quote:

Originally posted by sdy:

The third computer was corroded. An attempt was made to recover it. No one came back for the computer.

The repairman saw things that concerned him. He was vague about details. He said it had a "messy desktop". He had a friend contact the FBI.

So, ONCE AGAIN, a MAJOR news story comes to light due to the diligent efforts of two complete 'nobodies' (no offence intended; I consider myself to be a 'nobody').

The first one was the random guy with the camera phone who video'd the hildabeast being thrown into the back of a van like an unconscious sack of potatoes. Now, there is this guy.

IN BOTH CASES, major events that did and again will probably influence a presidential election were broke by average citizens. Meanwhile, the msm continued to blindly support 'their guy' and refused to pursue what, if it were related to ANY Republican candidate, would be the story of the decade.

Thank God for the little guys.

Democrats are loosing their sanity (if they have ever had any)...attacking their MSM cohorts




Link to original video: https://youtu.be/9RrucBLbUE8

Joe Biden lashes out after being asked about Post’s Hunter Biden exposé

https://nypost.com/2020/10/16/...hunter-biden-expose/

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden was finally asked about the explosive New York Post report that alleges emails show his son made millions trading on his father’s influence.

His response? “I have no response.”

After not being asked about the growing controversy surrounding Hunter Biden at the ABC News town hall by moderator George Stephanopoulos, the former vice president spoke to reporters outside his private jet Friday following his campaign events in Michigan. And when he was approached about the subject by CBS News reporter Bo Erickson, Biden went after the journalist.

“Mr. Biden, what is your response to the New York Post story about your son, sir?” Erickson asked.

“I know you’d ask it,” Biden fired back. “I have no response, it’s another smear campaign, right up your alley, those are the questions you always ask.”

The Biden 2020 presidential campaign previously responded to the Post story on Wednesday, saying the former vice president “carried out official U.S. policy toward Ukraine and engaged in no wrongdoing,” and that “Trump administration officials have attested to these facts under oath.”

Good video

Schweizer: Hunter Biden Had ‘United Nations of Corruption’ and Joe Biden Was ‘the Planet’ It Moved Around

https://www.breitbart.com/clip...net-it-moved-around/

Ok, so the repairman where Hunter Biden's computer was dropped off contacted the FBI about what it contained. It's unclear when he actually notified the FBI, but they took possession of little Hunter's computer in December of 2019.

I'm sure it's just a coincidence, but Nancy & the House started impeachment proceedings on Donald on Dec. 19, 2019 for "soliciting interference of a foreign government, Ukraine".
https://www.congress.gov/116/b...LS-116hres755enr.pdf

Did the FBI inform the White House that they had this evidence on Hunter & the ex VP? I'm sure that the Impeachment hearings would've blown sky high if Trump's lawyers would've had this info. Did Nancy or anyone in Congress know about the seized evidence? They must have!

Is anybody going to have to answer for this? Hell no.

another reason I think its authentic is the timing

'Russian agents' wouldn't have known in early / mid-2019 that Biden would have been the Dem nominee in Mid 2020.

Sure they could have guessed... but that's a lot of work to put into what at the time was a 'slim' chance that Biden would actually be the nominee

bottom line -- Creepy Joe is Dirty Joe

---------------------------------------

The Companies Of Biden’s Brother Received $54 MILLION In Taxpayer-Funded Loans To Finance Energy Projects In Central America

https://conservativeus.com/the...-in-central-america/

Frank Biden’s companies received $54 MILLION in taxpayer-funded loans to finance energy projects in Central America

Just like his son—Biden’s brother also had no energy experience.

“Clinton Cash” author Peter Schweizer makes the case for Biden family corruption in his new book “Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite.”

The book teaser reads:

In Profiles in Corruption, Schweizer offers a deep-dive investigation into the private finances, and secrets deals of some of America’s top political leaders.

And, as usual, he doesn’t disappoint, with never-before-reported revelations that uncover corruption and abuse of power—all backed up by a mountain of corporate documents and legal filings from around the globe.

Learn about how they are making sweetheart deals, generating side income, bending the law to their own benefits, using legislation to advance their own interests, and much more.

Breitbart reports Frank Biden, the youngest brother of former Vice President Joe Biden, saw his business interests benefit from millions of dollars in taxpayer loans to Caribbean nations during the Obama years.

The extensive overlap in Frank Biden’s dealings and Obama-Biden foreign policy in Central America is exposed in Peter Schweizer’s new book—Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite.

Frank Biden first set his sights on the region in 2009, as the Obama administration began to repair the U.S. relationship with Costa Rica. Tensions between the two countries flared under President George W. Bush, most notably on how to deal with drug trafficking.

When President Barack Obama entered the White House, he set out to mend fences in the region in hopes of inaugurating a new era of global cooperation. Leading the charge on that front was Joe Biden, who had long standing ties to the region from his tenure leading the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Shortly after the new administration took office, Frank Biden began scouting real estate opportunities in Costa Rica. A lawyer by training, Frank was undeterred by his lack of background in international development and decades old legal troubles at home.

As Schweizer notes, despite the professional and personal handicaps, business opportunities were plentiful for Frank, especially after his brother paid a visit to the country.

“Just months after Vice President [Joe] Biden’s visit, in August, Costa Rica News announced a new multilateral partnership “to reform Real Estate in Latin America” between Frank Biden, a developer named Craig Williamson, and the Guanacaste Country Club, a newly planned resort,” Schweizer writes in his book, a copy of which was exclusively obtained by Breitbart News.

The venture—officially sold to investors and the public as an opportunity to protect Costa Rica’s “breathtaking beauty”—amounted to little more than decimating the country’s natural wilderness to build a luxurious resort for wealthy foreigners.

“In real terms, Frank’s dream was to build in the jungles of Costa Rica thousands of homes, a world-class golf course, casinos, and an anti-aging center,” Schweizer notes. “The Costa Rican government was eager to cooperate with the vice president’s brother.”

The project, which is still in the development phase, has made Frank Biden a well-connected figure in Costa Rica’s political landscape. A letter the country’s president, Luis Guillermo Solis Rivera, penned praising the project even made its way on the internet in what appears to have been a botched attempt to solicit further investors.

In order to execute a project of such scale, however, Costa Rica would need to update and expand its electrical grid. Located on the Central American Isthmus, more than 51 percent of the country’s landscape is forested, with nearly half of that being land that has not been disturbed by human activity. As such, much of the area suitable for the type of resort Frank Biden wanted to build lacked access to electricity.

Frank, perhaps sensing a chance to make even more money, entered into a partnership with the Costa Rican National Power and Light Company (CNFL) to build a solar power complex in the country’s northwest region. The new facility would provide enough electricity to Frank’s resort, which was to be built in the vicinity.

The partnership with CNFL was secured even though Frank and his company, Sun Fund Americas, had no experience in the energy sector.

This is a disgrace

Will the Mainstream Media cover this?

Please share this article wherever you can. It is the only way we can work around their censorship and ensure people receive news about issues that Democrats and the mainstream media suppress.

Funny- Nothing on Hunter Bidens emails in the local news. Several articles about Biden outraising Trump and the Obstacles Trump's facing since he's trailing Biden.

For some obscure reason there's an article about Social Media and the FCC section 230. 15 paragraphs down there's passing mention of the Hunter Biden emails. They don't mention the content.

quote:

FCC moves to 'clarify' social media liability protections amid GOP outrage

https://komonews.com/news/nati...ons-amid-gop-outrage

Reading from a Giant Teleprompter.


https://twitter.com/i/status/1317238200612626432

^^^ Wtf? He looks like he's addressing a couple of random passer-bys at some podunk county fair. Just pathetic

This is really good and funny. He's not a republican, not a conservative and not a Trump supporter.

quote:

The Massive Hunter Biden Email Damage Control Continues

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZACZwZjQ0Ok

Law enforcement world slams Biden's advice to shoot suspects 'in the leg'

https://justthenews.com/politi...d-shoot-suspects-leg

"We shoot to stop the threat," said Lawrence O'Toole, a lieutenant colonel with the St. Louis Police Department. "You could be endangering the public by shooting and missing."



Law enforcement officials are slamming Joe Biden's suggestion that police officers should shoot violent assailants in the leg to avoid a potentially fatal altercation, with experts arguing that police are trained to do exactly the opposite of what Biden advised in order to minimize harm during violent confrontations.

In an extended exchange with a questioner during his Philadelphia town hall event with host George Stephanopolous Thursday, Biden laid out his vision for police reform, including his opinion of how police officers should utilize deadly force while on the job.

"There's a lot of things we've learned, and it takes time," he said, "but we can do this. You can ban chokeholds ... but beyond that, you have to teach people how to de-escalate circumstances."

"So, instead of anybody coming at you and the first thing you do is shoot to kill, you shoot them in the leg," he offered as an example.

'Why don't we train the military to do that?'

Multiple law enforcement officials argued to Just the News that Biden had strongly misjudged the logistics of police use-of-force.

"It's a myth," Dana Schrad, the executive director of the Virginia Association of Chiefs of Police, said of Biden's notion that leg shots are a practical alternative to current police training.

"We have a continuum of use of force policies that we follow," she said of police officers. "Officers are trained to de-escalate situations, to use the minimal force necessary, to contain a situation, and to bring it to a peaceful conclusion."

"If an officer is forced to use lethal force," she continued, "that means there's imminent danger. If there's that level of danger that would force an officer to use a firearm, he's trained to shoot to body mass."

"It takes some really special equipment and a real good marksman to disable someone by shooting them in the leg," she added.

Biden's remarks on Thursday were not the first time the politician has given controversial law enforcement advice. He made the same shoot-for-the-leg argument at a community meeting in June of this year. Several years ago, the former vice president also suggested that utilizing a double-barreled shotgun and "fir[ing] two blasts outside the house" would be enough to scare away would-be criminals.

Lawrence O'Toole, a Lt. Col with the St. Louis Police Department, said Biden's remarks on Thursday were "ridiculous."

"Why don't we train the military to do that?" he asked sarcastically.

"Obviously we shoot for the larger part of the body because we have the highest percentage of being able to hit the target," he argued. "We shoot to stop the threat. You could be endangering the public by shooting and missing."

O'Toole also took issue with Biden's premise that police officers "shoot to kill" when drawing their weapons.

"Nowhere have I ever heard in police training that we shoot to kill," he said, repeating: "We shoot to stop the threat. We do not shoot to kill."

'They have to be stopped immediately'

Police reform activists have often argued that officers can easily be trained to use firearms in a non-lethal manner when engaging with violent suspects. A bill put forth in the New York State Assembly several years ago would have directed police throughout the state to use "only the minimal amount of force necessary" when confronting and subduing violent suspects.

Dave Grossman, a retired Lt. Col. in the United States Army, told Just the News that violent, potentially murderous suspects "have to be stopped immediately."

"Shooting someone in the leg does not stop someone immediately," he said. "You're trying to stop an immediate threat. And shooting someone in the leg doesn't stop them from killing or shooting someone else."

Grossman, who runs a nationwide law enforcement training program and who developed the discipline of "killology," used a conversation with a deer-hunting relative to illustrate his point.

"He once asked me, 'Why don't cops just shoot suspects in the leg?'" Grossman said. "And I told him, 'The next time you shoot at a deer, aim for the leg.'"

"He got it immediately," Grossman added.

Police reform advocates also argue Biden is misguided

Justin Mazzola, a criminal justice research expert at Amnesty International, also argued that Biden missed the mark with his suggestion that police should aim for the leg.

"We definitely agree with the former vice president that officers should be taught de-escalation tactics," Mazzola said.

Yet regarding Biden's claim that officers should shoot suspects in the leg during violent altercations, "we don’t know that that's the right response in that specific circumstance," he said.

"What the real issue is," he said, "is whether or not lethal force was justified in the situation at all." Lethal force statutes in the U.S. are far too permissive, Mazzola argued. "We are calling on each state to restrict lethal force only in instances to protect life, under imminent threat of death or serious injury," he added.

Randy Shrewsberry, the executive director of California's Institute for Criminal Justice Training Reform and a former law enforcement officer, echoed Mazzola's remarks.

"It's an unrealistic proposition," he said of Biden's idea. "I think my feelings probably echo the vast majority that are in law enforcement today."

"The major thing to understand is that police officers must be trained to shoot for center mass because it's the largest part of the target," he said. "When we're talking about stress-shooting situations, accuracy drops tremendously. Most of the time it's not just someone standing in one spot. People are moving around. Adrenaline is pumping."

"I would argue that we need to teach officers to use other tools than shooting," he said, "such as mental health training. I think that would be a far better investment."

Fatal police shootings have received major media coverage in recent years, though they remain rare: The Washington Post's police shooting database identified roughly 5,000 deadly police shootings since 2015. If every one of those shootings was perpetrated by a different officer, that would still constitute about 0.6% of the more than 800,000 police officers throughout the country over a period of half a decade.

Overall, according to research, only about a quarter of police officers have ever fired their sidearms while on the job.

"Law enforcement officers rarely pull their weapons," Schrad said. "I know officers that have gone through a 25-year career and have never pulled their firearms."

Shrewsberry said the shoot-for-the-leg argument is "something that's been perpetuated in fictional TV shows." O'Toole said remarks like Biden's are "uninformed and uneducated" about the nature of marksmanship in dangerous and potentially deadly situations.

"If it was that easy to do, we would have been doing it all along," he said.

I have to laugh at these Biden ads claiming Trump only cares about the stock market. Can any Biden supporter tell me what happens nation wide when the stock market declines? Any of them have a concept of what happens if the market crashes? Are they saying Biden won't care about the market?

Hell, did Obama care about the market? If it worked for O, then it should work for B, right?

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:

I find it curious how many politicians significantly increase their net worth during their time in office, quite a bit more than could be explained by their salary plus standard benefits.

Obama is a perfect example. I wonder how much of their newly acquired wealth was kosher vs how much was payola.

Law enforcement world slams Biden's advice to shoot suspects 'in the leg

Using Biden's approach, I wonder how many knee replacements the police departments would have to pay for.

Former President Harry Truman once said, “anybody who gets rich while in Public Office, is a crook.”

quote:

Originally posted by satch:
Former President Harry Truman once said, “anybody who gets rich while in Public Office, is a crook.”

It was due to Truman that the current president gets a retirement. After office he ran into financial problems and refused to take a job at a corporation or do endorsements as he though it would demean the office of the presidency.