quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
Joe Biden, in concert with most elements of the progressive establishment, to persecute those who resist vaccine mandates, falsely claiming, as Biden did in his CNN town hall last week, that the unvaccinated are responsible for killing the vaccinated.

But what happens when the bullies get their way and practically everyone is vaccinated, yet COVID cases continue to rage?

Jack Cashill, writing in the American Spectator:

Irish Quandary: Who to Blame When Everyone’s Vaxxed?

No one seems curious about the prevalence of the disease in an almost fully vaccinated population.

https://spectator.org/irish-qu...en-everyones-vaxxed/

That's easy. They've already changed the definition of "fully vaccinated" to include a booster shot...then another, then another, ...

Hey, how about a little more mental retardation by the worst administration and president in history. Biden Administration Announces Vaccine Rules For Travelers Into US

-snip-

Another new rule requires fully vaccinated travelers to the United States to show a negative COVID-19 test within three days of departure.

Isn't this a complete admission that the vaccines are worthless for the advertised goal of "stopping the spread"? So again, what's the difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated people, and what's the point of mandating a vaccine? We have truly entered a bad version of the Twilight Zone mixed with Idiocracy run by a drooling retard.

Well Dang, would you look at that.
“Florida Has Lowest New Covid Cases in America”

Link

Gov. Ron DeSantis seems to have figured out this COVID-19 thing.
Maybe he should right a book.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo how’s those book sales going?
Book (toilet paper) American Crisis: Leadership Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic

Perhaps Mr. Cuomo, you should take Leadership Lessons from Governor DeSantis.

Louisiana High School Under Investigation For Vaccinating Teenage Students Without Parental Consent

Link



Jason Andean to Parents: ‘You Better Start Speaking Up NOW’

The Washington Department or Labor and Industries (L&I) filed an emergency rulemaking package last week extending emergency powers to Democrat Governor Jay Inslee.

This package, which is an extension of current mandates, grants Inslee the ability to enforce COVID vaccine mandates on all private businesses in the state of Washington, according to elected officials.

Link

Show you papers.

Vaccine verifications in King County

This is almost a year old so it may have been posted already but Sabine makes good points as usual


The last statement is particularly apt.

quote:

Originally posted by kimber1911:
Well Dang, would you look at that.
“Florida Has Lowest New Covid Cases in America”

You know, this isn't really rocket science. Dan Bongino made this point. The reason Florida saw a resurgence in the summer and is now seeing very low case numbers now is simply due to how colds have always spread. As the seasons are changing, people in Florida are spending more time outdoors compared to summer where many residents are in air conditioned buildings.

The opposite is true for northern states who are now going to start spending more time indoors as the winter months set in.

Masks, no masks, vaccine, no vaccine...it's mostly irrelevant. The virus is just going to keep doing its virusey thing, which is spread easier indoors.

“ Many people were anticipating a new “mid-term variant” for 2022 to supersede the previous variants. Politically this would likely assist the various ministries of COVID compliance in calling for more booster shots and new definitions for what is considered “fully vaccinated.”

Don’t go vote in person. Vote by mail. It’s not safe to go out in public. By voting time, it might even be illegal for “public safety” by that point.

This business has to end. One way or another.

Many assume that those in control actually have any intention of trying to stop the spread of the virus - which I believe is the exact opposite of what they are trying to do.

No end in sight to Jay Inslee's reign of terror against the unvaccinated in WA

If huge crowds at SEC college football games are any indication, much of the country has moved on from the media's ticker-induced COVID-19 hysteria.

Conversely, in the dystopian Pacific Northwest, Governor Jay Inslee's reign of terror against the unvaccinated goes largely unchallenged and unabated.

According to Marty Makary, a professor at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, citing an Israeli study of more than 700,000 people, natural immunity from infection confers 27 times more protection than the jab. And yet, starting yesterday (Oct. 25), the unvaccinated are prohibited from getting a cup of coffee at Starbucks in Seattle, or even stepping inside a gym, theater, or restaurant, without a negative COVID-19 test.

Inslee claims to follow "the science." In reality, he is a science-denier for outright dismissing natural immunity.

"We should not force COVID vaccines on anyone when the evidence shows that naturally acquired immunity is equal to or more robust and superior to existing vaccines. Instead, we should respect the right of the bodily integrity of individuals to decide for themselves," writes Paul Elias Alexander for the Brownstone Institute, where he references 91 studies affirming naturally acquired immunity to COVID-19.

So far, nearly 1,900 Washington state employees, including 67 state patrol troopers, have quit their jobs or have been fired for rejecting the governor's unconstitutional coronavirus vaccine mandate.

Put another way: comply or starve.

By contrast, 29 states have no vaccine mandates in place, including sunny Florida, where COVID-19 cases have been dropping for eight consecutive weeks. Perhaps Inslee could take a cue from Florida governor Ron DeSantis, who has now opened monoclonal antibody treatment clinics across his state to help those with COVID-19 avoid hospitalization.

Today, Washington State ranks among the bottom of all 50 states for legislative oversight of executive emergency actions, according to the Washington Policy Center. Inslee first proclaimed a state of emergency more than 600 days ago in February 2020 — which seems like an eternity now.

Still, Inslee has no plans to relinquish executive emergency powers.

"There's only one person in the state of Washington who has the capability to save those lives right now and it happens to be the governor of the state of Washington," Inslee told TVW, Washington State's public affairs network, recently.

If Inslee is sincere about saving lives, he will recognize natural immunity and affirm that the number of fully vaccinated people dying from COVID is rising.

"The best data we have comes out of the U.K. and Israel," notes Alex Berenson, the author of Unreported Truths about COVID-19 and Lockdowns. In the U.K., at least 70% of the people who died from COVID in August were fully vaccinated, according to Berenson, citing British government documents.

But the truth doesn't align with Inslee's narrative against the unvaccinated, which is why he is playing partisan politics again.

Earlier this month, he granted a 45,000-person carve-out (vaccination exemption) for unionized home care workers represented by the Service Employees International Union, or SEIU 775. The union pours millions into political campaigns to keep Democrats in office.

If Washington State's COVID-19 public health emergency is as catastrophic as Inslee professes, why is he exempting thousands of union workers from getting vaccinated while forcing others to choose between their convictions and their livelihoods?

Shiftwa.org couldn't have said it better:

So while a state wildlife officer, who rarely has any contact with a member of the public, could lose his job due to Governor Inslee's vaccine mandate, a state employee whose sole job is to interact and come in close contact with those most vulnerable to COVID (i.e. seniors and those with respiratory problems) can keep their job without obtaining a vaccine. This privilege is granted to them simply because they are represented by the powerful and wealthy SEIU, which has been bankrolling Inslee's career dating to his days in Congress.

Others are also waking up to Inslee's authoritarian practices, including masking as public health. A letter to the editor in the Spokane Review rebuked the governor's actions recently.

Gov. Inslee's order that all state employees and health care professionals must be vaccinated, or face termination is a blatant abuse of power, fully violating the Free Exercise clause of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Washington Law Against Discrimination, and section 2 of the Governor's Proclamation 21 - 14.

"The inmates are ... running the asylum here, and nobody knows what's going on," noted state representative Andrew Barkis, a Republican, on the Dori Monson Show on Friday. "But there's one thing for certain, and that is Jay Inslee retains power over our lives in a way that no governor and public officials should."

What is not certain, however, is how much more abuse Inslee could inflict upon the unvaccinated in Washington State.

https://www.americanthinker.co...accinated_in_wa.html

Boom. Keep fighting like hell, patriots.

https://news.yahoo.com/alabama...joins-100941328.html

Alabama Republican Gov. Kay Ivey ordered state agencies to resist the Biden administration's coronavirus vaccine mandates on Monday, pledging to fight the White House in court.

In her executive order, she says state officials should not penalize any business or individual for ignoring federal vaccine mandates. It also says that even when compelled to enforce federal laws, state officials should "take all practical steps to notify the affected" that Alabama opposes all vaccine mandates. Her attorney general is preparing a lawsuit to stop the mandates, she said.

If the fuckers could ignore President Trump's Executive orders regarding immigration, I see no reason why others should not be allowed to ignore Potato Joe's (even though he still hasn't signed one ). I love it.

Why is Pfizer Requesting Legal Immunity if Vaccines For 5 to 11 Year-Olds are Safe?

Alarming possibilities within the question…. None of them good.

Joe Biden is willing to allow experiments on our children.

Is the FDA about to approve an experimental COVID vaccine for kids?

Private profits over public health.

Techno Fog

On Tuesday, October 26, 2021, the FDA is meeting “to discuss a request to amend Pfizer-BioNTech’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for administration of their COVID-19 mRNA vaccine to children 5 through 11 years of age.”

In anticipation of this meeting (and to illuminate the real reason why Pfizer is seeking the EUA), we offer a rare point of agreement in our polarized world. One that damns both the FDA and Pfizer: healthy children aren’t threatened by COVID-19.

As compared to adults, children are less prone to get COVID, they are less prone to be hospitalized by COVID, and they are far less likely to die from COVID.

This is supported by CDC data (quoted by Pfizer), which shows that for children aged 5-11 years-old, there have been 1.8 million COVID-19 cases and only 138 deaths. By comparison, approximately double that amount of children have died of pneumonia during this same time period. For those children hospitalized with COVID-19, the vast majority had more than one underlying condition (chronic lung disease, obesity, or neurologic disorders).

According to NY Magazine, “among children the mortality risk from COVID-19 is actually lower than from the flu. The risk of severe disease or hospitalization is about the same.”

One study published in Nature estimated “that the infection fatality ration [of COVID-19] is lowest among 5–9-year-old children.” That same publication has noted that children just aren’t safe from serious COVID-19 infection. Children “aren’t driving viral spread” and they don’t get infected or spread the infection like adults. For example, studies of some schools in Nebraska showed “were open the whole year with over 20,000 students and staff, and there were only 2 transmission events during that entire study period.”

The CDC concedes that “children are less likely to develop severe illness or die from COVID-19.” It notes that “findings from several studies suggest that SARS-CoV-2 transmission among students is relatively rare, particularly when prevention strategies are in place.” It reluctantly admits “several contact tracing studies have found limited student-to-student transmission in schools.”

These facts would seem to contradict the the legal and factual justifications necessary for giving the vaccine an EUA for kids aged 5-11. For review, the FDA’s issuance of an EUA is governed by 21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3. In its original issuance of the EUA for the Pfizer vaccine back in 2020, the FDA concluded:

One can’t help but observe, based on the extremely low numbers of child deaths, that there are “adequate, approved, and available alternative[s]” to the Pfizer vaccine. Even for those children hospitalized with COVID-19, their recovery is sufficient proof that there are effective treatments out there. The data is clear that there is no justification for the FDA to issue this particular EUA.

And if COVID-19 constituted a serious public health emergency for children, why didn’t Pfizer focus on this age group last year?

Anyway, we make these observations and discuss the facts but we’re not sure how much it matters. It seems the FDA has already reached its decision on the necessity for a vaccine for children 5-11 years of age. The October 26 meeting would just be a pretext, the last hoop it has to jump through before vaccines are mandated in schools around the country. As the FDA has already stated, “the benefits of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine 2-dose primary series clearly outweigh the risks for ages 5-11 years.”

This FDA statement is made as the authorities promise kids will get the vaccine. On Sunday, Dr. Anthony Fauci guessed the vaccine would be available by “early November.”
Twitter avatar for @disclosetvDisclose.tv @disclosetv
JUST IN - Fauci: Vaccines for children ages 5 to 11 in the U.S. "may become available" in early November.

This came just over two weeks after the prediction from Pfizer’s Scott Gottlieb, M.D., who said the FDA go through a quick review of “weeks not months.” And Dr. Fauci’s comments come as the Biden White House promises to help vaccinate all eligible children. According to House Vaccination Coordinator Dr. Bechara Choucair:

“We know we have about 28 million kids five to eleven in this country, and we have to be ready. We’ve been spending a lot of time making sure that we have tens of thousands of family [doctors] and pediatricians ready to administer vaccines at their offices.”

The Pfizer Data

Pfizer has released its data for the clinical studies of its vaccines being administered to kids aged 5-11. Here’s what you need to know.

Pfizer boasts a “vaccine efficacy of 90.7%” – in the short-term. It did not measure the vaccine’s long-term effectiveness.

The number of participants in the Pfizer studies was (conveniently) “too small to detect any potential risks of myocarditis associated with vaccination.”

The long-term safety of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in kids aged 5-11 is unknown and will be studied at a later time. (According to Pfizer, “Long-term safety of COVID-19 vaccine in participants 5 to <12 years of age will be studied in 5 post-authorization safety studies.”)

Pfizer concludes the benefits of its vaccine “outweigh the known or potential risks” – while admitting it does not know the long-term risks.

Pfizer previously announced the vaccine’s side effects for kids aged 5-11 is “generally comparable to those observed in participants 16 to 25 years of age.” This is concerning because young men within that age-range have the highest incident of myocarditis after the second Pfizer dose.

Despite the unknowns, the FDA has concluded the benefits of the vaccine “clearly outweigh” the risks. But is that really the case? Look for yourself. Here are the FDA calculations, with most its models predicting only ONE preventable COVID-19 death per million children vaccinated. While it estimates COVID-19 ICU admissions will go down, those numbers aren’t much better than the excess myocarditis ICU admissions to be caused by the Pfizer vaccine.

The Upcoming Vote on the Pfizer Vaccine

There are also concerns with the FDA committee members. Dr. James Hildreth (a temporary voting member) is a professor and president/CEO of Meharry Medical College in Tennessee. He submitted this “Acknowledgement of Financial Interests”:

While those are mostly institutional interests (“imputed interests”) that benefit Dr. Hildreth, perhaps more concerning is the fact that he’s already on the record supporting the need to vaccinate children.

And as to the broader issue of personal autonomy – the concept that people should not be subjected to experimental treatment – here’s Dr. Hildreth advocating “mandatory vaccines.”



Pfizer Motivations

Finally, if all the experts are correct – if there is no COVID-19 emergency for kids 5-11 years old – then why is Pfizer seeking an emergency use authorization?

It seems the answer lies in the profits and not the public health.

And if that’s the case, then the FDA is corrupted for good.

https://technofog.substack.com...rove-an-experimental

FDA Panel Pretends They are Deliberating Vaccines for Kids 5 to 11 –
However, The Exclusive Pfizer Packaging for Kids Already Distributed

Everything about vaccinating children aged 5 to 11 for COVID-19 is wrong, on every level. There is an infinitesimally small risk for children from the COVID-19 virus or any variant, and that risk only presents in children with preexisting comorbidity (ie. something else already wrong).

As parents, grandparents and family members watching the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) closely on this issue, there is another alarming aspect to the influence of Big Pharma and politics in the vaccination debate.

As noted in this AP article about the FDA presumably deliberating today whether to approve the Pfizer vaccine for kids aged 5 to 11, note this tell-tale sign showing this ‘deliberation’ itself is a ruse:

WASHINGTON (AP) — Kid-size doses of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine may be getting closer as government advisers on Tuesday began deliberating whether there’s enough evidence that the shots are safe and effective for 5- to 11-year-olds.

[…] States are getting ready to roll out shots for little arms — in special orange-capped vials to distinguish them from adult vaccine — as soon as the government gives the OK. (read more)

The pharmaceutical industry has already secured the special packaging, modified the kiddie materials, shipped the specialized doses, and done everything to stage the kids vaccine in the supply chain – BEFORE the FDA has approved the vaccine. This level of proactive expense by Pfizer tells us the FDA deliberation is a complete farce. Pfizer knows the vaccine approval is a foregone conclusion.

https://theconservativetreehou...ributed/#more-219022

Happy day! My religious exemption has been granted.

Great! Congrats Husky Sig. Every victory needs to be built upon.

Pure evil.

FDA panel approves Pfizer’s COVID vaccine for kids ages 5-11

https://nypost.com/2021/10/26/...campaign=android_nyp

there is ONLY one way this will stop

ever

quote:

Originally posted by nhtagmember:
there is ONLY one way this will stop

ever

How? A TEOTWAWKI flood is off the table.

"Thus I establish My covenant with you: Never again shall all flesh be cut off by the waters of the flood; never again shall there be a flood to destroy the earth.” --- God

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
Pure evil.

FDA panel approves Pfizer’s COVID vaccine for kids ages 5-11

https://nypost.com/2021/10/26/...campaign=android_nyp

Oh good, government mandated child experimentation. Like this wasn't a foregone conclusion. They need to keep the conveyer belt of $$$ rollin'.

Now let's see just how many people are willing to have this stuck in the arms of their kids. Something tells me this administration is going to have another group of unvaccinated to be upset by. At least that's my hope.