http://www.realclearpolitics.c..._better_in_2017.html

MTV's video "2017 New Years Resolutions for White Guys" has been taken down at the MTV site.

You can still see the video at the above link.

Why did they make it "private" ?

89 thumbs up votes

11,922 thumbs down

MTV is still around? Why?

Filling those skulls full of mush with more mush.

"MTV News?" They have a news division? Well, that's amusing.

Anyone read this? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...try-asks-flight.html

Two comments from me. Those fucking fags are very brave to do that to a woman accompanied by kids.

I would have gladly rearranged their faces.

Bravo Jose!

quote:

Originally posted by jehzsa:
Anyone read this?
< snip >

If some manic did that to my wife and daughter in my presence, they'd have cause to regret it.

quote:

Originally posted by Sig2340:

quote:

Originally posted by jehzsa:
Anyone read this?
< snip >

If some manic did that to my wife and daughter in my presence, they'd have cause to regret it.

The Secret Service was there and chose not to intervene. Unpleasant but not dangerous, apparently.

I'm starting to think the reason all the libs are upset is this might actually be the first time in the millennials lives that they have not gotten their way. No participation trophy, nothing other than disappointment. As such they are acting like little kids who don't get what they want.

Political cartoons like the one posted by nhtagmember must really eat at her...IF she is allowed to see them.

Social media is putting the wood to these guys.

quote:

Originally posted by jehzsa:
Anyone read this? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...try-asks-flight.html

quote:

'Your father is ruining the country,' said Dan Goldstein,

He hasn't even taken office yet, genius.

quote:

Originally posted by lbj:
Social media is putting the wood to these guys.

I have a feeling they won't mind too much.

Thanks Santa!

http://beta.hotair.com/archive...-russian-propaganda/

The White House opposed a Republican-led push earlier this year to create an executive-branch task force to battle Russia’s covert information operations, according to a document obtained by POLITICO.

Sen. Tom Cotton, a leading GOP defense hawk who has long urged President Barack Obama to take a harder line on Russia, sought to force the White House to create a panel with representatives from a number of government agencies to counter Russian efforts “to exert covert influence,” including by exposing Russian “falsehoods, agents of influence, corruption, human rights abuses, terrorism, and assassinations.”

But the administration rejected the call , saying in a letter to Congress that hasn’t been released publicly that the panel would duplicate existing efforts to battle Russian influence operations — an argument Cotton rejects.

If the White House told Congress that they already had efforts in place to counter Russian propaganda that Cotton’s proposal would have duplicated, where was it over the past year? Who led that effort, and have they been held accountable for its apparent failures? Clearly the president himself is dissatisfied with its performance and blames it for the outcome of the election (a highly disputable conclusion, of course), so why hasn’t Obama fired the people responsible for its operation?

The answer appears to be that there’s no one to fire — because Obama and his team didn’t take it seriously. Until his party lost an election, that is.

Not only did Cotton work to build bipartisan support for the proposal, he was attempting months earlier to fill a gap left by the Obama administration. They weren’t interested in working with Cotton and Republicans at that time, nor does it appear they had enough concern about the impact of Russian propaganda to put even minimal resources in play against it.

Sean Spicer has been nominated as Press Secretary.

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/12/22...-his-press-team.html

Tony.

His husband?