Sigmonkey,

The “We” tweet in your signature. What is the meaning behind it? I see it was from 2017, but I’ve never noticed it in your signature prior to today (if it’s been there this whole time and I’ve just not seen it then it shows how much I pay attention). Just curious of it’s significance, if you don’t mind sharing.

For those with any doubts, please read this from American Thinker, posted in the other thread. Could very well be the plan for this week.

Tomorrow, the fight begins.

https://www.americanthinker.co...s_may_be_coming.html

(I recently added it)

Donald J. Trump, and America.

It was simply, "We", when he was elected and began the fight.


And now divided, those who stand with him.

"We"

Sometimes "We" is all there is.

Ok, makes sense. Got it now. Thanks

^^^^ Bingo.

President Trump's actions is echoing the famous words of John Paul Jones. "I have not yet begun to fight".

It's going to be an interesting 30+ days indeed.

Or better yet. President Trump's response when told Biden has now won the Presidency, "Nuts."

Ah, one can have some fun here, even in current darkness.

I'm a believer that God's hand helped the Founding Fathers. Valley Forge was a low point where people lost hope, but they prayed, and miracles happened. This is our winter in Valley Forge. We have remember God and not give up.

quote:

Originally posted by icom706:
Or better yet. President Trump's response when told Biden has now won the Presidency, "Nuts."

Ah, one can have some fun here, even in current darkness.

Trump doesn't seem worried. He played golf yesterday while the media had a masturbation circle jerk anointing Joe.

He knows something we don't

I'm all in with the Fuck fox crowd. Newsmax for me.

A big Thank You to all the members that suggested it.

As mentioned before, not quite as polished or flashy as the fake news (which now includes fucks er fox)but it will be fun watching it grow and improve

quote:

Originally posted by oddball:
For those with any doubts, please read this from American Thinker, posted in the other thread. Could very well be the plan for this week.

Tomorrow, the fight begins.

https://www.americanthinker.co...s_may_be_coming.html

Great article. This is going to be a long road. Can MI and WI certify if there is a recount and lawsuits?

The fact he didn't mention AZ in the article concerns me a bit. I thought that would have made his list for sure with a 20k margin.

My last question is in regards to PA and the separated ballots. There are reports that there are only 10k-20k that came in after 8 PM and those aren't in the count yet, which I think is utter bull. The problem could be proving it. I think the SOS actually mentioned those numbers. Again, I don't buy it.

Anyone else notice that the giant, running, COVID death toll screen scrolls are magically gone now that Creepy Joe is to be crowned?

Funny how that worked.

quote:

Originally posted by highroundcount:
I'm all in with the Fuck fox crowd. Newsmax for me.

Newsmax, OAN, or The First.

quote:

Originally posted by OcCurt:
Anyone else notice that the giant, running, COVID death toll screen scrolls are magically gone now that Creepy Joe is to be crowned?

I think that more likely because they have a new thing for which to sow FUD. When this is over you can bet they'll be back to it, unless something else new comes along. They have to. That's how they attract eyes: Drama.

quote:

Originally posted by ensigmatic:

quote:

Originally posted by highroundcount:
I'm all in with the Fuck fox crowd. Newsmax for me.

Newsmax, OAN, or The First.

quote:

Originally posted by OcCurt:
Anyone else notice that the giant, running, COVID death toll screen scrolls are magically gone now that Creepy Joe is to be crowned?

I think that more likely because they have a new thing for which to sow FUD. When this is over you can bet they'll be back to it, unless something else new comes along. They have to. That's how they attract eyes: Drama.

Thank you! I'll check out the others also.

quote:

Originally posted by oddball:
For those with any doubts, please read this from American Thinker, posted in the other thread. Could very well be the plan for this week.

Tomorrow, the fight begins.

https://www.americanthinker.co...s_may_be_coming.html

Good article....and scary IMHO due to the left openly stating there will be violence if DJT wins....let alone winning by the courts or the house.

quote:

Originally posted by ensigmatic:
They have to.

Of course they do. How would they survive otherwise?
News reporting organizations sell a product: information that people want to read or listen to. If they don’t have information people want to read or listen to, it’s like trying to sell seawater to island dwellers. And the news people are interested in isn’t limited to what makes them happy or they are pleased to hear. It’s obvious, for example, that many members here listen to the news media outlets that they despise precisely because they despise the way they present the information—i.e., because it is sensationalized.

There is also nothing new about sensationalism in news reporting; town criers didn’t walk through the streets yelling, “It will get dark after sundown,” “You’ll get wet if it rains,” or anything equally startling. The earliest printed news sources didn’t either. It’s all as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be.

quote:

Originally posted by dewhorse:

quote:

Originally posted by oddball:
For those with any doubts, please read this from American Thinker, posted in the other thread. Could very well be the plan for this week.

Tomorrow, the fight begins.

https://www.americanthinker.co...s_may_be_coming.html

Good article....and scary IMHO due to the left openly stating there will be violence if DJT wins....let alone winning by the courts or the house.

Bring it. I've had it with this stuff.

quote:

Originally posted by OcCurt:
Anyone else notice that the giant, running, COVID death toll screen scrolls are magically gone now that Creepy Joe is to be crowned?

Funny how that worked.

People celebrating in the streets, no distancing, many not wearing masks. They don't seem to have any worries about COVID. They were all going to die if they didn't have universal mail-in votes, but you know, 5 days changes everything.

Just wait, starting Monday the media will tell us that cases are indeed up 2-3x, but case fatality rates are 10x lower, and actual deaths are 4x lower and the curve is flat (all of this is true), and it will all just sort of blow over.

quote:

Originally posted by sigmonkey:

quote:

Originally posted by Czechvar:
https://youtu.be/ficae6x1Q5A

...you might want to download this soon...

Folks.
If you think the video is too long, go to the 30 minute mark and watch through to the 38 minute mark.

You then may think all of the video is worth watching.

Based on your recommendation, I just finished watching the entire video.

In addition to the overwhelming IT tech evidence presented that serious vulnerabilities in our election system have been documented as far back as 2007 and were largely ignored, and that widespread electronic voter fraud has taken place (to say nothing of the additional voter fraud that took place also), one of the things that strikes me about this video is that they were able to document election fraud in Texas and Kentucky.

While a real argument could be made that Texas could be included in the list of "battleground swing states", I don't think many people considered Kentucky to be one.

It is fairly obvious that widespread election and voter fraud occurred in the battleground swing states, but this leads to the question just how much of this fraud occurred in the relatively "safe" Republican controlled states, and perhaps even in Democrat controlled states as well?

The expert also makes some excellent recommendations in how to proceed with securing future elections.

This video interview, along with other pertinent interviews and statements, needs to be sent to every legal team filing lawsuits on behalf of Republican candidates across the country, every judge hearing those cases, all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court justices.

I'm in the process of trying to send a link to the video interview to the ACLJ, which many pages back I noted was one of the legal organizations that was getting involved in filing election lawsuits. The ACLJ has phone numbers listed for offering legal help, and the usual social media site contact info, but I don't have any social media accounts and so far I haven't found an email address to send them the video link.

Which brings me to another point. I realize that social media is responsible for much of the "Cancel Culture" and outright censorship, and it is completely understandable for members to quit using it...but, here is the problem. A lot of the "good guys", the ones working to defend candidates and voters that had the election stolen from them, also use social media, both to get the word out and also to be informed by those that "follow" them..

Perhaps some of you bailing out on social media might stop and actually use your social media to get important info like this out to those groups directly in the fight.

Information is power.

I'd like to encourage everyone to join me in contacting everyone from the ACLJ or groups like them, to your respective elected congressman and senators (at least for those of you lucky enough to have some Republican representatives), let them know your concerns and be sure to include pertinent factual evidence that will help to inform them on the evidence supporting widespread election (electronic) fraud, as well as voter fraud...especially if you happen to be a voter in one of the battleground swing states.

quote:

Originally posted by Ackks:

quote:

Originally posted by oddball:
For those with any doubts, please read this from American Thinker, posted in the other thread. Could very well be the plan for this week.

Tomorrow, the fight begins.

https://www.americanthinker.co...s_may_be_coming.html

Great article. This is going to be a long road. Can MI and WI certify if there is a recount and lawsuits?

The fact he didn't mention AZ in the article concerns me a bit. I thought that would have made his list for sure with a 20k margin.

Like the article says, one electoral vote at a time. First one with the best chance is PA. Then Nevada. Seems these two have the best chances of proof, strong evidence to present in court, and bring Biden's total to less than 270, giving Trump some breathing room to hopefully finish the job.

quote:

Perhaps some of you bailing out on social media might stop and actually use your social media to get important info like this out to those groups directly in the fight.

Information is power.

Yep.

Use it to our advantage. The few that abandon things like FB, Twitter and the like of socialism media, might as well try to dig a hole in the ocean with a fork. Our not using it hurts our voice, more than it does their pockets.

Certainly, the "big tech" is making money off the use of the platforms, but those same folks would be as quick to pick our bones clean if their censorship and manipulation of the narrative to their ends of total dominance and control over people's lives are realized.

Yeah, I have that nagging voice of 6 million (and more from communism) of my people in my head, along with the near 110 million other people in the past 100 years due to communism. So, before anyone tries to kick back that my concerns are overblown, save it.

Dollars over liberty.

I recall some guy, 2000 years ago when asked about a similar thing...

"When they had come, they said to Him, “Teacher, we know that You are true, and care about no one; for You do not regard the person of men, but teach the way of God in truth. Is it lawful to pay taxes to Caesar, or not?

Shall we give, or shall we not give? But he, knowing their hypocrisy, said unto them, Why tempt ye me? bring me a penny, that I may see it.

And they brought it. And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? And they said unto him, Caesar's.

And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. And they marvelled at him."

Point?

We have people talking about abandoning socialist media as a symbol of virtue, it is truly not much more than that.
The exception, being the argument of "consuming" it.

Rather we put it to good use, much like scattering chicken shit on the garden, both being a repullsive thing to handle, but a benefit to the user, in the end. Or should we have meager return without the effort, because it is repulsive to deal with?

Use it to further the cause, if we prevail, we can then lobby and push to have reform and proper regulation of the platforms as have been done with other "controlling monopolies" that are used by almost everyone.

If we choose not to use them to that advantage, and in doing so, lose the battle, we may well have no voice, nor hear any truth.

Look back on history and see the dark times people have gone through many different times, in many different places.

Real people, like you, like me, lived and died in horrible times.

Many, allowed themselves to be overtaken.

And they did not have to...