https://www.wavy.com/news/loca...e-masking-next-week/

Norfolk Naval Shipyard to require masking next week

by: Jimmy LaRoue

Posted: Jan 14, 2023 / 10:11 AM EST
Updated: Jan 14, 2023 / 11:46 PM EST

PORTSMOUTH, Va. (WAVY) – Due to high levels of COVID-19 in the community, Norfolk Naval Shipyard has been elevated to high, and masking will be required at the shipyard beginning Monday and continuing through Jan. 22.

Because of a high (red) community level, social distancing will be mandated along with masking, though social distancing requirements can be waived if everyone is wearing a mask.

The shipyard said masking is not required if an employee is alone in an enclosed office space or alone in their personal workspaces if separated from other personnel by cubicle walls. It is also not required for those who work in high bay areas with open air and natural ventilation.

Other shipyard employees working at Naval Station Norfolk and assigned to certain offsite locations would follow policies set by their leadership at their destination.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is reporting community levels of medium in Norfolk, Suffolk, Virginia Beach, Isle of Wight County, James City County, Southampton County, York County, Poquoson and Chesapeake, and high in Portsmouth, Hampton and Newport News.

They know they can use this as another little bit of control so they’ll keep doing forever.

quote:

Originally posted by sse:
https://twitter.com/TexasLinds.../1614306700533846016

Summary so those of us that don't have time to view the video know the content?

And you said the health agencies weren’t good for anything. The Washington Post ran a story late Friday headlined, “Extensive Review Affirms Safety of Covid Booster After Signal of Possible Risk.”

Whew! We sure dodged a needle there.

Here’s the timeline. Friday afternoon, the CDC announced that it had diligently found a faint safety signal showing a potential link between ischemic strokes in 65+ and the Pfizer bivalent booster. By Friday evening, when reports of the original signal were still being drafted, the FDA promptly announced it had concluded an “extensive” albeit rapid review and — fortunately — found no link whatsoever. None.

Never mind!

So you can quit whining and relax into your next booster. Here’s how WaPo described the FDA’s “extensive” research project that only took about 90 minutes:

Government vaccine safety experts have combed through databases containing millions of records in the United States and consulted with regulators in other countries but so far have not found any indication that the statistical signal represents a clinical risk to patients… “We have looked at the totality of the evidence and there are no concerns at this time that this represents a true safety signal,” an FDA official said.

See? They ran a database query and phoned a friend. There you go. Feel better now? Look how fast they move to protect pharma, sorry, I mean us. And you didn’t trust the health agencies. Shame on you.

But you know who also doesn’t seem to trust the U.S. regulatory agencies? Another top cardiologist, that’s who, this time Saudi Arabian professor, Dr. Abdullah Alabdulgader. Over the weekend, a video emerged in which the professor said, “Despite unprecedented support… [from] what we think [is] seriously increased levels of sudden cardiac death, I think anything related to the mRNA products should be reviewed critically, and in view of the cardiovascular complications of this type of vaccination; I think this type of vaccine should be suspended until it is fully investigated.”

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com...ack&utm_medium=email

quote:

Originally posted by bcereuss:

quote:

Originally posted by sse:
https://twitter.com/TexasLinds.../1614306700533846016

Summary so those of us that don't have time to view the video know the content?

Sure. It is testimony from an RN at a hospital from somewhere in CA, in which the neo-natal ICU started seeing a rapid increase in the rate of "fetal demise", which is defined as stillbirth of babies who have been carried to term, or nearly so, within weeks after introduction of the jab, without explanation.

They also share an excerpt from an internal hospital communication from last September addressing the issue.

If that piques your curiosity, the 8 min is worth your time. Contemplating the potential scale of this is mind boggling.

Thank you.

quote:

Dr. Abdullah Alabdulgader.

I have to agree with this cardiologist.

I would like to see an INDEPENDENT REVIEW BY an authority that we CAN TRUST should we be able to find such an authority.

It will never happen. CDC, FDA, .gov, and Pfizer + Moderna have too much invested in this sham vaccine to turn back now. Your decision to take it or not is the only choice left to you.

Good luck to us all.

RMD

All the time now

Thirty-one year old people die, sure. We have an opioid epidemic going on for the past few years, sure. He could have had an undetected congenital heart problem, sure. We don't yet know the cause of death, sure.

The one thing I am sure of in all this is that it seems to be happening every day now.

It used to be rare for a 31-year-old to have a heart attack.

CJ Harris, the former "American Idol" contestant who made it to the top 6 in 2014, has died.

A family member tells us CJ suffered an apparent heart attack Sunday night in Jasper, Alabama ... he was taken to a local hospital by ambulance, but didn't make it.

Yes, and of course these are just the ones we hear about because they are celebrities of some sort of another.

And not everyone of these victims of stroke or heart attack die. We only hear about the deaths.

And now the CDC is admitting, even if they try to deny it in the same breath, that we have problem with these shots.

quote:

And now the CDC is admitting, even if they try to deny it in the same breath, that we have problem with these shots.

Kind of... the CDC admitted that the Pfizer bivalent booster MIGHT have a problem... but the FDA "studied" it and by that SAME NIGHT had denied it.

Friday afternoon, the CDC announced that it had diligently found a faint safety signal showing a potential link between ischemic strokes in 65+ and the Pfizer bivalent booster. By Friday evening, when reports of the original signal were still being drafted, the FDA promptly announced it had concluded an “extensive” albeit rapid review and — fortunately — found no link whatsoever.

quote:

Kind of... the CDC admitted that the Pfizer bivalent booster MIGHT have a problem... but the FDA "studied" it and by that SAME NIGHT had denied it.

Hello? CDC? this is the White House, yeah we're gonna need you to retract that statement about the Pfizer Booster today, ok, yeah thanks...

The CDC could end all the COVID misinformation in a heartbeat... why aren't they?

Here are two ways they could settle the question of safety. They are both easy to do. I find it very troubling they have no interest in doing either of them.
Steve Kirsch

The US government (or any foreign government) could instantly end the safety debate by doing a couple of studies.

Why they don’t is a mystery to me.

Could they have something to hide?

The studies

Trial #1: Run a prospective double-blind randomized trial where they look at the parameters in the Thailand study PLUS d-Dimer before the shot and 3, 7, 14 days after the shot. Don’t limit it to just kids. A 30% rate of cardiac injury in the Thailand study wasn’t predicted by anyone in mainstream science. I’d have thought that the US government would want to see if it is even worse for the elderly and younger kids. But maybe nobody wants to know because they all seem afraid to want to look.

Study #2: Just do autopsies on anyone who died 2 weeks after their shot and actually do the correct histopathology and stains that can implicate the vaccine instead of skipping those tests. Autopsies using STANDARD tests (which is what we are doing now) will NEVER implicate the vaccine because they were never designed to find COVID vaccine damage.

It wouldn’t surprise me at all to find more than a 20% rate over all ages of measurable cardiac injury caused by these vaccines (18% had abnormal EKGs post-vax which is extremely troubling). I talked to Charles Hoff today and he found more than 50% of his patients had elevated d-Dimers post-vaccine. There was a cardiac screening in Puerto Rico using an FDA approved cardiac monitor that picked up an abnormal signal in 70% of the 177 people tested (age 8 to 84). I heard that a study in the US military discovered a 68% rate of cardiac injury. A study in Switzerland of 777 healthcare workers showed that 2.8% had elevated Troponin just 3 days after the booster.

So 7 million Americans with heart damage is a minimum.

I’m guessing it will be around 50 million Americans overall who have had their hearts damaged by these vaccines (based mostly on the 18% abnormal EKG post jab and that’s just ONE measurement).

Think about it… 50 million Americans may have been harmed by these vaccines and nobody is saying a word.

But don’t worry because if you are injured, it’s your fault for getting the vaccine. It’s not like you were forced to get it or anything like that. It was your free choice. The government isn’t liable for your injuries even though they didn’t warn you about the side effects.

Is there any wonder why nobody wants to find out the true numbers?

Any thinking person should be wondering why nobody in the medical community or mainstream media is speaking out.
Summary

The Thailand study should be concerning for everyone. It showed close to a 30% rate of cardiac injury (which they called “cardiovascular manifestations”) after the 2nd vax shot on kids who were perfectly normal before the shot.

This suggests that:

All of the previous estimates based on observational studies were wrong… in some cases by a factor of nearly 1,000X. That is a huge goof by the medical community. However, nobody seems to be upset by that… I guess science is OK when the peer-reviewed papers are off by close to three orders of magnitude. See this description of the Swiss study for the reference (“2.8 percent instead of the expected [post-COVID vaccine of] 0.0035 percent”).

We have no idea what the numbers will look like for older or younger people. They could be far worse. We have no idea because we’ve never measured it.

Everyone in the medical community, mainstream media, and Congress should be calling for both of these studies, but all I hear is crickets.

I wonder why?

https://stevekirsch.substack.c...covid-misinformation

terrible story from Canada

https://hotair.com/david-strom...aring-a-mask-n524001

Toronto hospital security guards killed a woman in March of 2020. For not pulling up a mask while suffering from breathing difficulties.

They were originally charged with manslaughter and criminal negligence, but a judge has tossed the case because … reasons.

There isn’t much dispute about what happened, although one of the guards involved intentionally turned a security camera away from the scene of the crime as it was happening, and another lied to police about what happened. He later was forced to admit to deceiving investigators when he was shown security footage contradicting his statement.

That’s OK though. He apologized, saying “I would have never said the things I said in there if I knew there was a video.” All good, then. That’s some world-class remorse.

The woman did not have Covid , she was having breathing problems

Danielle Stephanie Warriner, who suffered from COPD came to the hospital due to, unsurprisingly, breathing problems. She was admitted to the hospital, and was sitting in a hallway wearing PPE. She had lowered her mask due to her breathing problems. Guards approached her to enforce a mask mandate. She didn’t comply, again presumably because she had trouble breathing.

The guards donned PPE, demanded she don the mask, and then threw her against the wall almost immediately. While claiming that she struck them first, the video shows that this wasn’t true.

Right after throwing her to a wall, a different guard redirects the camera away from the incident, hiding what was happening. He “panicked,” so turning the camera away clearly didn’t show any consciousness of guilt, right?

Witnesses report the guards threw her to the ground, held her there in exactly the same manner that George Floyd was restrained (knee to the back using body weight). Only she had taken no meth or fentanyl. She was a 125-pound woman with breathing difficulties, as she told them.

They handcuffed her while unconscious and kept her restrained using a knee to the back. She stopped breathing. The guards load her into a wheelchair and eventually notice this fact and call for doctors. She subsequently died from her injuries, having never returned to consciousness.

charges have been dropped after a judge concluded there wasn’t enough evidence to take the case to trial

despite the available video footage, two security staff who testified the accused placed weight on her upper body while she was held chest down, a forensic pathologist who testified Warriner would still be alive had she not been restrained that day — and revelations one of the guards admitted he falsely claimed Warriner threw the first punch.

The FAA has very quietly tacitly admitted that the EKGs of pilots are no longer normal. We should be concerned.

After the vaccine rolled out, the FAA secretly widened the EKG parameter range for pilots so they wouldn't be grounded.

In the October 2022 version of the FAA Guide for Aviation Medical Examiners, the FAA quietly widened the EKG parameters beyond the normal range (from a PR max of .2 to unlimited). And they didn’t widen the range by a little. They widened it by a lot. It was done after the vaccine rollout.

This is extraordinary. They did it hoping nobody would notice. It worked for a while. Nobody caught it.

But you can’t hide these things for long.

This is a tacit admission from the US government that the COVID vaccine has damaged the hearts of our pilots. Not just a few pilots. A lot of pilots and a lot of damage.

The cardiac harm of course is not limited to pilots.

My best guess right now is that over 50M Americans sustained some amount of heart damage from the shot.

That’s a lot of people who will be very upset when they realize the vaccine they took to reduce their chance of dying from COVID actually worked in reverse making it:

1. More likely that people will get COVID

2. Be hospitalized from COVID and other diseases

3. Die from COVID (and other diseases)

4. You also have an excellent chance of getting a lifetime of heart damage for no extra charge.

But don’t worry; you can’t sue them. They fixed the law so none of them are liable (the doctors, the drug companies, the government). After all, you took the vaccine of your own free will. It’s not like you were forced (or coerced) to take it or anything like that! And there were plenty of people warning you not to take the shots (even though they censored most of them).

In this article, I will explain the evidence and thinking behind all my claims...

https://stevekirsch.substack.c...very-quietly-tacitly

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
terrible story from Canada

The day is coming when we will have to wreck these idiots. It may be years. I'll probably be in the ground before the decent people have had enough, but on the North American continent, there will come a breaking point, and then the people will deal with all these traitors, including half-wit security guards and judges who have forgotten why they were appointed.

What’s truly discouraging are all the people that in the face of irrefutable evidence, continue to “trust the science”, and even go so far as to denigrate those that choose not to trust the commingling of big pharma and government. These people are all traitors for money. And the ignorance of their supporters is absolutely astounding.

My favorite story of late is all the beautiful people that had to bow out of one of their precious award ceremonies, the “critics choice” award due to positive Covid tests. If they are Hollywood, it’s almost impossible that they are not “vaccinated”. If they weren’t, they’d either be out of jobs, or put on display as anti-vaxxers. And yet, like all the dishonest trash that insist that they’re glad they were “vaccinated” or else their symptoms would be SO much worse, they continue to tout the benefits of a “vaccine” that isn’t a vaccine.

Last week Dr. Aseem Malhotra, a British anti-vaccine cardiologist, spoke eloquently for several minutes on the BBC about vaccine injuries, and called for suspension of that country’s vaccination program. Well, on Friday, corporate media launched its counter-attack.

The Guardian UK ran a story headlined, “BBC Criticised for Letting Cardiologist ‘Hijack’ Interview With False Covid Jab Claim.” The article is a long character-assassination hit piece on Dr. Malhotra, including quotes by the entire battalion of compliant covid experts reflexively accusing the cardiologist of having “extreme fringe views,” fretting how “deeply dangerous” he is, and arrogantly claiming the doctor has no cardiology practice “to speak of.”

According to the Guardian, during his live interview Dr. Malhotra went off-topic and the BBC interviewers were just too appalled and embarrassed to stop him. After all, what were they SUPPOSED to do? Cut to commercial or something? Cancel him?

Yes, cancel him! Do it now!

For his part, Dr. Malhotra apparently embraced the Guardian’s request for comment on his own character-assassination, and turned the tables. The antagonistic article ends with Dr. Malhotra’s spirited response:

Malhotra told the Guardian: “Medical science is ever-evolving – discussing new developments openly is hard because the complicit media wants to only frame mRNA as right or wrong, to conflate mRNA vaccine debate as an entire attack on all vaccines, and to politicise views as left or right.

“I’ve promoted vaccines my entire career, including Covid vaccines on Good Morning Britain in early 2021. Labelling individuals who flag mRNA vaccine concerns as anti-vaxxers – pursuing personal attacks rather than analysing the latest data (with now overwhelming evidence of serious and common cardiac harms) and who funds it – sows public distrust and leads to a dangerous fall in safe vaccine uptake.”

I rest my case.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com...ack&utm_medium=email

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
The FAA has very quietly tacitly admitted that the EKGs of pilots are no longer normal. We should be concerned.

After the vaccine rolled out, the FAA secretly widened the EKG parameter range for pilots so they wouldn't be grounded.


In this article, I will explain the evidence and thinking behind all my claims...

https://stevekirsch.substack.c...very-quietly-tacitly

The FAA would not do that unless they had a lot of data. FAA are career government employees, so their #1 concern is not crossing the wrong line. They don't stick their necks out, and they are very slow to do anything lest it come back to bite them.

So they must have a need to make that change. Pressure from somewhere. They must have a plan to CYA themselves in the future, which could be some study that looks scientific even if it is junk science.

My main point is that this kind of change doesn't just happen because one or two docs have a medical opinion. Even if based in good solid research this kind of change might never happen.

I am very curious what cardiologists think of this change.