Come on Az. Repubs, kick their ass all the way to tomorrow!! There are some really brilliant computer folks out there, and seems as though Az. Rebubs found some of them. Dominion may not be too happy with this news either!!

the so-called 'republicans' out here are a bunch of spineless gutless quislings

the voting database was erased the day before the audit...gee how did that happen? How many 'republicans' stood up and demanded that the audit happen sooner rather than later...

voting is pointless when the outcome is determined in advance

the cartridge box is a becoming a better medium to select the leaders we need, not who big tech wants

Russell Brand, kind of a left wing gadfly, sees some light. Years late but he's no dummy and wants others to get a clue.

Wray Told Congress FBI Had Not Infiltrated Proud Boys, NYT Reports They Had Two Informants On Jan 6

https://nationalfile.com/wray-...informants-on-jan-6/

While many on the left still use the word “insurrection,” the federal government has yet to use it once on charging documents related to the civil unrest at the U.S. Capitol on January 6. Instead, the federal government has charged many in leadership positions of groups like the Proud Boys with “conspiracy” and have alleged that there was a plot among these groups to breach the U.S. Capitol.
FBI Director Christopher Wray previously seemed to acknowledge to Congress that his agency had not infiltrated the groups present at the Capitol protest. According to the New York Times, the FBI had at least two Proud Boys working as confidential informants on January 6.
Earlier today the New York Times released a report, quoting anonymous FBI officials, revealing that the FBI had at least two confidential informants at the Capitol on January 6, and one was regularly texting his FBI handler throughout the day to give updates on the rally-turned-protest that resulted in minor destruction of property at the U.S. Capitol building. The New York Times writes that this reveals “federal law enforcement had a far greater visibility into” the events of January 6 even as they were “taking place, than was previously known.”

In an appearance before the U.S. Senate, Wray was questioned on the topic of FBI infiltration of the groups accused of planning to enter the U.S. Capitol by Sen. Amy Klobuchar. While stopping short of explicitly claiming the FBI had not infiltrated these groups, FBI Director Chris Wray appeared to acknowledge his agency had not.

“There must me moments where you think, ‘If we would have known. If we could have infiltrated this group and found out what they were doing,’ questioned Klobuchar, “Do you have those moments?”

“Absolutely,” replied Wray, a Trump-appointee who was allowed to remain in his position by Joe Biden. “I will tell you Senator, this is something I feel passionately about.”

Describing the events of January 6 as an “attack,” Wray said that “We aim to bat 1,000. We aim to thwart every attack that’s out there, especially one that’s this horrific, that strikes right at the heart of our system of government, right at the time that a transfer of power is being discussed.” Wray added, “You can be darn tootin’ that we are focused very, very hard on how can we get better sources, better information, better analysis,” in order to make sure “January 6 never happens again.”

According to the lawyer representing Zach Rehl, the New York Times report indicating the FBI had two informants at January 6, and that one of them was in regular communication with his FBI handler, may hurt the prosecution’s argument that Proud Boys leaders were part of a conspiracy to enter the Capitol on January 6.

“This shows there was no pre-planning,” said lawyer Jon Moseley, who is now representing Rehl. “If they had these informants, they would have known about some plan before the grand jury even met.” Moseley says this new revelation pokes holes in the prosecution’s argument, which from the start has been that Rehl and other Proud Boys had an advanced plan to enter the U.S. Capitol building on January 6.

Moseley also says that, should the government have evidence of conspiracy, they would be compelled by existing law to provide this evidence to the defense.

Even without apparent evidence pointing to a conspiracy, four members of Proud Boys leadership are still being held pending trial. Recently, Joe Biggs released a devastating letter from jail describing the conditions of his confinement.

Rehl, meanwhile, is heard outside the U.S. Capitol discussing whether or not to go in the building, on video that seemingly contradicts the prosecution’s claim he organized a conspiracy.

more at link

Joey D
9/27/21

No description provided

I am hoping the State AG will actually do something,and lay charges against everyone involved - and we know who was involved at the State level

there may be a punishment, but justice would demand that they are stripped of their citizenship and lose the right to vote forever

in addition to any lengthy prison term they get

clearly these people do not have the moral standing to claim to be American's

and that's just Maricopa

I wish they would do an audit of Pima where I'm willing to bet that the results will be worse

Well the ball(and all of the evidence) is in the Az. AG hands now. Only time will tell what he will do with it. Apparently he has a shit ton of evidence showing voter fraud in Maricopa County.

It's quite difficult at this point to not be cynical.

I agree but I refuse to give up and throw in the towel.

Still got my towel

“Always take a towel” Ford Prefect

Wow!
Senator Dan Sullivan hammers Milley on his treasonous call to his Chinese counterpart.



Senator Harley questions Milley as to whether or not Milley was a bit distracted with his book interviews, while we had rapidly deteriorating conditions in Afghanistan.



Senator Blackburn questions Milley about his leaking.

Very funny video from the Babylon Bee linked in a feed from 100PercentFedUp.com -

MUST WATCH: Babylon Bee Produces HILARIOUS Video Mocking FBI Agent’s Role In Domestic Terror Plots

Link to vid is towards the bottom of the article.

quote:

Originally posted by kimber1911:
Senator Dan Sullivan hammers Milley on his treasonous call to his Chinese counterpart.

Motherfuckers. I can't listen to their lying bullshit.

Resignation, trial, imprisonment, and that's just for starters. AFAIC, they should be imprisoned for the rest of their lives. Solitary confinement 23.5 hours a day. No visitors, no communication of any kind with the outside world. If they need medical attention, the doctor will visit these traitors in their cell.

I want to hear these fools answer for their actions. I try and listen to this treasonous trash open their cake holes but I just have to shut it off.

https://theconservativetreehou...-attack/#more-217715

Earlier today Joint Chiefs Chairman, General Mark Milley, again claimed that intelligence was gathered and given to him showing that China was fearful of an imminent attack from the United States prior to Milley’s phone call with Chinese military to assure them the U.S. was not about to attack. This is the same claim that General Milley made yesterday

Immediately after this repeated claim, former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe directly refuted Milley on Fox News with Martha MacCallum. The intelligence products used by the Pentagon come from the DNI office, and John Ratcliffe noted there was no intelligence that China held any such concerns. As a result, any justification claim that Milley makes about his motives for the call surrounding “deescalation” are nonsense.

The Chinese did not escalate an issue because the issue did not exist. The Chinese were not worried the U.S. was going to attack. General Milley’s claims are based on a false premise. The question is, did another intelligence agency purposefully lie to Milley, or is Milley making it all up?

As John Ratcliffe noted in his rebuke of General Mark Milley’s justification, if the claim of legitimate intelligence was true, someone would have briefed President Trump about it. No-one from the office of the Director of National Intelligence, or the DoD, or the National Security Council ever saw any evidence that anything like what Milley is claiming actually existed.

You can surrender a war to 7th Century barbarians and leave them with $80 billion in US weapons.
That’s OK.

But you are not allowed to walk on stage at a Trump rally after you rescued babies in Kabul.
That’s not OK.

Lance Corporal Hunter Clark is Under Investigation by Department of Defense for Speaking at Trump Rally Out of Uniform.

Lance Corporal Hunter Clark was invited on the stage by President Trump.

Clark told the crowd, “I am the guy who pulled the baby over the wall and it’s definitely probably one of the greatest things I’ve ever done in my entire life.”

Link



Speaker Pelosi, Sec. of Defense Lloyd Austin, Gen. Milley, & Gen. McKenzie were said to be real pissed.
A lowly Lance Corporal had the nerve to speak behind a podium with a sign saying “Save America” when they have worked so hard to Destroy America.

Since when are military members prohibited from attending political rallies or events? What is there to investigate? He didn't say anything that everyone already didn't see/watch.

quote:

Originally posted by Graniteguy:
Since when are military members prohibited from attending political rallies or events? What is there to investigate? He didn't say anything that everyone already didn't see/watch.

They are not allowed to attend IN UNIFORM or in any way connecting them to active duty in the military. To do so would suggest that the military supports that candidate, which is a no-no. There is no rule preventing them from attending in civvies, that I know of, as long as they don't make speeches alluding to their service. Once they are off active duty (discharged or retired) there are no restrictions.

flashguy