Trump should agree to allow Biden to get all the questions in advance and even to have his handlers' answers for him loaded into a teleprompter. Then Trump should mention that at the end of the debate, something to the effect of, "Joe, I gave you a head start, let you have the questions in advance while I got none. You have your answers in the teleprompter and only had to read them, and you still screwed that up. Tell us all how you're ready for this job."

Biden is like Jerry Mahoney only out of sinc. Battery is low. Tin man needing oil..

POTUS stops for pizza.



I've been on a huge Portnoy pizza review binge lately. One bite everybody knows the rules.



And to bring it full circle:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1295691801416826880

Trump ad at link

hard hitting

I've been seeing tons of things like this: Black men and women that are fed up with the Democrats. NSFW audio, use of "bullshit".

https://twitter.com/DC_Draino/...617117073190914?s=20

quote:

Originally posted by sjtill:
Re: the Kim Klacik (Baltimore GOP candidate, yeah her in the red dress and high heels) video on the previous page:

A Star is Born: Daily Wire

Does Ms. Klacik have a legitimate shot at winning?

quote:

Does Ms. Klacik have a legitimate shot at winning?

I'd say we're going to be seeing her in Washington one way or t'other.

BTW--has anyone else noticed the hot babes who have won their GOP primaries? Anna Paulina Luna (see pix w guns); Maria Elvira Salazar? Go Florida!

quote:

Republican strategist and congressional GOP candidate Kimberly Klacik released a hard-hitting ad slamming Democrats for their apparent fake concern for black lives, highlighting the devastation in Democrat-run cities, particularly Baltimore.

I heard the ad yesterday when Rush played the audio and was really impressed with her. I'm sure the left will soon begin their attacks on her and the usual suspects will come out like cockroaches to disparage her. I hope this young lady wins her election.

quote:

Originally posted by LS1 GTO:
My forecast; they'll have one live debate (probably at Joe's insistence).

I can almost guarantee there will be none. Joe's handlers (we don't know who his campaign "manager is, do we?) will not risk it, no way. They have seen Trump in debates, they know he would show no mercy.

Trump would have a better chance at debating an Empty Chair.

This USAF veteran won her Republican primary and will face Charlie Christ (D, FL) for his Congressional seat in November. She has the President’s “full support.”

Anna Paulina Luna

To replace outgoing Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Establishment-TN), Trump-endorsed Bill Hagerty won our Republican primary. This was a harder decision than it sounds, since all the R primary candidates were trying to "out-conservative" one another.

This speech he is giving in Arlington right now is one of the best I have heard

quote:

Originally posted by TMats:
This USAF veteran won her Republican primary and will face Charlie Christ (D, FL) for his Congressional seat in November. She has the President’s “full support.”

Anna Paulina Luna

We can't be rid of that phony asshole Crist soon enough. More power to the Airman!

quote:

Originally posted by egregore:
To replace outgoing Sen. Lamar Alexander ... Trump-endorsed Bill Hagerty won our Republican primary.... This was a harder decision than it sounds

Alexander. I sent him an e-mail in 2016 saying, Straighten up RINO. We voted you in... we can vote your ass out. Won't have to he quit.

I didn't have to think very hard on who to vote for... Hagerty... simply because of Trump's endorsement and he won pretty handily.

quote:

Originally posted by HayesGreener:

quote:

Originally posted by TMats:
This USAF veteran won her Republican primary and will face Charlie Christ (D, FL) for his Congressional seat in November. She has the President’s “full support.”

Anna Paulina Luna

We can't be rid of that phony asshole Crist soon enough. More power to the Airman!

My apology for the misspelling of "Crist's" name. That was careless

Anna Paulina Luna, USAF veteran

so she is on our side then

I hope after he's re-elected, President Trump just hammers the dog shit out of Facebook.

According to a recent report from the Interface newsletter by Verge reporter Casey Newton, Facebook is piloting a new program that will monitor viral posts that gain millions of views to ensure that they don’t violate community standards.

The Verge reporter Casey Newton reports in the newsletter the Interface that social media giant Facebook is developing a new program to fight viral misinformation on the platform. In the newsletter, Newton lists suggestions made by the Center for American Progress (CAP) to prevent the spread of certain content on the platform.

Newton writes:

Still, tech platforms probably have more tools to manage the spread of misinformation than they’re using today. In its report “Fighting Coronavirus Misinformation and Disinformation,” the Center for American Progress lays out a trio of suggestions for doing just that. They are:

Virality circuit breakers. Platforms should detect, label, suspend algorithmic amplification, and prioritize rapid review and fact-checking of trending coronavirus content that displays reliable misinformation markers, which can be drawn from the existing body of coronavirus mis/disinformation.

Scan-and-suggest features. Platforms should develop privacy-sensitive features to scan draft posts, detect drafts discussing the coronavirus, and suggest quality information to users or provide them cues about being thoughtful or aware of trending mis/disinformation prior to publication.

Subject matter context additions. Social media platforms should embed quality information and relevant fact checks around posts on coronavirus topics. Providing in-post context by default can help equip users with the information they need to interpret the post content for themselves.

Newton further states that Facebook said late on Thursday that it is already piloting a program that resembles the “Virality circuit breakers” suggestion from CAP.

In a recent article by the New York Times, it was reported that Facebook is also working on ap political advertising “kill switch” to be activated if President Trump questions the legitimacy of presidential election results in November.

The NYT writes:

In a staff meeting later that week, Mr. Zuckerberg told employees that if political figures or commentators tried declaring victory in an election early, Facebook would consider adding a label to their posts explaining that the results were not final. Of Mr. Trump, Mr. Zuckerberg said the company was “in unprecedented territory with the president saying some of the things that he’s saying that I find quite troubling.” The meeting was reported earlier by BuzzFeed News.

Since then, executives have discussed the “kill switch” for political advertising, according to two employees, which would turn off political ads after Nov. 3 if the election’s outcome was not immediately clear or if Mr. Trump disputed the results.
The discussions remain fluid, and it is unclear if Facebook will follow through with the plan, three people close to the talks said.

In a call with reporters this month, Facebook executives said they had removed more than 110,000 pieces of content between March and July that violated the company’s election-related policies. They also said there was a lot about the election that they didn’t know.



https://www.breitbart.com/tech...ad-of-viral-content/

quote:

Originally posted by HayesGreener:
We can't be rid of that phony asshole Crist soon enough. More power to the Airman!

Charlie is exactly like herpes. We just can't get rid of him and he's always annoying.

quote:

Originally posted by oddball:
I can almost guarantee there will be none. Joe's handlers (we don't know who his campaign "manager is, do we?) will not risk it, no way. They have seen Trump in debates, they know he would show no mercy.

Only time will tell, but it certainly seems like it would be at least felony malpractice of any campaign manager to let a drooling senile idiot like Joe debate President Trump.

quote:

Trump would have a better chance at debating an Empty Chair.

Really, what would be the difference between Joe and an empty chair? Okay, sure the empty chair might be a little more coherent, but it would not be an unrealistic stand-in for Sleepy, Creepy Joe.