quote:

Originally posted by Cookster:
PDJT tried to Largefarva,...

He tried to what? A Largefarva? So he tried to punchisize someone's face? For free.
.
.
.
.
(Punctuation is important)

quote:

Originally posted by 12131:
^^^ This is exactly why I said what I said earlier:

quote:

I'm convinced that, even if there were an authentic video proof of, say, Clinton pointing a gun at someone and pulling the trigger, the leftist demons will wave it off as normal, nothing to see here, move along folks. Right is wrong. Up is down. Black is white. Corruption is praised. Integrity is ridiculed. That's just what they are, true demons.

Its not just the lefist demons, we have plenty engaged in derailing PDJT on the right as well.

Michigan Judge Orders Forensic Review of 22 Dominion Voting Machines, Giuliani Says

https://www.theepochtimes.com/...ni-says_3605715.html

A judge in Antrim County, Michigan, has authorized a forensic audit of 22 Dominion Voting Systems machines, according to Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani.

“BIG WIN FOR HONEST ELECTIONS,” the former New York City Mayor wrote on Twitter on Dec. 4. “This is where the untrustworthy Dominion machine flipped 6,000 votes from Trump to Biden. Spiking of votes by Dominion happened all over the state.”

It is unclear which of the several election lawsuits the order originated from. The public dockets in four of the major election lawsuits in Michigan did not feature an order Giuliani described. Giuliani did not immediately respond to an emailed request for clarification.

Giuliani’s reference to a Dominion machine flipping votes is disputed by both Michigan election officials and Dominion. The Michigan Secretary of State’s office said the votes were flipped due to a human error by an Antrim county clerk.

Allegations about vote manipulation through the abuse of Dominion machines figure prominently in the election lawsuits filed by former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, who is not a part of the legal team representing President Donald Trump in a number of post-election lawsuits. Dominion has denied all of the allegations.

The judge’s order is the first known instance of a green light for the Trump team to examine the Dominion machines.

A judge in Nevada has previously granted the team access to a signature matching machine made by a different company. In that case, the campaign complained that while the judge granted a forensic review, the campaign was given what amounted to a “guided tour” instead.

The Michigan GOP on Friday raised concerns about a memo sent by Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson that “is pushing for the mass deletion of election data,” although a spokesperson for the secretary’s office later said the process is routine.

The GOP said Benson’s office told clerks in Michigan counties to “delete Electronic Poll Book software and associated files” amid calls to audit the election while flagging it was concerning.

Giuliani testified before Michigan lawmakers on Wednesday, telling them that they are the final arbiters of the election.

Giuliani said he was not asking the legislators to hand the state’s 16 Electoral College votes—currently certified for Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden—to Trump. Rather, he said, he hoped state legislators would investigate and examine the evidence for themselves.

“You shouldn’t decide anything based on what I believe,” said Giuliani on Dec. 2, adding that the evidence presented at the hearing was “just a sample.”

“There’s a plethora of evidence that you can go through that will convince you that this election was stolen,” said Giuliani. “I would ask you to go through that.”

Democrats' defense of Georgia election fraud video doesn't hold water
By Andrea Widburg

Immediately after the story broke about the video showing workers at the State Farm Arena in Atlanta counting ballots after poll observers had apparently been asked to leave, a purported news site sprang into action to "fact-check" the report. While the "fact check" gave room to Democrat operatives to cover their derrières, the counter-narrative was ludicrous. Additionally, new evidence about vote spikes and two of the vote-counters behaving suspiciously gave even more credence to Republicans' take on the surveillance video.

The video that galvanized so many people showed a large room in which poll observers were completely cordoned off from any meaningful observation. Shortly before 10:00 P.M., one of the poll workers — a black woman with eye-catching long, blond braids — approached the observers, and, not long after that, with apparent reluctance, the observers filed away, vacating the room a little before 11 P.M.

At 11:00, with the room ostensibly shut down and the observers gone, the remaining poll workers suddenly sprang into action, dragging rolling suitcases out from under a table. They took ballots out of those suitcases and spent the next two hours scanning them, at a rate of about 3,000 ballots per hour per scanner.

If you go here, you can see several sharpened photographs showing what was going on.

By Friday, a site called Lead Stories had its fact check ready, denying the allegations. These are its contentions:

1. Nobody told the observers to leave; they just voluntarily traipsed after workers and could have returned whenever they wanted.

2. What the Republicans called "suitcases" were in fact empty "regular ballot containers" that were placed under the table to save floor space.

3. The ballots inside had already been removed from their envelopes and processed while observers were present.

The only one of those points that holds water is the contention that the ballots were in "ballot containers," not suitcases. Everything else is factually or logically wrong.

First, the poll-watchers who left stated that the workers had told them to leave, and, indeed, you can see the woman with blond braids talking to them. It makes sense that the observers wouldn't have left without being told that everything was shutting down. Trump-supporters were deeply suspicious of events and would never have walked away from watching.

Second, even assuming that people had watched the ballots getting removed from their envelopes, that's not a reason for them to be disinterested in watching the votes get counted. For example, they might have witnessed the woman in the purple shirt repeatedly running the same batch of ballots through the tabulator.

Third, the shutdown theater makes no sense. If the counting was proceeding as before, why in the world engage in that shutdown theater, which effectively drove the poll-watchers out, only to spring into frantic, completely unsupervised action for the next two hours?

Third, even as those poll workers were busily scanning in ballots without oversight, Biden received a "mathematically impossible" spike in vote counts:

Fourth, according to Bernard Kerik, a former New York City police commissioner, that spike is a mathematical impossibility — a claim that makes sense just by looking at that chart:



It isn't surprising that the so-called "fact check" was wrong. Lead Stories is a partisan Democrat site "staffed almost entirely by Democratic donors, half of whom had worked for CNN in the past." It's also one of Facebook's alleged "nonpartisan fact-checkers" — and they, as many have noted, function on a completely partisan basis.

There's another video of two of the women from the secret vote count — the gal in the purple shirt and the one with the blond braids — and it appears that Purple Shirt is passing something covertly to Blond Braids. Many people have speculated that what's being passed is a USB:

The facts remain clear: poll-observers testified they were deliberately cleared out, at which point workers, including two who had behaved suspiciously earlier, scanned ballots like crazy, with that scanning coinciding with an impossibly huge spike in counts that favored Joe Biden. No wonder Governor Kemp suddenly called for a signature audit. Even he knew that no one would believe the purported facts "explaining" the video.

Sadly, despite all this evidence of illegal conduct, Fulton County still certified its results. That's what happens when the fox is the one charged with certifying the henhouse.

https://www.americanthinker.co...esnt_hold_water.html

^^^It took Tokyo Rose half a day to come up with that bull.

That was in fact the notice/warning that I got when I posted it on facebook. Lead Stories had this to say:

I really have no words other than I’m praying that honesty and integrity overcome the fraud they’re trying to pull off. Schrödinger’s cat comes to mind. The box gets opened on Jan 20.

just out right lying. over and over

"Nobody told the observers to leave; they just voluntarily traipsed after workers and could have returned whenever they wanted."

^^^
It's hard to keep all the lies straight. Thank goodness they rely on everyone having a very short attention span.

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
Well said Kimber.

Yep. This is not a game of "I got your nose".

This is Freedom, Liberty and our natural inherent rights being stolen and we are being told to accept it. The "or else" will come, should they be permitted to prevail.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
just out right lying. over and over

"Nobody told the observers to leave; they just voluntarily traipsed after workers and could have returned whenever they wanted."

The swamp feels they have enough control to do this in the daylight. That's scary. Imagine what is going on that we don't know about. I'm optimistic we prevail, but it will take divine intervention.

I don't trust (I don't trust much anymore) the willingness to allow these voting machines to be examined all of a sudden. It's been just over four weeks since the election. There is no chain of custody as to where they have been or to who may have tampered with them. Had they been frozen and seized under subpoena very shortly after the election they may reveal something but that ship has long sailed.

It's like the perp allowing the detectives to examine the crime scene a month later. Good way for the detectives to wind up with egg on their face.

15 suitcases of ballots to flatten the curve.

quote:

Originally posted by lastmanstanding:
I don't trust (I don't trust much anymore) the willingness to allow these voting machines to be examined all of a sudden. It's been just over four weeks since the election. There is no chain of custody as to where they have been or to who may have tampered with them. Had they been frozen and seized under subpoena very shortly after the election they may reveal something but that ship has long sailed.

It's like the perp allowing the detectives to examine the crime scene a month later. Good way for the detectives to wind up with egg on their face.

Not only that... but if it was done remotely with a software application it may not leave any "fingerprints" on the machine.
I'm not a computer science guy but I agree, if they find nothing they wind up with egg on their face.
Still... you've got to look and see what you can find.

Another lawsuit over the steal in Ga.




Link to original video: https://youtu.be/2rQnstm6lvw

Brand new Kraken Website, Sydney Powell and Lin Wood

https://www.kraken-wood.com/

https://www.breitbart.com/2020...to-delete-vote-data/

Michigan Republican legislative leaders were not happy on Friday when they learned the Board of Elections (BOE) ordered county clerks to delete election-related data from government computers.

On December 1, the BOE, which is under the auspices of Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson (D), sent a memo to all clerks about recounts and the “release of voting equipment.”

One section, titled, “E-Pollbook laptops and flash drives,” read:

"The EPB software and associated files must be deleted from all devices by the seventh calendar day following the final canvass and certification of the election (November 30, 2020) unless a petition for recount has been filed and the recount has not been completed, a post-election audit is planned but has not yet been completed, or the deletion of the data has been stayed by an order of the court or the Secretary of State"

That raised the ire of state Rep. Matt Hall (R) and state Sen. Ed McBroom (R), chairmen of their respective oversight committees, who indicated the memo violated an order by House Speaker Lee Chatfield (R) and Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey (R) for election data to be preserved.

Chatfield and Shirkey issued a directive on November 6 “which served as notice of the Michigan Legislature’s plans to conduct an inquiry into the general election,” a release from Hall said.

“Because of that inquiry, Detroit city clerk and BOE offices were directed to preserve certain materials, including relevant electronic information. The inquiry also demands all surveillance video recordings that were taken at the TCF Center in Detroit from Nov. 3-5 be kept,” it continued.