quote:

Originally posted by RichardC:

Thank God, monkeys can't fly.

SIGforum's monkey flew a lot in the Air Force, and flew a couple times with me in the v-tail.

UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO/Hamilton/New Zealand

All 16 pages can be viewed at link.

The Rollout of COVID-19 Booster Vaccines is Associated With Rising Excess Mortality in New Zealand

https://repec.its.waikato.ac.n...ack&utm_medium=email

Abstract

The rollout of booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines to the general population is controversial.
The ratio of vaccine risk to benefits likely has swung more towards risk than during the original
randomized trials, due to dose-dependent adverse events and to fixation of immune responses
on a variant no longer circulating, yet the evidence underpinning mass use of boosters is weaker
than was the evidence for the original vaccine rollout. In light of an unsatisfactory risk-evidence
situation, aggregate weekly data on excess mortality in New Zealand are used here to study the
impacts of rolling out booster doses. Instrumental variables estimates using a plausible source
of exogenous variation in the rate of booster dose rollout indicate 16 excess deaths per 100,000
booster doses, totaling over 400 excess deaths from New Zealand’s booster rollout to date. The
value of statistical life of these excess deaths is over $1.6 billion. The age groups most likely
to use boosters had 7–10 percentage point rises in excess mortality rates as boosters were rolled
out while the age group that is mostly too young for boosters saw no rise in excess mortality.

Conclusions

Weekly data on all deaths in New Zealand, from 2011 through the end of March 2022,
are used here to calculate excess mortality during the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines. There is
a close relationship between booster rollout and rising excess mortality. This relationship was
not seen with the rollout of the original protocol vaccine doses. The age groups most likely to
use boosters had 7–10 percentage point rises in excess mortality rates as boosters were rolled
out while the age group that is mostly too young for boosters saw no rise in excess mortality.
Instrumental variables estimates that exploit a plausible source of exogenous variation in the
rate of administering booster doses suggest 16 excess deaths per 100,000 booster doses given,
amounting to over 400 excess deaths from New Zealand’s booster rollout. Value of statistical
life of these excess deaths is over $1.6 billion. Even a small fraction of this (say, one percent)
would have been sufficient to fund robust evidence on the impacts of rolling out COVID-19
booster vaccines.

“Fully Vaccinated” and “Twice Boosted” Biden Tests Positive for Covid

Literally everyone i know who's gotten the fake vaccine has later gotten covid.

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
“Fully Vaccinated” and “Twice Boosted” Biden Tests Positive for Covid

Did you mean "FOOLY Vaccinated"???

The "safe and effective" narrative is falling apart
Here is my list of over 50 leading indicators that the momentum is moving in our favor. I'd be surprised if the narrative doesn't fall apart soon.
Steve Kirsch

Here is my list of nearly 100 indicators that the “safe and effective” narrative is falling apart.

It is a devastating list.

https://stevekirsch.substack.c...-effective-narrative

Could Vaccines Make Omicron Infection Worse? Scientists Weigh in on Antibody Dependent Enhancement

https://www.theepochtimes.com/...pvrzO0rt3bmZcUWTzW%2

In October 2020, when the world was under the dark cloud of COVID-19, and the United States was in the midst of massive political upheaval, some scientists were working hard to make sense of the virus. Others were trying to figure out effective treatment and public health protocols. Others, knowing the ongoing expedited vaccine development might compromise safety, tried to warn us of the risk of a phenomenon called Antibody Dependent Enhancement, or ADE. ADE happens when non-neutralizing antibodies generated from vaccination exacerbate viral infection, making the disease the vaccine is supposed to prevent worse for some people.

Of particular note was an article by an international team of scientists, published in the peer-reviewed journal Nature.

This article outlined the characteristics and mechanisms of ADE, before the COVID-19 vaccines were rolled out.

The scientists explained that “ADE and ERD (enhanced respiratory disease) have been reported for SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV both in vitro and in vivo.”

In other words, the closest relatives to SARS-CoV-2, the SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV viruses, both have the problem of ADE. It would be reasonable to investigate the “extent to which ADE contributes to COVID-19 immunopathology,” the scientists wrote.


According to the authors, ADE “can occur when non-neutralizing antibodies or antibodies at sub-neutralizing levels bind to viral antigens without blocking or clearing infection.”

The team called ADE a “real risk … for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and antibody-based interventions.”

We know now that it is common for people vaccinated against COVID-19 to be infected and re-infected by SARS-CoV-2. The antibodies generated from the vaccines are not sterilizing (that is, they are not clearing infection), and non-neutralizing.

This begs the question: Do the vaccines actually help the virus infect people through ADE? If so, should the vaccines be pulled, as many doctors are now advising?

Lessons From the Dengue Fever Debacle
A closer look at what happened with the dengue fever vaccine is instructive. Dengue fever is an infection so painful that people in the Philippines and other countries where it’s endemic call it “breakbone fever.”

A viral illness passed to humans from mosquitoes, there are different serotypes of dengue fever. So even if you get it once, you can be infected up to four times, according to the World Health Organization.

Between 2000 and 2010, cases of dengue reported to the WHO increased sharply. Worldwide, there is thought to be 50 million infections every year and 22,000 deaths, mostly in the youngest children, according to the National Institutes of Health.

So in 2016 when a little girl from the Philippines sporting a T-shirt that read “Dengue is dangerous” got a shot in her arm to protect against Dengue fever, there was a feeling of relief and optimism in southeast Asia.

The Philippines, led by Health Secretary Dr. Janette Garin, launched an aggressive campaign with a goal to vaccinate a million children with the brand-new vaccine, called Dengvaxia.

Developed by a French pharmaceutical giant, Sanofi Pasteur, the vaccine underwent large safety trials, the results of which were published in the New England Journal of Medicine. Co-authored by nearly 25 eminent scientists, the study found that “risk of hospitalization among children 2 to 16 years of age was lower in the vaccine group than in the control group.”

This industry-sponsored peer-reviewed study was the green light the world needed to get a needle in the arms of children where dengue fever could make them sick.

But there was a problem. When some children caught dengue fever after being vaccinated, they sometimes had worse outcomes than children who had not been vaccinated. In fact, the vaccine seemed to cause a complication called plasma leakage syndrome, a potentially lethal vascular disorder also associated with the disease itself.

At Least 600 Children Died After Dengue Vaccine
It took almost two years, but the WHO’s recommendation to vaccinate children ages 9 to 16 against dengue fever was rescinded.

Interestingly, it was the company itself—Sanofi Pasteur—that found that children who had not previously had dengue could not be safely vaccinated.

But by then at least 10 families in the Philippines spoke out publicly that the vaccine had caused their children to die.

In April of 2019, the South China Morning Post reported that forensic investigators were looking into the cause of death of some 600 children who died after the vaccine. The bodies of these children exhibited swollen organs and internal hemorrhaging, especially in the brain and lungs, according to the article.

Antibody Dependent Enhancement Explained
The body’s immune response to viral and bacterial infections—as well as to other assaults that it considers foreign—is complicated and multi-faceted. After a virus or a bacterium invades, the body develops an adaptive immune response, which is specific to the pathogen. Antibodies are one facet of this response.

Antibodies are Y-shaped proteins that can neutralize infectious agents so they don’t cause harm. When the system works well, these protective proteins, produced by white blood cells, attach to the foreign substances and remove them from the body. During an infection, millions of antibodies will be released into your bloodstream and lymphatic system.

But some pathogens override the body’s immune response by using the antibodies themselves to enter your cells. When this happens, your body’s immune response can actually cause the disease to be more severe. This is called antibody dependent enhancement (ADE).

Unfortunately, ADE occurred in some children who were vaccinated against dengue fever. The vaccine-induced antibodies actually helped the virus infect more cells than it would have on its own.

With children who had not previously had dengue fever, the effect seemed to be the most pronounced.

Because of the risk of ADE, the WHO no longer recommends dengue fever vaccines for children with no prior history of infection.

“Most diseases do not cause ADE,” explains an article about antibody dependent enhancement and vaccines on the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia’s website. Dengue fever, the article goes on, “has four different forms … [that are] very similar, but the slight differences among them set the stage for ADE.”

The article also points out that we have seen ADE with other vaccines, including an early version of a vaccine against the measles that was made with formaldehyde, as well as a vaccine against respiratory syncytial virus, RSV.

Children given the RSV vaccine in clinical trials were more likely to sicken and die from pneumonia after an RSV infection than children who were not vaccinated.

To date, scientists have not successfully developed a safe vaccination against RSV. However, both Moderna and Pfizer are fast-tracking the development of mRNA vaccines to protect against this disease.

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines and ADE
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, scientists have raised concerns about the possibility that vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 could cause ADE. Dr. Scott Halstead, one of the world’s foremost experts on dengue fever, is a scientist who sounded the safety alarm many times over about Dengvaxia.

Writing in The Journal of Infectious Diseases in December of 2020, Halstead and his co-author asserted that ADE was “unlikely” because the SARS-CoV-2 virus did not seem to have the same attributes as the dengue virus.

However, the same article pointed out that, “Live virus challenge of animals given SARS or MERS vaccine resulted in vaccine hypersensitivity reactions … similar to those in humans given inactivated measles or respiratory syncytial vaccines,” concluding that in order to create a safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines scientists must avoid vaccine hypersensitivity reactions.

Since early 2021 scientists have stated that ADE is a real risk (in their words, “non-theoretical”). Seven months later, a 2021 article in The International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology confirmed that ADE does exist for SARS-CoV-2, and explored the possible mechanisms and how to avoid it.

More recent research, including a 2022 in vitro study in Nature, also shows that ADE happens in SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Scientist James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., told The Epoch Times that although the antibodies against the original strain of the virus were “nominally tested” for ADE, they have “not been sufficiently tested” for ADE against the more recent variants.

According to Lyons-Weiler, who has published over 50 peer-reviewed articles and is the founder of the Institute of Pure and Applied Knowledge, a non-profit that conducts scientific research in the public interest, “Given the repeated rounds of studies showing negative effectiveness with real-world data, and the fact of higher incidence of COVID-19 diagnoses and higher numbers of hospitalizations from COVID-19, and higher rates of severe COVID-19 infections in the vaccinated, we can only conclude that ADE must be occurring.”

Lyons-Weiler called it “unconscionable” that the FDA and CDC have turned a blind eye to the myriad health problems associated with these vaccines.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: wcb6092,

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
Could Vaccines Make Omicron Infection Worse? Scientists Weigh in on Antibody Dependent Enhancement

I was listening to a guest on the Charlie Kirk show yesterday and they were discussing this very topic as it relates to the latest "BR54.9" variant, or whatever it's called. The knowledgeable guest emphatically stated that the ONLY people that had to fear death from these new variants were the multi-vaccinated and boosted. Any comments about those unvaccinated and these variants wasn't even a blip on the radar. I don't think I have a damned thing to worry about, just as I have thought from day 1 of this bullshit.

quote:

The knowledgeable guest emphatically stated that the ONLY people that had to fear death from these new variants were the multi-vaccinated and boosted.

If they survive the booster...

Will physicians EVER speak out?

Or will they continue to shrug their shoulders and refuse to look at the data showing that these vaccines are the biggest scandal in medical history?
Steve Kirsch

The deaths:

Dates of death: July 17, 18, 20.

Look at how close together the dates are! All three died in a 3 day period just days after they gave the 4th shot. All are young doctors. You can see from their pictures. All three at Trillium Health in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

No mention of the vaccination date or cause of death.

Just bad luck? Or related to the vaccine? What do you think?

https://stevekirsch.substack.c...cians-ever-speak-out

I am very outspoken any time the “vaccines” are discussed; have been since they were released. I find it strange that the very same crowd of whack jobs that heckled, cajoled, insulted, high roaded, telling us to “believe-in-the-science and just get the damn shot” are strangely quiet now that the facts are proving them WRONG.

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:

The deaths:

Dates of death: July 17, 18, 20.

Look at how close together the dates are! All three died in a 3 day period just days after they gave the 4th shot. All are young doctors.

Just bad luck? Or related to the vaccine? What do you think?

https://stevekirsch.substack.c...cians-ever-speak-out

Gibbs Rule #39: There is no such thing as coincidences.

I'm STILL having chronic side effects from this damn "vaccine".

I had a severe episode yesterday morning.

quote:

Originally posted by gearhounds:
I am very outspoken any time the “vaccines” are discussed; have been since they were released. I find it strange that the very same crowd of whack jobs that heckled, cajoled, insulted, high roaded, telling us to “believe-in-the-science and just get the damn shot” are strangely quiet now that the facts are proving them WRONG.

I've noticed this as well. I wonder if this will inspire more parents to read up on 'well baby' vaccines before they agree to everything their doctor plans. Our pediatrician commented many years ago she could earn more than $100,000 extra each year if she pushed vaccines like other doctors in the area.

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:

Will physicians EVER speak out?
Steve Kirsch

The deaths:
Dates of death: July 17, 18, 20.

Look at how close together the dates are! All three died in a 3 day period just days after they gave the 4th shot. All are young doctors. You can see from their pictures. All three at Trillium Health in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

No mention of the vaccination date or cause of death.

Just bad luck? Or related to the vaccine? What do you think?

https://stevekirsch.substack.c...cians-ever-speak-out

I agree with some of the comments. It seems doctors have largely been complicit even in the face of first hand data and especially in the second.

No empathy.

COVID expert Deborah Birx says she 'knew' vaccines 'were not going to protect against infection'

Former Trump adviser says U.S. "overplayed the vaccines."

https://justthenews.com/politi..._campaign=newsletter

A former high-ranking federal COVID-19 adviser admitted this week that she "knew" the coronavirus vaccines "were not going to protect against infection," a stunning declaration that comes roughly 18 months after the shots were first rolled out to the general public.

Dr. Deborah Birx, an infectious disease expert and a regular presence at the Trump White House during the early days of the COVID-19 crisis, made the admission during an interview with Fox News's Neil Cavuto on Friday.

Asked by Cavuto why Americans should wish to get vaccinated if they see the number of individuals getting COVID even after getting the shot, Birx conceded: "I knew these vaccines were not going to protect against infection and I think we overplayed the vaccines."

Birx suggested that overstatements made about the vaccines "made people then worry that it's not going to protect against severe disease and hospitalization."

"It will," she argued, urging Americans also to consider taking the antiviral Paxlovid.

Birx's astonishing statement comes many months after multiple high-ranking federal officials indicated that getting the vaccine would indeed prevent the patient from both getting and spreading the virus.

President Joe Biden last year claimed that "you're not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations," while CDC Director Rochelle Walensky made a similar claim last April.

In the roughly year-and-a-half since the COVID vaccine rollouts, "breakthrough infections" have become commonplace, with Americans regularly getting infected with COVID even after getting vaccinated and boosted.

Like Birx, health officials have argued that, even if the vaccine does not prevent infection or transmission, it still helps prevent severe cases of COVID and/or deaths from the disease.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: wcb6092,

It was never about the flu bug

It was always about the money

quote:

Birx, health officials have argued that, even if the vaccine does not prevent infection or transmission, it still helps prevent severe cases of COVID and/or deaths from the disease.

Except... it isn't even doing that. All-cause mortality is what they should be looking at and it isn't decreasing.

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
Like Birx, health officials have argued that, even if the vaccine does not prevent infection or transmission, it still helps prevent severe cases of COVID and/or deaths from the disease.

Please. For the love of God, just stop. Not another word. Can we just let the data speak for itself?

Lies from tyrants with conflicts of interest. Enough.

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:

quote:

Birx, health officials have argued that, even if the vaccine does not prevent infection or transmission, it still helps prevent severe cases of COVID and/or deaths from the disease.

Except... it isn't even doing that. All-cause mortality is what they should be looking at and it isn't decreasing.

But it’s perfectly normal for 20-something’s to have heart attacks, for increased incidence of blood clots, Bell’s palsy, suppressed immune systems, frequent Covid infections, extremely heavy menstrual flow, strokes, etc. The government said so.