quote:

Originally posted by Sig2340:

quote:

Liberal filmmaker Rob Reiner's 'Shock and Awe' disappoints at box office with dismal opening weekend

Liberal filmmaker Rob Reiner’s Bush administration-bashing “Shock and Awe” was a disappointment during its debut weekend with an embarrassing box office intake.

“Shock and Awe” grossed only $41,000 on its opening weekend after being shown in only 100 theaters, according to Box Office Mojo. “Shock and Awe” finished No. 34 overall, behind numerous movies that have already been in theaters for several weeks, according to the service. Reiner’s film lost to other movies that were played in a limited number of theaters, including “Eighth Grade,” which was shown in only four theaters but managed to gross $252,284, according to the site.

< snip >

BWAHHAAAHHHHAAAAAHHHHH!

I guess he is a "Meathead".

quote:

Originally posted by JALLEN:

After the elections, he can be more flexible.

I saw what you did there

quote:

Originally posted by GWbiker:

quote:

Originally posted by Sig2340:

quote:

Liberal filmmaker Rob Reiner's 'Shock and Awe' disappoints at box office with dismal opening weekend

Liberal filmmaker Rob Reiner’s Bush administration-bashing “Shock and Awe” was a disappointment during its debut weekend with an embarrassing box office intake.

“Shock and Awe” grossed only $41,000 on its opening weekend after being shown in only 100 theaters, according to Box Office Mojo. “Shock and Awe” finished No. 34 overall, behind numerous movies that have already been in theaters for several weeks, according to the service. Reiner’s film lost to other movies that were played in a limited number of theaters, including “Eighth Grade,” which was shown in only four theaters but managed to gross $252,284, according to the site.

< snip >

BWAHHAAAHHHHAAAAAHHHHH!

I guess he is a "Meathead".

Where is the outrage for Obama allowing russia to interfere in the election? His administration knew about it and did NOTHING.

People are all upset about Trumps words, and no one seems concerned about Obamas actions.

Pathetic. Wake me up when the media and the left get upset about something important. I though the 80's called and they want their russian boogie man back. At least that's what the left claimed when the fraud was in office.

Good grief, bunch of people think that the President is a moron and got hoodwinked by Putin....this reminds me of all the dopes that wanted the President to call Kim Jung Un a war criminal & murderer to his face during the Singapore Summit....yep, that's a great way to not achieve peace.

It's insane that there are people that would be ok with starting a war just so that PDJT wouldn't get credit for bringing about peace.

quote:

Originally posted by mbinky:
Where is the outrage for Obama allowing russia to interfere in the election? His administration knew about it and did NOTHING.

You mean, when he said, "cut it out", the earth didn't shake and send the ruskies running?

quote:

Originally posted by Tuckerrnr1:

Let's try to stay on topic, guys. Keep in mind all the space images take up on the screen.

quote:

Originally posted by MagiaNera:

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
It doesn't matter what the man does. No matter what he does, they'll bitch to high Heaven, so fuck every last one of these pissy little bitches.

Clearly, that goes both ways. Nonetheless, this is a very specific case. The man basically took Putin's "strong and forceful" word over that of the entire USIC, and it's defended as a poor choice of words.

It may not be bombs and bullets, but a foreign power (adversary) has/is attacking the United States. The President took an oath to "protect and defend..."

He didn't just not condem Putin, but sided with him. This, especially from that office, is about egregious as it gets!

He’s supposed to side with the corrupt fucks trying to railroad him because... why? Help me out, here. You need to think about what things have been going on that the word “egregious” applies to, because Trump saying he wants to try to normalize shit with Russia ain’t, and what’s going on with the Meuller Circus is.

I won't even attempt to list the various governments in whose internal affairs we have meddled, in the interests of our (often legitimate) national security. Including attempts and successes at overthrowing whole regimes, not just meddling, and including in the Soviet Union. And while we may have had good and sufficient reasons in most cases, we certainly cannot claim moral superiority in all cases for doing literally exactly what our erstwhile allies-et-enemies the Russians did. Including similar active espionage on our several allies. In the main, we have vectored toward the righteous but if you think that has been or is always the case, you are much deluded. And this is not an "everyone does it" indictment, but the nature of national survival. As someone famous once said, you can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs. And we have embraced that philosophy in spades more than a few times. Perhaps we should remove the beam in our eye before we (most particularly the Democratic Party and political adherents) pollyanna our way onto the international stage to rend our garments, with our ass hanging out the back. Excuse my French.

Shit, Madame President would know how to handle those damn Russkies.

Maybe sell 'em some more uranium. That'll keep 'em quiet for a while.

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
Maybe sell 'em some more uranium. That'll keep 'em quiet for a while.

That right there made me laugh. Then it made me thank my maker the Trump is president.

It’s Undeniable: Trump Is Blessed With Really Stupid Enemies

Townhall.com
Kurt Schlichter

Donald Trump goes to Europe, scandalizes the Euroweenies, libs, and cruise-shilling grifters of Never Trump, and comes back victorious. He’s about to get his second SCOTUS justice confirmed – all they have on Brett Kavanaugh is that he likes beer and is named “Brett.” In Congress, the Democrats decided to go all in on abolishing ICE because Americans love open borders and welcome MS-13 or something. In the Mueller farce, the Dems decided that the smart play was to publicly run interference for creepy weirdo Peter Strzok when he went on national TV doing his impression of Lotion Boy from Silence of the Lambs.

Hey Pete, what do those Trump voters smell like? Smells like a red wave to me, you insipid weirdo.

How did Trump luck out by getting such hopeless geebos for opponents? It can’t just be chance. At every turn, these dummies choose to lock themselves into the most implausible and indefensible positions imaginable, then push all their chips into the center of the table. It’s almost supernatural – maybe Trump won the intervention of some ancient demon by heading over to the offices of the Weekly Standard and snatching away one of its Never Trump scribblers to use as a virgin sacrifice.

Look, I was not a Trump fan at the beginning – I was anti-Trump but never Never Trump, both because I was Never Hillary and because I wasn’t a Beltway squishboy who would take his white paper and go home when my guy Ted Cruz lost. I just had no idea what to make of Trump at first because he didn’t look like any mainstream Republican I had seen in the last few decades. But then, I soon realized that he didn’t look like any mainstream Republican I had seen in the last few decades because he wasn’t a hapless loser. He was the anti-Jeb!.


I recount my conversion (hilariously, according to such blurb writers as Nick Searcy and David Limbaugh) from being anti-Trump to Trump-curious to pro-Trump in my upcoming book Militant Normals: How Regular Americans Are Rebelling Against the Elite to Reclaim Our Democracy, except I give a lot more detail and use a lot more swears in there. Suffice it to say that my conversion (and that of many others) was based on the undeniable fact that Trump kept his promises and sided with America in a way we haven’t seen from a Republican since Reagan was owning the libs back in the eighties.

How did this guy win, and in doing so crush the avatar of the establishment, the smartest woman in the world, Felonia Milhous von Pantsuit? One of his secrets to success is really no secret at all. It is to embrace the obvious. Unlike our exhausted establishment, Trump rarely holds to bizarre, indefensible positions. You would think that would be an instinctive thing for politicians of both parties – “I know! I’ll adopt stands on issues that won’t make my constituents ask ‘What the hell is wrong with you?’” – but it isn’t. Instead, the establishment has somehow talked itself into taking positions that are so clearly ridiculous that Normals scratch their heads, baffled at what they are being told by their betters via the lapdog liberal media.

Look at NATO. The entire foreign policy establishment is scandalized that Trump says he expects the Europeans to cover their fair share of the NATO nut. Now a normal American is going to think “Yeah, I think they ought to pay their share of their own defense. Sounds reasonable.” But the establishment collectively wets itself – “HE’S DESTROYING THIS ESSENTIAL ALLIANCE BY ASKING THE PEOPLE BENEFITING FROM IT MOST TO ACTUALLY PARTICIPATE IN IT!”


And the Normals (many of whom, like me, actually served in NATO) wonder, “Well, if it’s so essential, why aren’t the allies eager to pay for it?” And the establishment responds, “SHUT UP, RUSSIAN STOOGE! ASKING THE ALLIES TO MAKE NATO MORE EFFECTIVE BY PAYING WHAT THEY PROMISED, WHICH IS STILL A FRACTION OF WHAT THE U.S. PAYS, IS PLAYING RIGHT INTO PUTIN’S HANDS. ALSO, THE EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE SOMEHOW.”

Okay, as an expert on arguments, I must observe that this is a losing argument. Now, I’m not relying on my expertise gained from a quarter century of convincing juries to go my way to say that. I don’t need to. I’m relying on the fact I have actually met normal Americans. This is such a facially idiotic argument that only someone in the establishment could talk himself into believing it.

Here’s a test. Leave DC or New York, drive a few hours out to America, find a random guy on the street and ask, “Hey, don’t you think it’s awful that Trump wants our allies to increase their contributions to their own defense to just about half of what the U.S. pays?” You can safely assume he’ll respond, “Wait, why only half?”

The Normal/Elite disconnect was also in full effect regarding the new SCOTUS dude. The establishment decided it’s going to bork Brett by pointing out that he bought baseball tickets and apparently liked beer in college, like there’s not a significant portion of Americans who wouldn’t be thrilled to have their next justice be nicknamed “Kegmaster K.” And what’s the new fussiness about alcohol, or are they upset because he quaffs brewskis (RUSSIANS!) instead of guzzling chardonnay? The Dems weren’t so picky about partying in 2016 when Stumbles McMyTurn was staggering all over the map.

Well, not in Wisconsin.

Then the establishment attacked Brett’s family for looking like a normal family instead of a traveling freak show. The Kavanaugh kids didn’t have nose rings or teen tatts, and they presumably know which bathroom to use. This, to the establishment, is unforgiveable. To Normal Americans, this constant social warfare against people who don’t want to be sketchy mutants is just more inspiration for more militancy.

The Democrats have also decided that they want to go into November on the platform of abolishing ICE and opening the borders to future Democrat voters from festering Third World hellholes. Perhaps they didn’t read the polls, but Normal Americans – the ones not appearing on CNN, working for Soros-funded agitator collectives, or in college squandering their dads’ money on degrees in Oppression Studies – actually like borders. If Trump’s brain trust gathered together in his palatial Mar-a-Lago estate to concoct a scheme to get the Democrat Party to adopt the most tone-deaf possible platform, they could not have drafted one better than what the Democrats have created for themselves. The Dems ought to be required to report everything they have done lately to the Federal Elections Commission as an in-kind donation to the Republicans in 2018.


And then there is the Mueller/ FBI/Collusion/Treason charade, which has normal people asking, “Is that still a thing?” Yeah, kind of, though it becomes less thingy every day as it becomes obvious that Sad Bassett Hound Mueller and the Conflict-of-Interest Crew’s got no-thing.

The establishment is convinced that Peter Strzok came out of that hearing not looking like a guy who probably has a sex dungeon in his basement. But he totally looked like he has a sex dungeon in his basement, thereby launching a thousand memes of him leering, smirking, and generally channeling Paul Lynde.

Despite the best efforts of borderline mental defectives like Ted Lieu and whoever that dork was who wanted to give Strzok a Purple Heart, this paragon of the establishment came off to Normals as exactly who he is – a skeevy bureaucrat who delights in jamming up other people with the rules he ignores. The FBI Motto is “Fidelity, Bravery, Integrity,” and that married serial sexting hack blew two of those just by cavorting with his gal pal. He and his establishment supporters somehow think Normals aren’t going to figure out that if his wife can’t trust him not to nail the chick at the next desk, we can’t trust his explanation for why he didn’t nail the woman with classified material all over her emails who was supposed to be the next president.

One of the secrets of Trump’s success is having really, really stupid enemies, enemies who are so tone-deaf and out-of-touch that they simply cannot adopt commonsense positions that resonate among normal Americans. The establishment instead insists on telling Americans that up is down, black is white, and girls can have penises. Nope. No wonder the Normals have gotten militant, and no wonder a leader like Donald Trump came along with the vision to exploit the opening the establishment left for an outsider to rise and prevail by embracing the obvious.

Link

Leftists thought they had Trump painted into a corner, that he'd have give validity to the Russian / Mueller investigation which JUST happened to drop unprovable indictments as he leaves for the summit.

Wrong - another W word, like Winning.

Just when you think that the Trump bullshit could not get more...effing weirder...this pops up!...I can only imagine if this was Barry or HilBot locking tounge with "fill in the blank"...

http://www.foxnews.com/enterta...putin-as-lovers.html

^^^^^^^^^

It's been out for awhile.

Shows what a despicable immoral POS the NYT is.

Trump did just fine in Russia. Don't believe the hype.

I keep seeing and hearing this narrative tonight that Trump got rolled, Trump went too easy on Vlad, Trump messed up with Russia.

And this is from many of my Trump supporting friends on FB, not the crazy wacko Trump hating Left! WTF, am I missing something here?

I stopped listening.

bitch, bitch, bitch

It's non-stop.

Excerpts from the press conference transcript, I don't see what the big deal is about. I think part of the reason the media & democrats are having a cow is because of Putin's accusation regarding "Bill Browder" and they're trying to redirect any attention to that remark.

*Any Trump "supporters" that are making this a big deal probably haven't read or heard what the President said and are reacting like democrats lemmings to the MSM & social media.

quote:

TRUMP: So let me just say that we have two thoughts. You have groups that are wondering why the FBI never took the server — haven’t they taken the server. Why was the FBI told to leave the office of the Democratic National Committee?

I’ve been wondering that, I’ve been asking that for months and months and I’ve been tweeting it out and calling it out on social media. Where is the server? I want to know where is the server and what is the server saying?

With that being said, all I can do is ask the question. My people came to me, Dan Coates came to me and some others, they said they think it’s Russia. I have President Putin; he just said it’s not Russia.

I will say this: I don’t see any reason why it would be. But I really do want to see the server.

But I have — I have confidence in both parties. I — I really believe that this will probably go on for a while, but I don’t think it can go on without finding out what happened to the server. What happened to the servers of the Pakistani gentleman that worked on the DNC? Where are those servers? They’re missing; where are they? What happened to Hillary Clinton’s e-mails? 33,000 e-mails gone — just gone. I think in Russia they wouldn’t be gone so easily. I think it’s a disgrace that we can’t get Hillary Clinton’s 33,000 e-mails.

TRUMP: So I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today.

And what he did is an incredible offer. He offered to have the people working on the case come and work with their investigators with respect to the 12 people. I think that’s an incredible offer. OK?

quote:

PUTIN: So this treaty has specific legal procedures we can offer the appropriate commission headed by Special Attorney Mueller. He can use this treaty as a solid foundation and send a formal — an official request to us so that we would interrogate — we want to hold a questioning of these individuals who he believes are privy to some crimes. And our law enforcement are perfectly able to do this questioning and send the appropriate materials to the United States.

Moreover, we can meet you halfway. We can make another step. We can actually permit official representatives of the United States, including the members of this very commission headed by Mr. Mueller — we can let them into the country and they will be present at this questioning.

But in this case, there is a — there’s another condition. This kind of effort should be a mutual one. Then we would expect that the Americans would reciprocate, and that they would question officials, including the officers of law enforcement and intelligence service of the United States, whom we believe are — who have something to do with illegal actions on the territory of Russia, and we have to — to request the presence of our law enforcement.

For instance, we can bring up the Mr. Browder in this particular case. Business associates of Mr. Browder have earned over $1.5 billion in Russia. They never paid any taxes, neither in Russia nor in the United States, and yet the money escaped the country. They were transferred to the United States. They sent huge amount of money, $400 million as a contribution to the campaign of Hillary Clinton. Well, that’s the personal case. It might have been legal, the contribution itself, but the way the money was earned was illegal.

So we have a solid reason to believe that some intelligence officers accompanied and guided these transactions (referring to U.S. intel members). So we have a — an interest of questioning them. We can all — that — that could be a first step, and we can also extend it. Options abound, and they all can be found in an appropriate legal framework.

http://time.com/5339848/donald...n-summit-transcript/