The elderly dropping bows on worthless fuckstick pieces of shit is hardly newsworthy but hell we have "the media" so yeah. WHERE THE FUCK WERE THESE COCK SUCKERS WHEN THE KNOCKOUT GAMES WERE BEING PLAYED????

My favorite moment in politics in 2015 was during a Trump rally that was televised on Fox News. During a brief pause in his speech you could clearly hear a supporter yell out "FUCK THE MEDIA!!!". Then Trump, rather sarcastically or just unemotionally said "thank you" and gave the thumbs up.

Words cannot describe how much I hate the media in this nation.

The difference between Trump and Politicians is, Politicians tell people what they want to here were as Trump is telling people what they need to hear. And these protesters at his rallys will only bring in more voters for him.

Republican establishment continues to play a very dangerous game.

Just watched Representative Issa, who is a Rubio supporter, say that even if Rubio loses Florida, he should continue on because the convention may have to pick the best person to unite the country.

They really do think they can steal this election.

And they think Trump has crazy ideas? Who is out of touch w reality here ?

Fuck the Republican Party, may you burn to the god damned feckless, shiftless, worthless ground. Maybe out of your ashes a decent party will arise.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
Republican establishment continues to play a very dangerous game.

Just watched Representative Issa, who is a Rubio supporter, say that even if Rubio loses Florida, he should continue on because the convention may have to pick the best person to unite the country.

They really do think they can steal this election.

And they think Trump has crazy ideas? Who is out of touch w reality here ?

But Trump IS Republican.....I can't stand the games the GOP backstabbers are playing. Rubio can take his spoiled self back to his mommy and daddy as far as I'm concerned.

OK Donald, you've entered an arena where you are a rookie, but you claim you will dominate. Solve the hired agitator problem with a smooth and clever solution and you will gain many voters.

If you are as great and the winner you claim, you should be one step ahead of them instead of being forced to play and react to their game.

quote:

Originally posted by stickman428:
Fuck the Republican Party, may you burn to the god damned feckless, shiftless, worthless ground. Maybe out of your ashes a decent party will arise.

Pretty much.

quote:

One of Costello’s first questions for Senecal was whether Trump was the same person onstage at the debates as he is offstage in real life.

That reminded me of an exchange during the Douglas/Lincoln debates.

Douglas accused Lincoln of being two-faced about a certain issue. Lincoln retorted (paraphrasing), "If I had another face, would I wear this one?".

quote:

Solve the hired agitator problem with a smooth and clever solution

Actually it is not Trump's responsibility to solve this.

If organized disruption of campaign events reaches a certain level of intensity and frequency, the police should arrest the protesters. They should get a few months in jail. They should be fined also.

The police should investigate who funded the organized disruption. They should get a few years in jail. And a healthy fine.

So where do we set the bar to arrest someone ?

If the disruption is obviously coordinated over multiple people, and if the disruption continues for a period of time, that would trip the bar.

A Republican National Committee Standing Rules Committee member told the membership Friday that convention delegates are not bound to cast their votes at the convention according to primary vote results in the first round of voting.


http://dailycaller.com/2016/03...und-on-first-ballot/

If they pulled some backdoor shit like that, it would be suicide for the Republican party. They've already got one foot in the grave.

BBC has really turned up the tempo of their anti-Trump propaganda as of late.

No shortage there of garbage such as the following...

_______________________________________________________________________________

US election 2016: Barack Obama says 'don't blame me for Donald Trump'


President Obama has dismissed suggestions that he is responsible for the rise of Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump.

"I have been blamed by Republicans for a lot of things but being blamed for who they are selecting for their party is novel," he said at a welcome for Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Mr Obama said he aimed to unify the US.

Meanwhile a man is reportedly facing assault charges for attacking a protester at a Trump rally.

The 78-year-old attacked a demonstrator being removed from the event in Fayetteville in North Carolina on Wednesday, US media reported.

Senior Republicans have urged supporters not to vote for Mr Trump.

Mr Obama's remarks came after he was asked by a reporter whether his administration was to blame for the increasing polarisation in US politics.

He blamed Republican elites and right wing media for feeding the Republican base "a notion that everything I do is to be opposed, that co-operation or compromise somehow is a betrayal".

"What you're seeing in the Republican party is all those efforts over the course of time creating an environment where someone like a Donald Trump can survive. He's just doing more of what's been done over the past seven-and-a-half years," Mr Obama said.

On Tuesday Mr Trump won primaries in three more states and called for the Republican party to unite behind him after a week of stinging criticism from party leaders.

"Instead of fighting it, they should embrace it," he said.

But Mr Obama said that although Mr Trump was known for his "provocative" comments, his policies on issues such as immigration were not that different from those of his presidential rivals Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.

Donald Trump has been condemned by many on the left and some on the right as being beyond the pale, a toxic virus that exists on the fringes of the political mainstream. But where do his policy views actually fit when compared to his fellow presidential candidates - and past Republican commanders-in-chief?

He also refused to endorse one of the two rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination, Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders.

"My most important role will be to make sure when primaries are done I'm bringing everyone together so we can focus on winning the general election," he said.

Mrs Clinton increased her overall lead over Mr Sanders in Tuesday's primaries.

The primary and caucus elections determine the number of delegates assigned to each of the candidates.

The delegates then endorse their candidate at the party conventions in July.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-35779473

I'll just leave this here, from the RNC themselves (via oldfuzzy's link):

quote:

Without the use of force to bind the votes of delegates to the results of the primary process, primaries are nearly worthless “beauty contests”.

quote:

Originally posted by 46and2:
I'll just leave this here, from the RNC themselves (via the above link):

quote:

Without the use of force to bind the votes of delegates to the results of the primary process, primaries are nearly worthless “beauty contests”.

If they want to go that route, I will never vote for a republican again. For anything. Ever.

You listening RNC? If you select a candidate that does not have the mandate of the people, we will burn your asses to the ground. Select the candidate the voters endorsed in the primary, or be done as a political power. Those are your options.

Actually, what they're counting on is some SlickWilly-esque definitions of what "mandate" means. Is it 34% of the popular vote, or maybe 51%, it is it 51% of States won, and any number of other malleable definitions that suit the ulterior motives of the status quo?

Make no mistake, whatever they do will be technically legal and within wiggle room, enough that some party loyalists will keep believing the bullshit, and those who disagree will be written off as extremists or infiltrators or some similar bullshit.

We only "win" if they can see the writing on the wall and have enough sane foresight and actual love for country that they can restrain themselves from undermining the will of the people, or if they are so blatant as to effectively destroy themselves as a result.

So this fuckhead who charged Trump is being given a national stage by CNN by giving him an interview.


CNN, you are fucking awful. This is truly shameful.

(I'm at the airport by the way which is the only reason why I know this cause I'm being forced to watch this crap.)

quote:

Make no mistake, whatever they do will be technically legal and within wiggle room

I have no doubts it will be "correct" and "allowable" by the process.

However, that will not keep me from voting against them at every opportunity, and even supporting other candidates financially.

If it's Trump, bully for Trump. If it's Cruz, bully for Cruz. But if they try some trickery to install some non-contender like Rubio, Kasich, Bush, or Romney - I am done.

^ Bofus.

quote:

Originally posted by bionic218:

If it's Trump, bully for Trump. If it's Cruz, bully for Cruz. But if they try some trickery to install some non-contender like Rubio, Kasich, Bush, or Romney - I am done.

A new party will surely bloom. The backlash to the RNC would be a finality if they pull that crap.

I still can't fathom that CNN is putting that asshole who rushed Trump on primetime.

Nice message. Threaten Trump, and we'll make you famous. Just awful.