Ye, Ramaswamy as Trump's press secretary would be awesome. Talk about a contrast- going from the useless half-wit diversity hire fool who's in that position now, to someone like Ramaswamy.

Tucker Carlson Outlines Nikki Haley as Favored UniParty Operative – Vivek Ramaswamy Agrees

The gist of the Tucker Carlson outlook is: You thought Democrats were going to dump Biden for Gavin Newsom, but they’re not. They’re backing Nikki Haley instead.

In this discussion segment Tucker Carlson and Vivek Ramaswamy outline how Nikki Haley is the perfect candidate for the administrative state in Washington DC.
WATCH: Nikki Haley: The Democrat Party's Trojan Horse




https://theconservativetreehou...-agrees/#more-254401

Well, he called it.

https://twitter.com/MostlyPeac.../1742936745443045729

^^ He's really quick on his feet.

I saw that post about Vivek predicting exactly how the WaPo reporter would deal with the interview. Awesome!

Red State had more.

Watched him in an interview with Dana Bash. Despite her constantly talking over him with nonsensical white supremacy crap, he kept his cool. Like him or not, he’s able to respond to a torrent of bullshit with clear, concise, well reasoned comebacks. I would have been arrested for slapping the empty headed twit.

So, I cherish my ignorance of the DC dumpster fire, but are they really trying to accuse the brown guy of being a white supremacist?

Or, is it like Miami, where “everyone” who isn’t AA, including the Haitians, call themselves “white”. (Might be exaggerating about the Haitians, but they really dislike the AA crowd.)

Tonight's Republican debate is only featuring Haley and DeSantis, nobody else. Continuing the theme of this thread, Ramaswamy is running this ad in Iowa markets tonight during the CNN telecast, and he is also going to be on Tim Pool's podcast in a live townhall in Iowa.

https://www.breitbart.com/poli...ng-viewers-turn-off/

I really like Vivek. I hope he stays in politics.

quote:

Originally posted by Aglifter:
So, I cherish my ignorance of the DC dumpster fire, but are they really trying to accuse the brown guy of being a white supremacist?

Or, is it like Miami, where “everyone” who isn’t AA, including the Haitians, call themselves “white”. (Might be exaggerating about the Haitians, but they really dislike the AA crowd.)

Per U.S. law and census, Indians are not classified as a race, nor are middle easterners, people from the -istans, or Latin Americans.

Until relatively recently, Indians were considered "white", since the are not black, East Asian / Pacific Islander, or Native American. They can now self-identify as "Asian" which doesn't make a lot of sense because Asia is native to every variety of human being on the planet, except black Africans.

And Latin Americans have to choose white, black, or mixed race, then check the hispanic ethnicity box.

Such is the absurdity of our laws regarding race.

In CRT/DEI lunacy, he is "white adjacent" along with East Asians.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Lefty Sig,

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
Tucker Carlson Outlines Nikki Haley as Favored UniParty Operative – Vivek Ramaswamy Agrees

The gist of the Tucker Carlson outlook is: You thought Democrats were going to dump Biden for Gavin Newsom, but they’re not. They’re backing Nikki Haley instead.

In this discussion segment Tucker Carlson and Vivek Ramaswamy outline how Nikki Haley is the perfect candidate for the administrative state in Washington DC.
WATCH: Nikki Haley: The Democrat Party's Trojan Horse




https://theconservativetreehou...-agrees/#more-254401

My wife is in a book club with a bunch of libtards and interestingly, last meeting she said they were talking about liking Nikki Haley. Go figure.

Townhall with Timcast.

^^^
Vivek Lays Out an Extremely Disturbing Election Conspiracy Theory



In this video, presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy is essentially describing the “splitter strategy” CTH has discussed and outlined in granular detail for years. Essentially, a process where the billionaire donors, hedge fund managers, corporations and multinationals – what we define as the Sea Island group (SIG), control the private corporation known as the RNC.

On this facet of his commentary, Ramaswamy is correct. However, from there he gets things wrong.

Yes, as we have said, the Chris Christie exit is part of the continuum. Remember, within mutually aligned motives the candidate doesn’t need specifically to be an active participant; they only need to be looking out for their individual interests, usually financial.

When the ‘time to exit’ tap on the shoulder is received, it comes via a key backer saying, “there’s no longer a path.” The money stops, and the candidate suspends their campaign. That’s how the process works.

Did Christie get that tap on the shoulder, at the specific time needed to retain the “never Trump” effort, thereby creating further support for Nikki Haley? Yes, absolutely – again, that’s how it works.

The SIG moved all their poker chips to Nikki after they realized the weird behavior of DeSantis meant he was no longer a viable option. When Brian Kemp began creating distance with DeSantis, that’s when the shift to Haley began.

Immediately preceding the shift to Nikki Haley, and specifically because DeSantis was not gaining traction, the evangelical brothers Mike Pence and Asa Hutchinson also received their tap on the shoulder and withdrew from their Iowa effort.

Within the plan of the SIG, Pence/Hutchinson were only camped in Iowa to pull a coalition of evangelicals together to hand them to DeSantis. But that part of the effort never gained traction. As a consequence, the SIG shifted to New Hampshire, where their allied Democrats could assist.

Ramaswamy is correct in the statement that the billionaire donors within the SIG want a head-to-head between President Trump and Nikki Haley, but only because that’s all that remains of the collapsing roadmap. Where Ramaswamy is wrong is that when Haley loses, the SIG/Never Trump group will shift to supporting Biden (Newsom). That’s the UniParty. Ultimately, in the big picture, the foundational effort is not about supporting DeSantis or Haley, it’s about stopping Trump.

https://theconservativetreehou...ecome-haley-partner/

I believe Vivek is on Gutfeld tonight and maybe tomorrow night as well.

This sounds curiously like Rush Limbaugh's:
Operation Chaos

So, there's been a dustup in the last couple of days, in which Ramaswamy has been perceived as throwing Donaldd Trump under the bus. You can find details of this quite easily, if you're not already familiar with it.

Trump (or perhaps Trump's campaign) hit back and now all those who wish to see blood are licking their chops.

I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that I see comments online from people who seem oblivious to the fact that Trump and Ramaswamy are de facto opponents, vying for the same position. Ramaswamy has stated- whether or not one chooses to believe him- that he is not angling for the Vice Presidency, or a cabinet position or anything of the like; he is campaigning to become POTUS. The effect of this dustup has been for some to evince disappointment in Ramaswamy, apparently believing that Ramaswamy realizes he will not win the Republican nomination and will not be elected POTUS this November, but from what I can see, the man has behaved in a manner consisted with his stated intentions. Any perception to the contrary is, it seems to me, due solely to the assumptions of the observer.

Some pundits have been saying they don't trust Ramaswamy, pointing out that positions he claims to hold at present are contradictory to those he has held in the past. He is a relatively young man, and while it may be that he is merely a politician behaving in the way politicians do, it could also be that he has evolved over time. Whatever the case, he certainly seems sincere, but anyone likely to read this post has been on this rock long enough to understand that we just can't divine the truth about such things until the truth reveals itself to us. I think you know what I am trying to say.

Here is Ramaswamy's statement, released less than an hour ago:

"Yes, I saw President Trump’s Truth Social post. It’s an unfortunate move by his campaign advisors, I don’t think friendly fire is helpful. Donald Trump was the greatest President of the 21st century, and I’m not going to criticize him in response to this late attack.

I’ve met tens of thousands of Iowans across 390+ events here, and they are deeply worried - and so am I - that this “system” won’t allow Donald J. Trump anywhere near the White House again. It seems they will stop at *nothing* to keep him away from power.

I’m worried for Trump. I’m worried for our country. I’ve stood up against the persecutions against Trump, and I’ve defended him at every step. I showed up at the Miami courthouse in solidarity following his first federal indictment. I filed a FOIA demand to the Biden DOJ. I submitted an amicus brief this week with the U.S. Supreme Court calling on them to overturn Colorado’s ruling. I pledged to remove myself from Maine’s & Colorado’s primary ballots if they remove Trump, calling on DeSantis and Haley to do the same.

But we have to open our eyes. Last time it was a man-made pandemic & Big Tech election interference. Now, the same billionaires funding the lawsuits against Trump are the ones trying to prop up Nikki Haley. The same MSM blasting Trump is lavishing praise on Nikki. They want to narrow this to a two-horse race between Trump & Haley, eliminate Trump (one way or other), & trot their puppet into the White House.

We can’t fall for that trap. 1 year from now, we won’t look back and say we were shocked that it happened. We’ll kick ourselves for not stopping it.

Our movement must live on. America-First didn’t start in 2016. It started in 1776. We owe it to our Founding Fathers to do the right thing for our country. I want to save Trump & to save this country. Let’s do it together. You won’t hear any friendly fire from me."

https://twitter.com/VivekGRama.../1746360780436427244

quote:

Whatever the case, he certainly seems sincere, but anyone likely to read this post has been on this rock long enough to understand that we just can't divine the truth about such things until the truth reveals itself to us. I think you know what I am trying to say.

Yes. He seems sincere. We just have to let it all play out. But I think he means well.

Taken from Twitter as a random example of the folly of the GOP not supporting Trump. Selling out Trump in 2024 will be a fatal mistake for the GOP:

https://twitter.com/of_lyon686.../1746324318672294292