The juicy irony of Hunter possibly using the Bruen case as a defense is amazing. Crackhead in posession of a gun or not, he still allegedly lied on a Federal form under penalty of perjury. If Bruen makes the form useless then that’s a conversation as well. The secret service going in to that FFL and demanding the 4473 needs to be investigated as well.

I can not keep up with his timeline. So he was involved with his dead brothers widow ? At almost the same time he was getting the stripper pregnant ? Man. This guy has some serious game.

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:

quote:

Gavin and Kamala are your 2024 ticket.

Both are from California... they wouldn't do that. Gavin more likely than Kamala but he would pick a different VP running mate.

I'll go even deeper than that - Gavin, Kamala DiFi, Boxer and Pelosi are from San Francisco.

There's no way well in hell that the DNC blesses an all San Fransciso ticket for a national election. SF isn't a model city for the nation.

"While neither Hunter Biden nor his father were Secret Service protectees at that time, Joe Biden reportedly maintained an unofficial working relationship with Secret Service agents stationed in Wilmington, Delaware, during those years between his vice presidency and his selection as the Democratic nominee for president."

Maybe a few Secret Service agents owed Hunter & The Big Guy a few favors.

Hookers & Blow involved? Hunter knows something about hookers & blow.

Not that farfetched, there's precedent: Scandal, Cartagena, 2012, prior to President Obama's impending visit. Joe Biden was his VP. Ten Secret Service agents, 20 hookers. Obama told the press, if the allegations about misbehaving SS agents proved true, he'd be soooooo mad.

quote:

Originally posted by 229DAK:

quote:

Originally posted by NK402:
What shit? It's an opinion like many other posts. Are opinions not allowed if they don't coincide with yours?

It's the pervasive attitude of this cynicism and defeatism that he does not like floating through his forum to the other members.

While I confess to being a cynic I deny defeatism. I was simply making a prediction, one, according to this afternoon's news, apparently shared by prominent attorney, Alan Dershowitz, who predicts plea deal, no jail time.

quote:

Originally posted by NK402:

quote:

Originally posted by 229DAK:

quote:

Originally posted by NK402:
What shit? It's an opinion like many other posts. Are opinions not allowed if they don't coincide with yours?

It's the pervasive attitude of this cynicism and defeatism that he does not like floating through his forum to the other members.

While I confess to being a cynic I deny defeatism. I was simply making a prediction, one, according to this afternoon's news, apparently shared by prominent attorney, Alan Dershowitz, who predicts plea deal, no jail time.

Turley also says there will be no jail time because there's no history of criminal convictions and as such, a non-violent crime and being a first time offender usually doesn't result in incarceration.

That said, he most certainly will be guilty and receive a suspended sentence and one of the terms in any sentence is that he break no laws. A guilty finding or plea in any subsequent cases would send him to jail.

Perfect

Here's a thought: How about we wait and and see what happens? Has that ever occurred to you? Has it? Can you divine any advantage to not predicting the worst?

And I don't want to hear about what Dershowitz or Turley think, because they don't know, either.

Am I getting through?

quote:

Originally posted by ElToro:
This guy has some serious game.

Money talks. You throw enough money at anyone with no principles and they'll do whatever you want. Even if you're a wart-riddled ogre...

CNN:

" Claim : Biden family and associates got $20 million through shell companies

“Bank records show that nearly $20 million in payments were directed to the Biden family members and associates through various shell companies,” Kevin McCarthy said.

Facts First : This is true about Joe Biden’s family and associates, but there is no public evidence to date that the president personally received any money. "

reply from PJ Media:

"CNN doesn’t even attempt to deny that the Biden family got millions from foreign sources or to come up with an explanation for the use of the shell companies. In fact, the lack of journalistic curiosity about these shell companies is quite alarming. We’ve been pointing out that these companies had no apparent purpose but to launder foreign money before distributing it to members of the Biden family.

Does having 20 shell companies to filter millions of dollars through sound like legitimate business to CNN? What were these companies selling, if not the product of Joe Biden’s influence?"

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/...ic-self-own-n2628515

quote:

...but there is no public evidence to date that the president personally received any money.

This particular line is getting REALLY old. It's obvious to anyone with a pulse that the product being sold is the biden name/influence.

Whether he receives it/any benefit in/directly or not, if anyone within the biden sphere benefits because of his position and influence, it's still bribery.

Picking apart whether brandon can be "documented or linked" directly to the money is a fools errand. If you can link him directly, that's fine, but it's still bribery without the link. That's obvious to anyone except the MSM...

West Point graduate, Apache Longbow pilot, combat veteran and U.S. Representative to Congress from Texas’ 38th District, Wesley Hunt, rips Biden on the open southern border, with documentation to back him up.

^^^^First I've heard of him. Let's hope he's better than the other combat veteran TX sent to Congress.

Wesley Hunt might make a great V.P. for President Trump

Hunter Biden sues IRS, alleges agents tried to ‘target’ and ‘embarrass’ him

https://nypost.com/2023/09/18/...t-and-embarrass-him/

Hunter Biden’s attorneys filed a lawsuit against the IRS on Monday, alleging that agents have “targeted and sought to embarrass” the president’s son.

Biden’s Monday morning filing cites two major examples in IRS agents Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, two whistleblowers who claimed the IRS mishandled aspects of its investigation into Biden.

Biden’s lawsuit seeks for the court to declare that the IRS “willfully, knowingly, and/or by gross negligence, unlawfully disclosed Mr. Biden’s confidential tax information.”

In addition, Biden is demanding $1,000 in damages for “each and every unauthorized disclosure of his tax returns,” including disclosures that happened after the fact.

Fox News Digital reached out to the IRS for comment on the lawsuit, but they did not immediately respond.

“Biden is the son of the President of the United States. He has all the same responsibilities as any other American citizen, and the IRS can and should make certain that he abides by those responsibilities,” the lawsuit said. “Similarly, Mr. Biden has no fewer or lesser rights than any other American citizen, and no government agency or government agent has free rein to violate his rights simply because of who he is.”

“Yet,” the complaint says, “the IRS and its agents have conducted themselves under a presumption that the rights that apply to every other American citizen do not apply to Mr. Biden.”

The lawsuit goes on to allege that IRS agents Shapley and Ziegler “targeted and sought to embarrass” Biden through statements to the media.

The suit clarifies that the pair of agents are only the “most recent” example of the alleged activity.

Shapley and Zielger testified before the House Oversight Committee earlier this year, saying they faced various limitations when tasked with investigating the president’s son.

Biden’s lawsuit argues the pair’s status as whistleblowers “cannot and does not shield them from their wrongful conduct in making unauthorized public disclosures that are not permitted by the whistleblower process.”

Yeah, cause Hunter Biden otherwise had a stellar, unmolested reputation.

What a dickhead.

This supposedly "broke" A-Hole somehow manages to file a lot of lawsuits.

quote:

Hunter Biden sues IRS, alleges agents tried to ‘target’ and ‘embarrass’ him

WTF? What bunk; dishonest people lacking any kind of moral compass are sort of hard to embarrass. This is obviously being done to draw attention away from the big guy and discredit the investigation into Biden family crime syndicate money laundering. Now we get to see the hypocritical left on full display. Lil hunter and his father are both are absolute trash and everyone, including daddy’s base, know it well.

Embarrasing Hunter Biden is a tall order.

That sets an interesting precedent for suits against those accusing a public figure of a crime, doesn't it.

Hunter Biden investigation: Third IRS official says Justice Department blocked Weiss from charging

https://www.washingtonexaminer...weiss-charging-biden

A third IRS official confirmed that Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss faced roadblocks when attempting to bring charges against Hunter Biden, contradicting denials issued Wednesday by Attorney General Merrick Garland.

IRS Director of Field Operations Michael Batdorf told the House Ways and Means Committee in a closed-door interview on Sept. 12 that he felt “frustrated” by the refusal of the Justice Department to approve tax charges that IRS agents viewed as well-supported by evidence, according to a transcript of the interview obtained by the Washington Examiner.

He also said the IRS removed agent Gary Shapley, a whistleblower, from the Hunter Biden case at the direction of Weiss despite having done nothing wrong.

Batdorf’s testimony was the latest piece of evidence to suggest Weiss did not enjoy the unfettered authority to pursue Hunter Biden that Garland and others claimed he had.

Still, Batdorf, who was above Shapley in the IRS chain of command, stopped short of attributing the DOJ’s actions to bias in favor of President Joe Biden.

In addition to the two Joe Biden-appointed U.S. attorneys who refused to allow Weiss to bring charges against Hunter Biden in their districts, Batdorf said the DOJ Tax Division opposed bringing charges.

Batdorf said DOJ Tax argued against charges for Hunter Biden during a June 2022 meeting with Weiss and IRS officials, who were in favor of advancing the case.

“DOJ Tax would have to authorize charges prior to David Weiss recommending an indictment or prosecution,” Batdorf said during his interview.

“So, I mean, my understanding is that, I mean, he can’t make that decision without DOJ Tax authorization,” Batdorf said.

The IRS supervisor confirmed that Hunter Biden’s defense team was given an unusual number of chances, possibly as many as four, to meet with DOJ Tax investigators and argue why its client should not face charges.

Tensions between DOJ Tax and the IRS investigators over the strength of the case began after DOJ Tax officials started meeting with Hunter Biden’s defense lawyers, Batdorf said.

Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) asked Garland on Wednesday about whether DOJ Tax had the ability to stop a U.S. attorney from proceeding on a tax case.

“Most of the time, but not when the attorney general has granted authority to a U.S. attorney to do what he thinks is best,” Garland said at the House Judiciary Committee hearing.

But Weiss did not appear to have that authority at the time.

Batdorf said he sensed frustration on the team that Weiss had found roadblocks on multiple paths to prosecuting Hunter Biden.

“I was frustrated,” he said. “[Weiss] was probably a little frustrated … because he now had to make some decisions on what he was going to do.”

Then, in the fall of last year, the investigation seemed to stall.

Batdorf said the case was effectively dormant from October 2022 until May this year. During the intervening months, investigators had little else to do except wait for Weiss to make a decision about whether to move the case forward or end it. Weiss did not decide to proceed until Shapley had already begun the process of testifying to Congress about the investigation.

“David Weiss made his decision to go forward in May. I’m not sure what drove that decision,” Batdorf said.

House Republicans have questioned whether it was the decision by Shapley and another IRS investigator, Joseph Ziegler, to share their concerns with Congress.

Batdorf said Weiss effectively asked for Shapley’s removal from the case in December 2022 after reviewing emails and memos in which Shapley had documented what he claimed was evidence of preferential treatment toward the Biden family. Weiss informed Batdorf and another IRS supervisor that he would no longer be responding to any of Shapley’s emails or calls.

The decision to remove Shapley’s team was made because, Batdorf said, the IRS supervisors feared Weiss would not move forward with a prosecution unless the IRS investigative team was replaced.

But because “no more investigative actions” remained after an Oct. 7, 2022, team meeting at which Weiss revealed his difficulties in bringing charges against Hunter Biden in a jurisdiction outside Delaware, Batdorf did not inform Shapley he was being pulled from the case until May of this year, when Weiss finally arrived at the decision to proceed, Batdorf said.

Batdorf also appeared to confirm that Lesley Wolf, the main prosecutor working on the investigation under Weiss, was removed from the case in May or June of this year. Hunter Biden’s legal team had worked closely with her in drafting the language of a now-withdrawn plea bargain offered to Hunter Biden until she seemingly dropped out of conversations, the New York Times reported in August.

Shapley had identified her as a constant obstacle to investigative moves the IRS team wanted to take, such as witness interviews or search warrants.