quote:

Originally posted by bigdeal:

quote:

Originally posted by grumpy1:
Susan Collins now wants to hear the second accuser testify to a senate panel which would mean more delays.

Collins is truly retarded isn't she. What an incredible dimwit to even suggest bringing that drunken nitwit into a senate hearing when she hasn't a clue what (if anything) actually happened to her. Best and brightest serving in Washington my ass.

people become politicians because they're unemployable in the private sector

quote:

Originally posted by BB61:
I was at a seminar recently in which Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of Berkley’s law school spoke. For those who don’t know him, Chemerinsky is arguably the top constitutional scholar in the country. In his presentation, Chemerinsky clearly and unambiguously stated that if Kavanaugh is confirmed, he “fully expects Roe vs. Wade to be directly or indirectly overturned.”

Chemerinsky is not the “top Constitutional scholar in the country” or anywhere except in his own mind. He used to be featured in a short radio segment on a San Diego radio station where he touted some of the most peculiar notions imaginable, even more than some of our own participants here! His views would be intolerable to nearly all of us on this forum.

quote:

Originally posted by eTripper:
Don't forget. We have another fuckin' clown entering the game. I guess, he's trying for the Center Ring of the Circus.

Ah yes, creepy porn lawyer. He needs to step up with credible persons or lose his lawyering license.

What a tool!

RMD

quote:

Originally posted by JALLEN:

quote:

Originally posted by BB61:
I was at a seminar recently in which Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of Berkley’s law school spoke. For those who don’t know him, Chemerinsky is arguably the top constitutional scholar in the country. In his presentation, Chemerinsky clearly and unambiguously stated that if Kavanaugh is confirmed, he “fully expects Roe vs. Wade to be directly or indirectly overturned.”

Chemerinsky is not the “top Constitutional scholar in the country” or anywhere except in his own mind. He used to be featured in a short radio segment on a San Diego radio station where he touted some of the most peculiar notions imaginable, even more than some of our own participants here! His views would be intolerable to nearly all of us on this forum.

Regardless, if one doesn't think that faction of the right isn't gearing up to have a case heard, they'd best pull their head out of the ground.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:

quote:

Originally posted by lastmanstanding:
Claiming he was a virgin was a bad move. The democrats are going to come up with 3 women who claim they slept with him in high school or college by Thursday.

I wouldn't put it past them, but it won't happen.

I believe it might happen. But the women will admit to being lights out drunk and we'll have to wait at least 6 days while they 'search their memories and talk with their lawyers' before they can be sure it was really Brett

quote:

Originally posted by BB61:
I was at a seminar recently in which Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of Berkley’s law school spoke. For those who don’t know him, Chemerinsky is arguably the top constitutional scholar in the country. In his presentation, Chemerinsky clearly and unambiguously stated that if Kavanaugh is confirmed, he “fully expects Roe vs. Wade to be directly or indirectly overturned.”

Except that's just simply not true and not going to happen. The Left loves to use that as their bogeyman to fire up the base that their precious right to baby killing is going to be taken away any second.

quote:

Originally posted by PASig:
Except that's just simply not true and not going to happen. The Left loves to use that as their bogeyman to fire up the base that their precious right to baby killing is going to be taken away any second.

Well, in all fairness, it goes both ways.
The Right uses the Pro-Life movement the same way, to fire up the base. The Republicans raise a lot of money off of Pro-Life people but I don't really see the status quo changing much.

What has changed, is the tactics of the left.

September 25, 2018
The real reason the left wants to destroy Brett Kavanaugh
By Bill Thomas

Dr. Ben Carson, on the campaign trail in 2016, said, "The Roman Empire was very, very much like us. They lost their moral core, their sense of values in terms of who they were. And after all of those things converged together, they just went right down the tubes very quickly." Four years later, that statement rings even more ominous. Progressives in our country have taken political opposition to an extreme and dangerous level. No longer do we see a "loyal opposition." In its place is a hate-filled, revenge-seeking mob no longer constrained by fact, decency, or integrity.

Neither the truth nor justice seems to matter to the Democrats. They traffic in lies and deceit. The shameful proceedings to vet Judge Brett Kavanaugh reek of corruption. Senator Dianne Feinstein held a letter from Dr. Christine Ford for nearly two months before it was leaked by Democrats after his hearing. The antics of Dr. Ford's attorneys regarding her plan to testify say more about the political points they hope to score than a pursuit of truth and justice. Kate Shaw, in a New York Times article this week, said it plainly: "[e]ven if it wouldn't support a criminal conviction or civil liability, a merely credible allegation is enough to disqualify him." Did you hear, in the distance, the foundation of our democracy starting to crack? What the left is saying is that truth doesn't matter. If the accusation is ugly enough, then it ought to be disqualifying.

Uncertain of whether Dr. Ford's allegations would suffice, the Democrat senators went on a fishing expedition to see if they could find someone else to make a charge against Judge Kavanaugh. Another accusation appeared. In a New Yorker article, Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayer tell the story of Deborah Ramirez, a former Yale University classmate of Kavanaugh, who contended that he exposed himself to her at a dorm room party.

There are a couple of important things to note about this accusation. First, according to Bill Hutchinson at the ABC News blog, Farrow said, "She came forward when Senate Democrats began looking at this claim. She did not flag this for those Democrats. This came to the attention of people on the Hill independently and it's really cornered her into an awkward position." Second, it should be noted that no one, not the New Yorker or even the New York Times, has found any sort of corroboration for her story. The Gray Lady reported that it interviewed "several dozen people over the past week" to corroborate Ramirez's claim but "could find no one with firsthand knowledge."

So what do we make of this accusation? It was sought by Senate Democrats, and Ms. Ramirez, who admits that her story "has gaps," was forced to come forward. It's also clear that no one else can back up her story. The party who is so concerned about women has seemingly thrown another woman to the wolves in an attempt to retain power.

Why is the left seeking to destroy Judge Kavanaugh? I think Geraldo Rivera nailed it in an appearance on Fox and Friends when he said, "This is all about abortion. This is the epic battle, latest battle, between the forces of pro-choice versus pro-life. And I think both sides will do whatever is necessary, whatever is legally possible, to delay or get their person on the high court." They fear that Judge Kavanaugh might be the vote to change the law on abortion. Leftists are bitter over losing an election in 2016 they believed they'd already won. Had they won, there would be no doubt that a pro-choice judge would be appointed by a President Clinton. They have yet to accept the fact that the American voters chose Donald Trump. One of the big reasons for that was the appointment of Supreme Court justices. The left now resorts to any tactic, legal or not, to hold on to the precious Roe v. Wade decision. They call it "choice" and "reproductive rights," but the reality is that they want to allow our society to kill unwanted babies in the womb. That's what this is about.

Dr. Carson has a valid point. Rome fell because of an inward decay. It wasn't the only empire to do so. The Incan civilization was prominent in South America in the 1400s. They were a powerful people, twelve million strong. One of the facets of the Incan civilization was the practice of human sacrifice to the gods, particularly the offering of their children, as a way to prevent natural calamities. There is not a civilization that has persisted that has valued children so little. May we reclaim truth, justice, and values before it is too late.

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.co...h.html#ixzz5S7ueRlGn

^^^
That letter appears in full on page 62 of this thread.

I saw this morning that the Democraps are now combing through Kavanaugh's HS yearbooks in order to find a word or phrase to hang him with?

That was my assertion, she'd not testifying she's delaying the process, hoping for more accusers in fact that may be the plan to have more women come out, fake claims, as one person isn't totally a problem, but three, five, 12, means it must have happened.

Vote him in, they should have done it on day one after the hearings.

Grassley should get some input soon re their intentions

From the Grassley ltr to Ford lawyers

^^^ Yeah, it seems unlikely to me that she'll be prepared with all of that. Then again, she doesn't have all those high priced lawyers for nothing I suppose.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
^^^ Yeah, it seems unlikely to me that she'll be prepared with all of that. Then again, she doesn't have all those high priced lawyers for nothing I suppose.

She had better let the lawyers do that. She has to get on the road....
She says she doesn't fly, so it's at least a 43 hour trip, without stops. Here, let me help:

https://www.google.com/maps/di...0368707!2d38.9071923

Question: Does she expect Chuck Grassley to "guarantee her safety" across the entire United States on this epic journey?

Creepy Porn Lawyer has gone dark on Twatter, admits his 'client' may not come forward.

LMFAO, what a cunt he is.

The sleazy porn lawyer is backtracking big time and locked his Twitter account, what a surprise.

https://www.breitbart.com/big-...ht-not-come-forward/

Attorney Michael Avenatti said his client might now not come forward against Brett Kavanaugh, and then locked his Twitter public profile from view.

After two days of ginning up publicity with the news he has a “100 percent credible” accuser against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, adding that she has “multiple witnesses to corroborate her story” and that she is “willing to take a polygraph,” Avenatti appeared to walk back that assurance in a Tuesday morning tweet.

“Let me be clear: We will disclose the client’s name and accusations only when SHE is ready and we have adequate security measures in place. And not a moment before that,” Avenatti tweeted. “It is her choice and hers alone as to when to surface bc it is her life. We expect it within the next 36 hrs.”

A few minutes after this apparent walk back, where he appears to be blaming the woman if he does not deliver what he promised, Avenatti, the attorney for porn star Stormy Daniels made famous by CNN, locked public access to his Twitter account.

^^^The tide is changing.

...know when to hold 'em & know when to fold 'em...

The actual demands for "evidence" seems to be some kind of issue with those accusing without factual evidence.

I'm waiting for Kavanaugh's 34 year old love child to appear. Then, we'll have to wait for DNA analysis and who know how long that'll take.

quote:

LMFAO, what a cunt he is.

Says it all. Does this mean his presidential bid may be in jeopardy?

Chrissy Ballsy Ford, last seen with her lawyer, somewhere in Colorado, heading East.



I predict Chrissy Ford wont show.