Heart attack is the cause of death. I don't see any reports of a cogenital heart condition for this guy. He just dropped dead at 31.

https://www.foxnews.com/entert...se-of-death-revealed

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
All the time now

Thirty-one year old people die, sure. We have an opioid epidemic going on for the past few years, sure. He could have had an undetected congenital heart problem, sure. We don't yet know the cause of death, sure.

The one thing I am sure of in all this is that it seems to be happening every day now.

AT this point, based upon the research and papers readily available, We really cannot have any doubt that the mRNA vaccines elicit antibodies with cross-reactivity to antigens on myocytes (cardiac cells).

There is emerging evidence that these vaccines also elicit a subclass of antibodies that are ineffective at neutralizing the virus, but instead act as blocking agents preventing the subclasses of effective antibodies from attaching to and neutralizing virus.

This is what you get when you rush a new "drug" to market. The annals of the FDA are replete with similar examples.

Sad, but true. This vaccine may eventually be responsible for more deaths than the damn virus.

RMD

Very large Cleveland Clinic study shows more vaccines make you more likely to get COVID

Steve Kirsch

Top study shows people with more jabs were more likely to get COVID than people with fewer jabs.

They lied, people died.

Introduction

Here’s Figure 2 from the Cleveland Clinic study (posted December 19, 2022) which looked at 51,011 working-age people who work at the Cleveland Clinic who have various vaccination status.

People with more jabs were more likely to get COVID than people with fewer jabs.

They started the clock for everyone at the same time: on the day the bivalent COVID-19 vaccine first became available to employees.

As you can see, people with more shots were more likely to get COVID and the differences were statistically significant.



https://stevekirsch.substack.c...eveland-clinic-study

Dumb question: I know this is just a sample but the numbers should correlate to the population, right? At this point, we would have expected almost everybody, especially in metro areas, to have been exposed to the virus.

Is this data then showing, assuming 100% coverage, how many people actually get sick based on jab count? Or how do I interpret this data - what does the line for 0 doses mean at the country level?

Is this saying, zero jab people, in the same location (same exposure and risk) as other people with jabs, 2 out of 100 of these people will actually get sick? Whereas in the same location, 6 out of 100 people with 3 jabs will get sick?

quote:

Is this data then showing, assuming 100% coverage, how many people actually get sick based on jab count? Or how do I interpret this data - what does the line for 0 doses mean at the country level?

This data is specific to the 51,011 working-age people who work at the Cleveland Clinic who have various known vaccination status.
Interpret and extrapolate as you want, but you don't have the data. In the over-all population you just don't know who has taken the shot, how many shots, and how many have nevertheless come down with Covid.

The following is kind of related in showing that even in hospitals they really don't know who is jabbed and who is not:

A nurse speaks out
She started off emailing about the deliberate undercounting of vaccinated Covid patients, but she wound up saying much more
Alex Berenson

Hi Alex -

As a nurse for over 20 years I can tell you it is DELIBERATE that hospitals DO NOT ASK about covid vaccination status. Epic (the most common hospital charting system) does not register shots given at pop up vaccination clinics, roving vans or pharmacies or from many other health organizations (as you noted).

MANY of my patients show covid vax status as 'unknown', but when I ask them many have already have 4 shots (the people in my state are ridiculously compliant). We have an extensive covid checklist that we ask all patients, even outpatients, before they enter the hospital - so whether it's a quick EKG or a huge surgery that's going to require a 4 day stay you get asked the 'covid questions'

https://alexberenson.substack....rue&utm_medium=email

Empirical evidence. Based on observable data. I know more people that have been “vaccinated” that have either gotten Covid multiple times, gotten quite ill from it, or both than unvaccinated people- myself included. At this point, I don’t see how anyone can place any faith in them. You can’t turn around without seeing a news story about so-and-so getting Covid after getting all the shots. They are not vaccines.

Just coincidence. Safe and effective.

https://t.me/s/covidbc

quote:

Originally posted by gearhounds: They are not vaccines.

No they do not fit into the historical definition of a vaccine that is why they recently changed the definition of a vaccine. So they can keep using the word. This is also why some of us describe what was given to people as a jab, shot, experimental drug.

Russel Brand nails it this time...LOL

Fox News Senior VP Alan Komissaroff Dead At 47

https://slaynews.com/news/fox-...issaroff-dead-at-47/

Fox News senior vice president of political news coverage Alan Komissaroff died Friday at the age of 47 after suffering a heart attack. Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott and Fox News Media President & Executive Editor Jay Wallace issued a statement that said:

“We have devastating news to share with you about Senior Vice President of News & Politics, Alan Komissaroff. Tragically, Alan passed away today after suffering a heart attack at his home nearly two weeks ago. He was just 47 years old.

Elon Musk’s ‘Young & Peak Health’ Cousin Hospitalized with ‘Serious Myocarditis’ after ‘Booster’

https://slaynews.com/news/elon...myocarditis-booster/

Twitter boss Elon Musk has revealed that his cousin, who he describes as “young & in peak health,” has been hospitalized with a “serious case of myocarditis” after receiving a “booster shot.”

Musk broke the news in a series of posts late on Friday evening.

He was commenting on new data that shows large numbers of Americans say they have suffered side effects after receiving Covid jabs.

The data was shared on Twitter by author Scott Adams on Friday.

Musk responded to the post by revealing that he suffered “major side effects” after receiving his “second booster shot.”

“I had major side effects from my second booster shot,” Musk tweeted.

“Felt like I was dying for several days.

“Hopefully, no permanent damage, but I dunno.”

“And my cousin, who is young & in peak health, had a serious case of myocarditis,” Musk said.

“Had to go to the hospital.”

More at link

How the 'vaccine lies' will play out

The internet is exploding with talk of sudden deaths, vaccine injuries, and altered immune systems — and it's coming from all corners of the world.

The National Herald India ran a story in December titled "Covid-19: What explains the sudden deaths?" In Australia, an alternative news service declared, "Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS) is taking the world by storm" while openly blaming the COVID vaccine.

Over at Channel News Asia, their report, "Sudden deaths: Why do seemingly fit and healthy people die for no apparent reason?," blames most of the deaths on undiagnosed, underlying heart problems — and never mentions the vaccine.

While speculation runs rampant, and social media are creating hashtags like #suddenlydied, one man seems to have a plan to counteract the craziness: let the people know how it's going to play out before it happens.

Media personality and conservative journalist J.D. Rucker runs the news aggregator site The Liberty Daily as well as other websites like his new project, Discern Report.

Earlier this week, he began his Substack report by imploring people to speak the truth about the vaccines as soon as possible: "We're seeing the truth starting to penetrate the shields of those who have ignored the signs for two years. Now, it's imperative that we drive the message home before it's too late."

Rucker continued:

The rise of adverse reaction concern is a good and bad thing. It's good for obvious reasons. It's bad because the powers-that-be are doubling down on their push to keep the universal vaccination agenda going for as long as possible.

He went on to tell his readers and podcast listeners that the "powers" behind the vaccine push knew they would eventually be caught; they never believed they could get away with it. The goal, he says, was always to get as many people "jabbed" as many times as possible before the populace realized there was a problem.

Here is how he believes it's going to go down:

The efficacy and the safety of the vaccines will be proven wrong. But with so many people involved in this, everyone will be pointing fingers at anyone but themselves. Eventually, they'll all point their fingers at Donald Trump and blame Operation Warp Speed. This is the point where his most fervent fans will chastise me for blaming him, but I'm not. The powers that be will blame him. Pfizer will blame him. China will blame him. The CDC will blame him. Anthony Fauci will blame him. They'll all say that they wanted to do longer testing but he demanded the jabs be available before the 2020 election. So they rushed it and made mistakes.

So what's the plan? Tell everyone this is going to happen before it happens. That way, he reasons, "[w]e will be able to argue more credibly against the powers that be who are playing dumb."

There are so many people involved in the vaccination agenda, directly or indirectly, knowingly or unknowingly, that it will be nearly impossible to blame them individually. "They can be shamed, but they won't be blamed." To alleviate this, Rucker predicts, everyone will start pointing fingers at others, and eventually at former President Trump.

Rucker maintains that Trump should have come out against the vaccines as far back as 2021. In his podcast, however, he assures people he's not blaming Trump:

I think he was manipulated by people like Mike Pence who was working with Anthony Fauci. He was manipulated by his various chiefs of staff ... by everybody from a medical perspective in my humble opinion ... other than people like Dr. Scott Atlas [and] Peter Navarro[.] ... It doesn't matter. The point is they are going to blame him.

The fact is, many of President Trump's supporters are concerned about vaccine injuries and increasing reports of sudden deaths. He's listened to them before; he needs to listen to them again. It's not too late for him to lead the people in their quest for answers.

Regardless, Rucker says it's time for the people to take advantage of "this very small window of opportunity" to make everyone fully aware of what's going on before they drag us to the next step:

[They will tell us,] "Thanks to our coordination with the Chinese Communist Party ... the World Health Organization ... The Council for Inclusive Capitalism ... the World Economic Forum and Sweden and Australia and everybody else; we're all going to come together with this Pandemic Treaty — and we've got the solution."

"And the solution will be another round of jabs," he concluded.

Ultimately, Rucker says, they can't be allowed to perpetuate their lies. The truth must come out now in order to stave off whatever they have planned for us next.

https://www.americanthinker.co...s_will_play_out.html

Blaming Trump isn't going to fly.

And, I think "they" all thought they'd get away with windfall personal fortunes with this newfangled injection that they assumed would be pretty safe. I believe many policy makers, political and medical, were just ignorant.

Once they set things in motion they became trapped by their hubris, believing they could keep any stink off of themselves. CYA required they never admit a mistake, so they keep doubling down even today in the USA.

The trend indicates the public is becoming more accepting of what had been portrayed as fringe conspiracy theory. More information is making it to more mainstream outlets.

Most people won't buy into it being Trump's fault. People will want to know who failed to do the right things. Who knew what when? Why didn't the institutions pay attention the last 2 years to all the research showing harm without benefit? Who cooked the books with the data touted by all the authorities?

Yes, I find it amazing that the shot is still being pushed as much as it is, with "they" knowing damn well it's not a good "vaccine". Yes, they have to keep up their story, but damn, at some point they'll drown in their own bullshit. Was/is it all a money game?

quote:

Originally posted by 6guns:
Was/is it all a money game?

If you strip away all theories of malicious or malevolent intent, the only thing left is money. You could say some variation on reputation and saving face and admitting wrong, and at their base level, all those things come back to the pocketbook. They're dealing with engineering genetics, so I don't buy the possibility that they're mouth-breaking fucking retards, but I guess anything is possible.

quote:

Originally posted by 6guns:
Yes, I find it amazing that the shot is still being pushed as much as it is, with "they" knowing damn well it's not a good "vaccine". Yes, they have to keep up their story, but damn, at some point they'll drown in their own bullshit. Was/is it all a money game?

I believe the agencies being partially funded by Pharma helped close their eyes to all other voices against the narrative, and their own data. But when you begin to scrub data as found that the DOD did with adverse effects on military personnel then it crosses the line to something other then money.

I personally think it’s deeper than the money, and more demonic.

quote:

Originally posted by Ozarkwoods:

I personally think it’s deeper than the money, and more demonic.

Same here.

quote:

Originally posted by Ozarkwoods:
I personally think it’s deeper than the money, and more demonic.

It doesn't have to be one or the other... It's both.
For some, it was clearly about the money. They were paid accomplices but kept their mouths shut, turned their heads away, and carried on when something wasn't right.
For some it was more demonic.

Bet you never saw this one coming. Stars and Stripes ran a muted story yesterday headlined, “FDA Proposes Switching to Annual Coronavirus Vaccine, Mimicking Flu Model.”

Yesterday the FDA released what is basically an agenda for the upcoming vaccine committee meeting on Thursday. The FDA’s notes disclosed a brand-new covid vaccine strategy that, “moving forward, most individuals may only need to receive one dose” of a coronavirus vaccine “to restore protective immunity for a period of time.” Just like they do with flu, the proposal would aim to play the “guess the dominant variant” game in June of each year, so as to start giving the shots in September, so that people will be all set for the winter covid season.

According to an “anonymous source,” the new strategy also reflects the growing view that “chasing variants” with ever-changing booster formulations will be ultimately futile. Hmm… sounds familiar … sounds familiar. Oh! On January 11th, Dr. Paul Offit, vaccine expert and an FDA committee member, made that exact point in a New England Journal of Medicine “perspective” titled, “Bivalent Covid-19 Vaccines — A Cautionary Tale.”

Could Dr. Offit be the anonymous source? That’s my bet.

The stated reason for the proposed change is to “reduce the complexity of the vaccine regimen.” Well, that’s true. It IS very complicated. Nobody knows whether they’re fully vaccinated, partly vaccinated, fully boosted, partially boosted, up to date, out of date, past date, or on a date.

The article also noted the lukewarm reception for the latest boosters, explaining that “the public has little interest in getting repeated injections.” Apparently. In his NEJM Perspective, Dr. Offit noted that “As of November 15, 2022, only about 10% of the population for whom the bivalent vaccine had been recommended had received it.”

Yawn. Absent widespread mandates, it looks like only a very few people want the shots. I wonder how much of that 10% is due to the remaining mandates in colleges and care homes.

As I read the article, my first thought was, how many times do I have to say, “no?” But then it occurred to me: wait a second. This could be IT. This could be the government’s off-ramp. Shunting the covid jabs into the annual flu pipeline means the end of the ceaseless, year-round drumbeat of manipulative covid media.

Face it: The jab propaganda has been worse than a pimply-faced teenager with a brand-new drum set.

The article made some other remarkable admissions. Check this out. First, the article all but admitted the efficacy of the unpopular bivalent vaccines has FAILED.

“The agency last fall authorized an updated bivalent vaccine that targeted the original strain of the virus and omicron subvariants BA.4 and BA.5. But by the time the booster was released, another variant was ascending rapidly. “

Haha, got you, suckers! Thanks for playing.

Then, in the very next paragraph, the article admitted the FDA wants to ashcan the “base” vaccines, since they uselessly target the long-vanished Wuhan strain:

The FDA, according to the document, also is seeking to retire the original vaccine formula that entered the market in late 2020 — the monovalent that focuses on the original virus.

Ironically, the proposal would authorize the equally-useless bivalent version — the one tested on eight mice — as the official “standard” vaccine, until June, when they’d presumably take a wild shot at guessing what the dominant strain will be, probably with similar accuracy to their flu guesses.

In other words, it will be like a two-year-old birthday party pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey game. Lots of laughs, but not much effect.

If this new strategy is approved in committee, then we’ll only hear about covid once a year, and it will compete with, join forces with, or merge into the already-scheduled annual influenza programming. Which we’ve already learned to tune out until it fades into background noise. The pretty young lady at the grocery store asks, “Would you like a $10 Publix gift card along with your vaccine?” And I always smile and stage whisper, “Let’s work together on this. I’ll take the gift card and you can keep the shot. Win-win!”

As further evidence for my theory, diminutive, bowtied-wonder Peter Hotez, a reliable vaccine apologist, “expressed concerns” about the FDA’s annual covid strategy. Hotez “isn’t sure” that an annual flu model will work for covid, because — get this — mRNA vaccines don’t last an entire year. Haha! You can’t make this stuff up!

If the covid profiteers are against it, it means the jabs would be fading away.

But wait! It’s even more hilarious! The article ended with this ridiculous quote from Peter: “There may be too many unknowns,” he warned darkly. Hahahahahaha! NOW they’re citing unknowns! They DON’T know it all!

But Peter, what about the eight mice?

Oh man, my ribs ache! All this laughing is killing me. Please, make it stop.

**********
The fashion world was shocked yesterday when news emerged that New Jersey male model Jeremy Ruehlemann, 27, went out in style, suddenly and unexpectedly treading right off the catwalk of Life on Sunday.

No details or cause of death have been released, of course, because what’s so unusual about a 27-year-old dropping dead? I mean, these days. Diligent online investigators quickly found evidence of a possible clue:




Don’t misunderstand me. I’m not saying it was the shots. I’m just saying. I’m just saying, “myocarditis.”

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com...ack&utm_medium=email