^^ The whole article was posted here previously.
https://sigforum.com/eve/forums...900087674#8900087674

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
^^ The whole article was posted here previously.
https://sigforum.com/eve/forums...900087674#8900087674

Thanks, chellim1. Let me strike that post. I spotted the article from another link, didn't see that post.

quote:

Originally posted by kimber1911:
There is no “bombshell” coming...

Great summation! Thank you for doing this.



.

FEC Chairman agrees Trump has ‘legitimate accusations’ of election fraud, says we need to let legal process play out

The head of the FEC has reviewed the affidavits and believes President Trump has legitimate accusations of election fraud that a court cannot dismiss:

JTN – The Trump campaign is bringing “legitimate accusations” to court through affidavits of credible witnesses and other evidence used in its challenges to electoral outcomes in various states, Federal Election Commission Chairman Trey Trainor said. Trainor said his review of evidence, including numerous affidavits claiming voter fraud and a sworn statement by a prominent mathematician flagging up to 100,000 Pennsylvania ballots, met the first level of legal scrutiny under what’s known as motion to dismiss or “Rule 12(b)(6)” of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which would dismiss less credible claims. Noting the subsequent legal threshold beyond a “motion to dismiss” is the “summary judgment phase,” Trainor said that under this phase, the credibility of witnesses is presumed to be accurate, especially given the caliber of the testimonies Trainor has observed to date. “When considering a motion for summary judgment, a judge will view all evidence in the light most favorable to the movant’s opponent,” explains Cornell University Law School’s Legal Information Institute website. “What I would be concerned with, if I were on the other side of these election contests that are going on around the country, is that if you look at the level of evidence that has been provided by these affidavits — hundreds of affidavits that corroborate events that have happened on the ground — in a summary judgment phase of these cases, you have to take the evidence of the plaintiff as being true,” Trainor told “Just the News AM” television show Friday morning. “The court has to take the evidence of the plaintiff as being true and see whether or not the other side can make a case against it,” added Trainor. “So, the massive amounts of affidavits that we see in these cases show that there was in fact fraud that took place. And the other side really needs to answer these questions.” On Thursday the Trump campaign, led by former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, presented what it called its “opening statement” in a press conference. Members of the campaign’s legal team reiterated that it would seek to protect the privacy of many of its sworn witnesses, waiting to sharing their identities with the court, to shield them from potential harassment. With the Trump campaign’s lawsuits in targeted battleground states across the country in various phases of progress through the courts, Trainor said, “At the end of the day, what I would say is that these are legitimate accusations that are going to be tried in court.” “And we need to let this legal process play out,” Trainor added, “so that we come to a valid conclusion to this election that everybody believes to be legitimate.”

More at THIS LINK.

quote:

Originally posted by kimber1911:
I also believe Obama is the King Pin with Soros’s and High Tech Companies providing the financing.

I believe Obama is deeply involved, for several reasons, but I don't believe he is the king pin. He isn't nearly smart enough.

He is the front man they needed: charismatic, nice smile and good speaker(when the teleprompter is on), but there is not much depth there. What is there is evil and 100% opportunistic, but without someone to prop him up (from college days and forward), he couldn't manage a convenience store successfully.



.

Agreed. obama is another puppet. I'd wager he's somehow involved but hillary's 'foundation' is probably higher up the ladder than him.

Link to original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...yo&feature=emb_title

Nevada Secretary of State Voter Turn out.
Total Ballots Cast = 1,327,394

Silver State Election Results.
Presidential Ballots Cast: 703,486 + 669,890 + 14,783, + 14,079 + 3,138 = 1,405,376

Seems the Secretary of State NV is reporting 77,982 fewer ballots cast than total number of ballots cast for all of the Presidential candidates.

Maybe Nevada should reconcile those numbers.

I like listening to this guy. Take a look.

Y’all keep going back and forth amongst yourselves from “BOMBSHELL coming”, to no it’s a “wet firecracker”.

I’m very seriously thinking of doing to this forum, to what I did with FuckButt, and that is HIT DELETE.

FOR GOD’S SAKE, just SHUT-UP ALREADY and let things play out. Until December 12 and the Electoral College convenes, it’s all so much claptrap noise.

quote:

Originally posted by 2BobTanner:
FOR GOD’S SAKE, just SHUT-UP ALREADY and let things play out. Until December 12 and the Electoral College convenes, it’s all so much claptrap noise.

Allrighty then...

Just speaking for myself... I have PESD (Post-Election Stress Disorder).
I haven't been able to sleep much since the election. I've been following things pretty closely and I'm glad a place like SIGforum exists where I can share thoughts and updates with fellow patriots.

Don't click it, Bob.

quote:

Originally posted by kimber1911:
Nevada Secretary of State Voter Turn out.
Total Ballots Cast = 1,327,394

Silver State Election Results.
Presidential Ballots Cast: 703,486 + 669,890 + 14,783, + 14,079 + 3,138 = 1,405,376

Seems the Secretary of State NV is reporting 77,982 fewer ballots cast than total number of ballots cast for all of the Presidential candidates.

Maybe Nevada should reconcile those numbers.

The SOS voter turnout page was last updated 11 days ago. There's no timestamp for the silver state results.

Tony.

Bob, you need to take 2 Fukitols at bedtime. They really help.

quote:

Originally posted by TigerDore:

quote:

Originally posted by kimber1911:
I also believe Obama is the King Pin with Soros’s and High Tech Companies providing the financing.

I believe Obama is deeply involved, for several reasons, but I don't believe he is the king pin. He isn't nearly smart enough.

He is the front man they needed: charismatic, nice smile and good speaker(when the teleprompter is on), but there is not much depth there. What is there is evil and 100% opportunistic, but without someone to prop him up (from college days and forward), he couldn't manage a convenience store successfully.
.

Good point.
This makes me think back to Rule Number 1.
What they are doing they accuse you of doing.

Following that logic, it is possible Obama’s strings are being pulled from Russia.



Go ahead, call me a conspiracy theorist.
I am a white male so already been told by mainstream media, I am pond scum.
Not much will hurt my feelings now.

Sad thing is, the enemy has been within our gates for a long time.

quote:

Originally posted by Keystoner:

You said Carlson wants Trump's legal team to have the goods. You could have stopped right there.

But I didn't.

quote:

Originally posted by 2BobTanner:
I’m very seriously thinking of doing to this forum, to what I did with FuckButt, and that is HIT DELETE.

quote:

Originally posted by 2BobTanner:
FOR GOD’S SAKE, just SHUT-UP ALREADY ... it’s all so much claptrap noise.

On behalf of the rest of the forum members participating in this thread, please accept my sincere apologies for you having been forced to read it.

Commentary: Flawed Globalist Ideology Underlies Opposition to Trump

by Edward Ring

There is a reason that nearly every powerful special interest in the United States is doing everything in its power to defeat Donald Trump, and it has nothing to do with the media’s fraudulent portrayal of him as a racist. Nor does it have anything to do with his allegedly abrasive personality.

If the president were willing to put the United States citizens under a total lockdown, allow millions of economic refugees to swarm across the borders, ship more jobs to Asia, and then impoverish whatever was left of middle America under the pretext of fighting “climate change,” he would be cruising to reelection.

Put another way, if Trump were a globalist, instead of a nationalist, there would not be well-funded militants destroying our cities while benefiting from a news blackout. There would not be NPC drones like ABC’s David Muir spewing anti-Trump pablum night after night, and money from Big Tech and Wall Street billionaires would be pouring into his campaign, instead of supporting his opponent.

In January 2018, in a speech of striking clarity, Trump described his vision of American nationalism. Addressing the assembled heads of state and business elite at the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Switzerland, Trump’s speech amounted to a declaration of war on the globalists. For example, he said:

The United States will no longer turn a blind eye to unfair economic practices, including massive intellectual property theft, industrial subsidies, and pervasive state-led economic planning. These and other predatory behaviors are distorting the global markets and harming businesses and workers, not just in the U.S., but around the globe. Just like we expect the leaders of other countries to protect their interests, as president of the United States, I will always protect the interests of our country, our companies, and our workers.

These words constituted a threat to globalist ideology not because Trump’s version of nationalism is particularly toxic, but because he exposed the globalist vision itself as flawed and dangerous. What globalists want will not deliver peace or prosperity to the world, much less America. What globalist billionaires and globalist corporations want, however, will make them wealthier and more powerful than ever.

In 2016 the World Economic Forum released a brief video called “8 predictions for the world in 2030” which remains an accurate summary of the globalist vision for the future. Here are the key points:

1) You’ll own nothing. And you’ll be happy. Everything you’ll want, you’ll rent, and it will be delivered by drone.

2) The United States won’t be the world’s leading superpower. Instead, a handful of countries will dominate.

3) You won’t die waiting for an organ donor. We won’t transplant organs. We’ll print new ones instead.

4) You’ll eat much less meat. An occasional treat, not a staple. For the good of the environment and our health.

5) A billion people will be displaced by climate change. We’ll have to do a better job at welcoming and integrating refugees.

6) Polluters will have to pay to emit carbon dioxide. There will be a global price on carbon. This will help make fossil fuels history.

7) You could be preparing to go to Mars. Scientists will have worked out how to keep you healthy in space.

8) Western values will have been tested to the breaking point. Checks and balances that underpin our democracies must not be forgotten.

The essence of this list, or agenda, can be distilled into the following: Private property will be abolished, the United States will lose its sovereignty, food will be rationed, state-supported refugees will arrive by the millions and be dispersed into every American city and town, energy will be rationed, and America’s traditional values and institutions will be obliterated.

This is a deeply flawed vision of the future. It fails on every practical level, but is marketed relentlessly by all the same institutions that attack President Trump. And on the surface, it has a powerful moral appeal. Consider these lyrics from John Lennon’s globalist anthem: “Imagine there’s no countries, it isn’t hard to do, nothing to kill or die for, and no religion, too.” This sounds great, until you face the reality of other powerful nations who aren’t about to cede their sovereignty to Western corporations, or deliberately undermine their cultures or their economies.

This means that “climate refugees” will not be pouring into China, or Japan, or Russia, or any other powerful and independent nations. It means those nations will continue to consume cheap and abundant fossil fuel, allowing them to allocate a higher percentage of their GDPs to more productive investments including research, industrial development, infrastructure upgrades, and military spending.

Deliberately hobbling the American economy, unilaterally, in the name of fighting “climate change” will elevate the price of everything imaginable—energy, water, food, housing, transportation, and every product and service that requires those basics for its own production. At the same time, adding tens of millions of “climate refugees” to America’s population without any regard to whether or not they come with productive skills will place additional burdens on an already handicapped economy.

Even worse, this agenda embraces a new dominant ideology, already well established, that attacks the core values that made America great. It justifies American submission to rationing and mass immigration through the underlying claim that American imperialist capitalism is responsible both for the “climate crisis” and the economic misery in other nations. It goes on to reject the most fundamental premise of capitalism, which is individual ownership of property. “You’ll own nothing. And you’ll be happy.”

But just as abandoning the fate of the world to rising nations such as China—an implacable police state bent on enslaving the world—is obviously flawed, abandoning capitalist values to a society where “you’ll own nothing” is also a recipe for misery. Taking away the ability for individuals to own property takes away the incentive for people to work hard and strive to improve conditions for themselves and their families. Behind the obvious historical fact that communism and socialism have never worked and have led to nothing but murderous tyranny and economic devastation in every place they have ever been tried, is one simple truth of human nature: people need to have an incentive to achieve, or they won’t bother.

Thus far, America’s influential elites, from Big Tech and Big Media to at least some significant percentage of academia and the corporate community, have been unable to embrace the alternative vision President Trump represents. This is a failure of imagination as much as evidence of corruption. Because there is an alternative future that doesn’t involve American decline.

In this alternative to the agenda of the Davos set, instead of despoiling the landscape with millions of wind turbines, we would have clean fossil fuel, hydroelectric power, and nuclear power that is deregulated and allowed to create cheap abundant energy in America and around the world. This would cause a rapid rise in the standard of living and quality of life in developing nations, which would lead to rising literacy and lower birth rates. In Africa, India, and elsewhere, economic development also fosters voluntary population migration into revitalized and inviting urban centers, taking pressure off ecosystems and wildlife.

This scenario, where sovereign nations are encouraged to develop conventional energy and make big infrastructure investments, has been completely derailed by the Western obsession with fighting climate change. The result is environmental destruction caused by burgeoning populations pouring into protected wildernesses in search of firewood and game meat. And that is a cold, devastating fact. Anthropogenic climate change as an existential threat to humanity, on the other hand, is a theory; a mighty convenient one at that.

President Trump’s policies have encouraged industrial development, especially in the United States, but also around the world. The globalists’ agenda calls for tightly controlled development, massive migration, and socialist redistribution, all under the supposedly benevolent management of multinational corporations and international banks. But even if their intentions were entirely innocent, their plans, should they ever come to fruition, would spell catastrophe.

The irony of globalist ideology is that its ostensible goal, peace and prosperity for all mankind, is better served by Trump’s version of nationalism. What Trump envisions—peaceful competition between nations, all looking out for their own national interests—offers humanity a path into the future that can be realized without trauma, especially if America remains united and prosperous, and able to exercise leadership. What globalists offer is tyranny, masquerading as enlightenment.

LINK

quote:

Originally posted by Ripley:

quote:

Originally posted by Keystoner:

You said Carlson wants Trump's legal team to have the goods. You could have stopped right there.

But I didn't.

It's not complicated--read your post. I'm sure you can figure it out.

quote:

Originally posted by 2BobTanner:
FuckButt

Heh...heheheheh.....heheheheh....

You shoulda heard what you just said....