The way the father is talking, you can tell the mother has been pulling crap with his visitation on a pretty constant basis. She thinks it perfectly reasonable to just keep the kids whenever she pleases.
The way the father is talking, you can tell the mother has been pulling crap with his visitation on a pretty constant basis. She thinks it perfectly reasonable to just keep the kids whenever she pleases.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Perhaps. I would think the Dad has done plenty of stuff as well. In these situations BOTH parties are at fault. Yelling and sreaming in front of the kids is beyond stupid.
Posts: 17993 | Location: Stuck at home | Registered: January 02, 2015
WTH? The wife of the guy that got shot keeps arguing with the shooter for damn near a minute before calling police and ambulance? No one cares he's laying there motionless, and she doesn't freak out "OMG! OMG! my husband is shot and dying, OMG!"?
Pretty sure the shooter is going to get charged for this. I don't see any evidence that the father could reasonably be construed as a deadly threat to justify confronting him with a firearm. But the father was pretty damn stupid to escalate with a guy pointing a gun at him.
Posts: 5094 | Location: Indiana | Registered: December 28, 2004
Am sorry that a adult died but what do you expect by the way they were behaving....... It is the kids that am sorry for because of the loss of their parent(s)....................... drill sgt.
Posts: 2245 | Location: denham springs , la | Registered: October 19, 2019
Shooting happened 20 days ago and he still hasn’t been arrested. Apparently the cops might think it is justified or they are waiting to see if a grand jury will bring charges.
Just having a gun, on your own property, is not justification for the dead guy to get offended and attack. This is exactly a Kyle Rittenhouse scenario. Probably shouldn’t have come out of the house with the gun, but it was legal for him to do so. It was not legal for dead man to assault the homeowner.
It may go to trial, but I think the homeowner will not face prison time. Certainly not 1st or 2nd degree murder. Maybe a lesser charge.
______________________________________________________ Often times a very small man can cast a very large shadow
Posts: 6741 | Location: Floriduh | Registered: October 16, 2004
Originally posted by bubbatime: Shooting happened 20 days ago and he still hasn’t been arrested. Apparently the cops might think it is justified or they are waiting to see if a grand jury will bring charges.
Part of it is that the shooter is actually the husband of a local judge, though they're getting divorced. So the local cops are apparently referring everything to a different jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute due to conflict of interest issues.
Originally posted by bubbatime: This is exactly a Kyle Rittenhouse scenario.
Baloney. He wasn't attacked. He got his feelings hurt.
The shooter fired a shot at his feet (with his wife in the line of fire) and the dead guy threw him off. That's it. No justification and no self defense IMO.
And don't get me started on the utter disregard for human life by all parties there. Sickening.
________________________________________________________ "Great danger lies in the notion that we can reason with evil." Doug Patton.
Posts: 21317 | Location: Montana | Registered: November 01, 2010
Seems like both parties could have made better choices. I guess the point of having a legal system is to resolve disputes without having to resort to violence too bad both didn’t make use of the legal system instead of getting in a pissing contest.
Posts: 7491 | Location: Lost, but making time. | Registered: February 23, 2011
