
 
Posts: 613 | Location: Pittsburgh | Registered: October 29, 2006Report This Post
Oh stewardess,
I speak jive.
Picture of 46and2
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Copefree:
It was just announced that trump with be holding a rally at an arena near my house on Tuesday. It's like 15 mins away. Might have to attend!

Please do. We could do with more first hand accounts.
 
Posts: 25613 | Registered: March 12, 2004Report This Post
Banned
posted Hide Post
And now she has paid for a TV ad to attack Trump's outreach to Blacks. They've really stretched the truth to build this attack piece. Yes....they are very scared right now.

http://www.oann.com/new-clinto...ach-to-black-voters/


quote:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Democrat Hillary Clinton called on Friday for voters to reject the “bigotry” of Donald Trump’s White House campaign, releasing a television ad criticizing his efforts to appeal to black voters and saying she was reaching out to people from all parties who are troubled by his candidacy.

The ad shows video of Trump’s controversial pitch to black voters, in which the Republican candidate urges them to support him by asking, “What do you have to lose?” It also shows headlines about a racial discrimination lawsuit the New York real estate mogul faced in the 1970s.

Clinton’s presidential campaign said the ad, released a day after she gave a speech accusing Trump of fueling America’s “radical fringe,” would air in the hotly contested states of Florida, North Carolina, Ohio and Pennsylvania.

Polls give Clinton a wide margin over Trump among Hispanic voters, but he is on a pitch to reduce her advantage by stressing he would create jobs for all.

Trump pressed on with trying to broaden his appeal to minority voters on Friday, as he met with Hispanic business leaders at his signature hotel in Las Vegas.

“We’ve been doing very, very well with the Latinos. We’ve been doing amazing, far, far greater … than anyone understands. They want to see jobs come in, we’re going to bring jobs. They want to see things happen,” Trump said.

He said the country’s GDP growth rate of 1.1 percent in the second quarter was not a good sign for the U.S. economy. “The country has some very, very serious problems,” he said.

Clinton, meanwhile, followed up on Thursday’s tough speech by saying that Trump’s temperament and divisiveness made him unfit for the White House.

“I am reaching out to everyone, Republicans, Democrats, independents, everyone who is as troubled as I am by the bigotry and divisiveness of Donald Trump’s campaign,” she told MSNBC, adding she was asking “fair-minded Americans to repudiate this kind of divisive demagoguery” at the Nov. 8 election.

Clinton attacks came during a difficult week for her campaign, as the release of new emails from her time as secretary of state revived criticism of her decision to use a private address and server rather than a government one.

The emails also stoked scrutiny of her family’s charitable foundation, including accusations that major corporate and foreign donors gave money in hopes of securing more access to then-Secretary Clinton. Her campaign says no donors received any special favors.

Republican National Committee spokesman Sean Spicer told MSNBC Clinton was only talking about Trump and race this week to deflect attention from that controversy.

Trump countered her rhetoric on Friday by releasing a video showing Clinton in the 1990s discussing a crime bill and referring to “super-predators,” or at-risk youth she said needed to be brought under control. The video also shows U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders, Clinton’s main opponent in the Democratic primary this year, calling that phrase a “racist term.”

CONTROVERSIAL STATEMENTS

In targeting what she terms Trump’s bigotry, Clinton hopes to remind voters of controversial statements he has made over the course of the campaign. Those include describing some Mexican immigrants as criminals and rapists, suggesting a judge could not be fair because of his Mexican-American heritage, and proposing a temporary ban on Muslim immigration to combat terrorism.

Trump has tried to sidestep these dust-ups by saying Democrats have failed minorities with their economic policies, leaving them living in poverty and attending failing schools.

Jennifer Hochschild, a professor at Harvard University who focuses on race and immigration, said she did not think Trump could fix his relationship with black and Hispanic voters.

“General cluelessness about racial dynamics will diminish any possible black support that comes from Trump’s emphasis on job creation,” Hochschild said in an email. “And Clinton has a lot of deep roots among black politicians.”

Trump also has been criticized for vowing to deport millions of people living in the United States illegally. In recent days, he had appeared to hold out the possibility of toning down his hardline stance, although his precise plans on immigration have been harder to pin down.

On Thursday, he denied he would loosen his proposed immigration restrictions.
 
Posts: 1562 | Location: Chester County, PA | Registered: February 12, 2016Report This Post
wishing we
were congress
posted Hide Post
This report from a former moderator at the Clinton Global Initiative meetings


http://dailycaller.com/2016/08...gusting-gross-audio/

A liberal journalist who has moderated forums hosted by the Clinton Global Initiative offered a brutal takedown of the organization, describing it as “creepy,” “disgusting” and “gross.”

Adam Davidson, who hosts a show for NPR and has written for New York Magazine, also said during an appearance on Slate’s “Political Gabfest” podcast this week, that the Bill and Hillary Clinton-controlled group’s events are “all about buying access.”

And later in the podcast, he said that the Clinton Foundation has made the Clintons “beholden to scumbags.”
Davidson’s harsh critique comes as Hillary Clinton faces accusations that her family charities are massive pay-for-play schemes. An AP investigation found that more than half of the private individuals Clinton met with as secretary of state were Clinton Foundation donors.

“It seems, to me, that it is all about buying access. It is incredibly expensive just to go to the thing, it’s $100,000-something,” said Davidson, who has hosted CGI panels for several years, including last year.

Davidson, who noted that his comments mean that he is unlikely to be invited back as a moderator, said that CGI events are clearly segregated between the haves and have-nots.

“There’s sort of these explicit ways in which you get access,” he said. “You pay more money to get more access to political leaders and to really rich people and to big corporate leaders.

“There’s this kinda creepy theatre that happens where you have the CEO of Coca-Cola or IBM or whatever or GE up there with President Clinton and they’re just bathing each other in love over how generous and wonderful they are and how much they care about the world and all these, like, earnest people applauding and thrilled.”

“It just feels like the worst version of an elite selling access to the aspirational, creating this theatre of doing good, but it’s all about something else. It really feels gross,” Davidson continued.

Davidson also laid out the differences between the Clinton Global Initiative and the Clinton Foundation. They operate under the Clinton umbrella but have separate staffs and different cultures. But he was equally as harsh about the Clinton Foundation’s work.

The Clinton Foundation, the higher profile of the two, is “just a bunch of people congratulating each other on how awesome they are,” said Davidson.

He described how Clinton Foundation officials would compel him to fill his panels with heads of state of foreign governments who were promised a slot but “literally have nothing to say.”

He also said that the Clinton Foundation’s work is “not in the top tier.”

He pointed to the Foundation’s work in Haiti in the aftermath of natural disasters there.

“Haiti is one of their singular focuses. It is a very small country. They have not had a major impact on Haiti,” he said.

“It’s more the performance of very public charity, not the actual intervention in deep and meaningful ways.”

Clinton and members of her campaign have adopted new talking points this week amid the Clinton Foundation criticism. They are now claiming that shutting down the organization would mean depriving millions of low-cost HIV/AIDS drugs.

Despite his grievances with the Clinton organizations, Davidson says he still supports Hillary Clinton for president.

“Obviously, I fully support Hillary Clinton,” he said.

????????????

BTW, if you wonder who the speakers are at a CGI, here is the list for last year's 2015 meeting. Interesting to scan.

https://www.clintonfoundation....etings/2015/speakers
 
Posts: 19759 | Registered: July 21, 2002Report This Post
Member
Picture of erj_pilot
posted Hide Post
WOW!! Eek After all he's seen, heard, and witnessed from this circle-jerk organization, he STILL support Hitlery Clinton for president. What a TWAT-WAFFLE.....[smh]



"If you’re a leader, you lead the way. Not just on the easy ones; you take the tough ones too…” – MAJ Richard D. Winters (1918-2011), E Company, 2nd Battalion, 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne

"Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil... Therefore, as tongues of fire lick up straw and as dry grass sinks down in the flames, so their roots will decay and their flowers blow away like dust; for they have rejected the law of the Lord Almighty and spurned the word of the Holy One of Israel." - Isaiah 5:20,24
 
Posts: 11066 | Location: NW Houston | Registered: April 04, 2012Report This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I'm watching obamas foreign policy and actions to see how he'll influence the election:

quote:
On two occasions, Clinton used military action for the specific purpose of distracting the American public from the fallout of the Lewinsky affair:

• On August 20, three days after Clinton finally admitted publicly to the Lewinsky affair, the news media was poised to focus on that day’s grand jury testimony by Monica Lewinsky. That same morning, Clinton personally went on national television to gravely announce his bombing of a Sudanese “chemical weapons factory,” and a terrorist training camp in Afghanistan. It was the first time most Americans ever heard the name of Osama bin Laden. The factory bombing in Sudan killed an innocent night watchman, but accomplished little else. It later was proven that the plant was making badly needed pharmaceuticals for people in that poverty-stricken part of the world, but no chemical weapons.

Several months later, the U.S. Center for Nonproliferation Studies, part of the Monterey Institute of International Studies, stated: "...the evidence indicates that the facility had no role whatsoever in chemical weapons development." Kroll Associates, one of the world's most reputable investigative firms, also confirmed that there was no link in any way between the plant and any terrorist organization. As for the Afghanistan bombing, it failed to do any damage at all to bin Laden or his organization. Clinton’s action was accurately characterized by George W. Bush when he said right after 9-11: "When I take action, I’m not going to fire a $2 million missile at a $10 empty tent and hit a camel in the butt.

Clinton’s pointless and murderous military actions did not make Americans safer that day, although they did destroy an innocent life, and for all the good they did certainly could have been delayed in any case. But they did succeed in diverting media attention from Lewinsky’s grand jury testimony for a 24-hour news cycle, which was the main point. So I guess, they weren’t a total loss.

•On December 16, 1998, on the eve of the scheduled House vote on his impeachment, Bill Clinton launched a surprise bombing attack on Baghdad. As justification for this exploit, he cited the urgent threat that Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction posed to America, and the need for immediate action. Almost immediately, the House Democrats held a caucus and emerged calling for a delay in the impeachment proceedings. House minority leader Dick Gephardt made a statement: "We obviously should pass a resolution by saying that we stand behind the troops. I would hope that we do not take up impeachment until the hostilities have completely ended."


____________________________________________________

The butcher with the sharpest knife has the warmest heart.
 
Posts: 13535 | Location: Bottom of Lake Washington | Registered: March 06, 2007Report This Post
Get Off My Lawn
Picture of oddball
posted Hide Post
Well, Julian Assange has stated that the information that Wikileaks has on Donald Trump is no different than the stuff that he publicly says anyways.

quote:
“We do have some information about the Republican campaign,” Assange said. “I mean, it’s from a point of view of an investigative journalist organization like WikiLeaks, the problem with the Trump campaign is it’s actually hard for us to publish much more controversial material than what comes out of Donald Trump’s mouth every second day, I mean, that’s a very strange reality for most of the media to be in.”


In other words, anything "controversial" is above board, out in the open. Trump is hiding nothing. He's clean.

link



"I’m not going to read Time Magazine, I’m not going to read Newsweek, I’m not going to read any of these magazines; I mean, because they have too much to lose by printing the truth"- Bob Dylan, 1965
 
Posts: 17677 | Location: Texas | Registered: May 13, 2003Report This Post
Glorious SPAM!
Picture of mbinky
posted Hide Post
Win or loose, pulling the lever for Trump this November will be refreshing. Almost cathartic.
 
Posts: 10647 | Registered: June 13, 2003Report This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I hope Adam Davidson's life insurance is paid up. I don't think the last sentence will make amends for the rest of the article.
 
Posts: 1341 | Location: Northern Michigan | Registered: September 08, 2008Report This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by erj_pilot:
WOW!! Eek After all he's seen, heard, and witnessed from this circle-jerk organization, he STILL support Hitlery Clinton for president. What a TWAT-WAFFLE.....[smh]

The liberal mindset is to work towards the socialist utopia with a religious-like devotion and zeal.
That is why, for example, almost all socialist movement have ended up being dictatorships under cult-of-personality dictators. They are willing to accept almost any violation of their own "values" to continue moving forward towards the "big goal" which is the socialist utopia.

I don't think they would consciously admit that to themselves, but that is how it actually works. They might recognize and criticize Hillary's flaws, but at least she is on "the team" and will move towards socialism. Trump, regardless of how virtuous he may or may not be, is "the enemy" simply because he is not working towards socialism.


"Crom is strong! If I die, I have to go before him, and he will ask me, 'What is the riddle of steel?' If I don't know it, he will cast me out of Valhalla and laugh at me."
 
Posts: 6641 | Registered: September 10, 2007Report This Post
Baroque Bloke
Picture of Pipe Smoker
posted Hide Post
It's becoming obvious that the Clinton machine is quite worried by Trump's black outreach efforts.

"Donald Trump has been savaged on Twitter after 'exploiting' the shooting death of Dwyane Wade's cousin in a 'disgusting' attempt to appeal to black voters. …"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...ls-star-s-wrong.html



Serious about crackers
 
Posts: 9759 | Location: San Diego | Registered: July 26, 2014Report This Post
Banned
posted Hide Post
Browsing through the various media offerings, it's becoming clear that the Clinton camp is increasingly alarmed that they haven't been able to open up any kind of lead over Trump. Indeed, they are statistically tied in at least 9 states that will decide the election.

The emerging strategy appears to be to try to build in the public's mind that the upcoming debates, especially the 1st on 9/26, is what will determine the winner. If they can build that narrative and embed it into the minds of the easily manipulated, then it's just a matter of reporting, over and over, that Clinton "easily won" the debate. It won't matter what really happens on 9/26, as most people won't watch it anyway. What will matter is how the media reports it the next 7-8 days after it's over. Make Trump out to be a huge loser in the debate and the election is over. The format of the debates is purposely built to keep any real "debate" from happening. It's a staged circus show with the script, and the built-in help for Hillary, written by her campaign and the media moderator who will be there to make sure it all goes as scripted.

They'll try to get him flustered and make him look like a hot head. If they succeed, he's likely done. But.....if the moderator can't get the outcome they've scripted, and Trump comes off looking great, then it will be up to the media to spin it to the masses the next day. How the media reports it will be all that matters.
 
Posts: 1562 | Location: Chester County, PA | Registered: February 12, 2016Report This Post
Banned
posted Hide Post
This is Trump today at an unscheduled event in Iowa for Joni Ernst. The entire thing is very enjoyable but the Trump part is great. He starts at about one hour, 24 minutes into the video. If you care about what is happening, it's well worth a look.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-48dGesVDM
 
Posts: 1562 | Location: Chester County, PA | Registered: February 12, 2016Report This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 ... 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 ... 1312 

Closed Topic Closed

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Donald Trump is a first-rate ass clown, but...

© SIGforum 2024